logo
Deja Foxx Is Running for Congress Because ‘Girls Like Me Deserve a Fighter'

Deja Foxx Is Running for Congress Because ‘Girls Like Me Deserve a Fighter'

Yahooa day ago

Deja Foxx for Arizona
Deja Foxx is many things: an organizer, a candidate for Congress, and a reproductive rights advocate. But there's one thing that she isn't, despite the headlines you may have read.
'I'm not an influencer,' she tells me with a smile. 'I'm a leader.'
Foxx, 25, has been often described as a 'Gen Z influencer' in the many news articles covering her unique and viral campaign for the special election for the House seat in Arizona's seventh Congressional District, the primary for which will be held on July 15. The race was called following the death of longtime representative Raúl Grijalva in March, and the primaries will be one of the first times voters will select candidates for national office since the election of Donald Trump last fall.
Foxx would be the youngest woman in Congress if elected, but she's no stranger to politics. At 17, she went viral for confronting then Arizona Senator Jeff Flake about his stance on Planned Parenthood at a town hall, and she hasn't stopped since. While a high school student and then a student at Columbia University, she has continued to advocate for Planned Parenthood, worked on digital strategy for both Kamala Harris's 2020 and 2024 campaigns, and even spoke at the Democratic National Convention. And yes, she's really good at social media, with half a million followers across platforms.
So when the seat opened up in her home district, Foxx looked at the current state of American politics, at the now-decade of organizing work under her belt, and thought to herself, 'Why not me?'
'I've held a lot of different job titles,' she tells me via Zoom. 'I've worked at a gas station, I've been a digital strategist on a presidential campaign. I've been a content creator in front of the camera, and now I'm a candidate for Congress. But I want more than anything to be a good role model. And every single day I know I'm achieving that goal. I intend to win at the ballot box, but I rack up wins every single day.… In a moment where people feel so hopeless because things are hard, because Donald Trump is making a circus of our government and he's putting families in the crosshairs, it can't be overstated how important it is that someone like me is moving people toward hope again.'
Foxx chatted with Glamour about how her background influences her work, how Democrats can embrace change, and how other young women can get involved.
: You're running for Congress in the district where you were born and raised. How would you describe your background?
Deja Foxx: I was raised by a single mom. She and I relied on Section 8 housing, SNAP benefits, which some folks know as food stamps, and Medicaid. I was a free-lunch kid in our public schools here. So that was my introduction to politics; the things I needed to survive and just get by being decided by people in elected office who more often than not felt really far away from families like mine.
Programs like SNAP change based on elections and who's in charge. How did you come to realize that these things you relied on were, in actuality, political?
As a kid, you only understand things the way that they are in front of you. You don't have a comparison of what's going on in other people's houses. So there wasn't this 'aha' moment of, Oh, it's elections deciding this stuff. It was the lived experience of there being years where our food stamps would get cut. There would be harder months or Section 8 visits where they would come and inspect our house, and that might look like picking up extra chores to make sure the house was ready. So it was a lived and day-to-day experience. There were moments of comparison about being a free-lunch kid at public school when other kids' parents might pack them Uncrustables and all of the name-brand snacks. But it was clear to me that our family was affected by the things going on in the news and in Washington.
I was raised in the era of Obama, which was a very different political understanding. When Obama got elected, I was eight years old. I was so filled with hope. It felt like things were bending toward justice, things were going the right way. And then by the time I was 15, Donald Trump was running for president, which I think blows some people's minds—that for the last decade and for most of my political understanding, Donald Trump and his chaos and cruelty have defined the political landscape.
You were involved in political advocacy starting as a teenager. How did you have the moxie to jump into it at such a young age?
For me, politics was always about survival. My very first organizing memory was seeing my mom and my neighbors make enough together. Everybody had a deficit in their house: Somebody was short on bills, somebody's car was broken down, somebody needed a babysitter, but my neighbors knew each other. We talked, we spent time together, and we made enough together.
I think about the ways that when my mom was between jobs, and I mean she worked every odd job you could imagine. She delivered flowers, she worked at a post office, she cleaned houses. She was a caregiver for the elderly, and when she was between jobs, she would step up to babysit so one of our neighbors could take on an extra shift and because they took on that extra shift, they might have gas in their car to drive me to school when we didn't have a car. And so I really watched as my neighbors came together to overcome the ways that they were made to not have enough in one of the richest countries in the world.
At 15 you made the difficult decision to move out of your mom's home as she battled addiction and moved in with your then-boyfriend and his family. How did that factor into your political origin story?
I lived there until I went to college…they weren't folks with a whole lot extra to give, but they made space in their home to treat me like their own child and take me in. At the same time, I was learning sex education in my public school. It was the only place I was going to get it. The curriculum I was taught was last updated in the 1980s. It didn't mention consent. It was medically inaccurate and more ridiculously, it was taught by the baseball coach.
So I started showing up to these school board meetings and telling my story, which was a very vulnerable story, something I hadn't shared yet. You could imagine being a teenage girl, the last thing I wanted everyone to know about me was that I didn't have a home of my own and that things were kind of rough. Yet I showed up to these school board meetings and during community calls, I stood in front of a crowd and shared the story and demanded that they update this curriculum. I invited my friends along to do the same. And after six months of organizing, we won a victory to update that curriculum in Southern Arizona's largest school district. That was my first true advocacy battle.
You went to Columbia University, moved back to Arizona, and are now running for Congress at 25. Why run now?
I feel a deep sense of responsibility. I wasn't born on a path to Congress. I'm running against someone whose father was the former congressman. For me, this has been a hard choice. I had to ask, Can my friends and family handle this? Do I even have the money to get through this race? I'm no career politician, but I'm in this because I feel a deep sense of responsibility to families like mine who have the most to lose…there's a sense of urgency for me and a responsibility to my community, to my family, to my friends, to give them a fighter in this moment. Because what I hear most on the ground is that people don't feel like anyone's fighting for them right now.
What do you say to those who say you don't have enough 'experience' or are too young to run?
Let's be clear. When we talk about our party, it's two pieces: the establishment and the voters. Right now, they are not in agreement. The establishment goes around and in their stump speeches, every single one of them says, 'We need newer and younger leaders. We need a new generation of leadership.' And they get applause. And yet, when newer and younger comes around…I have watched them put their thumb on the scale, endorse in a primary, a Democratic primary where we have more than one good candidate, where we have the opportunity to make history and elect a new generation of leadership. And so in action, our party is failing a new generation of leaders. Then, when we think about the voters, they're excited, they're open to younger leaders.
What have you experienced in your campaign? Are voters open to a younger leader?
I will tell you that aside from the other 20-somethings, the people who are the most receptive to our message are these older folks. They want so badly for someone to take on the fight, to pick up the torch and know that what they fought for was not for nothing. That someone will keep that work alive. We hear it all the time. I just knocked on a woman's door, and I gave her my speech that I'd be the youngest member, first woman in my generation, I've been fighting for reproductive rights for the last 10 years. And she said, 'Young lady, you just tell me what to do. You young folks need to just tell us what to do.'
I think there's this sort of created narrative that because older people who sit in positions of power are unwilling to cede them, that means that all older voters are unwilling to elect a young person. That's not true from what we're hearing. These older folks are more excited than anyone else that they are seeing young people show up and that they have an assurance that their fight will be kept alive.
We are in an era of rampant misogyny in politics. What new energy will you bring into the Capitol, and how do you combat this rapid hate?
Let me be clear. I got my first death threat when I was 16 years old, but running for Congress is an entirely different experience. It's a different experience for someone like me, a young working-class woman of color, than it is for some of the other people in my race or your traditional candidate. I'll just give you one example. When you file your paperwork to run for office here in Arizona, you're required to list your residential address, essentially self-doxxing and putting your sensitive information into the public record. That is enough to keep most of the women I know out of politics. There are structural barriers to participation, and I am less safe today than I was three months ago. I want people to hear that and know that even though you see me on social media and it looks like incredible energy and momentum because it is, I have taken, rather, I have made this decision. In all seriousness, I have crossed a threshold. I will never be able to walk back.
I do it because families like mine, girls [who grew up] like me who are 16 years old and working at the gas station and relying on Planned Parenthood deserve a fighter, and I'm not going to wait around for somebody else to do it. It is with a deep sense of responsibility and personal risk that I'm in this race.
The Democratic party clearly has rebuilding to do before the 2026 midterms. What do you think needs to change?
I've worked behind the scenes of campaigns, and I've been on the front lines as an activist on the ground and a content creator online reading the comment sections. Democrats believe that we can govern from the top down—that is, if we craft the perfect press release and message, everybody's going to hop on. That's not how our media ecosystem works anymore.
We need to be coming from the comment sections up. We need to be listening to people. Something our campaign implemented that I'm really proud of is that on our policy section of our website, there's a box at the bottom. You want to see something, leave us a suggestion. We don't have to wait until we're in office to listen to our constituents. We host listening sessions often right here in my living room where we sit with people and they tell us their stories of what these Medicaid cuts could mean to them. It's a different question of how we govern, and Democrats are failing to listen. If they had, they'd be embracing candidates like me who are energizing and mobilizing the young people and the working-class people we have left behind.
What's your advice to other young women who want to be involved in politics or activism in the era of Trump?
Politics is personal. It is for me. You don't have to run for office to get involved politically. I'm asking folks to find the issue that personally impacts you. Where does your life overlap with what you see in the news? And then, get really specific on your personal story. Maybe you start by journaling it or telling a friend or talking about it at Sunday dinner with your family. The next step has to be mobilizing your personal network. You show up to that protest for the first time or that school board meeting, but then the next time you go, you bring your daughter or you bring your best friend or your neighbor along. That is how we are going to create change.
Originally Appeared on Glamour
Abortion After Roe
The abortion advocates turning pain into power
The journey of an abortion in South Carolina
Confused about the fetal personhood bill introduced in Congress? Let us explain
A colleague of the doctor charged for a 'criminal abortion' says they aren't backing down

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Local congressman's first bill passes House
Local congressman's first bill passes House

Yahoo

time41 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Local congressman's first bill passes House

HIGH POINT — Freshman Rep. Addison McDowell, R-6th District, has marked a milestone in his role as a congressman. The House of Representatives earlier this week passed McDowell's House Resolution 2351 to strengthen the U.S. Coast Guard's authority to combat drug trafficking and respond to fentanyl overdoses. The bill is McDowell's first sponsored legislation to pass on the House floor. 'Our Coast Guard is taking the fight straight to fentanyl traffickers off our coast, stopping dangerous drugs before they poison our communities,' said McDowell, who took office after winning in last November's general election. 'This bill gives them the muscle and authority they need to secure our maritime borders, prosecute traffickers hiding behind unmanned vessels, and save lives with immediate access to naloxone.' The legislation expands the Coast Guard's authority to prosecute cases involving unmanned vessels or drugs smuggled aboard without the crew's knowledge. The bill also requires naloxone and other lifesaving overdose treatments to be available wherever Coast Guard personnel serve to allow for quick response saving lives during overdoses. 'This bill gives our Coast Guard the tools they need to save lives and stop traffickers,' McDowell said.

Trump's mass deportations leave Democrats more ready to fight back

timean hour ago

Trump's mass deportations leave Democrats more ready to fight back

WASHINGTON -- California Gov. Gavin Newsom looked straight into the camera and staked out a clear choice for his Democratic Party. The governor positioned himself as not only a leader of the opposition to President Donald Trump's mass deportation agenda, but a de facto champion of the immigrants now being rounded up in California and across the country. Many of them, he said in the video address, were not hardened criminals, but hard-working people scooped up at a Home Depot lot or a garment factory, and detained by masked agents assisted by National Guard troops. It's a politically charged position for the party to take, after watching voter discontent with illegal immigration fuel Trump's return to the White House. It leaves Democrats deciding how strongly to align with that message in the face of blistering criticism from Republicans who are pouring billions of dollars into supporting Trump's strict immigration campaign. Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer of New York said Wednesday he's proud of Newsom, 'he's refusing to be intimidated by Donald Trump.' From the streets of Los Angeles to the halls of Congress, the debate over Trump's mass deportation agenda is forcing the U.S. to reckon with core values as a nation of immigrants, but also its long-standing practice of allowing migrants to live and work in the U.S. in a gray zone while not granting them full legal status. More than 11 million immigrants are in the U.S. without proper approval, with millions more having arrived with temporary protections. As Trump's administration promises to round up some 3,000 immigrants a day and deport 1 million a year, the political stakes are shifting in real time. The president rode to the White House with his promise of mass deportations — rally crowds echoed his campaign promise to 'build the wall.' But Americans are watching as Trump deploys the National Guard and active U.S. Marines to Los Angeles, while pockets of demonstrations erupt in other cities nationwide, including after agents raided a meat processing plant in Omaha, Nebraska Joel Payne, a Democratic strategist, said the country's mood appears to be somewhere between then-President Barack Obama's assertion that America is 'a nation of immigrants, we're also a nation of laws' and Trump's 'more aggressive' deportation approach. 'Democrats still have some work to do to be consistently trustworthy messengers on the issue,' he said. At the same time, he said, Trump's actions as a 'chaos agent' on immigration when there's already unrest over his trade wars and economic uncertainty, risk overreaching if the upheaval begins to sow havoc in the lives of Americans. Republicans have been relentless in their attacks on Democrats, portraying the situation in Los Angeles, which has been largely confined to a small area downtown, in highly charged terms as 'riots,' in a preview of campaign ads to come. Police said more than 200 people were detained for failing to disperse on Tuesday, and 17 others for violating the 8 p.m. curfew over part of Los Angeles. Police arrested several more people for possessing a firearm, assaulting a police officer and other violations. Two people have been charged for allegedly throwing Molotov cocktails toward police during LA protests. House Speaker Mike Johnson said Newsom should be 'tarred and feathered' for his leadership in the state, which he called 'a safe haven to violent criminal illegal aliens.' At a private meeting of House Republicans this week with White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, Rep. Richard Hudson, the chairman of the GOP's campaign arm, framed the situation as Democrats supporting rioting and chaos while Republicans stand for law and order. 'Violent insurrectionists turned areas of Los Angeles into lawless hellscapes over the weekend,' wrote Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., earlier this week in the Wall Street Journal, suggesting it may be time to send in military troops. 'The American people elected Donald Trump and a Republican Congress to secure our border and deport violent illegal aliens. That's exactly what the president is doing.' But not all rank-and-file Republicans are on board with such a heavy-handed approach. GOP Rep, David Valadao, who represents California's agriculture regions in the Central Valley, said on social media he remains 'concerned about ongoing ICE operations throughout CA' and was urging the administration 'to prioritize the removal of known criminals over the hardworking people who have lived peacefully in the Valley for years.' Heading into the 2026 midterm election season, with control of the House and Senate at stake, it's a repeat of past political battles, as Congress has failed repeatedly to pass major immigration law changes. The politics have shifted dramatically from the Obama era, when his administration took executive action to protect young immigrants known as Dreamers under the landmark Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program. Those days, lawmakers were considering proposals to beef up border security as part of a broader package that would also create legal pathways, including for citizenship, for immigrants who have lived in the country for years and paid taxes, some filling roles in jobs Americans won't always take. With Trump's return to the Oval Office, the debate has turned toward aggressively removing immigrants, including millions who were allowed to legally enter the U.S. during the Biden administration, as they await their immigration hearings and proceedings. 'This anniversary should be a reminder,' said Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., at a Wednesday event at the U.S. Capitol championing DACA's 13th year, even as protections are at risk under Trump's administration. 'Immigration has many faces.' Despite their challenges in last year's election, Democrats feel more emboldened to resist Trump's actions than even just a few months ago, but the political conversation has nonetheless shifted in Trump's direction. While Democrats are unified against Trump's big tax breaks bill, with its $150 billion for new detention facilities, deportation flights and 10,000 new Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, they talk more openly about beefing up border security and detaining the most dangerous criminal elements. Rep. Suzan DelBene, D-Wash., chair of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, points to the example of Democratic Rep. Tom Suozzi, who won a special election in New York last year when he addressed potential changes to the immigration system head-on. At one point, he crashed a GOP opponent's news conference with his own. 'Trump said he was going to go after the worst of the worst, but he has ignored the laws, ignored due process, ignored the courts — and the American people reject that,' she told The Associated Press. 'People want a president and a government that is going to fight for the issues that matter most to them, fight to move our country forward,' she said. 'They want a Congress that is going to be a coequal branch of government and a check on this president.'

Trump is expected to sign a measure blocking California's nation-leading vehicle emissions rules

timean hour ago

Trump is expected to sign a measure blocking California's nation-leading vehicle emissions rules

WASHINGTON -- President Donald Trump is expected to sign a measure Thursday that blocks California's first-in-the-nation rule banning the sale of new gas-powered cars by 2035, a White House official told The Associated Press. The resolution Trump plans to sign, which Congress approved last month, aims to quash the country's most aggressive attempt to phase out gas-powered cars. He also plans to approve measures to overturn state policies curbing tailpipe emissions in certain vehicles and smog-forming nitrogen oxide pollution from trucks. The timing of the signing was confirmed Wednesday by a White House official who spoke on condition of anonymity to share plans not yet public. The development comes as the Republican president is mired in a clash with California's Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom, over Trump's move to deploy troops to Los Angeles in response to immigration protests. It's the latest in an ongoing battle between the Trump administration and heavily Democratic California over everything from tariffs to the rights of LGBTQ+ youth and funding for electric vehicle chargers. 'If it's a day ending in Y, it's another day of Trump's war on California,' Newsom spokesperson Daniel Villaseñor said in an email. "We're fighting back." According to the White House official, Trump is expected to sign resolutions that block California's rule phasing out gas-powered cars and ending the sale of new ones by 2035. He will also kill rules that phase out the sale of medium- and heavy-duty diesel vehicles and cut tailpipe emissions from trucks. The president is scheduled to sign the measures and make remarks during an event at the White House on Thursday morning. Newsom, who is considered a likely 2028 Democratic presidential candidate, and California officials contend that what the federal government is doing is illegal and said the state plans to sue. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, Energy Secretary Chris Wright and Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin are expected to attend, along with members of Congress and representatives from the energy, trucking and gas station industries. The signings come as Trump has pledged to revive American auto manufacturing and boost oil and gas drilling. The move will also come a day after the Environmental Protection Agency proposed repealing rules that limit greenhouse gas emissions from power plants fueled by coal and natural gas. Zeldin said it would remove billions of dollars in costs for industry and help 'unleash' American energy. California, which has some of the nation's worst air pollution, has been able to seek waivers for decades from the EPA, allowing it to adopt stricter emissions standards than the federal government. In his first term, Trump revoked California's ability to enforce its standards, but President Joe Biden reinstated it in 2022. Trump has not yet sought to revoke it again. Republicans have long criticized those waivers and earlier this year opted to use the Congressional Review Act, a law aimed at improving congressional oversight of actions by federal agencies, to try to block the rules. That's despite a finding from the U.S. Government Accountability Office, a nonpartisan congressional watchdog, that California's standards cannot legally be blocked using the Congressional Review Act. The Senate parliamentarian agreed with that finding. California, which makes up roughly 11% of the U.S. car market, has significant power to sway trends in the auto industry. About a dozen states signed on to adopt California's rule phasing out the sale of new gas-powered cars. The National Automobile Dealers Association supported the federal government's move to block California's ban on gas-powered cars, saying Congress should decide on such a national issue, not the state. The American Trucking Associations said the rules were not feasible and celebrated Congress' move to block them. Chris Spear, the CEO of the American Trucking Associations, said in a statement Wednesday: 'This is not the United States of California.' It was also applauded by Detroit automaker General Motors, which said it will 'help align emissions standards with today's market realities.' 'We have long advocated for one national standard that will allow us to stay competitive, continue to invest in U.S. innovation, and offer customer choice across the broadest lineup of gas-powered and electric vehicles,' the company said in a statement. Dan Becker with the Center for Biological Diversity, in anticipation of the president signing the measures, said earlier Thursday that the move would be 'Trump's latest betrayal of democracy.' 'Signing this bill is a flagrant abuse of the law to reward Big Oil and Big Auto corporations at the expense of everyday people's health and their wallets,' Becker said in a statement.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store