
Changes in Public Service Loan Forgiveness Worry Doctors
About a third of medical students say they plan to use the US Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) Program to pay off federal loans. If they work in a qualifying hospital or clinic for 10 years and make 120 monthly loan repayments, the rest of their debt will be erased. The amount forgiven depends on salary and the amount of loan repayments.
Some students and physicians are alarmed by language tucked into the Republican budget bill, now being debated in Congress, that would exclude residency years from counting toward PSLF. Residencies can range from 3 to 7 years depending on specialty.
'At a time when our country urgently needs more doctors, especially in underserved areas, this bill would create new financial and logistical barriers that disproportionately harm low-income students,' warned Shannon Udovic-Constant, president of the California Medical Association.
At the same time, the Department of Education is holding public hearings on student loan program rules with the possibility of limiting which hospitals and clinics are eligible for PSLF. The agency did not respond to Medscape's request for comment.
Today, rural and community hospitals, Veteran Affairs health services, and most nonprofit and academic medical institutions qualify for PSLF. Graduates can start their 10-year countdown at the beginning of their residency.
Critics of the proposed changes say that making it harder for new doctors to use PSLF will discourage them from choosing lower-paid specialties like primary care or pediatrics and could reduce access to care in rural or underserved regions.
'I went into pediatric endocrinology knowing that I would work for an academic non-profit hospital, and as such, would qualify for Public Service Loan Forgiveness,' wrote Brittany Bruggerman, a pediatric endocrinologist at the University of Florida, on Facebook. 'If I thought I would have to pay back my $200k of loans on my own… I may have made a different choice.'
Limiting Options for Physicians
These aren't the first attempts to reform the PSLF. While an important lifeline for many students, the program is far from perfect and suffers from bureaucratic hurdles and an overall lack of clarity, said Dimitri Koustas, an assistant professor at the Harris school of Public Policy, University of Chicago.
Some of the rules of the program, including income thresholds and which employers qualify, can seem arbitrary, he said. The proposed PSLF changes reduce rather than expand eligibility. The intent is to address what is referred to as the 'doctors' loophole,' explained Audra McGeorge, communications director of the Republican-controlled House Committee on Education & the Workforce.
Doctors who begin repaying their student loans during residency do so on a low salary which rises significantly once they become attendings; so for those years, they benefit from a high discount on their loan repayment.
Supporters of PSLF changes say residency years should be considered part of doctors' education, not employment.
To that end, the budget bill would allow physicians and dentists to defer loan payments during their residency years without accruing interest, based on the premise that residency is education, not employment.
That would benefit residents earning lower salaries, said McGeorge. Currently, federal loan payment can be deferred during residency, but in some cases interest continues to accrue.
Broader Repercussions for Healthcare
Medical organizations and students worry that the proposed PSLF changes could have long-lasting repercussions for doctors' careers and for healthcare more broadly.
Reducing PSLF's benefits for medical students 'could have the effect of pushing indebted medical students away from academic practice and away from lower paying specialties,' said Jim Dahle, an emergency physician and the founder of The White Coat Investor, a personal finance site for doctors. Some low-income students, worried about decades of debt, may decide not to pursue medicine at all.
For medical students, having residency years no longer qualify for PSLF 'would be a major blow,' said Santoshi Billakota, a neurologist and epileptologist at Wyckoff Heights in Brooklyn, NY, and the co-host of Be Empowered, a podcast offering financial advice for doctors. 'PSLF was one of the few incentives encouraging new doctors to work in underserved or rural areas that often pay significantly less.'
Doctors and students also noted that, due to the structure of the residency matching process, they have limited control over where they end up in residency, and those who ended up in lower-paying positions would be penalized if they couldn't offset the loss of income by participating in PSLF. The National Resident Matching Program, which places medical students in residency, did not respond to Medscape's request for comment.
A Threat to the Healthcare System
The intent behind the PSLF program, said Koustas, is to encourage professionals — in this case doctors — to take on roles they would otherwise remain unfulfilled because of the incentive of seeing their debt forgiven.
Once that incentive is gone, his research found, people tend to leave their posts and gravitate toward higher paying positions.
This, said Koustas, was the unexpected part of forgiveness that happened during the Biden administration, which granted borrowers a one-time adjustment that would include payments made outside of qualifying employment to count toward debt forgiveness. 'We did see that people switched out of public service and the not-for-profit sectors when they got forgiveness,' he said.
'I am a physician who is currently enrolled in PSLF. Neither of my parents were college educated nor did they have the funds to pay for my education,' said Mary Flaherty, a neurologist. 'It saddens me that other people from my background will not be able to access higher education to make our country better. I would not be where I am today if it were not for federal student loans.'
Koustas' research confirms that first-generation students and those from lower income tend to be more debt averse and may be more likely not to choose an expensive educational path if it didn't come with an early opportunity of debt relief.
'I entered medicine not for personal financial gain, but out of a sincere desire to serve our nation's military veterans,' wrote Austin Miller, an incoming resident in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation at Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, in a comment to the Department of Education. 'The PSLF program has been the only realistic path forward to both manage [my] debt and serve in a lower-paying but essential public sector role, such as practicing at the VA after residency.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Laura Coates Uses Trump's Own Words to Shatter ‘Woke' Smithsonian Claims: ‘Couldn't Have Said It Better Myself, Mr. President'
In 2017, Trump called the Smithsonian's National Museum of African American History and Culture a "beautiful tribute to so many American heroes" CNN's Laura Coates took issue Tuesday night with President Donald Trump's repeated claims that the Smithsonian Institute has gone 'out of control' with woke content and used some of his own words from 2017 to prove him wrong. Trump took to Truth Social Tuesday to announce that he has instructed his attorneys to review the Smithsonian's museums. More from TheWrap Laura Coates Uses Trump's Own Words to Shatter 'Woke' Smithsonian Claims: 'Couldn't Have Said It Better Myself, Mr. President' | Video Trump's White House Lashes Out at Rosie O'Donnell Again in Response to Mark Hamill's Near Emigration 'Morning Joe' Warns Rep. Elise Stefanik's Home District Boos Are a 'Terrible Sign' for Republicans | Video Shonda Rhimes Says Self-Censorship Is Palpable as Networks Cower to Trump 'The Smithsonian is OUT OF CONTROL, where everything discussed is how horrible our Country is, how bad Slavery was, and how unaccomplished the downtrodden have been,' Trump wrote. 'This Country cannot be WOKE, because WOKE IS BROKE.' Among the museums that Trump has targeted is the Smithsonian's National Museum of African American History and Culture, which Coates was quick to point out Tuesday. The CNN anchor was also quick to note that, contrary to his recent claims, Trump had nothing but good things to say about the museum in question after he toured it in 2017. To prove her point, Coates played a clip of the speech Trump gave following his visit. 'This museum is a beautiful tribute to so many American heroes. It's amazing to see,' Trump said at the time. 'We did a pretty comprehensive tour, but not comprehensive enough. So, [Smithsonian Secretary] Lonnie [Bunch III] I'll be back. I told you that. Because I could stay here for a lot longer, believe me. It's really incredible. This tour was a meaningful reminder of why we have to fight bigotry, intolerance, and hatred in all of its very ugly forms.' You can watch the clip yourself in the video below. For her part, Coates took particular issue with Trump's insistence that the museums his administration is reviewing focus only on suffering and oppression. 'Yes, it goes into the unvarnished truth of slavery in America, the brutal reality that millions endured and the impact that's still felt today,' Coates acknowledge about the National Museum of African American History and Culture. 'But the museum, if you actually go to it rather than just talk about it and see it on paper from a Truth Social post, it doesn't only focus on suffering. It is about resilience and achievement and celebration. Umbrella? History.' The CNN anchor noted that the museum highlights the achievements of Black icons like Muhammad Ali, Louis Armstrong, Jim Brown, Gabby Douglas and Carl Lewis. 'If that's woke, then maybe woke just means telling the whole story because every exhibition that I've just mentioned showcases exactly what Trump says that he wants: success, brightness, a look toward the future,' Coates argued. Responding to Trump's 2017 remark that the museum is a 'reminder of why we have to fight bigotry, intolerance, and hatred in all of its very ugly forms,' Coates concluded, '[I] couldn't have said it better myself, Mr. President.' The post Laura Coates Uses Trump's Own Words to Shatter 'Woke' Smithsonian Claims: 'Couldn't Have Said It Better Myself, Mr. President' | Video appeared first on TheWrap.
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stablecoins Should Not Be Exempt From New York Crypto Tax, Lawmaker Says
New York State Assemblymember Phil Steck's proposed tax on crypto transactions will not be modified to accommodate stablecoins' use in everyday payments, the lawmaker told Decrypt. 'I don't think that there should be some exemption from a tax on crypto if you buy it for the purpose of using it as a currency,' he said on Tuesday. 'I can't see, frankly, crypto being used to take the place of the dollar bill in everyday transactions.' Last week, Steck estimated that a 0.2% tax on crypto transactions in the Empire State would generate $158 million annually, which could go toward helping schools combat substance abuse in upstate New York by funding the expansion of an existing support program. 'We thought this might be a way to raise the money needed to make this a statewide program,' he said, noting that the state's Office of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Services currently serves communities in New York City and has faced budget constraints. Crypto advocates should support what appears to be a painless way of raising money to help those in need because it would 'show their commitment to doing something positive for the public,' the 66-year-old lawmaker said. Not all cryptocurrencies are the same, but digital assets are mostly speculative and resemble a form of entertainment, Steck said. And when Steck wants to watch professional baseball, he has no problem with paying a 4% sales tax on Mets tickets. Steck's bill would go into effect immediately if passed, and it comes as stablecoin legislation is expected to unlock more competition in the $280 billion sector, from the likes of Bank of America to Citigroup, following the passage of the GENIUS Act last month. But at least one observer has raised concerns that the bill would penalize consumers for transfers between their own accounts that incur no profits. These movements are similar to those an individual would execute between a savings and checking account. Stablecoins are often pegged to the U.S. dollar and backed by a mix of cash and U.S. Treasuries. Some regulators have compared them to poker chips in the past because crypto traders primarily use them primarily as a way to swap out of relatively volatile assets. Visa Adds More Stablecoin Features, Unveiling Avalanche, Stellar Support Steck's bill could make a positive impact upstate, but it's unclear how a 0.2% excise tax would play out in the epicenter of the financial world. Steck said his legislation would not include exemptions for high-frequency traders, who can execute thousands of transactions in a second while using complex computer algorithms to capitalize on the smallest changes in markets. 'I would see taxing high-frequency trading as very advantageous because [many economists] do not consider that to be productive economic activity,' he said. 'It's not for investment purposes. It's essentially a form of gambling.' Steck has meanwhile called for the reinstatement of a state tax on stock transfers. New York collected a 5-cent fee on sales over $20 from 1905 to 1981. It's possible that Steck's $158 million revenue estimate is low. His team tried to get information on the volume of crypto transactions in New York from the state's Department of Financial Services, but a bill memo shared with Decrypt notes those efforts were unsuccessful. Under the bill's plain text, crypto users would be taxed for moving funds between accounts they own, a non-event from the perspective of federal tax, Nick Slettengren, co-founder and CEO of Count on Sheep, a tax preparation service, told Decrypt. 'Unless regulations carve it out, [the bill] would penalize basic security hygiene and bookkeeping,' he said. 'That's a recipe for confusion, over-collection, and disputes.' Steck isn't the only one turning to crypto to help fund schools. Wyoming debuted its Frontier Stable Token (FRNT) on Tuesday, becoming the first state to issue stablecoin, and revenue generated by the token's reserves will go toward the state's school foundation fund. Asked for his thoughts on FRNT, Steck said 'they're going to have to pay a lot of money to create that currency digitally, which is very expensive from the point of view of using energy.' The lawmaker did not appear to know the difference between proof-of-work or proof-of-stake, or that Bitcoin's energy consumption is massive compared to other networks, including the seven blockchains that Wyoming's stablecoin debuted on earlier this week. So far, Steck said he hasn't had the opportunity to gauge assemblymembers' thoughts on the crypto tax. Not only was the bill just introduced, but he said that the New York legislature will not be in session until January.
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US sanctions more ICC judges, prosecutors for probes into alleged American, Israeli war crimes
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration is ramping up pressure on the International Criminal Court for pursuing investigations into U.S. and Israeli officials for alleged war crimes. The State Department on Wednesday announced new sanctions on four ICC officials, including two judges and two prosecutors, who it said had been instrumental in efforts to prosecute Americans and Israelis. As a result of the sanctions, any assets the targets hold in U.S. jurisdictions are frozen. The sanctions are just the latest in a series of steps the administration has taken against The Hague-based court, the world's first international war crimes tribunal. The U.S. has already imposed penalties on the ICC's former chief prosecutor, Karim Khan, who stepped aside in May pending an investigation into alleged sexual misconduct, and four other tribunal judges. In a statement, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said he had taken action against ICC judges Kimberly Proust of Canada and Nicolas Guillou of France and prosecutors Nazhat Shameem Khan of Fiji and Mame Mandiaye Niang of Senegal. 'These individuals are foreign persons who directly engaged in efforts by the International Criminal Court to investigate, arrest, detain, or prosecute nationals of the United States or Israel, without the consent of either nation,' Rubio said. He added that the administration would continue 'to take whatever actions we deem necessary to protect our troops, our sovereignty, and our allies from the ICC's illegitimate and baseless actions.' In a separate statement, the State Department said Prost was hit for ruling to authorize an ICC investigation into U.S. personnel in Afghanistan, which was later dropped. Guillou was sanctioned for ruling to authorize the ICC's issuance of arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Minister of Defense Yoav Gallant related to Israel's war against Hamas in Gaza. Khan and Niang were penalized for continuing Karim Khan's investigation into Israel's actions in Gaza, including upholding the ICC's arrest warrants for Netanyahu and Gallant, according to the statement. Wednesday's move carries on a history of Trump administration actions against the ICC, of which the U.S. is not a member, dating back to his first term in office. During Trump's first term, the U.S. hit the ICC with sanctions, but those were rescinded by President Joe Biden's administration in early 2021.