logo
California Mansion Tax: Overview, Exemptions, How to Avoid

California Mansion Tax: Overview, Exemptions, How to Avoid

Yahoo01-03-2025

SmartAsset and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue through links in the content below.
California is known for its high property values. And in some parts of the state, like Los Angeles, high-value property owners now face additional financial considerations with a mansion tax. Officially known as the Measure ULA, or the United to House L.A. proposition, it primarily impacts high-end property sales by adding a levy on transactions exceeding $5 million. If you're a homeowner, investor, or seller in the California real estate market then it's important to understand how this tax works.
A financial advisor can provide personalized guidance, helping you optimize your real estate strategy while staying compliant with state regulations.
While California does not have a statewide mansion tax, Los Angeles has one for the city. A mansion tax is a real estate transfer tax imposed on high-value property sales. Unlike standard property taxes, which are paid annually, this tax is levied at the time of sale.
The tax primarily targets high-value residential and commercial property owners who sell properties above $5.15 million as of June 2024. It affects those selling single-family homes, condominiums, apartment complexes and some commercial properties.
While California has several local transfer taxes, the Measure ULA tax specifically applies to properties sold in Los Angeles. However, several high-income neighborhoods outside Los Angeles, such as Beverly Hills, Malibu and Calabasas, are exempt from the tax.
In addition to Los Angeles, the other jurisdictions in California that have enacted "mansion taxes" include Berkeley, Culver City, Emeryville, Oakland, Richmond, San Francisco, San Jose, San Mateo and Santa Monica.
The tax rate depends on the sale price of the property. For Los Angeles:
Properties sold for $5.15 million to $10.3 million are taxed at 4%.
Properties sold for over $10.3 million are taxed at 5.5%.
These rates are significantly higher than traditional real estate transfer taxes, making it essential for sellers to plan accordingly.
The mansion tax became effective in Los Angeles on April 1, 2023, after being approved by voters under Measure ULA. It raised $192 million in its first 10 months, and is the largest single source of revenue for affordable housing and homelessness prevention programs.
The tax is typically paid at closing by the seller. This means if a property sells for $6 million, the seller is responsible for paying 4% of the sale price ($240,000) in mansion tax fees.
The mansion tax can increase the cost of high-value property transactions, which could discourage some buyers and slow sales in higher price ranges. In markets like Los Angeles, where home prices can exceed the tax threshold, it could influence pricing strategies and buyer demand. Here are four general ways in which the mansion tax could affect the real estate market:
Slowdown in luxury home sales: Many luxury homeowners have reconsidered selling their properties due to the additional tax burden. This has led to a slowdown in high-value property transactions, with some sellers delaying sales or withdrawing listings altogether.
Increase in off-market deals. To avoid triggering the mansion tax, some property owners have turned to off-market transactions or private sales, structuring deals in ways that minimize tax implications.
Impact on commercial real estate. The tax does not just affect luxury homeowners - commercial property sellers also face increased costs, which can lead to higher rents or shifts in investment strategies.
Incentivizing smaller transactions. Some sellers have adjusted their pricing strategies to keep sales under the tax threshold, leading to a shift in market dynamics and price negotiations.
Here are three exemptions to consider:
Government-owned properties: Properties sold by government agencies, such as city, county or federal entities, are typically exempt from the mansion tax.
Nonprofit organizations: Some sales involving nonprofit organizations may be exempt, particularly if the sale is used to advance charitable or public purposes. This includes certain low-income housing developments or properties transferred between nonprofit entities.
Affordable housing developments: Properties being sold for the purpose of constructing affordable housing may be exempt, depending on the specifics of the transaction and buyer intent.
Here are three possible ways to avoid the mansion tax:
Sell below the tax threshold: Since the tax applies only to properties sold for $5.15 million or more, some sellers negotiate deals that stay just below this threshold.
Split the transaction: Some sellers explore creative structuring, such as separating land and building sales or dividing ownership shares. However, you must comply with legal requirements and should consult with a tax expert in California to verify whether you could do it.
Gift or transfer ownership: Transferring a property to an heir or family member before selling can, in some cases, circumvent taxes, particularly if done through estate planning or trusts. You may want to consult with a tax expert in California to see if this applies to the mansion tax as well.
While the mansion tax is not a statewide tax, it can significantly impact high-value real estate transactions in cities like Los Angeles. The tax aims to fund affordable housing initiatives, but it can also make the housing market more expensive for sellers and investors. For property owners facing this tax, a tax expert can recommend specific tax-efficient strategies.
If you are looking for ways to lower your tax liability, a financial advisor who specializes in tax planning can help optimize your finances. Finding a financial advisor doesn't have to be hard. SmartAsset's free tool matches you with vetted financial advisors who serve your area, and you can have a free introductory call with your advisor matches to decide which one you feel is right for you. If you're ready to find an advisor who can help you achieve your financial goals, get started now.
If you want to know how much your next tax refund or balance could be, SmartAsset's tax return calculator can help you get an estimate.
Photo credit: ©iStock.com/Miljan Živković, ©iStock.com/simonkr, ©iStock.com/Jirapong Manustrong
The post California Mansion Tax: Overview, Exemptions, How to Avoid appeared first on SmartReads by SmartAsset.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Peter Schiff Says He'd Admit He Was Wrong On Bitcoin If He Wakes Up In A World Where...
Peter Schiff Says He'd Admit He Was Wrong On Bitcoin If He Wakes Up In A World Where...

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Peter Schiff Says He'd Admit He Was Wrong On Bitcoin If He Wakes Up In A World Where...

Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. Economist Peter Schiff said in a recent interview that he would admit being wrong about Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) if the world wakes up to a 'hyper Bitcoinization' scenario. What Happened: During an interview that aired Monday, Schiff was asked about what it would take for him to drop his long-standing skepticism and start buying into the apex cryptocurrency. 'I haven't bought it yet, and it's gone from practically nothing to $100,000. So if that hasn't convinced me, what's going to convince me?' the Bitcoin skeptic replied. Trending: New to crypto? on Coinbase. For the sake of argument, Schiff then envisioned a Bitcoin utopia. 'I suppose what everybody is saying is one day we're going to wake up in hyper Bitcoinization and Bitcoin is going to be money. There won't be any more dollars or any more euros or any more yen.' He added that if he woke up in such a world where everything, from insurance to bonds, is priced in Bitcoin, he would have to admit that he was wrong about Bitcoin. 'i guess if I wake up in that world, I'd have to admit that I was wrong.' 'I just don't believe that that's ever going to happen because we're no closer to that now than we were 10 years ago,' Schiff was quick to add. He said Bitcoin is being used more for 'gambling' than as a medium of exchange. Why It Matters: Schiff's views on Bitcoin have been a topic of debate in the cryptocurrency community. He has consistently claimed that the leading cryptocurrency lacks intrinsic value and is destined to fail. Earlier this year, he referred to Bitcoin as a "digital risk" and predicted that the financial turmoil of 2025 could mark its end. Interestingly, Schiff said in a recent podcast that his teachings on economics inadvertently led many to invest in Bitcoin, despite his advice against it. He added that many Bitcoin 2025 conference attendees cited him as the reason they purchased the apex cryptocurrency. Read Next: A must-have for all crypto enthusiasts: Sign up for the Gemini Credit Card today and earn rewards on Bitcoin Ether, or 60+ other tokens, with every purchase. Image Via Shutterstock/Frame Stock Footage This article Peter Schiff Says He'd Admit He Was Wrong On Bitcoin If He Wakes Up In A World Where... originally appeared on

The Next Palantir? Does This Under $5 AI Stock Have The Potential To Rise And Shine
The Next Palantir? Does This Under $5 AI Stock Have The Potential To Rise And Shine

Yahoo

time11 hours ago

  • Yahoo

The Next Palantir? Does This Under $5 AI Stock Have The Potential To Rise And Shine

Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. This micro-cap AI stock is being increasingly touted as the next Palantir Technologies Inc. (NASDAQ:PLTR), but some analysts disagree with this framing. What Happened: On Monday, Holdings (NYSE:BBAI), which focuses on artificial intelligence and analytics primarily for defense and government contracts, was hit with a class-action lawsuit by investors, aimed at recovering losses arising due to alleged securities fraud between March 31, 2022, and March 25, 2025. Trending: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — The complaint alleges that deficient accounting practices, alongside the improper accounting of convertible notes, led to losses for investors, which it seeks to recover. This comes during a volatile couple of months for the stock, starting with a 146% rally from January through February, followed by a 62% pullback, amid growing financial turbulence and legal scrutiny. Analysts remain cautiously optimistic on the stock, with an average consensus price target of $4.63 per share, representing an upside of 18.71% from current prices. William Blair analyst, Louie DiPalma, has reiterated a 'Neutral' stance on the stock, citing funding and guidance-related issues, reported TipRanks. Cantor Fitzgerald analyst Jonathan Ruykhaver reduced his price target from $8 to $6 but retained an 'Overweight' rating. Ruykhaver believes recent contracts with the Navy and the Department of Defense's Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Office (CDAO) could provide meaningful growth opportunities if federal budgets to research by The Motley Fool, the company is expected to underperform for the next five years, primarily due to 40% of revenue being tied to the Federal Government, making it vulnerable to budget cuts and policy changes. Why It Matters: During its first quarter results last month, the company reported $34.76 million in revenue, missing estimates at $36.26 million, followed by a loss of $0.26 per share, significantly higher than consensus estimates at $0.06 per share. The stock has a relative strength index (RSI) of 52.96, which puts it in the Neutral category, meaning that it's neither overbought nor oversold. Read Next: In terms of getting money back, these bank accounts put traditional checking and savings accounts to shame. Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down taxes: Schedule your free call with a financial advisor to start your financial journey – no cost, no obligation. Photo: Sundry Photography / Shutterstock This article The Next Palantir? Does This Under $5 AI Stock Have The Potential To Rise And Shine originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

Don't Be Next: How One Anonymous Whale Lost $308 Million in Minutes – The Brutal Reality of High Leverage Trading
Don't Be Next: How One Anonymous Whale Lost $308 Million in Minutes – The Brutal Reality of High Leverage Trading

Yahoo

time11 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Don't Be Next: How One Anonymous Whale Lost $308 Million in Minutes – The Brutal Reality of High Leverage Trading

Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. In the unforgiving world of cryptocurrency trading, fortunes can vanish faster than a market flash crash. This harsh reality struck home in March 2025 when an anonymous trader, known only by their wallet address 0xf3F496C9486BE5924a93D67e98298733Bb47057c, watched $308 million disappear in what became one of the largest single liquidation events in crypto history. The numbers tell a sobering story. This whale opened a massive 50x leveraged long position on Ethereum when ETH was trading at $1,900, betting that prices would continue climbing. With their liquidation price set at just $1,877 – a mere $23 buffer – they were walking a financial tightrope with no safety net. Don't Miss: — no wallets, just price speculation and free paper trading to practice different strategies. Grow your IRA or 401(k) with Crypto – . When global tariff concerns triggered market volatility, ETH's price plummeted below that critical threshold. In an instant, 160,234 ETH was forcibly sold, wiping out the trader's entire position. Adding insult to injury, Lookonchain revealed that this whale had converted all their Bitcoin holdings into this single leveraged ETH trade, concentrating their entire portfolio into one catastrophic bet. Since late March, the trader's account has remained dormant on the Hyperliquid platform – a digital ghost town where $308 million once lived. Leverage trading allows investors to control larger positions than their actual capital would permit by borrowing funds. In this case, 50x leverage meant that for every $1 of the trader's own money, they controlled $50 worth of Ethereum. While this amplifies potential profits, it equally magnifies potential losses. Here's the brutal mathematics: With 50x leverage, a mere 2% price movement against your position can wipe out your entire investment. The anonymous whale needed ETH to drop only 1.2% from their entry point to face complete liquidation – and that's exactly what happened. Think of leverage like driving a sports car. In perfect conditions on a straight road, you can reach incredible speeds. But hit a patch of ice or take a sharp turn too fast, and that same power becomes your downfall. The crypto markets, with their notorious volatility, are rarely straight roads with perfect conditions. Many traders fall into the dangerous mindset of focusing exclusively on potential returns while minimizing or ignoring potential losses. This anonymous whale likely calculated the massive profits possible if ETH surged 10%, 20%, or even 50%. With 50x leverage, even a modest 10% price increase would have generated a 500% return on their investment. However, successful risk management requires equal attention to the downside scenario. Professional traders follow a fundamental principle: never risk more than you can afford to lose, and always calculate your maximum potential loss before considering potential gains. Beyond the leverage risk, this trader committed another cardinal sin of investing: putting all eggs in one basket. By converting their entire Bitcoin position into leveraged ETH, they eliminated any diversification benefits. When their single bet went wrong, they had no other positions to offset the losses. This concentration risk transforms what might have been a manageable loss into a portfolio-destroying event. Even sophisticated investors like Warren Buffett, known for concentrated bets, typically limit individual positions to 20-30% of their portfolio – not 100%. Trending: New to crypto? on Coinbase. Start Small, Learn Continuously: If you're new to leverage trading, begin with minimal amounts and low leverage ratios (2x or 3x maximum). Treat it as education, not wealth building. The 1% Rule: Never risk more than 1-2% of your total portfolio on any single leveraged trade. This whale appears to have risked everything on one position. Set Stop Losses: Always define your exit strategy before entering a trade. Know exactly how much you're willing to lose and stick to that limit. Diversify Your Bets: Spread risk across multiple positions, asset classes, and strategies. Concentration might create wealth, but diversification preserves it. Understand Market Conditions: High-leverage positions during volatile periods (like the tariff concerns mentioned) amplify already elevated risks. Professional traders often say that leverage doesn't make bad traders good – it makes bad traders broke faster. This anonymous whale's story serves as a stark reminder that in leveraged trading, you're not just competing against market movements; you're racing against time and probability. The cryptocurrency markets operate 24/7 with extreme volatility. Unlike traditional markets with circuit breakers and trading halts, crypto markets can gap dramatically within minutes. A position that seems safe can become a liquidation candidate before you even realize what's happening. The anonymous whale's $308 million loss represents more than just a number – it's a career-ending, life-altering financial catastrophe that could have been avoided with proper risk management. Their wallet remains inactive not by choice, but by necessity. Before you consider high-leverage trading, ask yourself: Can I afford to lose 100% of this investment? If the answer is no, step away from the leverage slider. The markets will always offer opportunities, but capital preservation ensures you'll be around to capitalize on them. Remember, in trading, your first job isn't to make money – it's to not lose money. Master that principle, and profits may follow. Ignore it, and you might become the next cautionary tale in someone else's risk management article. The anonymous whale thought they were on the verge of a massive windfall. Instead, they became a stark reminder that in high-leverage trading, the house edge isn't just mathematical – it's brutal, swift, and absolute. Don't be next. Read Next: A must-have for all crypto enthusiasts: . Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — Image: Shutterstock This article Don't Be Next: How One Anonymous Whale Lost $308 Million in Minutes – The Brutal Reality of High Leverage Trading originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store