logo
Society of the Spectacle: the shock and prescience of Weegee's photography

Society of the Spectacle: the shock and prescience of Weegee's photography

The Guardian27-02-2025

Known both for his preternatural ability to show up at the scene of murders, car crashes, fires and other urban calamities, as well as his bizarre distortions of world-famous figures like Marilyn Monroe and The Beatles, the photographer Weegee, AKA Arthur Fellig, was a fascinating study in contrasts. A new exhibit from the International Center of Photography in New York City, Weegee: Society of the Spectacle explores the work and legacy of a man who in many ways was at once of his time and so far ahead of it.
'At the beginning of this project was a kind of puzzling question,' said exhibit curator Clément Chéroux, 'it's as if you had in the same body a Walker Evans and a Man Ray. How could the same photographer do that?'
A child of Jewish emigres from what is now the Ukraine, Weegee left school at a young age to join the workforce and support his family – thus began his career in photography. In fact, one account of the origins of his distinctive moniker states that it came from his work as a photo boy in the New York Times's photo lab, where he would squeegee water off of countless photographic prints. This boundless work ethic and steely determination were to become hallmarks of Weegee's energetic and prodigious career.
As his adoption of a professional alter ego implies, Weegee was very much a self-made creation, and he was not shy about crafting elaborate mise-en-scenes in which to situate himself for self-portraits. One shows him in a mock–mug shot, ever-present Speed Graphic camera in hand and cigar protruding enormously from his mouth. 'He was someone who liked to play roles,' said Chéroux. 'He had this stamp, 'Weegee the Famous', that he would put on the back of all his photographs. He was playing with a kind of idea that he was famous.'
The mixture of seediness, spectacle and in-your-face audacity very much captures the public image that Weegee promulgated, as well as the dramatic aesthetic that he cultivated with his photographs. Weegee built his reputation throughout the 1930s and 40s with a seemingly endless array of crime scene photos for the tabloid press that depicted murdered bodies, car crashes, fires and individuals being hauled into police headquarters. In order to be first on the scene, he made good use of a police scanner that was installed in his vehicle, and he was also known to cruise the streets of New York all night long in search of fresh shots. His lightning-fast work even led to the myth that he had a darkroom right in the trunk of his car (more likely, it was that Weegee smartly situated his photo studio right next to police headquarters).
As much as Weegee became synonymous with on-the-scene photojournalism, his career took a sharp turn when he began to make incredibly distorted, grotesque images of luminaries like John F Kennedy and Andy Warhol, and even shots of the Mona Lisa. 'This is very rare in the story of photography of the 20th century,' said Chéroux. 'I don't know of any other photographer who had that same polarity – being both interested in what was right in front of the camera, and then also so interested in the darkroom manipulations. That was what struck me from the beginning.'
If there is one throughline to unite these two halves of Weegee's output, it may be the idea of 'spectacle' that is right in the exhibition's title. As curator, Chéroux took the phrase 'society of the spectacle' from French philosopher Guy Debord's magnum opus, which advanced the argument that deep interpersonal connections between people were being replaced by a society ever more focused on surfaces and images.
Although Weegee is not known to have ever read Guy Debord's book (which appeared in the French just one year before his death in 1968) the overlap is beyond doubt – the cover of the book's 1983 edition, which features a Life magazine photograph by JR Eyerman of rows of movie theater spectators wearing 3D glasses, may as well be one of Weegee's many shots of urban dwellers turning out to stare at the latest disaster.
'Weegee had a kind of understanding that the tabloid press of the time was transforming everything into a kind of spectacle,' said Chéroux. 'Very often, he had spectators in the image, you will see someone looking at the scene. He understood that if you put a spectator in, it will help someone to feel that they are a voyeur of the scene.'
Indeed some of the most striking images in the exhibit are of people acting as spectators, be they portraits of individuals sitting at the movies or of people with their heads craned upwards looking at the latest urban trainwreck. Ironically, in these photos of people taking in spectacles one can see a certain kind of innocence and authenticity, as they are so lost in their wonderment that they disarm the typical masks that we have all become accustomed to wearing whenever someone is taking our photo. It is as though Weegee is opining that when we are staring at others we in fact offer up our true selves.
A similar critique of American culture can be seen in the 1939 shot Balcony Seats at a Murder, which shows groups of New Yorkers leaning out of the windows of their apartments, presumably staring at the titular event. It is as though Weegee is posing the latest happenings in the big city as a kind of modern entertainment.
'With his title, Weegee is telling us that the people looking at the murder or fire or crash are exactly like the spectators in a movie theater,' said Chéroux. 'If you think about that, Weegee was very smart, he had this political consciousness. If you look at the first and second parts of career, in both case he's criticizing the way that American society is transforming everything into a spectacle.'
With our own modern-day fixation on social media images and the endlessness of round-the-clock news, Weegee very much speaks to what the society of the spectacle has become in our time. It's an important exhibition for introducing new audiences to someone who still has things to tell us. 'I hope that people will see the exhibition and think that it's going to help us think about today,' Chéroux said. 'I equally hope that this show is also going to go the other way around, the present situation will help us think about what has come before.'
Weegee: Society of the Spectacle is now on show at the ICP in New York until 5 May

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Justin Baldoni slams Blake Lively's 'false' victory as he makes lawsuit vow
Justin Baldoni slams Blake Lively's 'false' victory as he makes lawsuit vow

Daily Mirror

time16 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Justin Baldoni slams Blake Lively's 'false' victory as he makes lawsuit vow

Actor Justin Baldoni has been locked in a legal battle with his It Ends With Us co-star Blake Lively as a judge dismissed his £294m defamation lawsuit against her Justin Baldoni's legal team have insisted Blake Lively's victory over her It Ends With Us co-star is "false" after his $400million lawsuit was dismissed by a judge. Their ongoing legal battle kicked off following their time working together on the film. Blake launched a sexual harassment lawsuit against Justin, who has strongly refuted the claims. He then hit back with a $400m defamation claim against her, her publicist and husband Ryan Reynolds, all of whom have dismissed the accusations. Justin went on to launch a $250m libel case against the New York Times over their coverage of Blake's allegations. Yesterday, it was reported his $400million lawsuit was dismissed. Judge Lewis J Liman dismissed the lawsuit due to Blake's allegations being made within privileged court papers, so were subsequently not defamatory. Blake's legal time branded the decision a "total victory" and "complete vindication" for the star. However, Justin's lawyer has now hit back at their celebrations and branded it "false". In a statement to the Mirror, Bryan Freedman said: "Ms. Lively and her team's predictable declaration of victory is false, so let us be clear about the latest ruling. "While the Court dismissed the defamation-related claims, the Court has invited us to amend four out of the seven claims against Ms. Lively, which will showcase additional evidence and refined allegations. "This case is about false accusations of sexual harassment and retaliation and a nonexistent smear campaign, which Ms. Lively's own team conveniently describes as 'untraceable' because they cannot prove what never happened. "Most importantly, Ms. Lively's own claims are no truer today than they were yesterday, and with the facts on our side, we march forward with the same confidence that we had when Ms. Lively and her cohorts initiated this battle and look forward to her forthcoming deposition, which I will be taking. "We are grateful for the organic show of support from the public and for the dedication of the Internet sleuth community who continue to cover the case with discernment and integrity." A spokesperson for Blake, who stepped out at the Chanel Tribeca Festival Artists Dinner red carpet last night, had told the Daily Mail: "Today's opinion is a total victory and a complete vindication for Blake Lively, along with those that Justin Baldoni and the Wayfarer Parties dragged into their retaliatory lawsuit, including Ryan Reynolds, Leslie Sloane and The New York Times. "As we have said from day one, this '$400 million' lawsuit was a sham, and the Court saw right through it. We look forward to the next round, which is seeking attorneys' fees, treble damages and punitive damages against Baldoni, Sarowitz, Nathan, and the other Wayfarer Parties who perpetrated this abusive litigation." The actress went on to issue a statement on Instagram as she said: "Last week, I stood proudly alongside 19 organisations united in defending women's rights to speak up for their safety. Like so many others, I've felt the pain of a retaliatory lawsuit, including the manufactured shame that tries to break us. While the suit against me was defeated, so many don't have the resources to fight back." Blake added she was "more resolved than ever to continue to stand for every woman's right to have a voice in protecting themselves, including their safety, their integrity, their dignity and their story". The Gossip Girl actress, who has four children with actor Ryan Reynolds, continued: "With love and gratitude for the many who stood by me, many of you I know. Many of you I don't. But I will never stop appreciating or advocating for you."

Glen Powell's ex blames Sydney Sweeney cheating rumours for their split saying ‘I hope they're in love'
Glen Powell's ex blames Sydney Sweeney cheating rumours for their split saying ‘I hope they're in love'

Scottish Sun

time18 hours ago

  • Scottish Sun

Glen Powell's ex blames Sydney Sweeney cheating rumours for their split saying ‘I hope they're in love'

Gigi slammed Glen's response to the huge speculation of a romance between him and Sydney played out Glen Powell's ex blames Sydney Sweeney cheating rumours for their split saying 'I hope they're in love' Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) GLEN Powell's ex Gigi Paris has broken her silence on their split more than two years after their relationship ended. Actor Glen, 36, and model Gigi, 32, broke up after three years together in 2023 amid rumors of a romance between him and his Anyone But You co-star Sydney Sweeney. Sign up for the Entertainment newsletter Sign up 3 Gigi has blamed her split from Glen on the rumors surrounding him and Sydney Credit: Shutterstock 3 Glen and Sydney have insisted they were playing up to the speculation Credit: Getty 3 Gigi and Glen were together for three years Credit: Getty Speaking to Emma Klipstein on the Too Much podcast, Gigi - while not naming her ex or 27-year-old Sydney - slammed Glen for failing to put the fan speculation to bed at the time. She said: 'It was just, this is what I have to do for my job. 'I had two options. I could either pretend like I was going along with everything and have everyone wonder, like, 'Are they hooking up? Are they not hooking up? Is she okay with this? What the f***?' 'Or stand up for myself and say, 'No, I'm actually not okay with this, and I'm walking away.' So that's what I decided to do… I was shattered.' Both Glen and Sydney, who at the time was engaged to Jonathan Davino, have denied anything happened between them and actually admitted to playing on the rumors to ensure maximum publicity for the movie. Glen previously told the New York Times: 'That's people wanting what's on the screen, off the screen, and sometimes you just have to lean into it a bit — and it worked wonderfully.' Now Gigi has slammed her ex for refusing to deny the continuous speculation. She said: 'Where are you when you just need to stand up and say, 'No, I would never cheat on my girlfriend. I wouldn't do that.' 'That's all that needed to be said. And that wasn't said ... Never once. "It was serving them for their PR. Later on, it turned out that it was all, I don't know if there was a relationship there or not, but then they came out to say it was all a PR scheme at the expense of our relationship. Like, it was just crazy.' Glen Powell breaks his silence on Sydney Sweeney dating rumors after she attends his sister's wedding And she admitted at the time she hoped Glen and Sydney would end up together so her break-up wasn't for nothing. She added: 'I honestly hoped that they'd end up together, because I was like, at least it would make it worth it for me, you know? I hope they are in love or whatnot.'

‘They tell you every minor inconvenience': bartenders on which generation has the worst behavior
‘They tell you every minor inconvenience': bartenders on which generation has the worst behavior

The Guardian

timea day ago

  • The Guardian

‘They tell you every minor inconvenience': bartenders on which generation has the worst behavior

Gen Z are used to headlines about the things they've 'killed': writing in cursive, getting their driver's licenses, knowing how printers work, wearing skinny jeans. Their latest offense, according to a recent New York Times article: opening bar tabs. Bartenders and drinkers alike spoke to the Times about young people's hesitancy to leave their credit cards behind the bar, instead preferring to close out and pay after every single drink – no matter how many rounds they order. The piece sparked conversations on TikTok and Reddit about gen Z bar etiquette, which some call nearly irredeemable. 'Working a bar that is almost exclusively Gen Z, we stopped opening tabs altogether because they're so bad at even remembering they have a card,' one person wrote on r/bartenders. But does gen Z have the worst bar etiquette? The Guardian spoke to bartenders across the US about which generation behaves best and discovered that younger folks aren't the horrible customers so many trend pieces set them up to be. Older drinkers often have worse manners – and they don't have the excuse of inexperience to let them off the hook. Michaela Giunchigliani works in Sonoma, California, at a boutique winery where she serves people of all ages. 'By far the most challenging, stressful, taxing – and I say this with love – are the boomers,' Giunchigliani said. 'I find that boomers [roughly those aged between 60 and 80] keep this keen eye on any little thing that they can glob onto and say: 'Well, you didn't bend over backwards for me.' Gen Z doesn't have that same entitlement.' Rachel Phelps, a bartender in Pittsburgh, agreed that the '50-plus' crowd wins the distinction of most demanding. 'They're going to want to pick where they sit, and they're going to tell you every minor inconvenience. I used to work at a bar that didn't have air conditioning, and it was always my fault, according to them.' Gen Z, meanwhile, isn't nearly as fussy. 'If I just perform like the bare minimum of what I'm expected to do, we're good,' Giunchigliani said. Since the legal drinkers of gen Z haven't experienced bar culture for that long (the oldest in the cohort are 28) many of them don't know or care about certain bar rituals. Chloe Richards, who tends bar at dives in Brooklyn and Queens, New York, said gen Z is blissfully ignorant of 'buybacks', the old saloon tradition of getting a free drink or shot after a few rounds. (In 2019, the New York Post eulogized the ritual, saying gentrification and higher rents killed it off.) But 'old heads', as Richards calls her gen X-and-up patrons, come in expecting the quid pro quo. 'They think that after every three drinks, I'm supposed to give them a free one,' Richards said. 'That's not a real thing or a hard rule: it's a privilege. If you're a good customer or a patron, of course, but I don't owe anybody free anything.' Bartenders also said gone are the days when the youngest drinkers wind up the most wasted by the end of the night. Gen Z came of age during a seismic shift in drinking culture: they're imbibing much less than previous generations. This means the getting-sloshed baton falls to an older crowd. 'People in their late 30s to early 40s usually have higher tabs, but it comes at a cost,' said Dimitri Gellis, who manages the Chicago sports bar Fatpour Tap Works. 'They think they can still drink like they're in their 20s, but they can't hang. They'll order whiskey on the rocks like pros, but after a few they're holding onto the wall and they don't take it well when you cut them off.' Gen Z may be drinking less, but that doesn't mean their bar hangs can't last for hours – even if they don't keep ordering. 'Something that drives me fucking nuts is when they get like one drink and use that as an excuse to sit at the bar for five hours,' said a Brooklyn bartender who goes by Priz. 'Why go to a bar? One drink is not access to unlimited space at a place. You have to do a little more.' Gen Z's anxiety manifests at the bar counter, too: some of them haven't yet nailed the quickest way to order a round. 'What's most annoying to me is when people order their drinks one by one when they're in a group, especially when they all have to think about it,' Richards said. 'For me it's like, let's get it going, because you're slowing down the process. Get it together first before you get my attention.' Most bartenders say they understand why gen Z has a hard time in bars. Many spent formative going-out years in the wake of Covid restrictions. 'They're learning how to do this a bit later than the rest of us did,' Richards said. She gets it, but also that inexperience can mess with her tips. 'I think young people are just guessing numbers,' Richards said. Ultimately, bartenders say that there's no magic age for an ideal patron – their work headaches come from people of all generations. Phelps, the Pittsburgh bartender, added that overall, gen Z's looking for 'experiences' on nights out – it's not really about drinking anymore. In some ways, that makes them easier to serve. 'They want to look cute and take pictures,' she said. 'The sloppy behavior is just not there the way it was for us when we were younger. It's definitely better for the people behind the bar. But also, I'm always like, 'Have some fun! Do something stupid.''

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store