Bipartisan congressional group hopes to restore bill providing millions in rural school funding
A bipartisan group of lawmakers from the West are joining forces to persuade Congress to reauthorize a 24-year-old bill that has sent billions to states including Oregon for critical public services and schools.
Oregon's U.S. Sens. Ron Wyden and Jeff Merkley, both Democrats, and two Idaho Republicans — U.S. Sens. Mike Crapo and Jim Risch — announced Feb. 4 that they are reintroducing the Secure Rural Schools Act that was left to die without a vote by U.S. House Republicans last December. A bipartisan group of lawmakers from the U.S. House of Representatives, including U.S. Rep. Val Hoyle, a Democrat representing Oregon's 4th District, and Rep. Cliff Bentz, a Republican representing Oregon's 2nd District, also reintroduced the act in the U.S. House on Feb. 14. There is currently no hearing on the bill scheduled in the House or Senate, but if passed, it would restore millions in funding — including about $80 million for Oregon — through 2026.
Glen Szymoniak, superintendent of the Klamath County School District in southern Oregon, which has received the most funding from the act among the state's school districts, said the money is crucial. The district has, in recent years, gotten between $800,000 and $1 million each year.
'Having that money each year is a big deal us,' he said. 'When you can't pass a bond, having a million dollars to fix roofs or something like that is a big deal.'
In November, the Senate reauthorized the act, which first passed in 2000. But during the December run-up to passage of a stop-gap spending bill to keep the government open until March, House Republicans could not reach agreement about how the bill should be funded and so it died without a vote, according to Wyden spokesman Hank Stern. Wyden co-authored the original bill in 2000.
'I'm glad this bill is being reintroduced right at the start of this new Congress in this bipartisan spirit, and I strongly urge our House colleagues to act with the same urgency and bipartisan ethic to reconnect this proven lifeline ASAP for rural communities in Oregon and nationwide,' Wyden said in a news release.
The Secure Rural Schools Act has distributed billions in funding for schools, roads and other public services and infrastructure to counties in Oregon, 40 other states and Puerto Rico.
The money is designated to counties that have federal land within their borders. Because those counties provide critical services to people and industries using those lands for activities that generate revenue for the federal government — such as animal grazing and timber production — the federal government sends money back to those counties to help them pay for critical services and to weather other changes.
In the West, the money has largely helped keep county and school budgets whole following reduced logging and a reduction in timber revenue from federal forests in the 1990s to save imperiled species. In Oregon, the bulk of funding goes to school districts in and around the Willamette National Forest, which took the biggest financial hit when harvest levels on the heavily logged forest were reduced nearly 80%.
Oregon has received $4 billion in funding from the bill in the last 24 years, and in 2024, 30 counties got nearly $74 million. Early payments to counties under the act equaled the average amount they received from timber harvests from the U.S. Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management in the top three timber-producing years of the 1980s. It's declined by more than half in recent years due to reshifting of funds across eligible states and because it was meant to be transitional, according to Stern.
Oregon schools have received more than $368 million from the act since 2004, and an average of $9.7 million each year, according to Oregon Department of Education data. Oregon traditionally counted the Secure Rural Schools payments as local revenues for the sake of the statewide school funding equalization formula, so 165 of the state's 197 school districts ended up seeing some money from the act, including the two biggest, Portland Public Schools and the Salem-Keizer School District, despite having little to no federal forest land within their boundaries. This changed in 2023, when Oregon made updates to the distribution model and stopped counting Secure Rural Schools funding as local revenue. The Oregon Department of Education in 2024 agreed to back-pay districts like Klamath County School District that should have received more direct funding from the Secure Rural Schools Act since 2018. The agency has until Oct. 1 to make up for millions of dollars in underpayments to 82 school districts, including Klamath County School District, which is owed more than $2.5 million.
Despite these issues with funding distribution, districts in Eugene, Douglas County and Roseburg, Springfield and Albany were among the top recipients of funding in the last two decades. And districts near the Klamath National Forest, such as Klamath County School District, have ultimately received greater payments than most other districts in the last two decades.
Szymoniak, the superintendent in Klamath County, said it is the only money the district gets from the federal government that can be broadly used for any needs they have.
'Other federal money, like Title I and Title IX, they all have strings attached, and they have really strict allowances for how you spend it. With state school funding, I always consider that that's got to go to kids and teachers and to providing education,' he explained. 'Secure Rural Schools money, because there's no strings attached, that's where I go to buy buses, to get equipment for maintenance for the school. That's where we can build efficiencies and invest in the future.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
16 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Trump is fighting something in D.C., but it isn't crime
When the man says no, the agent continues. 'Yeah, Trump's got all federal agencies coming together, seven days, and going out trying to stop the violent crime, all kind of stuff,' the agent says. He continues: 'Smoking, drinking in public, right, it can't happen.' I'm a Detroit-born, Boston transplant at heart, but I've worked as a journalist in Washington for nearly two decades. Though I've built my career here working only for Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up Understandably, I have some very strong and very personal views about the president's Advertisement Most obviously, sending armed federal agents and the National Guard to patrol the streets of the nation's capital bears all the hallmarks of a But from my local vantage point, I see even more layers to this dangerous gambit. Advertisement First, let's dispel the idea that Trump's effort is driven in any way by a true desire to make D.C. a better place to live and visit. Trump points to anecdotal evidence, like the If Trump really wanted to fight crime here, there are many things he could do that would actually help, starting with telling his fellow Republicans in Congress to release No, Trump's crime crusade is about something else. Aside from satisfying his Trump loves a shock-and-awe-style attack on perceived domestic enemies. Look at Trump's immigration crackdown, complete with images of suspected immigrants being detained and held in brutally inhumane facilities with nicknames like 'Alligator Alcatraz.' It's a show put on by the former reality show host and the latest episode is brought to you from Democratic-controlled cities he has long railed against. Crime fighting isn't the point. Cruelty is. Advertisement It's gut wrenching to see it happening in a place so filled with history, culture, and joy. It's a richness that comes not just from transplants like me or its world-renown cultural institutions (which are They, and I, want safe, well-policed, and well-resourced communities. Not a federal takeover. And I'm exhausted by the crime hot takes from people who couldn't identify Ironically, even if you thought soldiers should be sent here, they are also being sent from Ohio, the only state that Even Trump's claim that Advertisement Trump is selling a dangerous lie about the city I've made a life in. My D.C. is one of Kimberly Atkins Stohr is a columnist for the Globe. She may be reached at
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Florida Democrats challenge Trump's plans to cut mail-in ballots before 2026 midterms
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (WFLA) — President Trump announced his plans to sign an executive order to eliminate mail-in ballots ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. This move has reignited fierce debate surrounding voting by mail, and Florida Democrats are fighting back, challenging the president's constitutional authority.'We're going to start with an executive order that's being written right now by the best lawyers in the country, to end mail-in ballots,' Trump said from the Oval Office. Florida accuses 2 companies of over charging school districts for instructional materials The president posted on Truth Social Monday morning saying, 'ELECTIONS CAN NEVER BE HONEST WITH MAIL IN BALLOTS/VOTING, and everybody, IN PARTICULAR THE DEMOCRATS, KNOWS THIS.''We would get secure elections; we get much faster results of machines. I mean they say we're going to have the results in two weeks, with paper ballots you have the results that night,' Trump said. In the Sunshine State, Florida has a long history of making sure elections are secure and fair. The state legislature passed a bill back in 2021, led by current Chief Financial Officer Blaise Ingoglia, which made a slew of changes to the state's elections law. But just like with this recent call, state Democrats are still not on board. 'Florida actually has the largest population of seniors in the country. We have a number of Floridians who are disabled and just who aren't able to get to the polls. And we know that vote by mail has been a safe and convenient way for people to vote,' said State Rep. Fentrice Driskell (D-Tampa). Driskell said, just like in 2021, she believes her Republican colleagues could attach this idea to legislation next session.'I don't think that the case was ever fully made for why we needed to take such drastic changes. It was more so of the legislature trying to serve the political will of Donald Trump and furthering the big lie that Donald Trump won the 2020 election. And so, it makes me very nervous that we are on such uneven footing. I thought we'd move past all of that but here we are again,' Driskell said. 8 On Your Side sat down with political analyst Tara Newsom to dig into the current laws on the books.'President Trump will do this, but it doesn't mean he constitutionally can. Article 1, section 4 of the constitution is clear that the time, place and manner of elections is vested in the states.' Newsom added that coupling up Trump's call to end mail-in ballots with the plans to redistrict mid-decade may be too much maneuvering for voters to support. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Texas Capitol Evacuated After Shooting Threat
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Parts of the Texas Capitol were evacuated on Tuesday evening following reports of an active shooter threat. The Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) said the evacuation, which happened at around 6:30 p.m., was prompted by a threat posted online. "Earlier today, an individual posted a message on social media regarding the ongoing political situation at the Texas State Capitol. In that message, the individual calls on others to go to the Capitol building and take action by shooting and killing those who will not allow lawmakers to leave," the Texas DPS said. "For the safety of those at the Texas State Capitol, and out of an abundance of caution, the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) evacuated the public from the Capitol building around 6:30 this evening. It will remain closed to the public for the remainder of the day." DPS said it is working to identify the suspect who posted the threat online, and added that no further details will be released until the investigation is completed. The Texas House Democrats released a statement thanking State Troopers for their response and condemning the incident. "Violence and threats have no place in our democratic process, and we unequivocally condemn any threats against public servants or law enforcement, regardless of political differences," they said. Texas State Troopers at the Texas Capitol in Austin on Monday. Texas State Troopers at the Texas Capitol in Austin on Monday. Stephen Spillman/AP This is a developing story. More to follow.