Suicide pod activist takes his own life aged 47 after ‘trauma' of arrest
Florian Willet suffered a mental health crisis after he was arrested by Swiss police in September last year, said Philip Nitschke, the inventor of the Sarco suicide capsule.
Mr Willet was the director of Swiss suicide organisation Last Resort, which was set up to facilitate the use of the Sarco.
The 47-year-old German was investigated for aiding and abetting suicide. Prosecutors also investigated whether he had strangled the woman, but that was ruled out before he was released in December after 70 days of pre-trial detention.
'Gone was his warm smile and self-confidence. In its place was a man who seemed deeply traumatised by the experience of incarceration and the wrongful accusation of strangulation,' said Mr Nitschke, director of pro euthanasia group Exit International.
The Australian former physician, who is called 'Doctor Death' by his critics, said Mr Willet sought help and was admitted to a psychiatric hospital twice before his death on May 5.
Mr Nitschke told the Dutch newspaper Volkskrant that Mr Willet had died in Germany with the help of an unnamed specialised organisation. It is not known how he died.
'To describe Florian is to talk of a man who was thoughtful, caring, funny, and friendly. He was an easy person to be around,' said Mr Nitschke, who lives in the Netherlands.
'But most of all, Florian was kind. Florian was also passionate about a person's right to choose when to die.'
Suicide is legal under certain conditions in Switzerland, but the pod had never been used before and there were warnings it would be illegal.
Mr Willet was the only person present when a 64-year-old American woman, who has not been named, pressed a button to fill the Sarco pod with nitrogen gas. The woman had suffered from an immune disease.
He informed the authorities after her death in a forest in the canton of Schaffhausen but was arrested, along with several others, including a newspaper photographer.
They were later released but Mr Willet, a former media spokesman for euthanasia clinic Dignitas, continued to be detained.
He had described the first death in the controversial Sarco pod as 'peaceful, fast and dignified'.
The 3D-printable capsule cost about £550,000 to research and develop in the Netherlands over 12 years. Last Resort has said that future reusable pods could cost about £12,600.
'By the age of five I took my own dying by suicide into consideration,' Mr Willet said in an interview before his arrest.
He revealed his father had died by suicide when he was 14 and claimed he was 'completely fine with it.'
He added: 'I was extremely sad because I loved my father. But, I understood immediately my father wanted to do this because he was a rational person, which means that expecting him to remain alive just because I need a father would mean extending his suffering.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
5 minutes ago
- BBC News
Sally Rooney says she will support Palestine Action despite ban
Author Sally Rooney says she will continue to support Palestine Action, despite the group being proscribed as a terrorist organisation in the award-winning Irish novelist said she intends to use the earnings of her work and her public platform to "go on supporting Palestine Action and direct action against genocide".Writing in the Irish Times, she said "if this makes me a supporter of terror under UK law, so be it".Her remarks come as Home Secretary Yvette Cooper again defended the proscription of Palestine Action, saying it is more than "a regular protest group known for occasional stunts". Palestine Action is a British pro-Palestinian direct action group that was proscribed as a terrorist organisation by the government in activities have predominantly targeted arms companies since the start of the current war in Gaza. After mass arrests, what happens next with Palestine Action ban?Palestine Action can challenge UK ban, court rulesBring sick and injured children to UK from Gaza immediately, MPs say Rooney, who wrote bestsellers including Normal People and Intermezzo, has previously been a vocal backer of the protest group, writing in the Guardian in June that proscribing them would be an "alarming attack on free speech".She was speaking after some of its members broke into RAF Brize Norton and sprayed two planes with red paint, causing damages worth £ in 2021, she refused to allow Beautiful World, Where Are You to be translated into Hebrew in a move to boycott Israel over its policies towards her latest Irish Times opinion piece, she said she will continue to use the proceeds of her work - including residuals from a BBC co-production of Normal People and Conversations with Friends - to keep supporting the than 700 people have been arrested since the group was banned by the government on 5 July - including more than 500 at a demonstration in central London last writing in the Observer on Sunday, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said while many were aware of the Brize Norton incident, fewer would be aware of other incidents for which the group had claimed example, in August 2024 alleged Palestine Action supporters broke into Elbit Systems UK in Bristol, an Israeli defence firm that has long been a key allegations are due to come to trial in November. Eighteen people deny charges including criminal damage, assault causing actual bodily harm, violent disorder and aggravated has also referenced a so-called "Underground Manual" from the group, which she said "provides practical guidance on how to identify targets to attack and how to evade law enforcement"."These are not the actions of a legitimate protest group," Cooper also said she had received "disturbing information" which "covered ideas and planning for future attacks".Rooney - who lives in the west of Ireland - wrote: "The present UK government has willingly stripped its own citizens of basic rights and freedoms, including the right to express and read dissenting opinions, in order to protect its relationship with Israel."She said "the ramifications for cultural and intellectual life in the UK... are and will be profound".The BBC and Rooney's management have been contacted for comment. Israel has long rejected accusations of genocide, but leading Israeli and global human rights organisations have argued that the country's conduct in the war in Gaza constitutes genocide against the Palestinian war was triggered by Hamas's 7 October 2023 attack on Israel, which killed about 1,200 people and saw 251 others taken offensive has since killed more than 61,000 Palestinians, according to figures from the Hamas-run Gaza health ministry, which the UN considers reliable.
Telegraph
5 minutes ago
- Telegraph
My criticism of university sparked a backlash. I stand by it – young people deserve better
My article last week arguing that too many youngsters go to university stirred up a hornets' nest. I had a large amount of correspondence, most of which was supportive, although some was critical. This raised many fundamental issues, for which I am grateful. One line of criticism was that many prospective employers advertise jobs as graduate-only. Accordingly, even if many students would rather not do another three years of full-time study, they may feel that they are compelled to do it. This point is well taken. What is going on here is a system of mutual re-enforcement. More graduates are produced so employers can supposedly raise the status of their jobs by advertising them as 'graduate only'. This then leads to an increased appetite for degrees. And so on. One of the effects is to propel many students into undertaking post-graduate courses in order to mark them out from the hordes of mere graduates. This is a sort of arms race. Admittedly, degrees aren't all about money. The attitudes of students and parents are critical. It took decades for an attitude to develop on the part of both teenagers and parents that it was natural for everyone to go to university. Given this, some of my respondents were sceptical that anything could be done to change the system. The answer, as so often, lies with the funding. At the moment, most government funding for university courses comes in the form of support for the student loan agency, which provides funds to pay for tuition and, in some cases, living expenses. These loans are guaranteed by the state. If and when they are not repaid, the state bears the loss. Accordingly, herein lies a route through which the state can influence matters. There are three aspects of the over-expansion of higher education: individuals ill-suited to higher education; next-to-useless courses; and poorly performing universities. A blanket reduction in the amount of loan funding would be a crude and inefficient way of proceeding. It would be better for the Department for Education to vet university courses according to content, excellence of teaching and the subsequent success of students who take them. The majority of university courses would pass this test. But those that failed it would cease to be eligible for student loans. That would surely cause the number of students applying for these courses to plummet. Moreover, some of these courses would cease to be offered and some universities might cease to exist. That would be no bad thing. Another of the strands of criticism that I encountered was about equity. Isn't it important, some respondents said, that everybody should have access to higher education? I do think it is important that students who are capable of benefiting from a university education should have that opportunity, whatever background they come from. But being at an institution for which you are not properly suited, wasting three years to acquire a useless qualification and then emerging with a heavy burden of debt (which averages more than £53,000) is not an opportunity. It's a curse. We do young people no favours by encouraging them into such a position.
BreakingNews.ie
5 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
US envoy says Putin agreed to protections for Ukraine as part of Trump summit
Special US envoy Steve Witkoff said that Russian leader Vladimir Putin agreed at his summit with President Donald Trump to allow the US and European allies to offer Ukraine a security guarantee resembling Nato's collective defence mandate as part of an eventual deal to end the war. 'We were able to win the following concession: That the United States could offer Article 5-like protection, which is one of the real reasons why Ukraine wants to be in Nato,' he said on CNN's State Of The Union. Advertisement Mr Witkoff said it was the first time he had heard Mr Putin agree to that. European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen, speaking at a news conference in Brussels with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky, said that 'we welcome President Trump's willingness to contribute to Article 5-like security guarantees for Ukraine, and the 'Coalition of the willing' – including the European Union – is ready to do its share'. White House envoy Steve Witkoff (Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP) Mr Witkoff, offering some of the first details of what was discussed at Friday's summit in Alaska, said the two sides agreed to 'robust security guarantees that I would describe as game-changing'. He added that Russia said that it would make a legislative commitment not to go after any additional territory in Ukraine. Advertisement Mr Zelensky thanked the United States for recent signals that Washington is willing to support security guarantees for Ukraine, but said the details remained unclear. 'It is important that America agrees to work with Europe to provide security guarantees for Ukraine,' he said. 'But there are no details how it will work, and what America's role will be, Europe's role will be and what the EU can do, and this is our main task, we need security to work in practice like Article 5 of Nato, and we consider EU accession to be part of the security guarantees.' Mr Witkoff defended Mr Trump's decision to abandon his push for Russian to agree to an immediate ceasefire, saying the president had pivoted toward a peace deal because so much progress was made. Advertisement 'We covered almost all the other issues necessary for a peace deal,' Mr Witkoff said, without elaborating. 'We began to see some moderation in the way they're thinking about getting to a final peace deal,' he said.
