Council plans to crack down on anti-social behaviour in car parks
A council has launched a consultation into tackling anti-social behaviour in six city centre car parks.Plymouth City Council wants to introduce a Public Space Protection Order (PSPO) to stop incidents related to alcohol and drug use, public intimidation and using stairwells as toilets.The PSPO would give "police and designated officers" the power to move people on if they were causing a nuisance.The council said the consultation will gather the thoughts of local residents and businesses before a PSPO could be introduced.
The order would cover the Napier Street, Regent Street, Mayflower East, Theatre Royal, Western Approach and Colin Campbell Court car parks.The council said its aim was to crack down on anti-social and intimidating behaviour.This includes people gathering or loitering with others, large car meets congregating and motorbikes racing and causing a noise disturbance.Councillor Sally Haydon, cabinet member for community safety, said: "People should feel safe in our car parks. Full stop. They should be able to come and go from their cars without worry or witnessing unpleasant behaviour."This order is another tool we and the police can use to make people feel safer – but we want to know what residents and businesses think about this."
'Unreasonable and persistent'
The consultation has the backing of the Plymouth City Centre Company, which represents the interests of more than 500 businesses.Its chief executive Steve Hughes said the PSPO would allow the police to take the necessary action to make the car parks "safer and more welcoming". The council said it needs evidence anti-social behaviour is having a "detrimental effect on the quality of life" of those living or working nearby and that the behaviour is "unreasonable and persistent"."We are working with the police and agencies across the city to understand the effects of the proposed rules on all those that are impacted and the next steps after the consultation period ends," it said.People have until Wednesday 7 May to take part in the consultation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
4 days ago
- Metro
Gran fined £100 for setting up a table in the street because it broke Asbo law
A grandmother could be left with court costs of up to £1,000 for setting up a camping table in a city centre. Heather Rawling was campaigning against council cuts in Leicester and had set up a 6ft (2m) camping table to hold leaflets and petitions. The 72-year-old was approached by a warden within around 30 minutes who ordered her to dismantle it – but when she said no, she was handed a fine. Heather was told the table was in breach of a public spaces protection order (PSPO), which are designed to reduce anti-social behaviour like street drinking, riding e-bikes, and using loud speakers. But the gran-of-one, a member of the Socialist Party, fears the additional rules against tables and other 'unauthorised structures' are designed to suppress freedom of speech and political campaigning. She explained: 'We were in the city centre and had a little campaign stall where we were protesting against the cuts by Leicester city council. 'I accept the PSPO can be needed to deal with people on e-bikes, noisy speakers or street drinkers. 'But this was a small camping table which we had for leaflets and so people could sign a petition. 'I firmly stood my ground as I feel this is an attack on people's rights to campaign. 'There are people up and down the county who do campaign stalls and tables everywhere. 'All I had was a camping table two metres long in a wide pedestrian area. I don't think we were in anybody's way. There was plenty of space. 'I was not obstructing anybody, I wasn't causing a nuisance. The council might think I'm a nuisance, but in terms of passers by and pedestrians, they didn't care at all. 'The warden asked me if I was aware of the PSPO and explained what it was and asked me if I was prepared to take the stall table down. 'He asked for my details and I was reluctant to at first. He even said he would call the police so I gave him my information. 'He issued me with a fixed penalty notice. 'I think this was political – we were asked to take it down because we were campaigning about council cuts.' Three days after the incident on May 31 Heather, a gran-of-one, received a fine of £100 in the post. She has vowed to plead not guilty and fight the fine in court – but she reckons she could be £1,000 out of pocket if she loses. She explained: 'The danger is if I lost in court, they could charge court costs. I am taking a risk, but I feel strongly about this issue. 'I'm not going to pay it on principle, and if I have to go to court, I will. 'All groups should have a right to campaign. 'The council issued the PSPO order that includes amplification, people on e-bikes and e-scooters. At the end of the order they've tagged on unauthorised structures like stall tables. 'We are in an era full of austerity and cutbacks and despite more and people getting angry about what's happening they don't want us to protest about it.' A Leicester city council spokesperson said: 'This group had put up a table, in breach of the Public Spaces Protection Order (PSPO) that covers the city centre. More Trending 'One of our wardens asked them to take down the table and advised that if they didn't, they would be issued with a fixed penalty notice. 'They refused to take it down and so a fine was issued. 'The PSPO does not restrict freedom of speech, but it does restrict the nuisance of amplifiers, gazebos and other structures that more than 1,100 respondents to our consultation told us negatively impacted their experience of Leicester city centre. 'Many groups have been respectful of this so far and, as a result, the environment in the city centre is noticeably improved.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Trump likens LA protests to foreign 'invasion' amid attempt to block him from using troops MORE: Rioters throw petrol bombs and fireworks at police during second day of Ballymena riots MORE: Man found dead in a car outside Asda in Leicester
The Independent
5 days ago
- The Independent
Homeless people could be arrested after refusing three offers of shelter in Silicon Valley city
Homeless people who reject three offers of shelter could be arrested under a controversial proposal before the city council of the most populous city in California 's Silicon Valley on Tuesday. The proposal being pushed by San Jose Mayor Matt Mahon is eye-opening because it comes from a liberal city headed by a Democrat in the left-leaning San Francisco Bay Area. It is among the stricter anti-encampment deterrents proposed by elected officials since the Supreme Court in 2023 made it easier to ban homeless people from camping on public property. And it's another sign of just how frustrated people have become with squalid tents lining sidewalks and riverbanks, and erratic behavior of those using drugs or in distress in a state with an estimated 187,000 homeless people. California is home to roughly a quarter of all homeless people in the country. Mahan says most people do accept offers of shelter. But he wants to make clear to the small percentage of people who refuse, that as the city builds more shelter and interim housing, they have a responsibility to move indoors. 'I think we need a cultural change, a culture of accountability for everyone involved,' said Mahan. 'I don't want to use the criminal justice system to make vulnerable people's lives harder. I want to use it as a last resort.' California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat and former mayor of San Francisco, has repeatedly urged cities to ban encampments. Arrests for illegal lodging have soared in San Francisco, and its current mayor, Daniel Lurie, has reiterated that it is not appropriate for people to live outdoors. Advocates for homeless people say cracking down on encampments is traumatizing and even counterproductive. Forcing a person to clear out sets them back in their search for stability as they could lose important documents needed to apply for work and housing, they said. 'Pushing people with mental health needs or drug addiction into incarceration — without any crime committed — is both inhumane and ineffective,' said Otto Lee, president of the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors, in a written statement emailed Monday to The Associated Press. Lee and other county leaders are opposed to the mayor's proposal. They say they need more housing, beds and services, and not punishment. The 'responsibility to shelter' proposal does not mandate an arrest after three rejected offers. After talking with the city attorney's office and police, Mahan said it made more sense to give front-line outreach workers and police officers discretion to decide when to escalate or prioritize a situation. The city will set up a new six-officer quality of life unit within the police department. 'We don't want to overly tie their hands and tell them this is the only way to do it,' the mayor said. People who repeatedly violate the city's encampment code of conduct — which also includes keeping tents free of trash and not blocking the public right of way — could be sent to a recovery center for detox or petitioned for court-mandated treatment to mental health and substance use disorder care, Mahan said. San Jose has nearly 1,400 shelter spots and hopes to add another 800 by the end of the year. Officials are aware they do not have enough beds, and Mahan said that people will not be punished if beds are unavailable or the only options are unsuitable.
BBC News
5 days ago
- BBC News
Packmoor residents oppose plans to build 1,200 homes in village
Hundreds of residents have signed a petition urging the council to reconsider "catastrophic" plans to build up to 1,200 homes in a City Council wants to build the residential development on 80-hectares of council-owned farmland in some residents said the proposals would result in the loss of valuable green space and would put pressure on local council said its Packmoor masterplan would allow a "clearer view" of proposed improvements to highways and local amenities. A petition opposing the plans gained more than 300 signatures in five petitioner, Darren Bamford, said the council was "not listening" to the feedback of residents following the recent consultation."The sheer size of these proposed plans would be absolutely catastrophic for Packmoor," he said."We urge the city council and cabinet to reconsider the proposed masterplan, the impact it could potentially have on Packmoor, its residents, our unique identity as a village and loss of our greenspace."A technical assessment of land to the south-east of Packmoor suggested that it could deliver between 800 and 1,200 homes but most of the land would remain open space.A spokesperson for the local authority said it had "engaged extensively" with hundreds of residents in Packmoor and other areas in the last two years."The council's cabinet has now determined that it is appropriate to develop a masterplan as the next stage in engaging residents," they explained."It is recognised that some residents are opposed to this decision but it will enable a clearer view of the residential, extra care facilities and highways improvements that could be delivered alongside new homes and affordable homes." This news was gathered by the Local Democracy Reporting Service, which covers councils and other public service organisations. Follow BBC Stoke & Staffordshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
