&w=3840&q=100)
Australians equally distrust both Donald Trump, Xi Jinping, survey finds
A new survey released by the Lowy Institute think tank in Sydney showed that 72 per cent of respondents said they didn't trust Trump to act responsibly in global affairs, just edging out the 71 per cent who said they didn't trust China's Xi. When asked whether Trump or Xi would be a better partner for Australia, the two leaders were tied at 45 per cent apiece.
The results come as Prime Minister Anthony Albanese attends a Group of Seven meeting in Canada, where he could hold his first face-to-face meeting with the US president. Albanese will be hoping to negotiate an exemption on US steel and aluminum tariffs for Australia, as well as trying to secure Trump's support for Aukus following the announcement in Washington of a review of the security accord.
Subscribe to The Bloomberg Australia Podcast on Apple, Spotify, on YouTube, or wherever you listen.
Albanese's balancing act with Trump is a difficult one. Australians' faith in the US has deteriorated following the president's return to the White House. Trust in America as a global player has fallen to just 36 per cent, by far the lowest result in the Lowy survey's 20-year history.
Yet despite an aversion to Trump, Australians aren't ready to move away from the US as the nation's primary security partner. The survey showed consistent support for the US alliance, with 80 per cent of respondents saying America was important for Australia's security.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
25 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Russian Forces Make Major Advances in Ukraine Ahead of Trump-Putin Summit
Russian troops have recently made significant advances in eastern Ukraine, escalating tensions just before the upcoming Trump-Putin summit. The meeting aims to explore discussions on potential peace, but Russia's ongoing advances raise concerns on its commitment. Ukrainian officials express concern that Moscow's actions signal a strategy to strengthen their position rather than seek genuine diplomacy. The summit could be a pivotal moment for the region's future stability. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Diplomatic Talks Shadowed by Military Action Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Strategic Intentions Behind Moscow's Moves FAQs: As anticipation builds for the upcoming meeting between former U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin , Russian military forces have launched significant offensives across Ukraine. These developments intensify concerns about Moscow's true intentions and the prospects for peace and escalating the Donetsk region, Russian troops have ramped up their military campaign, making important territorial progress. Using coordinated assaults, Moscow's forces broke through Ukrainian defenses near key villages including Kucheriv Yar and Zolotyi Kolodiaz. These advances represent some of the most substantial progress in recent weeks, enabling Russia to strengthen its position on contested Russian units in the Sumy region have pushed closer to the Ukrainian border. Verified reports and geolocated footage indicate advances around Oleksiivka and Yunakivka, signaling a broader push by Moscow into northern Ukrainian territory. These maneuvers are viewed as strategic moves to strengthen Russia's negotiating position by demonstrating ongoing battlefield timing of these offensives coincides with the Trump-Putin summit set for August 15 in Alaska. The meeting is observed as an opportunity to explore peace discussions, but the recent escalation complicates diplomatic efforts. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky remains cautious, warning that Russia's enhanced military activity undermines hopes for a swift Trump has characterized the summit as a 'feel-out session' where he hopes to rapidly assess Putin's willingness to negotiate a resolution. Trump remains optimistic about assessing the potential for peace within minutes of the discussions, though many experts regard the meeting as an initial step rather than a decisive suggest that Russia's recent advances are part of a deliberate strategy to strengthen its bargaining position. By demonstrating continued momentum on the battlefield, Moscow may seek to pressure the West into accepting Russia's territorial gains or granting observers warn that Putin might use the summit to legitimize international recognition of Russia's control over disputed regions, complicating efforts for a lasting peace. This approach risks prolonging the conflict and deepening geopolitical divisions between Russia and Western countries.A1. Russian troops have advanced in several key areas of eastern Ukraine, increasing military pressure on Ukrainian forces.A2. The summit is intended to provide a platform for dialogue between the U.S. and Russia on conflict resolution and other issues.

The Hindu
25 minutes ago
- The Hindu
AI startup Perplexity makes $34.5-billion bid for Google's Chrome browser
Perplexity AI said it has made a $34.5 billion unsolicited all-cash offer for Alphabet's Chrome browser, a low but bold bid that would need financing well above the startup's own valuation. Run by Aravind Srinivas, Perplexity is no stranger to headline-grabbing offers - it made a similar one for TikTok U.S. in January, offering to merge with the popular short-video app to resolve U.S. concerns about TikTok's Chinese ownership. Buying Chrome would allow the startup to tap the browser's more than three billion users for an edge in the AI search race as regulatory pressure threatens Google's grip on the industry. Google did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. The company has not offered Chrome for sale and plans to appeal a U.S. court ruling last year that found it held an unlawful monopoly in online search. The Justice Department has sought a Chrome divestiture as part of the case's remedies. Perplexity did not disclose on Tuesday (August 12, 2025) how it plans to fund the offer. The three-year-old company has raised around $1 billion in funding so far from investors including Nvidia and Japan's SoftBank. It was last valued at $14 billion. Multiple funds have offered to finance the deal in full, a person familiar with the matter said, without naming the funds. As a new generation of users turns to chatbots such as ChatGPT and Perplexity for answers, web browsers are regaining prominence as vital gateways to search traffic and prized user data, making them central to Big Tech's AI ambitions. Perplexity already has an AI browser, Comet, that can perform certain tasks on a user's behalf and acquiring Chrome would give it the heft to better compete against bigger rivals such as OpenAI. The ChatGPT parent has also expressed interest in buying Chrome and is working on its own AI browser. Perplexity's bid pledges to keep the underlying browser code called Chromium open source, invest $3 billion over two years and make no changes to Chrome's default search engine, according to a term sheet seen by Reuters. The company said the offer, with no equity component, would preserve user choice and ease future competition concerns. Analysts have said Google would be unlikely to sell Chrome and would likely engage in a long legal fight to prevent that outcome, given it is crucial to the company's AI push as it rolls out features including AI-generated search summaries, known as Overviews, to help defend its search market share. A federal judge is expected to issue a ruling on remedies in the Google search antitrust case sometime this month. Perplexity's bid is also below the at least $50 billion value that rival search engine DuckDuckGo's CEO, Gabriel Weinberg, suggested Chrome may command if Google was forced to sell it. Besides OpenAI and Perplexity, Yahoo and private-equity firm Apollo Global Management have also expressed interest in Chrome.


News18
35 minutes ago
- News18
Xi Leveraging Tehran-Beijing Ties? Chinese Automakers Still Take Red Sea Despite Houthi Menace
Chinese automakers are shipping cars to Europe through the Red Sea, despite Houthi attacks in the critical Middle East transit route, the NYT reported. While China gets a more direct route to Europe, other automakers are still shipping cars from Asia by way of a much longer, and expensive, trip around Africa. In July 2025, at least 14 car-carrier ships traveled from Chinese ports to Europe through the Red Sea, the NYT reported citing analysis by Lloyd's List trips have continued even after the Houthis used drones, grenades and gunfire to sink two other cargo ships early last month. The Iran-backed militia group said the attacks are in solidarity with Palestinians living through Israel's war against Hamas in Gaza. The Houthis announced on July 28 that they would continue their campaign of attacks on ships that they believe are linked to Israel or Israeli ports. n18oc_world n18oc_crux0:00 INTRODUCTION1:44 HAS CHINA REACHED AN UNDERSTANDING WITH HOUTHIS?4:52 CHINESE FOREIGN MINISTRY REACTS