
Flag lady raising the standards in her village
For the last 30 years, wherever she has lived, Sue Wiles has had a flag pole in her garden.She is known as the "flag lady of Stapleford" - the village in Cambridgeshire she now calls home."I don't feel I'm making a statement flying a flag but I like to be patriotic," she said."I like to keep people amused and I know people notice my flags when they drive along the road."The 82-year-old always has one of her 20 flags flying when she is at home.
Her flags include well-known national ones like the union flag, the St George's flag and the stars and stripes of America, along with quirkier options. "I've been flying the Ukrainian flag a lot so much I am now on my fourth one," she said.But she also has ones for Christmas and other special occasions."I made three during lockdown. I made a 'Thank you NHS' flag and when the Queen gave a pep talk I made one that said: 'Never give up, never despair.'"She also made one following the Queen's address on the eve of lockdown which read "We will meet again"."I had a lot of reaction. I would look out the window and nearly every time somebody was on the pavement taking a picture," she said."People put notes through the door saying: 'Thank you so much for flying the flag and keeping us jollied along.'"You have to keep on the ball though because there are royal birthdays when it is appropriate to fly the union flag."
Has flag flying become too political?
The flying of flags has become a talking point with several local authorities restricting the number being flown outside council buildings.This week the Conservative MP for Romford, Andrew Rosindell, held a special debate in parliament encouraging more authorities to follow suit."The flying of identity-based political banners especially those representing what is sometimes only a slim, exclusive and often exclusionary subset of a particular interest group of social movement is often seen as implicitly endorsing a specific view point" he said"If a town hall chooses to fly a banner for one group of people it would surely be obliged to fly one for another group and another group and so on. In doing so it will inevitably appear to be endorsing every cause identity and political campaign"And this week councillors at West Northamptonshire Council, which is run by Reform UK, approved new protocol which will see only the union, St George's and Northamptonshire flags regularly flown, alongside the occasional military flag.Some people have expressed their disappointment that Pride and Windrush flags will no longer be flown.The council said it would "continue to give its backing to a busy and varied local community events calendar".
Conservative-run Suffolk County Council has also limited the number of flags it flies. A Suffolk County Council spokesman said: "In the past we've flown a variety of flags on a fairly ad hoc basis. "We didn't have an agreed schedule or anything like that. We've wanted more rigour for some time.Meanwhile, for Mrs Wiles, there can never be too many flags. "I don't think councils should restrict the flags they are flying."Obviously we don't want to have hundreds of flags but to restrict them to two or three would be very sad," she said. "To use flags to make a political point I think would be a great mistake in my opinion."I think people like to see public building flying flags. Maybe that would encourage more people to have their own flag pole."
BBC Politics East will be broadcast on Sunday, 29 June at 10:00 BST on BBC One in the East of England, and will be available after broadcast on BBC iPlayer.Follow Cambridgeshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
39 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Albanian burglar with almost 50 convictions wins the right to stay in the UK as 'his crimes weren't extreme enough to "revolt" the public'
An Albanian burglar with nearly 50 convictions has won the right to stay in the UK as 'his crimes were not extreme enough to "revolt" the public'. Zenel Beshi has been dubbed a 'genuine, present and sufficiently serious threat' to the UK by the Home Office, which said he should be deported. But upper immigration tribunal judge Leonie Hirst found his crimes were not of the 'very extreme' type that would cause 'deep public revulsion' - and let him stay. Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said the ruling was 'out of touch' as Beshi is 'clearly a danger to the British public', The Telegraph reports. 'It's time these judges started to prioritise protecting law-abiding British citizens instead of foreign criminals', he said. Mr Philp added foreign criminals, no matter where their crime was committed, should all be sent back to their country of origin, 'no ifs, no buts'. It comes as Home Secretary Yvette Cooper proposes to change the law to make it harder to allow foreign citizens to stay in the UK on a human rights claim. Her suggested scheme would oblige judges to consider public safety more in such decisions. Beshi came to the UK in August 2020 - three years after he received a six-year prison sentence in Turin, Italy. As well as robbery and false imprisonment, he had been jailed for 44 counts of burglary and theft. But he failed to disclose his previous convictions upon his arrival in Britain. The Albanian applied for a European Economic Area (EEA) residence card, on the grounds he was a spouse of an EEA national. He was granted this, after his application was initially refused and he appealed. While he waited to hear back on this appeal, he applied for leave to remain under the EU Settlement Scheme. The Home Office, though, decided to deport him as a threat to the British public. Beshi appealed, which was upheld by a first tier tribunal, after a psychologist said he did not in fact constitute a 'serious threat' to society. They also said he posed a 'low risk' of reoffending. Ms Cooper appealed this decision - but an upper tribunal has now found Beshi not disclosing his previous convictions is of 'little relevance'. Judge Hirst said the deportation threshold and notions of rehabilitation had been applied correctly. She also lauded the legal arguments behind the decision to allow Beshi to stay as 'detailed, clear and well-structured'. The judge found there was no legal mistake to require overturning the decision - and allowed the criminal to remain. Almost half of Brits have no confidence that the police will show up if their home was burgled, a poll revealed earlier this year. Some 46 per cent of adults said they did not believe a home burglary would be properly investigated, with 49 per cent saying the same for car thefts. When looking at pensioners, with 54 per cent of those aged 65 or older expressing a lack of confidence in officers attending their property. And fears are not unjustified, as police failed to solve 94 per cent of burglary cases in 2023/24, according to Home Office figures. Just 16,912 (six per cent) of 266,215 recorded burglaries resulted in a charge. In nearly three-quarters of cases police officers were unable to even identify a suspect, and a further 15 per cent ran into evidential difficulties after a suspect was identified. Reported burglaries have fallen in the past decade, from around 444,000 in 2013/14 to the more than 266,000 in 2023/24. Meanwhile, 13 per cent of people move house because they cannot bear to stay in their home after it has been burgled. A similar proportion have said they are unable to stand being home alone after their house has been invaded. A Home Office spokesperson has previously said: 'We do not agree with this judgment and are considering options for appeal. 'Foreign nationals who commit crime should be in no doubt that we will do everything to make sure they are not free on Britain's streets, including removal from the UK at the earliest opportunity.'


North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Lecturers to be consulted on industrial action following ‘derisory' pay offer
Members of the Educational Institute of Scotland University Lecturers' Association (EIS ULA) are taking part in a consultative ballot on whether to accept the proposed offer, and whether they back industrial action. The ballot will be open for six weeks and will close on August 11. The EIS ULA, which is open to all university lecturers in Scotland, has called on its members to reject what it called a 'real-terms pay cut' and back industrial action. It said the offer 'fails to recognise' the contribution made by university lecturers, or make up for years of below-inflation pay rises. It also called on employers to return to the negotiating table with a 'significantly improved' offer, warning of 'widespread disruption' if industrial action were to take place. Garry Ross, EIS ULA national officer, said: 'This 1.4% offer is not just disappointing, it is derisory and does not reflect the dedication and expertise of our university lecturers and academic-related members. 'Our members are working harder than ever, delivering world-class education and research, yet their financial security continues to be undermined by employers who appear unwilling to offer a fair deal. 'This offer fails to recognise the essential contributions of our members and does nothing to address the severe impact of rising living costs or the sub-inflationary rises they have experienced over a number of years.' The union said the offer stood in 'stark contrast' to the 4.14% increase given to further education lecturers, and to pay awards made to NHS workers and other public sector employees across Scotland. It said this disparity highlighted a 'clear injustice' within higher education, and demonstrated the need for a more equitable approach to staff pay, A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'Staffing and operational matters are the responsibility of individual universities. 'The Scottish Government is not directly involved in higher education pay negotiations, but we are absolutely clear that Fair Work must be the guiding principle for all employment-related decisions, and we continue to urge university management and the respective trade unions to reach decisions that ensure employees are treated fairly.'


South Wales Guardian
an hour ago
- South Wales Guardian
Lecturers to be consulted on industrial action following ‘derisory' pay offer
Members of the Educational Institute of Scotland University Lecturers' Association (EIS ULA) are taking part in a consultative ballot on whether to accept the proposed offer, and whether they back industrial action. The ballot will be open for six weeks and will close on August 11. The EIS ULA, which is open to all university lecturers in Scotland, has called on its members to reject what it called a 'real-terms pay cut' and back industrial action. It said the offer 'fails to recognise' the contribution made by university lecturers, or make up for years of below-inflation pay rises. It also called on employers to return to the negotiating table with a 'significantly improved' offer, warning of 'widespread disruption' if industrial action were to take place. Garry Ross, EIS ULA national officer, said: 'This 1.4% offer is not just disappointing, it is derisory and does not reflect the dedication and expertise of our university lecturers and academic-related members. 'Our members are working harder than ever, delivering world-class education and research, yet their financial security continues to be undermined by employers who appear unwilling to offer a fair deal. 'This offer fails to recognise the essential contributions of our members and does nothing to address the severe impact of rising living costs or the sub-inflationary rises they have experienced over a number of years.' The union said the offer stood in 'stark contrast' to the 4.14% increase given to further education lecturers, and to pay awards made to NHS workers and other public sector employees across Scotland. It said this disparity highlighted a 'clear injustice' within higher education, and demonstrated the need for a more equitable approach to staff pay, A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'Staffing and operational matters are the responsibility of individual universities. 'The Scottish Government is not directly involved in higher education pay negotiations, but we are absolutely clear that Fair Work must be the guiding principle for all employment-related decisions, and we continue to urge university management and the respective trade unions to reach decisions that ensure employees are treated fairly.'