US charity says halt in visas for Gazans will harm wounded kids
The State Department said on Saturday it was halting all visitor visas for Gazans while it conducted "a full and thorough" review, after far-right conspiracy theoristLaura Loomer said Palestinian refugees were entering the U.S.
HEAL Palestine said there was no refugee resettlement program as stated by Loomer and that the group's efforts were part of a medical treatment program. It also said the program was run on donations and did not use U.S. government money.
The charity sponsored and brought "severely injured children to the U.S. on temporary visas for essential medical treatment not available at home," it said in a statement.
"After their treatment is complete, the children and any accompanying family members return to the Middle East."
The U.S. has issued more than 3,800 B1/B2 visitor visas, which permit foreigners to seek medical treatment in the U.S., to holders of Palestinian Authority travel documents so far in 2025. That figure includes 640 visas issued in May.
The Palestinian Authority issues travel documents to residents of the Israeli-occupied West Bank and Gaza.
The State Department said a small number of temporary medical-humanitarian visas were issued to people from Gaza in recent days but did not provide a figure.
The Council on American Islamic Relations and the Palestine Children's Relief Fund condemned the decision to stop the visas.
Loomer told the New York Times she spoke to Secretary of State Marco Rubio to warn about what she called a threat from "Islamic invaders."
Rubio said the government was evaluating the process of granting such visas after concerns by some members of Congress regarding alleged ties to extremism. He said their offices had presented evidence of such ties but he gave no details.
Gaza has been devastated by Israel's military assault, which has killed tens of thousands, caused a hunger crisis, and prompted genocide and war crimes accusations at international courts.
The U.S. ally denies the accusations and says its offensive is in self-defense after an October 2023 attack in Israel by Hamas militants in which 1,200 were killed and about 250 taken hostage.
(Reporting by Kanishka Singh in Washington; Editing by Edmund Klamann)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
22 minutes ago
- The Hill
Panama deserves sanctions, not the Security Council presidency
This month, Panama holds the rotating presidency of the U.N. Security Council — a position that confers moral authority, policy influence and global prestige as the representative 'face' of the Council. But given Panama's longstanding and conscious role in undermining sanctions on Iran, this honor is deeply wrong and misguided. In fact, Panama should not be elevated — it should be sanctioned. A country that enables Iran's sanctions evasion should not be rewarded with the symbolic leadership of the very body charged with upholding those sanctions. Despite its protestations, Panama is neither a champion of the rules-based international order nor a true ally to the U.S. Panama's acquiescence to Chinese 'Belt and Road Initiative' ambitions in controlling the Panama Canal is only the latest sign of Panamanian duplicity that place it squarely at odds with the values and objectives of the council. For years, Panama has allowed its flag — akin to a passport for ships — to be used by vessels transporting illicit Iranian oil, the key revenue stream for a regime that continues to defy international nuclear restrictions. Panama is not ignorant or unaware of this problem. In January 2024, a bipartisan group of 31 U.S. Senators led by Senators Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and Bob Casey (D-Pa.) urged the Panama Maritime Authority to 'cooperate with the United States and conduct investigations into a significant number of ships registered in Panama which are alleged to transport Iranian oil in violation of U.S. sanctions…' They sought Panama's explicit commitment to investigate some '189 Panamanian-flagged vessels of concern,' constituting ' nearly half ' of all the vessels aiding Iran. Two months later, then-Special Envoy to Iran Abram Paley visited Panama 'to ensure that the vessel registry is not abused by entities seeking to evade our sanctions on Iran. … Iran and its affiliated groups are trying to evade sanctions here in Panama, they are trying to abuse the flag registration of ships.' According to analysis by our organization, United Against Nuclear Iran, of the 542 foreign-flagged vessels that have carried in excess of $200 billion worth of Iranian oil since 2020 (mainly to China), some 289 have at one stage or another flown the 100-year old Bandera de Panama. As of this week, we identify 116 vessels currently flying the Panamanian flag that are implicated in carrying Iranian oil. This has all occurred despite repeated warnings to Panama over the last five years about this behavior by our organization, which has been praised for producing ' the best public data we have.' This is more than an oversight — it is tantamount to complicity. At the same time, the Islamic Republic of Iran is a nemesis to the UN Security Council, repeatedly violating council resolutions stretching back to 2006, when Iran was instructed to suspend all enrichment-related activities. Since then, Tehran has violated resolutions relating to nuclear activities, arms embargos, ballistic missile testing, and a resolution endorsing the failed Iran nuclear deal. Most recently, a top Iranian advisor issued what sounded a lot like a personal threaten against the head of the UN's nuclear watchdog, Rafael Grossi, following years of stonewalling UN nuclear inspectors. Now, two decades and one moribund nuclear deal later, Iran is still insistent on enriching nuclear fuel to the threat of world security. Iran has never been interested in nuclear compliance. Today, with key nuclear sites severely degraded by Israel and the U.N. in last month's strikes, Iran has insisted it will never give up its 'inherent right' to enrichment. Efforts to reconstitute and to develop the missiles needed to carry nuclear warheads require money, which in Iran's case will come in large part from illicit oil sales moved by tankers — tankers that Panama helps shield from scrutiny. These 'Ghost Fleet' vessels engage in deceptive maritime practices designed to obscure the origin and destination of oil — actions that violate international norms and often amount to criminal conduct. They switch off transponders, manipulate automatic identification systems, and conduct dangerous ship-to-ship transfers in international waters. These actions form the backbone of Iran's sanctions-evasion playbook. And Panama plays along. The UN Security Council is the body tasked with upholding international peace and security, including through the enforcement of sanctions. It was the council that imposed multiple rounds of sanctions on Iran over its nuclear program. But the council's credibility suffers when one of its rotating presidents enables, with impunity, the very violations those sanctions were designed to deter. The world is entering a still-more-volatile phase in its dealings with Iran as it braces for renewed nuclear provocations. Now is the moment for the international community — embodied by the United Nations — to close ranks, not reward enablers of sanctions evasion. Thus, Panama's presidency at this critical juncture sends an unfortunate message to every regime looking to flout global norms. Panama has had ample time to reform its maritime registry. Yet Panama-flagged ghost tankers continue to offer the most critical economic lifeline for the Tehran regime. Until that changes, Panama should be sanctioned, not promoted to a leadership post at the United Nations.
San Francisco Chronicle
22 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
US sanctions more ICC judges, prosecutors for probes into alleged American, Israeli war crimes
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration is ramping up pressure on the International Criminal Court for pursuing investigations into U.S. and Israeli officials for alleged war crimes. The State Department on Wednesday announced new sanctions on four ICC officials, including two judges and two prosecutors, who it said had been instrumental in efforts to prosecute Americans and Israelis. As a result of the sanctions, any assets the targets hold in U.S. jurisdictions are frozen. The sanctions are just the latest in a series of steps the administration has taken against The Hague-based court, the world's first international war crimes tribunal. The U.S. has already imposed penalties on the ICC's former chief prosecutor, Karim Khan, who stepped aside in May pending an investigation into alleged sexual misconduct, and four other tribunal judges. In a statement, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said he had taken action against ICC judges Kimberly Proust of Canada and Nicolas Guillou of France and prosecutors Nazhat Shameem Khan of Fiji and Mame Mandiaye Niang of Senegal. 'These individuals are foreign persons who directly engaged in efforts by the International Criminal Court to investigate, arrest, detain, or prosecute nationals of the United States or Israel, without the consent of either nation,' Rubio said. He added that the administration would continue 'to take whatever actions we deem necessary to protect our troops, our sovereignty, and our allies from the ICC's illegitimate and baseless actions.' In a separate statement, the State Department said Prost was hit for ruling to authorize an ICC investigation into U.S. personnel in Afghanistan, which was later dropped. Guillou was sanctioned for ruling to authorize the ICC's issuance of arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Minister of Defense Yoav Gallant related to Israel's war against Hamas in Gaza. Khan and Niang were penalized for continuing Karim Khan's investigation into Israel's actions in Gaza, including upholding the ICC's arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant, according to the statement.
Newsweek
23 minutes ago
- Newsweek
7,000 Christians Have Been Killed in Nigeria This Year, Group Says
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. More than 7,000 Christians had been killed in Nigeria during the first 220 days of 2025, a civil-society watchdog said. This is an average of 35 killings a day, according to the recent report published by the Nigeria-based human-rights NGO International Society for Civil Liberties and the Rule of Law (Intersociety). Newsweek has contacted the Nigerian Ministry of Humanitarian Affairs and National Human Rights Commission via email for comment. Why It Matters Nigeria has long been an epicenter of Christian persecution, with more Christians killed for their faith in Nigeria than in the rest of the world combined, according to human rights organization Open Doors, which monitors the persecution of Christians around the globe. The violence has displaced at least 12 million Christians since 2009, according to Intersociety. That year marked the start of Boko Haram's insurgency to establish a caliphate in Nigeria and the broader Sahel. In the 16 years since, Intersociety estimates that 189,000 civilians have been killed—125,000 of whom were Christians and 60,000 liberal Muslims. Parishioners leave St. Charles Catholic Church after a Mass in Ngurore, Nigeria, in February 2019. Parishioners leave St. Charles Catholic Church after a Mass in Ngurore, Nigeria, in February 2019. AP What To Know The Intersociety report said that 7,087 Christians were killed in Nigeria between January 1 and August 10, and that 7,800 others were abducted in the same period. The report identified Benue State in Nigeria's Middle Belt as among the hardest hit, with at least 1,100 deaths, including the Yelewata massacre in June, when 280 Christians were killed. "Nigeria is headquartering and providing safe haven for no fewer than 22 embryonic and full grown Islamic Terror Groups in Africa with links or potential links to ISIS, ISIL and World Jihad Fund," the report said. The Middle Belt and northern states are especially volatile, with Islamic militant groups like Boko Haram, Fulani extremists and ISWAP (Islamic State West Africa Province) targeting Christian communities through mass killings, kidnappings and church burnings. While Nigeria legally offers more religious freedom than other countries on Open Doors watchlist, "the biggest threat is from Islamic militants who seek to destroy Christianity and Christians in the region," the organization says. The U.S. Department of State's report on terrorism in Nigeria in 2023 highlighted that ISIS-West Africa (ISIS-WA), Boko Haram and Ansaru are active there, carrying out attacks against Nigerian government and security forces and civilians across the country's northern and central regions. The Nigerian government has previously dismissed some claims about specific groups operating in the country, including in June, when a defense department spokesperson, Major General Markus Kangye, pushed back against the Turkish ambassador's claims that the terrorist group FETO is active. Kangye said that the Nigerian military does not recognize the group and has not received any credible intelligence to support the claim, according to local newspaper The Nigeria Lawyer. Newsweek has contacted Nigeria's National Counter Terrorism Centre, via email, for comment. What People Are Saying Father Dominic Asor, the rector of St. James Minor Seminary, last month: "We must not flee from our vocation because of trials, insecurity or the lure of worldly comfort. God who called us will sustain us, but we must remain faithful and focused. The seminary has not become an endangered species. Apart from the seminaries, where else can you have complete safety? There is no place." Jeff King, president of International Christian Concern, previously told Newsweek: "The persecution of Christians isn't merely a religious issue, it's a human rights crisis affecting millions." What Happens Next The Intersociety report urged international actors to intervene and to consider placing Nigeria on watch lists that could trigger diplomatic or sanctions responses. Open Doors and other monitoring groups continued to document attacks and displacement, which suggested ongoing humanitarian and protection needs for millions of displaced people and for communities reporting repeated violence.
