logo
Justice minister apologizes for comments that 'potentially eroded' trust with Indigenous peoples

Justice minister apologizes for comments that 'potentially eroded' trust with Indigenous peoples

Calgary Herald04-06-2025
OTTAWA — Justice Minister Sean Fraser apologized Wednesday for recent comments about the federal government's duty to consult First Nations regarding developing projects on their territories, saying his words 'potentially eroded a very precarious trust.'
Article content
The issue has emerged in light of Prime Minister Mark Carney's plan to introduce legislation that would fast-track approvals for major energy and infrastructure projects by cutting the timeline to two years, down from five.
Article content
Article content
Article content
The Assembly of First Nations, a national advocacy organization representing more than 600 First Nations across the country, has expressed concerns that, from what they have seen of the forthcoming bill, it 'suggests a serious threat' to First Nations treaty rights.
Article content
Article content
In a recent letter to Carney, National Chief Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak cited the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, which outlines the principle of obtaining 'free, prior, and informed consent' regarding laws and decisions that affect Indigenous peoples.
Article content
When asked about that principle on Tuesday, Fraser outlined his interpretation of it, telling reporters that it demands 'a very deep level of engagement and understanding of the rights that may be impacted.'
Article content
Article content
On Wednesday, Fraser apologized for those comments, saying it gave some the impression of the government wanting to 'work unilaterally, not in partnership,' with Indigenous people.
Article content
'Despite innocent intentions, I think my comments actually caused hurt and potentially eroded a very precarious trust that has been built up over many years to respect the rights of Indigenous people in this country,' he said on his way into the Liberal caucus meeting.
Article content
The minister said that after he made those remarks he received a call from the national chief, 'expressing her frustration.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What should we make of Carney's foreign policy outlook?
What should we make of Carney's foreign policy outlook?

Winnipeg Free Press

timean hour ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

What should we make of Carney's foreign policy outlook?

Opinion It's early days yet for the Mark Carney Liberal government. So, it's hard to decipher with any precision what the contours of a Carney foreign policy will be. On the face of it, his international policy outlook appears to be focused largely on the so-called 'Anglosphere' of countries — that is, the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand. Stated differently, it is a foreign policy posture that is shaping up to be more like Stephen Harper's than that of Justin Trudeau's. You might even posit that it sounds a lot like the language of Pierre Elliott Trudeau's early 1970s foreign policy orientation — including his ill-fated 'Third Option' trade adjustment strategy. There is an obvious emphasis on greater autonomy and sovereignty, economic progress and transformation, trade policy and diversification, and defence policy, global security and military procurement. But there is also a sense that Carney views Western Europe, China and India (throw in Mexico and Brazil for good measure) as intimately connected to these overarching foreign policy themes. RICKY CARIOTI / THE WASHINGTON POST FILES President Donald Trump meets with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney at the White House in May. Carney's foreign policy includes making distance between Canada and its nearest neighbour. Moreover, the mid-June G7 Summit in Alberta confirmed Carney's commitment to economic expansion, international security and world order and less interest in the African continent, the Middle East and Latin America and the Caribbean. Carney's worldview, then, is evidently a narrow one, with a sharp focus on a small set of issue-areas and a central banker's fixation on measuring results and outcomes. Any understanding of Carney's foreign policy universe, though, needs to begin with how he views the international diplomatic space. In a word, he sees global politics through the prism of a political realist and the disposition of someone versed in power politics. The emphasis is on interests, military security, balance of power and, most important, economic advancement. This all came through loud and clear in Carney's June 9 speech on foreign and defence policy at the Munk School of Global Affairs in Toronto, where he stressed that this was a 'hinge moment' for Canada. When the multiple threats from a 'dangerous and divided' world (later mentioning 'a darker, more competitive world' and a declining U.S.) are undermining the existing rules-based international order, he said that this country has no choice but to respond to these fundamentally changing circumstances. Additionally, he reminded his audience that Canada has 'agency in determining what comes next.' As Carney noted in his speech: 'Canada can work toward a new international set of partnerships that are more secure, prosperous, just and free. We can pursue deeper alliances with stable democracies who share our interests, values, principles and history.' But where exactly does this leave Canada? From Carney's standpoint, Ottawa needs to be on the offensive and can't afford to just sit back and react to events. 'Middle powers must compete for interest and attention knowing that if they are not at the table, they are on the menu,' he explained. Make no mistake, Carney envisions a stronger defence posture at home with a more activist and reliable diplomatic presence abroad. Accordingly, there will be dollops of money thrown at the Canadian Armed Forces to meet our NATO commitments (including more money for Ukraine), to bolster Canada's defence industry and to strengthen our military footprint in the Arctic. Carney's speech even had flashes of a 21st century version of the Chinese counterweight strategy on how to deal with a threatening U.S. In other words, Canada needs to find other countries to lessen our dependence on the U.S., to show the Americans that they are not the only game in town and to fortify our bargaining position vis-à-vis Washington. Tuesdays A weekly look at politics close to home and around the world. Of course, Carney's outlining of the broader strokes of his foreign policy will need to be fleshed out in the coming months and years. He will most assuredly need to put some meat on the bone and come up with a handful of key policy priorities and initiatives. He also can't simply forget to factor in the 'U.S. equation' in the conduct of Canadian foreign policy. I'd like to see Carney marry his counterweight and trade diversification strategy to an ambitious push to rejuvenate Canada-Latin America relations. Besides revitalization our role within the Organization of American States (OAS) and the Summit of the Americas machinery, he could seek to assembly in Ottawa (or Mexico City) a high-level meeting of many of the region's top political leaders to set a new course for reinvigorating the overall relationship. Much of his Munk School speech was about symbolism and signalling — which are always key foreign policy objectives. He needed to inform the Canadian public that Canada is going to lessen its reliance on the U.S. and, equally important, to send a reassuring message to our friends, allies and partners around the world. But as Prime Minister Carney said pointedly, '…aspiration without effort is just empty rhetoric.' For too long, Canada's role in the world traded on its past reputation and accomplishments, flowery language and resplendent pledges. Only time will tell, though, whether Carney can actually match his encouraging words with concrete actions. Peter McKenna is professor of political science at the University of Prince Edward Island in Charlottetown.

First Nations fishers hit the water as Fraser River sockeye return in big numbers
First Nations fishers hit the water as Fraser River sockeye return in big numbers

CTV News

time7 hours ago

  • CTV News

First Nations fishers hit the water as Fraser River sockeye return in big numbers

Spawning sockeye salmon, a species of Pacific salmon, are seen making their way up the Adams River in Roderick Haig-Brown Provincial Park near Chase, B.C., Tuesday, Oct. 14, 2014. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jonathan Hayward Sockeye salmon have sustained Indigenous people in British Columbia for thousands of years, but in recent decades, the abundance has not been what it once was. 'I would have 20 cases of sockeye for the winter. I would have 40 or 50 sockeye in the deep freeze,' said Bob Chamberlin, chair of the First Nations Wild Salmon Alliance. 'Now, I'm lucky if I make a case of fish last two years because it's so rare to get.' This year is shaping up to be the best in recent memory. So far, close to 750,000 Early Stuart sockeye have made their way past the Fraser River counting station at Mission. Those fish will travel 1,200 kilometres inland to their spawning grounds near Fort St James. The early numbers are more than ten times the 70,000 Early Stuart fish originally expected. In light of the stronger than anticipated return, some B.C. First Nations have the green light to harvest sockeye for food, social and cultural purposes. The fish will be distributed to their members who will smoke or can most of it. 'For nations across the province to have that kind of food source is incredible. Now the fun part is when the whole family gets together, strengthens the family ties, and works collectively on fish,' Chamberlin said. 'Its great. It's a lot of work but it's fun and it strengthens our communities and our nations.' Commercial operators would also like a chance to catch Fraser River sockeye for the first time in six years. 'We've had record test fishing for July, since records were kept on test fishing,' said Paul Kershaw, a commercial fisherman. According to Kershaw, who represents other commercial operators in meetings with the Department of Fisheries and Oceans and the Pacific Salmon Commission, the latest estimates put the total Fraser River sockeye return at close to six million. He expects that estimate to increase even further in the coming days, but he doesn't think commercial fishers will be allowed to land any sockeye this summer. 'Well, unfortunately, they're still operating under a low-run scenario that they modeled in the wintertime,' he said of the DFO and the PSC, which is made up of commissioners from Canada and the United States. Conservationists are also watching this year's return closely. According to Greg Taylor, an advisor with Watershed Watch Salmon Society, sockeye returning to the Fraser River this year face an uncertain future. He told CTV News low water levels and high water temperatures could lead to increased mortality. 'There's estimates now this year, that somewhere between 30 and 50 per cent of returning fish could die enroute to their spawning grounds,' Taylor said. Along with the unexpected numbers, those are also factors the DFO and PSC will have to consider before deciding whether to allow the commercial fleet onto the water.

Letters to the Editor, Aug. 7, 2025
Letters to the Editor, Aug. 7, 2025

Toronto Sun

time7 hours ago

  • Toronto Sun

Letters to the Editor, Aug. 7, 2025

ASSISTING AID This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Re 'Israel is losing the propaganda wars' (Warren Kinsella, July 29): Powerful prose by Warren Kinsella! Is this a case of 'The Boy Who Cried Wolf' or is Israel intentionally starving civilian Gazans. From the onset on Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas has lied about every issue from lack of aid to the source of a bombed hospital. But this is war. No doubt there is a shortage of food. It appears that Israel is taking no chances by air dropping aid and opening the corridors for other agencies to truck in supplies. A defensive combatant that warns civilians regarding any attack in a war that was started in a treacherous massacre, holding civilian hostages after two years, deserves the benefit of any doubt. Larry Sylvester Acton, Ont. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. (Hamas takes the aid being delivered and then in turn withholds it from the people in Gaza. These terrorists continue to terrorize their own people) TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE Can somebody please tell me how much money the government has thrown away, thus far, prosecuting Tamara Lich and Chris Barber for standing up to Liberal tyranny on behalf of all Canadians who value their Charter rights and freedoms? The amount will surely be in the multiple tens of millions of dollars. As near as I can tell, citations for parking violations would have covered it. And all of this could have been avoided had our evil former prime minister (whose name I can't even stand to say) met with them in the first place. Why aren't more people speaking up about this travesty of justice? Were it not for them, our rights and freedoms would still be under attack. Rather than continuing down this path of political persecution, the government should nominate these two people for the Governor General award for their bravery and selflessness. I, myself, am most grateful to them. Rick Mailloux Windsor (It will be millions — but we will ask these questions. It is appalling this is still going on) Editorial Cartoons World Canada Celebrity World

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store