logo
Ambridge's origin story missed a trick by glossing over the impact of the war effort on farming

Ambridge's origin story missed a trick by glossing over the impact of the war effort on farming

Telegraph07-05-2025

One of the greatest pleasures of BBC Radio is the often esoteric ways it finds to honour certain events. With the 80th anniversary of VE Day around the corner, this was illustrated very nicely at the weekend by two very different programmes that explored the realities and the aftermath of the Second World War. During this crucial moment of remembrance, I was grateful to have these fresh insights into this most studied of historical events.
Victory at Ambridge (Radio 4, Sunday) took us back to wartime Borsetshire, six years before The Archers began on the BBC Light Programme, to a time of rationing, land girls and dashing GIs. Given how important both the war and The Archers are to the British sense of self, it was the ideal vehicle, reminding us that this 'everyday story of country folk' has roots that go way beyond the parameters of the soap opera itself. The Archers is British lore. To hear its wartime origins was thrilling and I would – quite genuinely – encourage the producers to take us further back. Ambridge and the Corn Laws. Ambridge and the Industrial Revolution. Ambridge and the introduction of the turnip.
The two-part drama, based on the novel by Catherine Miller and dramatised by Tim Stimpson, was an extremely pleasant wallow in nostalgia, as well as a fan-pleasing exercise in what the superhero movies call 'origin stories'. Performed, of course, by the modern-day cast of The Archers (Timothy Bentinck, aka David Archer, as David's grandfather, Dan Archer, and so on) it gave us titillating dollops, such as the introduction to the village of a naive young London barmaid named Peggy (destined to become Peggy Archer), and an enjoyably silly plot that revolved around mysterious prophecies and the folklore legend of 'Mother Molly', a mystic who lived in a hermit's cave outside the village.
The wartime setting was given a Call the Midwife -like sprinkle, with scattered references to doodlebugs and the war effort, but the plot centred on romance, jealousy and internecine arguments. I can't have been the only listener hoping for a bit more agricultural nitty-gritty. Just what impact did the war effort have on the Ambridge farmers? How did rationing change their practices, their crops, their livestock? I enjoyed the relationship shenanigans and pleasingly hammy lines such as, 'Evil's come to Ambridge – and we know who to blame!', yet I yearned to learn more about the realities of British farming in 1945.
Monday's Farming Today (Radio 4) suggested an opportunity missed, as Vernon Harwood took a look at how the conflict brought about a revolution in the way we grew food in Britain, as the government pushed the sector harder and harder towards commercialisation to meet the growing demand. 'Many of the fault-lines in British agriculture today were created there,' said historian Alex Langlands, and Victory at Ambridge would have been better still if we could have heard these fault-lines being created. A couple of hours in Ambridge is never time wasted, whatever the era, but I'd rather we spent more time in the fields and less in The Bull.
Not at all lacking in nitty-gritty was the excellent Conscripting Beethoven (Radio 3, Sunday), music historian Leah Broad's exploration of how two extraordinary female pianists used Beethoven to change the wartime culture of Britain and Germany. For Myra Hess – British, Jewish – Beethoven's work represented strength, indomitability and democracy, for the German Elly Ney, it was the triumphant background music to the rise of Adolf Hitler. 'Audiences at their concerts would have heard exactly the same music,' said Broad, 'but would have come away with two very different impressions of Beethoven. As a peacebroker and philosopher in Britain, and as a warmonger and combatant in Germany.'
It was the similarities between the women that were striking. Not just their success in overcoming the patriarchal structures of the time, but their zealous efforts to bring Beethoven to the masses. Hess's famed National Gallery concerts, which went on throughout the war, were for everyone: 'Everyone was very busy during the war, so there was no one there to tell people this sort of music would go over their heads. So they came in and they enjoyed it.' Ney's concerts, arranged by the Nazi Party, were like 'Holy Masses for Beethoven', with Ney playing the part of the high priest. Educating people about Beethoven was to emphasise German supremacy. At a time when we talk constantly of 'culture wars', the programme was a beautiful illustration of how one shared piece of art can be pulled so violently in different directions.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Meghan Markle's 'business like' approach to royal rift with Harry exposed
Meghan Markle's 'business like' approach to royal rift with Harry exposed

Daily Record

time36 minutes ago

  • Daily Record

Meghan Markle's 'business like' approach to royal rift with Harry exposed

Meghan and Harry have been estranged from the Royal Family for five years, with the Duke of Sussex recently expressing his desire to reconcile with his relatives Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are said to take contrasting stances on managing their distance from the Royal Family. Reports have suggested that the Duchess of Sussex adopts a rather "business" mindset towards the situation. The duke and duchess stepped back from royal duties five years ago back in 2021, and carved out a new path in the US with their children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet. Since then, they have been attempting to launch their careers in new directions. ‌ Despite having levelled numerous critiques at the Royal Family over time, recently, Prince Harry has signalled his desire for reconciliation. ‌ New insights, however, suggest that while Meghan is very supportive of Harry's legal battles and the "painful rift" with his family, she is perceived as having a more pragmatic "business"-like perspective, reportedly wishing Harry could be less affected "by the past and more present in the life they've built together". It is believed that the Sussexes feel excluded from intricate royal affairs taking place in the UK, reports the Express. "They [Harry and Meghan] are aware of everything going on in England, but they're being left out of the details - there's clearly no trust," a source speaking to People magazine remarked. Finding it challenging to be fully informed about his father, Prince Harry reportedly struggles to receive precise updates regarding King Charles. Last month, the duke expressed to the BBC his concern over the lack of communication with his father and his uncertainty about the time the King may have left. ‌ Moreover, he voiced a hope for mending ties with his relatives, saying: "Of course, they will never forgive me for lots of things, but there's no point in continuing to fight anymore." Prince Harry expressed his desire for reconciliation, stating: "I would love reconciliation with my family. There's no point continuing to fight any more, life is precious." ‌ However, Sally Bedell Smith, a royal biographer, suggested that trust remains a significant hurdle. In an interview with People magazine, she revealed: "The King and William don't trust Harry and Meghan with any kind of confidential conversation." Valentine Low, another author, noted that although Harry's BBC interview wasn't intended as a direct attack on the Royal Family, "it would be seen as one," making it even more challenging for Charles to extend an olive branch. Elsewhere, the Duke of Sussex was reportedly left furious after the King and British officials caused "repeated delays" in issuing his children's passports, leading to a name change. ‌ Prince Harry allegedly considered changing his family name to Spencer following "repeated delays by British officials" in issuing passports for his children, Archie and Lilibet. The Duke of Sussex had reportedly "discussed the issue" with his late mother's brother, Earl Spencer. He allegedly "actively explored ways" to make the switch while in the UK, but it is said that "the legal hurdles were insurmountable". The claims have been rejected as "completely untrue" by sources close to the Sussexes, sparking debate among commentators who believe such a move could worsen tensions within the Royal Family.

Lesley Garrett cast in Northern Ireland Opera's Follies after cancer surgery
Lesley Garrett cast in Northern Ireland Opera's Follies after cancer surgery

Wales Online

time43 minutes ago

  • Wales Online

Lesley Garrett cast in Northern Ireland Opera's Follies after cancer surgery

Lesley Garrett cast in Northern Ireland Opera's Follies after cancer surgery Garrett will play Heidi Schiller in Stephen Sondheim and James Goldman's musical about a group of former showgirls, at the Grand Opera House in Belfast in the autumn Internationally acclaimed soprano Lesley Garrett (Image: ©William Cherry / Presseye ) Classical singer Lesley Garrett has joined the Northern Ireland Opera's revival of Follies, after her cancer surgery. Garrett will play Heidi Schiller in Stephen Sondheim and James Goldman's musical about a group of former showgirls, at the Grand Opera House in Belfast in the autumn. ‌ The British soprano said on ITV's This Morning earlier this month that she had cancer surgery after being diagnosed with thymoma, a rare cancer of the thymus gland, which could have affected her singing. ‌ Since the surgery to remove the tumour, she has made a successful recovery and will now be joining the Follies cast. Garrett said: "I'm so excited to be coming back to Belfast and especially to be making my debut with Northern Ireland Opera at the age of 70. "Sondheim's Follies is a masterpiece and I'm delighted to have been given the once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to perform the iconic role of Heidi Schiller." Article continues below The production marks the singer's 45th anniversary in the industry and her debut with the Northern Ireland Opera, where she will play the "opera diva" of the Weismann's Follies. Set in 1971, the musical follows the group as they return to their former Broadway stage at Weisman Theatre, for a final reunion show before its scheduled demolition. Jazz singer Jacqueline Dankworth, who was in the original cast of the West End debut for Sondheim's Into The Woods in 1990, will join the cast as Carlotta Campion. ‌ West End stars Anna-Jane Casey and Annette McLaughlin will play former room mates Sally Plummer and Phyllis Stone. The production is directed by Cameron Menzies, with Greg Arrowsmith as the musical director. The musical scored seven Tony awards at the 1972 ceremony and is best known for its songs Broadway Baby, I'm Still Here and Losing My Mind. Article continues below Follies will run from September 13-20.

Clarkson's Farm fans think they spotted 'editing error' – but there's more to it
Clarkson's Farm fans think they spotted 'editing error' – but there's more to it

Metro

timean hour ago

  • Metro

Clarkson's Farm fans think they spotted 'editing error' – but there's more to it

Jeremy Clarkson fans thought they spotted an editing mistake in the season 4 finale (Picture: Amazon Prime) Clarkson's Farm fans got quite the shock when they tuned in to watch the season 4 finale today. For a brief moment during the closing moments of the eighth episode, there was a strange blink and you'll miss it moment where a woman holding a red case flashed up on screen. The cameo – if you want to call it that – seems rather inexplicable, and it's not commented on by the narration, which has led some online to label it an editing error. On X, @Nc2012_700x wrote that, 'While watching Clarkson's Farm on Amazon Prime Video, a still image of a woman flashed on screen for a split second. Likely an editing mistake. Anyone else notice this?' They weren't the only ones to spot the 'mistake'.@gibsey007 tagged Jeremy in a tweet and asked, 'Why was a single frame added to your end message. Who is she?' Meanwhile, on Reddit, WasKnown asked other Clarkson's farm fans 'was symbolic of anything or an editing mistake? So confused by that.' The above photo made a blink and you'll miss it appearance in the episode (Picture: Justin Tallis/AFP via Getty Images) Of course, if you've been paying attention to British politics over the last few months, you'll know this wasn't an editing mistake or a random gag. The woman in question is Rachel Reeves, the current Chancellor of the Exchequer, who upset farmers with her recent budget. Basically, the UK government has reintroduced a 20% inheritance tax on farms valued at more than £1million. This means the children and heirs of some farmers will no longer inherit land tax-free as they once did. Needless to say, the move has upset a number of farmers across the UK who claim that while their assets may be valuable, they are cash poor. They argue then this new law will force those inheriting farms to sell their land if they want to pay the tax bill. The picture was likely no accident however (Picture: In Pictures via Getty Images) Farmers claim this puts the future of the industry at risk and threatens food security in the UK. Supporters on the other hand, argue that the current law – which means farmers don't pay inheritance tax – is being abused by the wealthy to avoid taxes. Furthermore, they claim that only a small percentage of UK farmers will be affected Still, the British farming community was so incensed by the proposal that there were widespread protests in London, with Jeremy Clarkson becoming something of a spokesperson for the movement. Speaking to Sky News during one protest, Clarkson demanded that the government 'back down' on the policy. Rachel Reeves has upset farmers by changing inheritance tax laws (Picture:) 'If you make a mistake, we all do, and they have, be big enough to say we made a mistake here, and then back down,' he said. It seems likely, then, that the picture of Reeves which flashes up just as Jeremy says 'next year couldn't be any worse' is a not-so-subtle dig at the chancellor's plans, which will come into force from 2026. Jeremy has become the farmer's unofficial spokesperson on the issue (Picture: Getty Images) While some fans were baffled by Reeve's appearance, others immediately got the gag and shared their thoughts on it on social media. @jfyuga wrote on X, 'Seeing a subliminal frame of Rachel Reeves with the red briefcase during the last episode of Clarkson's Farm 4…. Well played @JeremyClarkson'. Shane Ó Dubhuir, meanwhile, added, 'Rachel Reeves very brief appearance at the end of Clarkson's Farm [crying face emoji].' Clarkson's Farm season 4 is available to stream now on Amazon Prime Video Got a story? If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you. Arrow MORE: Jeremy Clarkson's girlfriend Lisa Hogan reveals why he still hasn't proposed after 9 years Arrow MORE: The Grand Tour's 'new line-up revealed' after Jeremy Clarkson leaves Amazon series Arrow MORE: Jeremy Clarskon celebrates girlfriend Lisa's birthday by sharing pics of her skinny dipping

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store