logo
The mystery of the first potatoes has finally been solved – and a tomato was involved

The mystery of the first potatoes has finally been solved – and a tomato was involved

Independent4 days ago
The potato, a global food staple first cultivated thousands of years ago in the Andes region of South America before its worldwide spread from the 16th century, has long presented a puzzling evolutionary mystery.
Now, a new analysis has finally unravelled its origins.
Scientists have revealed that the potato lineage emerged approximately nine million years ago in South America, through a natural interbreeding event between a wild tomato plant and a potato-like species. This significant discovery, based on the genomic analysis of 450 cultivated potatoes and 56 wild species, explains how this vital crop came to be.
This ancient hybridisation event is understood to have led to the appearance of the nascent potato plant's distinctive tuber – the enlarged structure housing nutrients underground, according to the researchers. While the edible part of a tomato plant is its fruit, the potato's value lies in this subterranean growth. The study also identified two crucial genes involved in tuber formation, deepening our understanding of this essential crop.
"Potatoes are truly one of humanity's most remarkable food staples, combining extraordinary versatility, nutritional value and cultural ubiquity in ways few crops can match," said Sanwen Huang, a genome biologist and plant breeder at the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences and senior author of the study published on Friday in the journal Cell.
"People eat potatoes using virtually every cooking method - baking, roasting, boiling, steaming and frying. Despite being stereotyped as carbohydrates, potatoes offer vitamin C, potassium, fiber and resistant starch, and are naturally gluten-free, low-fat and satiating - a nutrient-dense calorie source," Huang added.
Resistant starch is a type of carbohydrate that resists digestion in the small intestine and ferments in the large intestine, feeding beneficial bacteria in the gut.
The modern-day potato plant's scientific name is Solanum tuberosum. Its two parents identified in the study were plants that were the ancestors of a potato-like species now found in Peru named Etuberosum, which closely resembles the potato plant but lacks a tuber, and the tomato plant.
These two plants themselves shared a common ancestor that lived about 14 million years ago, and were able to naturally interbreed when the fortuitous hybridization event occurred five million years after they had diverged from each other.
"This event led to a reshuffling of genes such that the new lineage produced tubers, allowing these plants to expand into the newly created cold, dry habitats in the rising Andes mountain chain," said botanist Sandra Knapp of the Natural History Museum in London, a co-author of the study.
This hybridization event coincided with the rapid uplift of the Andes. With a tuber, the potato plant was able to adapt to the changing regional environment and thrive in the harsh conditions of the mountains.
"Tubers can store nutrients for cold adaptation, and enable asexual reproduction to meet the challenge of the reduced fertility in cold conditions. These allowed the plant to survive and rapidly expand," Huang said.
The study's findings, according to the researchers, may help guide improved cultivated potato breeding to address environmental challenges that crops presently face due to factors such as climate change.
There currently are roughly 5,000 potato varieties. The potato is the world's third most important food crop, after rice and wheat, for human consumption, according to the Peru-based International Potato Center research organization. China is the world's leading potato producer.
"It always is hard to remove all the deleterious mutations in potato genomes in breeding, and this study opens a new door to make a potato free of deleterious mutations using the tomato as the chassis of synthetic biology," Huang said.
The study also may open the door to generate a new crop species that could produce tomato fruit above ground and potato tubers below ground, according to Zhiyang Zhang, a postdoctoral researcher at the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences.
The potato and tomato are members of the nightshade family of flowering plants that also includes tobacco and peppers, among others. The study did not investigate the evolutionary origins of other tuberous root crops that originated in South America such as the sweet potato and yuca, which are members of different families of flowering plants.
While the parts of the tomato and potato plants that people eat are quite different, the plants themselves are very similar.
"We use different parts of these two species, fruits in tomatoes and tubers in potatoes," Knapp said. "If you look at the flowers or leaves, these are very similar. And if you are lucky enough to let your potato plant produce fruits, they look just like little green tomatoes. But don't eat them. They are not very nice."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Potatoes actually evolved from tomatoes, experts say
Potatoes actually evolved from tomatoes, experts say

BBC News

time7 hours ago

  • BBC News

Potatoes actually evolved from tomatoes, experts say

They can be made into crisps, chips, waffles, and all sorts of other tasty foods - but have you ever asked yourself where potatoes come from? Our guess is probably not and we don't blame you, as we've also been far too busy enjoying them to think any deeper about it. However, scientists now think that they could have actually evolved from an early type of tomato that helps explain why tomato sauce goes so well with chips. It was already known that tomatoes and potatoes were related in some way, with their similar genes making the two plants each other's closest living relatives. But scientists didn't fully understand how the tubers - the edible parts of many root plants that grow beneath the soil - had come about. After taking a closer look at the genes of both plants, the scientists analysed the genomes of wild and cultivated potatoes, tomatoes and their ancestors and found that each potato species contains a mix of genetics from now think that wild tomatoes, which grew in the Andean mountains in South America nine million years ago, crossed with a plant called Etuberosum.A process called hybridisation took place where their genetic material became mixed to form an entirely new species of plant, which is what led to potatoes as we now know them. "Tomato is the mother and Etuberosum is the father," said Sanwen Huang, a professor at the Agricultural Genomics Institute in Shenzhen, China, who led the research team. "But this wasn't obvious at first."The research has been published in the scientific journal team is now hoping that by understanding the potato's evolution more, it can help them develop new ways to breed it in the the make-up of its genes can also help them know how to protect it better from diseases.

Not all fierce-looking dinosaurs like T rex packed strong bites, study reveals
Not all fierce-looking dinosaurs like T rex packed strong bites, study reveals

The Independent

time11 hours ago

  • The Independent

Not all fierce-looking dinosaurs like T rex packed strong bites, study reveals

A comprehensive new analysis of the bite forces of 18 species of dinosaurs has revealed that, despite their size, several of the giant prehistoric predators packed much weaker bites than previously thought. Researchers, including from the University of Bristol, found that while dinosaurs like the mighty Tyrannosaurus rex were optimised for quick, strong bites, much like a crocodile, many others that walked on two legs, such as the spinosaurus and allosaurs, had much weaker bite forces and instead specialised in slashing and ripping flesh. The research, published in the journal Current Biology, revealed that meat-eating dinosaurs followed different evolutionary paths in terms of skull design and feeding style despite their similarly gigantic sizes. 'Tyrannosaurs evolved skulls built for strength and crushing bites while other lineages had comparatively weaker but more specialized skulls, suggesting a diversity of feeding strategies even at massive sizes,' Andrew Rowe, one author of the study from the University of Bristol, said. 'In other words, there wasn't one 'best' skull design for being a predatory giant; several designs functioned perfectly well.' In the study, scientists probed how walking on two legs influenced skull mechanics and feeding techniques in dinosaurs. Previous research showed that despite reaching similar sizes, predatory dinosaurs evolved in very different parts of the world at various times and conditions and had different skull shapes. This raised doubts on whether the skulls of these dinosaurs were functionally similar under the surface or if there were notable differences in their predatory lifestyles. 'Carnivorous dinosaurs took very different paths as they evolved into giants in terms of feeding biomechanics and possible behaviors,' Dr Rowe said. To understand the relationship between body size and skull biomechanics, researchers used 3D X-ray scanning technology to analyse the skull mechanics and quantify the feeding performance and the bite strength across 18 species of two-legged carnivorous dinosaurs ranging from small ones to giants. Researchers were surprised to find clear divergence among the species. For instance, skull stress didn't show a pattern of increase with size. Some smaller dinosaurs even experienced greater stress than the larger species due to increased muscle volume and bite force. 'Tyrannosaurids like T rex had skulls that were optimised for high bite forces at the cost of higher skull stress,' Dr Rowe noted. 'But in some other giants like Giganotosaurus, we calculated stress patterns suggesting a relatively lighter bite. It drove home how evolution can produce multiple 'solutions' to life as a large, carnivorous biped.' Overall, being a predatory two-legged dinosaur did not always equate to being a bone-crushing giant like T rex. Unlike T rex, some dinosaurs like spinosaurus and allosaurs became giants while maintaining weaker bites more suited to slashing at prey and stripping flesh. 'Large tyrannosaur skulls were instead optimised like modern crocodiles with high bite forces that crushed prey,' Dr Rowe explained. 'I tend to compare Allosaurus to a modern Komodo dragon in terms of feeding style.' 'This biomechanical diversity suggests that dinosaur ecosystems supported a wider range of giant carnivore ecologies than we often assume,' he added.

Why humans are so good at digesting alcohol
Why humans are so good at digesting alcohol

The Independent

time21 hours ago

  • The Independent

Why humans are so good at digesting alcohol

Research suggests that the dietary habits of ape ancestors, particularly their consumption of fermented fruit, could explain why humans are so adept at digesting alcohol. The term 'scrumping' refers to apes eating fermented or fallen fruit, a practice that may have led to a 40-fold increase in alcohol metabolism in the last common ancestor of humans and African apes around 10 million years ago. Studies analysing the dietary habits of various primates found that African apes regularly engage in 'scrumping,' unlike orangutans, whose primary enzyme for metabolising ethanol is less efficient. This enhanced metabolic ability allows African apes to safely consume up to 10 pounds of fermented fruit daily, indicating that ethanol exposure was a significant factor in their lives and a major force in human evolution. The findings suggest that humans may have retained the social aspects associated with shared feeding on fermented fruits, prompting further research into how this influences social relationships in other apes.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store