
Society of the Spectacle: the shock and prescience of Weegee's photography
'At the beginning of this project was a kind of puzzling question,' said exhibit curator Clément Chéroux, 'it's as if you had in the same body a Walker Evans and a Man Ray. How could the same photographer do that?'
A child of Jewish emigres from what is now the Ukraine, Weegee left school at a young age to join the workforce and support his family – thus began his career in photography. In fact, one account of the origins of his distinctive moniker states that it came from his work as a photo boy in the New York Times's photo lab, where he would squeegee water off of countless photographic prints. This boundless work ethic and steely determination were to become hallmarks of Weegee's energetic and prodigious career.
As his adoption of a professional alter ego implies, Weegee was very much a self-made creation, and he was not shy about crafting elaborate mise-en-scenes in which to situate himself for self-portraits. One shows him in a mock–mug shot, ever-present Speed Graphic camera in hand and cigar protruding enormously from his mouth. 'He was someone who liked to play roles,' said Chéroux. 'He had this stamp, 'Weegee the Famous', that he would put on the back of all his photographs. He was playing with a kind of idea that he was famous.'
The mixture of seediness, spectacle and in-your-face audacity very much captures the public image that Weegee promulgated, as well as the dramatic aesthetic that he cultivated with his photographs. Weegee built his reputation throughout the 1930s and 40s with a seemingly endless array of crime scene photos for the tabloid press that depicted murdered bodies, car crashes, fires and individuals being hauled into police headquarters. In order to be first on the scene, he made good use of a police scanner that was installed in his vehicle, and he was also known to cruise the streets of New York all night long in search of fresh shots. His lightning-fast work even led to the myth that he had a darkroom right in the trunk of his car (more likely, it was that Weegee smartly situated his photo studio right next to police headquarters).
As much as Weegee became synonymous with on-the-scene photojournalism, his career took a sharp turn when he began to make incredibly distorted, grotesque images of luminaries like John F Kennedy and Andy Warhol, and even shots of the Mona Lisa. 'This is very rare in the story of photography of the 20th century,' said Chéroux. 'I don't know of any other photographer who had that same polarity – being both interested in what was right in front of the camera, and then also so interested in the darkroom manipulations. That was what struck me from the beginning.'
If there is one throughline to unite these two halves of Weegee's output, it may be the idea of 'spectacle' that is right in the exhibition's title. As curator, Chéroux took the phrase 'society of the spectacle' from French philosopher Guy Debord's magnum opus, which advanced the argument that deep interpersonal connections between people were being replaced by a society ever more focused on surfaces and images.
Although Weegee is not known to have ever read Guy Debord's book (which appeared in the French just one year before his death in 1968) the overlap is beyond doubt – the cover of the book's 1983 edition, which features a Life magazine photograph by JR Eyerman of rows of movie theater spectators wearing 3D glasses, may as well be one of Weegee's many shots of urban dwellers turning out to stare at the latest disaster.
'Weegee had a kind of understanding that the tabloid press of the time was transforming everything into a kind of spectacle,' said Chéroux. 'Very often, he had spectators in the image, you will see someone looking at the scene. He understood that if you put a spectator in, it will help someone to feel that they are a voyeur of the scene.'
Indeed some of the most striking images in the exhibit are of people acting as spectators, be they portraits of individuals sitting at the movies or of people with their heads craned upwards looking at the latest urban trainwreck. Ironically, in these photos of people taking in spectacles one can see a certain kind of innocence and authenticity, as they are so lost in their wonderment that they disarm the typical masks that we have all become accustomed to wearing whenever someone is taking our photo. It is as though Weegee is opining that when we are staring at others we in fact offer up our true selves.
A similar critique of American culture can be seen in the 1939 shot Balcony Seats at a Murder, which shows groups of New Yorkers leaning out of the windows of their apartments, presumably staring at the titular event. It is as though Weegee is posing the latest happenings in the big city as a kind of modern entertainment.
'With his title, Weegee is telling us that the people looking at the murder or fire or crash are exactly like the spectators in a movie theater,' said Chéroux. 'If you think about that, Weegee was very smart, he had this political consciousness. If you look at the first and second parts of career, in both case he's criticizing the way that American society is transforming everything into a spectacle.'
With our own modern-day fixation on social media images and the endlessness of round-the-clock news, Weegee very much speaks to what the society of the spectacle has become in our time. It's an important exhibition for introducing new audiences to someone who still has things to tell us. 'I hope that people will see the exhibition and think that it's going to help us think about today,' Chéroux said. 'I equally hope that this show is also going to go the other way around, the present situation will help us think about what has come before.'
Weegee: Society of the Spectacle is now on show at the ICP in New York until 5 May
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Edinburgh Reporter
10 hours ago
- Edinburgh Reporter
Fringe 2025 – Joe Bor: Leave Them Wanting Bor ⭐⭐⭐
The filmmaker, cartoonist, and comedian Joe Bor made a return to the Edinburgh Fringe with Leave Them Wanting Bor. This was Bor's first appearance here since 2019. His 2019 show, The Story of Walter and Herbert, was a gentle, humorous meditation on friendship, family and the Jewish experience in the 20th century. That show had a very clear narrative and focus, skilfully interweaving sound recordings, video and extracts from his grandfather's unpublished memoirs. This year Bor has brought a new show, Leave Them Wanting Bor to Edinburgh. Willy the warm up In contrast, this show lacked the same level bit of coherence, though Bor was again an engaging presence on stage. He began under the guise of 'Willy the warm-up' an Australian alter ego in a Pat Sharp style wig, who tried to raise the atmosphere in the room. This was perhaps an admission that the room lacked a bit of character, especially mid-afternoon – the 'strip club' vibes not ideal. In the evening, Fingers Piano Bar can have a fantastic atmosphere, but at 2pm it wasn't ideal for a comedy based act; it was a little flat with fewer than a dozen in the room. The 'Willy the warm-up' character actually had perhaps more potential; I felt that Bor switched too abruptly to his normal persona. Breaking down barriers Bor gave us tales from his travels and his life experiences. These were told in an engaging way, with some nice moments of interaction with the audience which helped create a nice collective feel to the show. That's very much consistent with the Free Fringe philosophy of breaking down barriers. Bor clearly enjoyed picking up bits of wisdom from some of the members of the audience, keen to find out what the secret of the long lasting relationship was. Some of the best material was actually found in his very entertaining text exchanges with his 'no filter' Mum. Perhaps this aspect could have been made a larger feature of the show. A sense of acclaim Ultimately the theme was of Bor's sense of not quite living up to some of his relatives of past generations , especially his great aunt, the chemist and X-ray crystallographer Rosalind Franklin, whose work was central to the understanding of the molecular structures of DNA. This sense of trying to live up to a certain standard of achievement, the search for a 'sense of acclaim', was the thread running through the show, rather than the slightly laboured material on science. Bor shared a number of Einstein quotes about science, which were interesting in themselves, but I'm not sure they really cohered with the show more generally; at least in its present form. Stupid joke – but I like it The show how a little bit of a scattergun feel, with Bor sometimes shooting off into tangents, and slightly losing his thread. The tangents were often very entertaining, but the show perhaps needs some tightening up. His clear enjoyment of 'stupid jokes' (aka Dad jokes), was endearing, but perhaps overdone ('stupid joke – but I like it'). More broadly, the whole show was tinged with a large element of self-deprecation 'I think that's the best joke – it never gets a big laugh though'. In general, the show had many good elements (if you pardon the science pun), but, in its current state, lacks the satisfying cohesiveness of The Story of Walter and Herbert. I imagine that as Bor's run here at the Fringe continues, the show will develop and get closer to its potential. Like this: Like Related


The Herald Scotland
a day ago
- The Herald Scotland
Cutting the Tightrope is a powerful piece of no-holds barred theatre
Church Hill Theatre Neil Cooper Four stars What to do when artists are told by those bankrolling them not to say certain things lest the plug be pulled on them? In the case of those behind this compendium of bite-size plays responding to Art Council England's guidelines warning those in receipt of public funding not to be 'political', you do the exact opposite of what was asked. Leaving aside the very obvious truism that all art is political, the result is a series of urgent statements on the ongoing atrocities being carried out in Palestine and elsewhere. The show begins with one of the eight-strong ensemble stepping out as a festival director attempting to rein in those programmed. The theme is continued in the next piece, in which the dead victim of a bombing attempts to pitch their story to a theatre director, only to be sidelined with a litany of bureaucrat-speak. A young man brings his artist activist girlfriend home to his middle class parents who would rather not discuss uncomfortable topics. A flower seller reminisces about life before the invasion and the man who bought different flowers for each of his girlfriends. A Zionist writer giving a presentation is interrupted from the stalls by an anti-Zionist Jewish playwright. Most powerful of all is 46 Women, based around the incident when Westminster MP Diane Abbott tried in vain to speak in a debate forty-six times after a Tory donor allegedly said she made him hate all black women, and needed 'to be shot.' As women rise from the audience to ask each question, it becomes a vital reclaiming of power. Read more With writers of the calibre of Dawn King, Ed Edwards and Philip Arditti on board alongside Zia Ahmed, Nina Bowers and Hassan Abdulrazzak, rather than be credited individually, the twelve playwrights behind the works are listed as a collective. Equal responsibility for the plays also goes to Mojisola Adebayo, Roxy Cook, Ahmed Masoud, Sami Abu Wardeh and cast members Waleed Elgadi and Joel Samuels. Each act ends with a ferocious monologue, with the latter seeing a young Muslim attempting to walk to Walthamstow following outbreaks of violence after three children were killed in Southport by what was wrongly claimed to be an asylum seeker. Originating at London's Dalston based grassroots Arcola Theatre, all this is brought to life by directors Cressida Brown and Kirsty Housley with Zainab Hasan on a stage lined with the sort of plastic orange bucket seats that look leftover from a 1980s job centre. This inadvertently reflects how the dole was regarded at the time by many would be artists as an unofficial form of funding, no questions asked. Those days may be long gone, but the desire to create contentious work remains. The series of statistics of the daily horrors in Palestine projected on to the stage may break Arts Council England's guidelines as much as the plays, but both bring home the of the moment call to arms that matters more. Until August 17th


Graziadaily
a day ago
- Graziadaily
Sound The Alarm, There's New Pictures Of Nobody Wants This Season Two
Nobody Wants This was one of Netflix's biggest shows on 2024, with over 10 million viewers in just four days when it hit the streaming service in September. The first season saw Kristen Bell play a sex podcaster called Joanne and Adam Brody play Noah, a newly single rabbi who fall in love despite the complications surrounding their relationship. After Joanne and Noah got back together after a brief split at the end of season one, fans were begging for a second season of the show – and Netflix granted their wish. Here's everything we know so far about Nobody Wants This season two. Yes, Netflix confirmed a second season of Nobody Wants This was coming in October last year, just weeks after the first season arrived. The show's creator Erin Foster will continue to tell story of Joanne and Noah, but this time with Girls showrunners Jenni Konner and Bruce Eric Kaplansaid. Now, new pictures have even been released of them filming on set. Foster said, 'I'm so lucky to be able to continue this story and to do it alongside Jenni Konner and Bruce Eric Kaplan, who I've been such a fan of since Girls... Justice for healthy relationships being the most romantic!' Of course, Kristen Bell and Adam Brody will return as Joanne and Noah as well as some other favourite characters from season 1. But they will also be joined by some new faces – including Brody's former Gossip Girl co-star Leighton Meester. The full cast list so far is: Not just yet, but we do have a 35-second teaser clip... Season 1 saw Joanne and Noah fall in love quickly, trying to navigate their relationship despite Joanne not being Jewish. While she considered converting, she wasn't ready to make the commitment. The pair briefly split but reunited after Noah made a grand gesture in a parking lot after a bat mitzvah. Yes, show creator Foster based the show on her own experience of converting to Reform Judaism to marry her husband Simon Tikhman. Nobody Wants This is scheduled for release on October 23 this year - and we're counting down the days! While you wait, you can watch season 1 of Nobody Wants This on Netflix now. Samuel McManus is a senior content creator for Bauer Media, writing celebrity news and features across five of the company's brands – heat, Closer, Grazia, Bella and Yours. Samuel has worked at Bauer Media since November 2024.