
Society of the Spectacle: the shock and prescience of Weegee's photography
Known both for his preternatural ability to show up at the scene of murders, car crashes, fires and other urban calamities, as well as his bizarre distortions of world-famous figures like Marilyn Monroe and The Beatles, the photographer Weegee, AKA Arthur Fellig, was a fascinating study in contrasts. A new exhibit from the International Center of Photography in New York City, Weegee: Society of the Spectacle explores the work and legacy of a man who in many ways was at once of his time and so far ahead of it.
'At the beginning of this project was a kind of puzzling question,' said exhibit curator Clément Chéroux, 'it's as if you had in the same body a Walker Evans and a Man Ray. How could the same photographer do that?'
A child of Jewish emigres from what is now the Ukraine, Weegee left school at a young age to join the workforce and support his family – thus began his career in photography. In fact, one account of the origins of his distinctive moniker states that it came from his work as a photo boy in the New York Times's photo lab, where he would squeegee water off of countless photographic prints. This boundless work ethic and steely determination were to become hallmarks of Weegee's energetic and prodigious career.
As his adoption of a professional alter ego implies, Weegee was very much a self-made creation, and he was not shy about crafting elaborate mise-en-scenes in which to situate himself for self-portraits. One shows him in a mock–mug shot, ever-present Speed Graphic camera in hand and cigar protruding enormously from his mouth. 'He was someone who liked to play roles,' said Chéroux. 'He had this stamp, 'Weegee the Famous', that he would put on the back of all his photographs. He was playing with a kind of idea that he was famous.'
The mixture of seediness, spectacle and in-your-face audacity very much captures the public image that Weegee promulgated, as well as the dramatic aesthetic that he cultivated with his photographs. Weegee built his reputation throughout the 1930s and 40s with a seemingly endless array of crime scene photos for the tabloid press that depicted murdered bodies, car crashes, fires and individuals being hauled into police headquarters. In order to be first on the scene, he made good use of a police scanner that was installed in his vehicle, and he was also known to cruise the streets of New York all night long in search of fresh shots. His lightning-fast work even led to the myth that he had a darkroom right in the trunk of his car (more likely, it was that Weegee smartly situated his photo studio right next to police headquarters).
As much as Weegee became synonymous with on-the-scene photojournalism, his career took a sharp turn when he began to make incredibly distorted, grotesque images of luminaries like John F Kennedy and Andy Warhol, and even shots of the Mona Lisa. 'This is very rare in the story of photography of the 20th century,' said Chéroux. 'I don't know of any other photographer who had that same polarity – being both interested in what was right in front of the camera, and then also so interested in the darkroom manipulations. That was what struck me from the beginning.'
If there is one throughline to unite these two halves of Weegee's output, it may be the idea of 'spectacle' that is right in the exhibition's title. As curator, Chéroux took the phrase 'society of the spectacle' from French philosopher Guy Debord's magnum opus, which advanced the argument that deep interpersonal connections between people were being replaced by a society ever more focused on surfaces and images.
Although Weegee is not known to have ever read Guy Debord's book (which appeared in the French just one year before his death in 1968) the overlap is beyond doubt – the cover of the book's 1983 edition, which features a Life magazine photograph by JR Eyerman of rows of movie theater spectators wearing 3D glasses, may as well be one of Weegee's many shots of urban dwellers turning out to stare at the latest disaster.
'Weegee had a kind of understanding that the tabloid press of the time was transforming everything into a kind of spectacle,' said Chéroux. 'Very often, he had spectators in the image, you will see someone looking at the scene. He understood that if you put a spectator in, it will help someone to feel that they are a voyeur of the scene.'
Indeed some of the most striking images in the exhibit are of people acting as spectators, be they portraits of individuals sitting at the movies or of people with their heads craned upwards looking at the latest urban trainwreck. Ironically, in these photos of people taking in spectacles one can see a certain kind of innocence and authenticity, as they are so lost in their wonderment that they disarm the typical masks that we have all become accustomed to wearing whenever someone is taking our photo. It is as though Weegee is opining that when we are staring at others we in fact offer up our true selves.
A similar critique of American culture can be seen in the 1939 shot Balcony Seats at a Murder, which shows groups of New Yorkers leaning out of the windows of their apartments, presumably staring at the titular event. It is as though Weegee is posing the latest happenings in the big city as a kind of modern entertainment.
'With his title, Weegee is telling us that the people looking at the murder or fire or crash are exactly like the spectators in a movie theater,' said Chéroux. 'If you think about that, Weegee was very smart, he had this political consciousness. If you look at the first and second parts of career, in both case he's criticizing the way that American society is transforming everything into a spectacle.'
With our own modern-day fixation on social media images and the endlessness of round-the-clock news, Weegee very much speaks to what the society of the spectacle has become in our time. It's an important exhibition for introducing new audiences to someone who still has things to tell us. 'I hope that people will see the exhibition and think that it's going to help us think about today,' Chéroux said. 'I equally hope that this show is also going to go the other way around, the present situation will help us think about what has come before.'
Weegee: Society of the Spectacle is now on show at the ICP in New York until 5 May
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
5 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
David Attenborough's great-nephew gets explosive role in brand new drama
A new addictive series is coming to U&Drama and one name in the line-up might have a familiar ring to it. Sir David Attenborough's great-nephew Will takes on a surprising role. David Attenborough has retired from public life but another member of his family is keeping his legacy in the spotlight. David, 99, has most recently starred in a powerful documentary to raise the alarm bells for our oceans. Now, Sir David Attenborough 's great-nephew Will Attenborough stars in a new show on U&Drama, titled Outrageous, alongside Bessie Carter, James Purefoy, Anna Chancellor and Joshua Sasse. In the six-part series, Will, 33, plays a fictional character named Joss, crafted from several real figures. 'It was originally going to be Evelyn Waugh, then writer Sarah Williams thought it'd be interesting to make him Jewish, but not very openly,' Will says. 'He's also gay, but that's never really talked about in the show.' Joss forms a bond with main character Nancy, played by Bessie Carter, particularly in scenes that reflect the wider political chaos of the time. One scene in Buckinghamshire stands out to Will in particular. 'They're talking about the far-right,' he remembers, 'And we were filming while riots were actually happening around the country last summer. It was a reminder: 'These things don't happen in isolation. There's a culture behind it. History is being repeated.'' READ MORE: NARS' new summer collection includes cream eyeshadow that 'doesn't budge' on oily eyelids Actress Bessie Carter made her name as the scheming Prudence Featherington in Bridgerton. Now, she's taking centre stage in Outrageous, a drama with bite, built on truth, and unafraid to rattle the bones of British history. Adapted from Mary S. Lovell's novel The Mitford Girls, the six-part series set in the 1930s sees Bessie play Nancy Mitford - the eldest of six aristocratic siblings who each challenged, defied or catastrophically clashed with the values of their time. 'I knew a weird amount about them already,' Bessie says, 'I've been strangely connected to Nancy for ages.' That connection turns out to be more than just artistic. Bessie, who is the daughter of actors Jim Carter and Imedla Staunton, voiced the audiobook of Nancy's The Pursuit of Love and later discovered they shared some eerie life overlaps. 'I found out I went to the same school as her for the same amount of time, only three years. During the war she worked at St Mary's Hospital, which is where I was born,' Bessie says. 'She lived in Maida Vale, 10 minutes from where I used to live. It's a series of really odd coincidences.' That synchronicity only deepened Bessie's instinct for Nancy. In Outrageous, Nancy is the anchor - a writer determined to make sense of the crumbling world around her, and to carve a new one through sharp prose and even sharper choices. Her sisters, however, take wildly different paths. 'They want to find their own rules because there's so much to fight against in that house. They grew up with a bit of a dictator as a father,' says Bessie, 'Nancy is fearless as a writer, but the others veer off into other directions perhaps because they lack real purpose in life.' Enter Joanna Vanderham as Diana, Nancy's closest sister - and political opposite. At first, Diana is the glamorous wife of London's richest man. But after a bitter divorce, she finds solace in Oswald Mosley, founder of the British Union of Fascists. The series traces her transformation and the painful wedge it drives between her and Nancy. 'Diana and Nancy are best friends to begin with, but the story follows the breakdown of their relationship,' Joanna says, 'You realise how problematic fascism is through Nancy's eyes because you see what it does to Diana. Politics cause the fracture between them. Neither can see it from the other's perspective.' To make matters worse, Diana's relationship with Oswald is nothing short of hectic. 'He's had numerous affairs, but she stood by him,' Joanna says. 'When she says, 'He's the one I'm going to spend the rest of my life with,' she makes that happen.' Joanna adds: 'The Mitfords are known for their sense of humour but Diana starts losing that. She can't poke fun at herself anymore. She becomes a bit uptight and keeps her emotions very private.' Yet she remains outspoken about her views - which became increasingly difficult for Joanna to portray on-screen. 'I had a line the other day and was like, 'This is just horrible to say and to think,'' Joanna recalls. 'The biggest acting demand is to say that with conviction and to not feel physically revolted by it.' To ground her own performance, Bessie leaned on the sisters' extensive real-life correspondence. 'One book I found really useful was The Mitford: Letters Between Six Sisters. They wrote over 17,000 letters between them,' Bessie says, 'This book obviously doesn't contain nearly as many as that, but it's already as thick as a brick.' Outrageous doesn't shy away from the more uncomfortable chapters. Shannon Watson plays Unity Mitford, infamous for her obsession with Adolf Hitler and her open antisemitism. Zoe Brough also joins the cast as Jessica Mitford, who became a staunch communist. The ideological gulf between the sisters mirrors the chaos of the era. 'We see the pressure these political divides put on Nancy,' says Bessie. 'Do you stay true to your family because they are blood…or do you stay true to yourself and your beliefs? I found all that so interesting.' Outrageous airs on U and U&Drama from Thursday, June 19th.


Metro
14 hours ago
- Metro
Justin Baldoni's $400m lawsuit against Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds dismissed
Justin Baldoni has just been dealt a major blow after his $400million lawsuit against It Ends With Us co-star Blake Lively was dismissed by a judge. The pair, who starred in the film adaptation of Colleen Hoover's novel of the same name last year, have been embroiled in a bitter feud in recent months. In December, the Gossip Girl actress, 37, launched legal proceedings against the 41-year-old – who also served as director – over claims she suffered 'severe emotional distress and pain, humiliation, embarrassment, belittlement, frustration and mental anguish'. He denied all claims and filed a countersuit against her, husband Ryan Reynolds and their publicist, Leslie Sloane – alleging extortion and defamation – as well as separate documents against the New York Times. According to People Magazine, Judge Lewis J Liman has granted a motional to dismiss the $400m countersuit, as well as the defamation filing against the publication. 'The Wayfarer Parties have not alleged that Lively is responsible for any statements other than the statements in her CRD complaint, which are privileged,' he wrote, via the outlet. 'The Wayfarer Parties have alleged that Reynolds and Sloane made additional statements accusing Baldoni of sexual misconduct and that the Times made additional statements accusing the Wayfarer Parties of engaging in a smear campaign. 'But the Wayfarer Parties have not alleged that Reynolds, Sloane or the Times would have seriously doubted these statements were true based on the information available to them, as is required for them to be liable for defamation under applicable law. 'The Wayfarer Parties' additional claims also fail. Accordingly, the Amended Complaint must be dismissed in its entirety.' Lively's lawsuits against Baldoni are still intact – although the latter filed a motion to dismiss them, the judge has not yet ruled on that. In a statement shared with Metro, her legal team declared the decision was a 'total victory and a complete vindication'. 'Today's opinion is a total victory and a complete vindication for Blake Lively, along with those that Justin Baldoni and the Wayfarer Parties dragged into their retaliatory lawsuit, including Ryan Reynolds, Leslie Sloane and The New York Times,' Esra Hudson and Mike Gottlieb said. 'As we have said from day one, this $400million lawsuit was a sham, and the Court saw right through it. 'We look forward to the next round, which is seeking attorneys' fees, treble damages and punitive damages against Baldoni, Sarowitz, Nathan, and the other Wayfarer Parties who perpetrated this abusive litigation. Baldoni's reps have not spoken publicly over the reports. It Ends With Us was released in 2024, with Lively cast in the lead role of Lily Bloom opposite Baldoni as antagonist Ryle Kincaid. Their characters embarked upon a relationship, but it took a turn for the worse when Ryle's violent behavior was revealed. Jenny Slate, Hasan Minhaj, Amy Morton and Brandon Sklenar also made up the cast. The news comes just days after Lively requested to withdraw two claims she made about the filmmaker in her original proceedings. In the legal complaint, the A Simple Favor actress made various allegations, but attempted to drop the claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress and negligent infliction of emotional distress last week. More Trending Variety reports that Baldoni's legal team attempted to gain access to her medical records, therapy notes and other information relevant to her claims that she endured 'severe emotional distress and pain' on set. Judge Liman wrote that the motion in question was denied 'based on the Plaintiff's representation that the relevant claims will be withdrawn.' Metro has contacted reps for Lively and Baldoni for a comment. Got a story? If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you. MORE: Pitbull was a visual feast in Manchester – and we don't mean the bald caps MORE: American Psycho director vows no one can replace Christian Bale after remake rumours MORE: Keanu Reeves is even a gentleman when straddled by another actor


Daily Mirror
15 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Justin Baldoni suffers huge blow in $400m Blake Lively lawsuit in major update
Justin Baldoni's $400m lawsuit against It Ends With Us co-star Blake Lively has been dismissed, according to reports. The legal debate kicked off following Blake and Justin's time working together on the film, that was released last summer. Blake initially launched a sexual harassment lawsuit against Justin - who has strongly refuted the claims. However, he hit back with a $400million defamation claim against her, her publicist and husband Ryan Reynolds, all of whom have dismissed the accusations. Additionally, Justin launched a $250 million libel case against the New York Times over their coverage of Blake's allegations. However, the $400million lawsuit has reportedly now been dismissed. A spokesperson for Blake told the Daily Mail: "Today's opinion is a total victory and a complete vindication for Blake Lively, along with those that Justin Baldoni and the Wayfarer Parties dragged into their retaliatory lawsuit, including Ryan Reynolds, Leslie Sloane and The New York Times. "As we have said from day one, this '$400 million' lawsuit was a sham, and the Court saw right through it. We look forward to the next round, which is seeking attorneys' fees, treble damages and punitive damages against Baldoni, Sarowitz, Nathan, and the other Wayfarer Parties who perpetrated this abusive litigation." Last month, Blake's pal Taylor Swift was dragged into the scandal when she was officially subpoenaed to appear as a witness. The pop star was delivered a legal notice by Justin's lawyer Bryan Freedman - a decision which had been slammed by her team as a tactic to create clickbait. In a move that appeared to please Blake and Taylor, it was confirmed Justin would no longer be calling on the Bad Blood hitmaker to appear as a witness. Bryan Freedman had claimed Blake had called on "her high-profile friends" including Taylor to "manipulate Justin at every turn." Taylor, who is close friends with Blake, licensed her hit song My Tears Ricochet to be used in the film but was not involved in the making of It Ends With Us, said her reps. They slammed the subpoena, claiming it was "designed to use Taylor Swift 's name to draw public interest by creating tabloid clickbait instead of focusing on the facts of the case." Justin's legal team dropped the subpoena last month, as Blake's spokesperson said they were "pleased" with the decision. 'We supported the efforts of Taylor's team to quash these inappropriate subpoenas directed to her counsel, and we will continue to stand up for any third party who is unjustly harassed or threatened in the process,' they told People. 'The Baldoni and Wayfarer team have tried to put Taylor Swift, a woman who has been an inspiration for tens of millions across the globe, at the center of this case since day one,' they claimed. They alleged that 'exploiting Taylor Swift's celebrity was the original plan in [PR professional] Melissa Nathan's scenario planning document, and it continues to this day.' 'Faced with having to justify themselves in federal court, they folded. At some point they will run out of distractions from the actual claims of sexual harassment and retaliation they are facing,' they said. The Mirror has contacted Justin's representative for comment.