logo
James Cameron Gives His Reason For Dedicating His Filmmaking Career to Avatar Franchise: 'People Sometimes Just Want...'

James Cameron Gives His Reason For Dedicating His Filmmaking Career to Avatar Franchise: 'People Sometimes Just Want...'

Pink Villaa day ago
James Cameron has returned to his director's chair for the third Avatar film, Fire and Ash. As the makers and the cast members prepare for the big release, the filmmaker opened up about the reason why he dedicated his filmmaking career to the hit action/sci-fi franchise.
While sitting down for a conversation with Rolling Stone, the director revealed that getting into the industry wasn't only about the money but also about the hope of doing good for the world.
Previously, in an interview with Empire, Cameron opened up about his plans to develop Avatar's fourth and fifth installments, too, once the upcoming film is released.
James Cameron reflects on only directing Avatar movies
While in an interview with the media portal, James Cameron opened up about being dedicated to developing only Avatar films throughout his filmmaking career. The director revealed, 'I've justified making 'Avatar' movies to myself for the last 20 years, not based on how much money we made, but on the basis that hopefully it can do some good.'
He further added, 'It can help connect us. It can help connect us to our lost aspect of ourself that connects with nature and respects nature and all those things.'
Elsewhere in the talks, the director claimed that while the movies are not the answer to human problems, people sometimes just look for entertainment. Cameron explained, 'I think 'Avatar' is a Trojan horse strategy that gets you into a piece of entertainment but then works on your brain and your heart a little bit in a way.'
James Cameron's movies outside Avatar franchise
As for James Cameron directorials outside of the Avatar franchise, he stepped behind the camera for the classic Leonardo DiCaprio film, Titanic. The movie went on to be nominated for the Oscars, and the cast and the crew won 11 Academy Awards.
Additionally, Cameron announced last week that he will be directing the Ghosts of Hiroshima, which will be based on the novel of the same name by Charles Pellegrino. The film will talk about the disastrous nuclear attack and the aftermath.
James Cameron is also developing a movie based on Joe Abercrombie's fantasy novel, The Devils. Further details about the upcoming films will be rolled out soon.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

James Cameron warns AI weapons could trigger ‘Terminator-style apocalypse'
James Cameron warns AI weapons could trigger ‘Terminator-style apocalypse'

Time of India

time12 hours ago

  • Time of India

James Cameron warns AI weapons could trigger ‘Terminator-style apocalypse'

Acclaimed filmmaker James Cameron has raised urgent concerns about the growing role of artificial intelligence in modern weaponry, particularly nuclear systems, warning that its unchecked integration could plunge humanity into a 'Terminator-style apocalypse.' In a recent Rolling Stone interview promoting his upcoming film adaptation of Ghosts of Hiroshima, Cameron highlighted the peril of rapid-response military environments where decision-making speeds may surpass human capacity. He cautioned that even having a 'human in the loop' may not be enough to prevent catastrophic errors, urging world leaders to implement strict safeguards and act swiftly to avoid consequences comparable to a nuclear disaster. Terminator director James Cameron highlights three existential threats Cameron emphasised that humanity now faces three concurrent existential crises: climate change and environmental degradation, nuclear proliferation, and super-intelligent AI. He noted that all three are 'manifesting and peaking at the same time,' creating a level of risk unlike any previous period in history. His warning echoes recent findings, such as a Stanford survey where 36% of AI researchers believed AI could trigger a 'nuclear-level catastrophe,' and conclusions from a University of Chicago summit envisioning the near inevitability of AI pairing with nuclear systems. AI in film, useful but not creative replacement by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like These Are The Most Beautiful Women In The World Undo Despite his concerns about AI's role in weaponry, Cameron supports its limited and intentional use in filmmaking, particularly for tasks like visual effects, where it can halve production costs without reducing artistic staffing. In 2024, he joined Stability AI's board and has voiced optimism that generative tools can accelerate creative workflows. However, he stands firm in his belief that AI cannot replace screenwriters or actors. 'You have to be human to write something that moves an audience,' Cameron said, dismissing AI-generated scripts as emotionally hollow "word salad." A moral through-line from Terminator to Hiroshima Cameron's warnings are grounded in decades-long themes from his body of work, including The Terminator's portrayal of an AI-dominated apocalypse and his longstanding fascination with nuclear threats. His upcoming Ghosts of Hiroshima project continues this through-line. He hopes the film not only chronicles humanity's darkest moments but also inspires empathy and introspection. 'If I do my job perfectly,' he said, 'everybody will walk out of the theatre in horror after the first 20 minutes. But then they'll care.' AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

Eddie Murphy says he is not motivated by awards
Eddie Murphy says he is not motivated by awards

Time of India

time17 hours ago

  • Time of India

Eddie Murphy says he is not motivated by awards

Los Angeles, Aug 9 (IANS) Actor and comedian Eddie Murphy's motivation doesn't come from accolades. However, the actor-comedian doesn't have a problem with an Oscar on his shelf. Actor and comedian Eddie Murphy 's motivation doesn't come from accolades. However, the actor-comedian doesn't have a problem with an Oscar on his shelf. The 64-year-old actor has enjoyed huge success in Hollywood, starring in hit film franchises like 'Beverly Hills Cop' and 'Shrek', but Eddie insists that he's not motivated by awards, reports 'Female First UK'. He told Sky News, "The movies are timeless, and they're special, so for years and years those movies play and the movies have commercial success. So you make a lot of money and people love it, so you don't even think about 'I didn't win a trophy'. The response from the people and that the movie has legs, that's the trophy". He further mentioned, "You know what I've earned over these years? One day, they'll give me one of those honorary Oscars. When I'm really old. And I'll say thank you so much for this wonderful honour. I'll be old like that and I'll have no teeth. I'm cool with getting my honorary Oscar when I'm 90". As per 'Female First UK', Eddie stars alongside Pete Davidson in 'The Pickup', the new action-comedy movie, and the actor recently claimed that he has "a lot in common" with Pete. Eddie also revealed that he relished the experience of working with Pete, a former Saturday Night Live star. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Is this legal? Access all TV channels without a subscription! Techno Mag Learn More Undo Speaking to Extra, Eddie explained, "I was looking forward to working with him. I was a fan already from SNL, and we have a lot in common now. We both started doing stand-up when we were really young, and we both started Saturday Night Live when we were really young, and we both lost our dads when we were really young. So, we had a lot in common, and he's a new-generation SNL. So, it was exciting. I love working with SNL alumni. I feel like a kinship to all of them". Pete is currently expecting his first child with Elsie Hewitt but Eddie hadn't offered him any parenting advice.

AI in filmmaking: Innovation or a threat to creative freedom?
AI in filmmaking: Innovation or a threat to creative freedom?

India Today

timea day ago

  • India Today

AI in filmmaking: Innovation or a threat to creative freedom?

If the digital world wasn't enough, there are digital babies. Al avatars, and deceased celebrities are being resurrected on-screen. In 2025, AI isn't just part of everyday life and movie-making toolbox—it's shaping entire stories, performances, and now, controversially, the last two years alone, AI has left its fingerprints on some of the most celebrated films. 'Emilia Prez', leading the Oscars race with 13 nominations, used AI to enhance Karla Sofa Gascón's singing voice. 'The Brutalist', starring Adrien Brody and Felicity Jones, saw its Hungarian dialogue refined through AI tools. Studios are leaning in as well. Warner Bros. uses AI-driven casting analytics; Lionsgate has tapped Runway AI to speed up storyboarding; and James Cameron is a part of Stability AI's is no denying AI. It is the present, and if used transparently, these tools can be a boon that helps in streamlining pre-production, improving accessibility, and even pushing artistic boundaries. But the recent 'Raanjhanaa' controversy has exposed the flipside to AI, where it is being used to rewrite a vision, rather than enhancing Raanjhanaa Flashpoint Earlier this month, Eros International re-released the Tamil version of 'Raanjhanaa' (Ambikapathy) with an AI-generated alternate ending in which Kundan [Dhanush] survives, leading to a sentimental reunion rather than the film's original tragic Aanand L Rai and lead actor Dhanush, neither consulted nor informed, called it a betrayal. Rai branded the move 'a dangerous precedent' and is looking at pursuing legal action to protect the work's artistic began as a 'tech experiment' became a national flashpoint. Critics argue that the power of 'Raanjhanaa' rests in its heartbreak; change the ending and you change the soul of the film. Rai compared it to 'hijacking' the story's Akhtar backed the director publicly. 'If the creator of the film was unhappy about their work being changed, I will always support the creator,' he said during an event. Ritesh Sidhwani echoed the sentiment, stressing AI should only be used 'smartly' and 'to the film's advantage,' not to override the filmmaker's defended the update, describing the new finale as a 'creative reimagining' and asserting their legal right as the film's copyright isn't the first time Indian filmmakers have expressed unease over AI's creative creep. Karan Johar has previously said that while one cannot ignore the existence of AI, natural intelligence is irreplaceable. He mentioned, 'If you have pure orange juice and you have canned orange juice, there is a difference. And yes, canned orange juice can take you to higher sales, and you can do much more economically. But there is a purity to fresh orange juice.'Anurag Kashyap, never shy about industry shifts, said that while AI could help with improving the quality of remakes in cinema, it 'might not encourage more original filmmaking.'When AI Works: The Case of MaaYet, it's not all bad news. Ajay Devgn's 'Maa', produced by Prismix Studios, released a statement today explaining the use of AI in its latest production. A pivotal three-minute sequence in the film features 90 seconds of AI-generated visuals, created via an in-house generative Studios calls it 'a fusion of art and innovation', a glimpse into how AI can inspire risk-taking while respecting cinematic vision. 'We're setting the foundation for how AI can responsibly and meaningfully contribute to the art of cinema,' their statement with the help of AI, fans of deceased pop stars/celebrities, can continue experiencing their legacy. Case in point, late Punjabi rapper Sidhu Moose Wala will soon be 'performing' in an AI-driven hologram concert, allowing fans to witness an immersive, larger-than-life stage This Matters for AudiencesMovies live in our collective memory because of how they make us feel. Imagine 'Kal Ho Naa Ho' without Aman's death, or 'Titanic' with Jack clambering onto the raft. Tempting? Maybe. But would they still be the same films? Absolutely 'Raanjhanaa' incident raises urgent questions: If studios can unilaterally alter endings, what stops them from modifying performances, rewriting dialogue, or sanitising plots to suit trends? What happens when your favourite film is 'updated' every few years to fit new market tastes?advertisementFor filmmakers, this is about creative ownership. For audiences, it's about trust. If you can't be sure you're watching the director's vision, are you watching the movie at all, or an algorithmic remix?AI is neither hero nor villain—it's a tool. De-aging technology gave us 'The Irishman's decades-spanning drama. AI-assisted VFX are making mid-budget films look like blockbusters. Accessibility tools are making films more inclusive for audiences with real issue is governance. At present, the rules are struggling to keep pace with technology. The Academy is reportedly considering requiring filmmakers to disclose AI use in submissions, a step many see as the bare entertainment industry globally is calling for stronger safeguards. Be it mandatory creator consent for alterations post-release or a declaration when AI-generated elements form part of the final film. Also, archival protection for original versions of films, among these guardrails, AI risks being a matrix of metrics be real. AI is here to stay. It has the potential to become the most transformative filmmaking tool, when done right. But cinema is more than just content, it's art, shaped by the intent and imagination of the people behind it. The moment that intent becomes optional, we risk losing what makes the medium worth protecting.- Ends

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store