Ohio leaders should support farmers fighting bird flu
As a physician, I have been closely following our country's bird flu crisis. I am especially concerned about the recent revelation that someone from Mercer County has become the first person in Ohio to contract the virus, one of nearly 70 cases in the United States. To complicate matters further, a second type of bird flu has been detected in dairy cows in Nevada, and a new strain of the bird flu virus, H5N9, was found in California.
These developments are precisely what many public health officials have been most concerned about as this means that bird flu is transforming in a way that could allow it to spread more easily in humans.
For this reason, I was shocked to learn that the Trump administration accidentally fired 25% of the federal workers handling our country's bird flu response and are scrambling to try to correct the mistake. I also read the news that the new administration halted the release of public health information related to bird flu virus and studies that could help reduce its spread. I call on Ohio U.S. Sens. Bernie Moreno and Jon Husted to do what they can to see that efforts to fight bird flu are reinstated.
Sen. Husted, in particular, should champion this effort given his appointment to the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pension, which is responsible for matters related to public health. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Ohio has more birds affected by the virus than any other state. Ohio farmers need support; Sen. Husted should take decisive action to stop the spread of bird flu.
Gov. DeWine seeking more federal support for Ohio flocks reeling from bird flu
I support researchers at Ohio State working to find ways to curb the spread of the virus and Ohio Department of Agriculture Director Brian Baldridge, who is helping farmers adopt practices to keep the virus at bay. The reality is that washing hands, disinfecting equipment, and even exterminating millions of birds has not been enough.
Now is the time to take a hard look at the food production system that puts farm workers in close contact with sick birds and cows, the Standard American Diet that demands it, and the health ramifications of both. Bird flu is raising concerns among Americans about the care and well-being of our food supply.
A new Morning Consult survey shows that 86% of Americans surveyed would not drink milk if they knew it contained dead bird flu virus. The survey was conducted for the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, a public health nonprofit.
Last spring, Ohio State University researchers found H5N1 viral RNA in 58 of 150 commercially available milk product samples from 10 states. These milk products were easily available on local grocery store shelves.
Consumers are clear in this new survey that they do not want to consume cow's milk affected by bird flu virus, even if the milk is pasteurized and the risk of infection is low. What should consumers drink if they are worried about bird flu and want an alternative to cow's milk?
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Fortunately, nutritious plant-based milks, like oat milk and almond milk are prevalent and tasty. They are also safe for the majority of Latino Americans, African Americans, Asian Americans, and Native Americans who are lactose intolerant.
Almond milk is low in calories, high in vitamin E, and often fortified with calcium and vitamin D. Soy milk is full of isoflavones, which have been shown to reduce breast cancer risk, and has an amount of protein comparable to cow's milk.
Oat milk has a creamy texture, may help lower cholesterol, and is often fortified with calcium and vitamin D. Other plant-based milk alternatives include rice milk, cashew milk, coconut milk, pea milk, and hemp milk.
I am often asked by family members and friends how concerned they should be about the spread of the virus among backyard birds, pets, and people. While I wish I could put everyone's mind at ease, the reality is that our country has experienced the death of a patient who was stricken with bird flu. The virus has sickened dozens of people, decimated poultry populations, and infected dairy cows.
Until we are able to stop the spread of bird flu, Ohio leaders should do what they can to protect consumers, help farmers keep bird flu at bay, and support crop farmers and businesses producing plant-based foods.
Angela Eakin, MD, is a board-certified family physician and lifestyle medicine physician from Columbus. She is a member of the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, a public health nonprofit with more than 17,000 doctor members.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
37 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
More Americans support path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants with no criminal background, UMass poll finds
But a strong majority, 69 percent, support deporting undocumented immigrants who have criminal records, according to the release. This is down from an Advertisement 'These results suggest that the Trump administration, if it desires to be in step with the public that they represent, should emphasize the detention and removal of undocumented immigrants with criminal records,' Tatishe Nteta, provost professor of political science at UMASS and the poll's director, said in the release. The Trump Administration has vowed to deport 11 million undocumented immigrants, and has authorized aggressive enforcement tactics, such as raiding schools, churches and other venues that have long been safe havens for immigrants. The poll also found that only 30 percent supported deporting undocumented immigrants who work full time and pay taxes. Around 37 percent of poll respondents supported deporting undocumented immigrants who had no criminal record outside of their immigration status and 33 percent of respondents supported deporting those whose children were born in the U.S. Advertisement The poll found that Americans support protections for legal immigrants as well. A majority of respondents said that immigrants on valid visas should be entitled to constitutional rights that citizens enjoy like freedom of speech. A minority of respondents thought legal immigrants, like international students involved in protests, should be deported for expressing opposition to American foreign policy. The poll also found bipartisan opposition to reducing federal spending on scientific research at universities and requiring colleges to consider ideological diversity in hiring and admissions, according to the release. The poll of 1000 national respondents was conducted by the website YouGov between July 25 and July 30 and the margin of error for the poll was 3.5 percent. A little over 50 percent of respondents oppose immigration enforcement in churches, schools and hospitals but public opinion is split when it comes to enforcement elsewhere. For example, around 43 percent of respondents supported immigration enforcement at home and 40 percent at workplaces, according to the results. There was a big partisan gap on the question of where immigration enforcement was acceptable with 65 percent of Republicans supporting immigration enforcement at churches and hospitals while support for enforcement at these venues among Democrats was in the single digits. Around 70 percent of poll respondents said that immigrants in the country on valid visas should be entitled to the constitutional rights that citizens have such as freedom of speech, the right to an attorney when accused of a crime and the right to a hearing before a judge before deportation, among others. Advertisement Around 22 percent of respondents opposed deporting legal immigrants on the basis of their opposition to American foreign policy, an objective the Trump administration has been pursuing when it comes to international students like Tufts University PhD candidate, Rümeysa Öztürk who expressed opposition to the war in Gaza. Support for these deportations was higher among Republicans, conservatives and Trump voters, but did not exceed 50 percent in those groups. Angela Mathew can be reached at
San Francisco Chronicle
37 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Americans get more than half their calories from ultraprocessed foods, CDC report says
Most Americans get more than half their calories from ultraprocessed foods, those super-tasty, energy-dense foods typically full of sugar, salt and unhealthy fats, according to a new federal report. Nutrition research has shown for years that ultraprocessed foods make up a big chunk of the U.S. diet, especially for kids and teens. For the first time, however, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has confirmed those high levels of consumption, using dietary data collected from August 2021 to August 2023. The report comes amid growing scrutiny of such foods by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who blames them for causing chronic disease. 'We are poisoning ourselves and it's coming principally from these ultraprocessed foods,' Kennedy told Fox News earlier this year. Overall, about 55% of total calories consumed by Americans age 1 and older came from ultraprocessed foods during that period, according to the report. For adults, ultraprocessed foods made up about 53% of total calories consumed, but for kids through age 18, it was nearly 62%. The top sources included burgers and sandwiches, sweet baked goods, savory snacks, pizza and sweetened drinks. Young children consumed fewer calories from ultraprocessed foods than older kids, the report found. Adults 60 and older consumed fewer calories from those sources than younger adults. Low-income adults consumed more ultraprocessed foods than those with higher incomes. The results were not surprising, said co-author Anne Williams, a CDC nutrition expert. What was surprising was that consumption of ultraprocessed foods appeared to dip slightly over the past decade. Among adults, total calories from those sources fell from about 56% in 2013-2014 and from nearly 66% for kids in 2017-2018. Williams said she couldn't speculate about the reason for the decline or whether consumption of less processed foods increased. But Andrea Deierlein, a nutrition expert at New York University who was not involved in the research, suggested that there may be greater awareness of the potential harms of ultraprocessed foods. 'People are trying, at least in some populations, to decrease their intakes of these foods,' she said. Concern over ultraprocessed foods' health effects has been growing for years, but finding solutions has been difficult. Many studies have linked them to obesity, diabetes and heart disease, but they haven't been able to prove that the foods directly cause those chronic health problems. One small but influential study found that even when diets were matched for calories, sugar, fat, fiber and micronutrients, people consumed more calories and gained more weight when they ate ultraprocessed foods than when they ate minimally processed foods. Research published this week in the journal Nature found that participants in a clinical trial lost twice as much weight when they ate minimally processed foods — such as pasta, chicken, fruits and vegetables — than ultraprocessed foods, even those matched for nutrition components and considered healthy, such as ready-to-heat frozen meals, protein bars and shakes. Part of the problem is simply defining ultraprocessed foods. The new CDC report used the most common definition based on the four-tier Nova system developed by Brazilian researchers that classifies foods according to the amount of processing they undergo. Such foods tend to be 'hyperpalatable, energy-dense, low in dietary fiber and contain little or no whole foods, while having high amounts of salt, sweeteners and unhealthy fats,' the CDC report said. U.S. health officials recently said there are concerns over whether current definitions 'accurately capture' the range of foods that may affect health. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the Agriculture Department recently issued a request for information to develop a new, uniform definition of ultraprocessed foods for products in the U.S. food supply. In the meantime, Americans should try to reduce ultraprocessed foods in their daily diets, Deierlein said. For instance, instead of instant oatmeal that may contain added sugar, sodium, artificial colors and preservatives, use plain oats sweetened with honey or maple syrup. Read food packages and nutrition information, she suggested. 'I do think that there are less-processed options available for many foods,' she said.
38 minutes ago
Americans consume more than half of their calories from ultra-processed foods: CDC
Adults and children in the United States are getting more than 50% of their total calories from ultra-processed foods, according to a new federal report released early Thursday. Among Americans aged 1 and older, an average of 55% of their total calories came from ultra-processed foods, according to results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey conducted between August 2021 and August 2023 and run by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Children aged 18 and younger consumed a higher percentage of calories from ultra-processed foods at 61.9% compared to 53% for adults aged 19 and older. "That's excessive," Julia Zumpano, a registered dietitian at the Cleveland Clinic, who was not involved in the study, told ABC News. "That's concerning. It's way too much. … We don't have guidelines, because why would we provide guidelines for junk food, but about 10% would be reasonable." It comes amid Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s crusade to rid American diets of ultra-processed foods. Recently, the White House's Make America Healthy Again Commission, led by Kennedy, released a report blaming ultra-processed foods as one cause of the rise in chronic disease rates, such as obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease. The report described ultra-processed foods as "hyperpalatable," containing little to no whole foods and being low in dietary fiber while being high in salt, sweeteners and unhealthy fats. Examples include most, but not all, chips, candy bars, breakfast cereals, sugar-sweetened beverages and ready-to-eat meals. "They're high in sugar, high in carbohydrates and high in fat," Zampano said. "When you combine those, the taste is an explosion in your mouth and you think, 'Wow this is good.'" Studies have shown that consumption of ultra-processed foods has been linked to a higher risk of cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality, the report said. When breaking children down into smaller age groups, the report found that children between ages 1 and 5 consumed fewer calories from ultra-processed foods than children between ages 6 and 22 and pre-teens and teenagers aged 12 to 18. Among adults, those aged 19 to 39 consumed the highest percentage of calories from ultra-processed foods at 54.4% compared to adults aged 40 to 59, who consumed 52.6%, and adults aged 60 and older, who consumed 51.7%. However, there was a silver lining in the report. Data showed that between 2013 and 2014 and August 2021 through August 2023, average calories from ultra-processed foods fell among adults and children. Average total calories from ultra-processed foods decreased from 55.8% in 2013 through 2014 to 53% from August 2021 to August 2023. For children, it fell from 63.8% to 61.9% over the same period. "It's good that we see a decline of the percentage of ultra-processed food in both children and adults," Dr. Fang Fang Zhang, a cancer and nutrition epidemiologist and Neely Family Professor at the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University, who was not involved in the study, told ABC News. "I wish that there could be some analysis to see which [food subgroup consumption] is declining," she continued. "I didn't see that. It might be the sugars and beverages because we have done a lot of work to try to lower the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages." To lower the percentage of total calories Americans are getting from ultra-processed foods, Zumpano said she would like to see less marketing of the products on television and make sure schools and parents are educated on the negative health effects of ultra-processed foods. "If kids get a packaged snack or a dessert at school lunch every day, they think it's okay," she said. "Or if their parents are eating ultra-processed foods every day, then they think it's okay. It has to come from schools, parents educating themselves and then educating their children." Zhang agreed, saying the reduction of ultra-processed foods in schools and workplaces "could have a long-lasting impact on the overall population level health."
