Civic groups question Greater Bengaluru Authority Act over centralisation concerns
Bengaluru: Taking objection to the haphazard manner in which the Greater Bengaluru Authority (GBA) has been rolled out, several civic activists are contemplating legal options to prevent what they call derailment and destruction of
decentralised governance
in the city.
At a public discussion organised by CIVIC Bangalore here Saturday, activists said they plan to file a PIL plea in this regard. In the current form, GBA will weaken local decision-making and hamper effective civic administration in Bengaluru, they claimed. On the govt's justification that GBA had to be brought in as Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) had failed in administering the city, CIVIC Bangalore executive trustee Kathyanai Chamaraj said: "BBMP did not fail because of internal inefficiency, it was was systematically undermined by the govt.
"
One of the major criticisms by experts is that the govt failed to expand Metropolitan Planning Committee (MPC), a body meant to coordinate various parastatal agencies, and instead opted to create GBA, which took away crucial planning and financial powers from BBMP. This move will leave the city's smaller municipal corporations with limited authority and resources, forcing them to depend heavily on the state-controlled GBA for major projects and budgets, they said.
Satyajit Arikutharam, mobility expert, spoke about the impact the bill will have on major mobility decisions: "BMLTA (Bengaluru Metropolitan Land Transport Authority) Act is already in force — the problem isn't the absence of law, but the deliberate neglect of it. Mega projects like tunnel roads are being pushed through without scrutiny, undermining public transport goals and democratic oversight. We're seeing real estate interests take precedence over planning, and citizens are left paying the price.
This isn't just bad governance, it is an erosion of accountability disguised as development."
TR Raghunandan, former bureaucrat, said the GBA Act is being sold to people as a reform, but in reality, it's a dangerous centralisation of power. "It creates multiple urban populations without constitutional backing, ignoring the spirit of the 74th Amendment. There's no clarity on what local bodies actually do. It's all PowerPoint governance and not actual empowerment. The Act pretends to devolve power while concentrating it at the top.
This is not local self-governance; it's a model of elected monarchies. If we are serious about democracy and functional devolution, we need real responsibilities at the local level, not ornamental laws that weaken it further."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Claims of forest rights face challenges as Dec deadline looms
Margao: Sixty-five-year-old Mahadev Velip clutches weathered papers outside his mud house at Morpirla, in Quepem taluka — documents that could secure his family's future under the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act. Like thousands of others, he waits as chief minister Pramod Sawant's Dec 19 deadline to clear all pending claims faces mounting challenges. With 10,500 claims filed across the state, only 871 families have been cleared to be issued sanads (title deeds) so far. Another 949 claims have been rejected, leaving 8,680 families in limbo — including Velip's. Sanads will be issued to 150 families at a function to be held on Monday at Ponda. Also, a special camp will be held on June 14 across six talukas to fast-track pending cases. 'This land has been our home for generations,' said Velip, his eyes scanning the foliage around his dwelling. 'Without official recognition, we have always lived in fear.' Sources in the tribal welfare department reveal three critical obstacles threatening the Dec 19 timeline. The most pressing is a severe shortage of skilled personnel for spot verification and demarcation of claimed land — the crucial step in the validation of each claim. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Esta nueva alarma con cámara es casi regalada en Bragado (ver precio) Verisure Undo Survey teams currently manage only three to four verifications per day, a pace that appears insufficient given the massive backlog. The monsoon compounds these difficulties. Heavy rain triggers extensive vegetation growth and waterlogging, making forest sites virtually inaccessible and bringing verification work to 'almost a standstill', officials said. A forest department official said, 'We are racing against time and nature. The monsoon window severely limits our working months.' A third challenge involves ensuring adequate gram sabha attendance to validate claims — the requirement of 50% quorum at gram sabhas, with a third of them women, has turned out to be a major impediment in the speedy processing of the claims. Further, processing claims that are not supported by adequate documentation is fraught with delays. With the Dec 19 deadline only six months away, sources said the fulfilment of the promise depends on navigating these formidable challenges.
Indian Express
3 hours ago
- Indian Express
Why Kerala wants Wildlife Act amended to allow it to kill some wild animals
Kerala has sought the Union government's nod to kill wild animals that pose a threat to human life and properties. The state wants the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972 amended so it can be allowed to kill wild animals that foray into human habitats. Here is why. The wildlife attack problem in Kerala Wildlife attacks have emerged as a major issue in Kerala, with the government identifying 273 village local bodies, out of 941, as hotspots. The problem animals are mainly tiger, leopard, elephant, bison, wild boar, bonnet macaque and peafowl. Although bonnet macaque (a monkey species) and peafowl do not pose a threat to life, their repeated raids have forced farmers to abandon vast tracts of agricultural land. As many as 919 persons were killed and 8,967 others injured in wildlife attacks in Kerala from 2016-17 to 2024-25 (till January 31), according to government data. Major reasons are regional fluctuations in wildlife population, animals forced to move out as the quality of their habitats decline, grazing of domestic cattle in forest areas, changes in cropping patterns, etc. But importantly, the population explosion in the case of wild pigs and various species of monkeys is wreaking havoc in human habitations. The existing legal framework puts several constraints in taking timely action in emergency situations, officials said, especially in the case of animals protected under Schedule I of the Act. Before ordering the killing of dangerous wild animals, the state chief wildlife warden should be convinced that it cannot be captured, tranquilised or shifted to another place. Such captured animals should not be held under confinement. Also, apart from conditions laid down in the Act, the government has to follow the advisory of the Tiger Conservation Authority and Project Elephant Scheme while dealing with human-wildlife conflict. While the district collector, who is the executive magistrate, can issue orders for removal of a public nuisance, there are court orders preventing the invoking of these powers with regard to wild animals. The government's stand on killing wild animals State Forest Minister A K Saseendran said the state wants the Centre to amend the 1972 Act to allow Kerala to kill 'all man-eating wild animals.' 'We are not looking for powers for indiscriminate killing of wild animals. Culling of animals posing threat to life and cultivation should be allowed for a certain period. The permission can be also region-specific and seasonal. All preventive measures such as fencing have failed to stop animal attacks,' he said. The minister added that in the case of wild boars, the wild boar control system (in which licenced shooters are allowed to kill crop-raiding animals) has failed to effectively curb the menace. 'Before shooting a wild boar, one has to examine whether it is pregnant or not. Such impractical guidelines have failed to serve the purpose. The growing population of wildlife has to be controlled to prevent threats to human lives,'' he added. Changing the legal status of animals The state wants wild boars to be declared as vermin for a certain period under section 62 of the Act. The state also wants to address the bonnet macaque threat by removing it from the category of Schedule I. This species of monkey was included in Schedule I in 2022. Until then, the chief wildlife warden could order capturing and relocating of monkeys causing mayhem in human habitations. Now, the warden cannot take any suo motu action on this threat.
India Today
4 hours ago
- India Today
If used properly, Waqf Amendment Act is pro-Muslim: Chandrababu Naidu
Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu reiterated his party's support to the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, saying that if used properly, this law is pro-Muslim. Naidu's Telugu Desam Party (TDP) voted in Parliament in support of the contentious law enacted by the Modi government, which got the President's nod in April. The TDP is part of the ruling NDA alliance in the Centre, alongside Nitish Kumar's JDU, Chirag Paswan's LJP and Jayant Chaudhary's RLD, among others. Speaking exclusively to India Today TV on Sunday, the TDP chief recalled the work done by his previous governments for Muslim minorities in the state and said that his party is fully committed to the welfare of all religions and communities. "If used properly, the Waqf law is pro-Muslim," Naidu said. The Amendment to the 1995 law was challenged by several opposition parties in the Supreme Court, who, after hearing all sides, has the verdict reserved. Naidu also touched upon a range of issues of national significance as well as those concerning Andhra Pradesh. Watch the full interview.
