El Brasa: Halal-friendly hawker Samyang pasta, charcoal burgers w juicy pulled beef & crispy mentaiko fries
The newly-opened Bukit Batok West Hawker Centre is another food win for the Westies! I covered its opening and visited it on its first day of operations a couple of weeks back. During that trip, El Brasa stood out; the interesting menu items had drawn me to it.
From the lovely co-founder Syahir Osman, I learned that the other founder Mr Lim has had years of hawker experience in Chinese cuisine. They ventured into serving halal Western hawker food, hoping to provide the dishes at affordable prices to appeal to the younger generation. The stall is currently in the process of applying for a halal certification.
El Brasa is said to have been popular even from its soft launch when the hawker centre opened. Customer favourites include the Signature Chicken Chop (S$7.90) and Grilled Salmon (S$13.90) but I decided to go for some of the more unique bestsellers.
I had already chosen a few dishes based on my gut feeling before the arrival, so I was delighted to hear that they were the most recommended ones.
We started off our feast with the Fries (S$5). El Brasa is best known for its fries, which are deep-fried in small batches for the best quality.
Our fries, taken from the freshest batch, were drizzled with Japanese mayonnaise and orange-pink mentaiko sauce and sprinkled with a seaweed topping. Unable to resist temptation, we each stabbed a fork into the pile of potatoes once my camera had eaten its fill.
On their own, the fries were glorious. Fried a deep golden, the thick-cut strips were soft and fluffy on the inside and lightly crisp on the outside without being too greasy. With the toppings, it was an addictive medley of potato and creamy fish roe sauce with umami from the nori flakes and salt. Even I, who doesn't like an overload of mayonnaise, found it enjoyable, though a tad indulgent in big bites.
Our second dish was El Brasa's Samyang Prawn Pasta (S$8.50) inspired by the viral buldak carbonara instant noodles, studded with shiitake mushrooms and topped with 4 prawns.
My first bite of the fragrant noodles with sauce was heaven in pasta form. The al dente spaghetti picked up the spicy cream sauce in its crevices as it twirled, resulting in the richest and most flavourful bite. While not instantly spicy, the heat of the chilli hit the back of my throat after each mouthful.
My friend commented that the pasta sauce tasted more like a gochugaru cream sauce rather than like the original instant noodle dish, and I agreed. Nonetheless, it was delicious!
Though the prawns weren't gigantic, they were still larger than the shrimps I am used to seeing in cheap hawker pasta. Furthermore, each had been meticulously deshelled without wasting even the bits at the tail. This made eating them simpler as I just had to pop each piece in my mouth to savour the bouncy and ocean-fresh flesh.
The shiitake mushrooms added savoury-sweet earthy notes to the spicy pasta. It wasn't a combination I expected, but still one that worked well. I also enjoyed the chewiness of each slice, though some were slightly tougher than others.
Panda Bee: XL $7.90 hawker fish & chips — so big, you'll wonder how they profit
Finally, we tried the Pulled Beef Burger (S$12.90) with El Brasa's signature pulled beef and a side of fries.
The black charcoal burger buns topped with sesame seeds were quite the sight. Flavour-wise, there wasn't much to comment about; the charcoal seemed to be there solely for presentation. They were soft enough but not as fluffy as I'd hoped, though still alright overall.
Inside, there was a mayonnaise spread, lettuce, pulled beef and caramelised onions.
The pulled beef was so amazing that I wished I could order a whole plate alone. Still dripping with gravy, the beefy shreds were perfectly soft after being slow-cooked for hours. When I say that the meat was so addictively juicy and tender that I couldn't stop eating it, I mean it wholeheartedly. It shone even without the help of the buns and additional toppings!
To my surprise, the caramelized onions weren't sweet. Instead, they tasted sharp and savoury, possibly due to the type of onions they used. This, however, was a great complement to the beef.
Well, colour me impressed. That was a decent meal! I daresay you could claim these dishes were from a restaurant and I'd genuinely believe it. Crispy fries, tender pulled beef, flavourful pasta with sauce – what could be better than this?
My friend fell in love with the Samyang Pasta at first bite. While it might not have tasted exactly like Samyang instant noodles, she found it wonderfully spicy and creamy. This alongside the pulled beef was my favourite, though the buns were just average in my opinion.
Since El Brasa is a stone's throw away from my area, I'll bring my friends and family here for lunch or dinner in the future!
Expected damage: S$8.50 – S$13.50 per pax
Order Delivery: Deliveroo
All 'Bout Chicken: Affordable fresh fried chicken that is also finger-licking good
The post El Brasa: Halal-friendly hawker Samyang pasta, charcoal burgers w juicy pulled beef & crispy mentaiko fries appeared first on SETHLUI.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
China Dominates 44% of Visible Fishing Activity Worldwide
A new Oceana analysis reveals the global scale of China's visible fishing fleet Washington, D.C., June 05, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Today, on the International Day for the Fight Against Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated Fishing, Oceana released an analysis of China's global fishing* activity worldwide between 2022 and 2024. The analysis shows China's global fishing footprint, in which 57,000 of their industrial fishing vessels dominated 44% of the world's visible fishing activity during this period. 'To protect our oceans and fisheries, we must know who is fishing and where,' said Dr. Max Valentine, illegal fishing and transparency campaign director and senior scientist at Oceana. 'It is critical that we have eyes on the seas, paying close attention to the world's largest fishing fleets, especially from China, which have been linked to illegal, unreported, and unregulated fishing and human rights abuses at sea. The sheer scale of China's distant-water fleet has a profound impact on marine ecosystems worldwide. Transparency at sea is essential, not just to track distant-water fleets, but to hold bad actors accountable, protect vulnerable communities, and safeguard the sustainability of our ocean for future generations.' Some key takeaways from Oceana's analysis of China's apparent fishing activity over a three-year period, from Jan. 1, 2022, to Dec. 31, 2024: 57,000 fishing vessels, primarily trawlers, flagged to China appeared to fish for more than 110 million hours, China's fishing vessels appeared to conduct 44% of the global fishing activity during this period, Chinese vessels accounted for 30% of all fishing activity on the high seas, appearing to fish for more than 8.3 million hours, China's fishing vessels were most active in South Korea (11.8 million hours), Taiwan (4.4 million hours), Japan (1.5 million hours), Kiribati (almost 425,000 hours), and Papua New Guinea (over 415,000 hours), China appeared to fish in more than 90 countries' waters for more than 22 million hours. Increased transparency in global fisheries is critical. Oceana calls on governments to require vessel monitoring for both their fishing fleets and vessels they authorize to fish in their waters. The analysis used data from Global Fishing Watch** (GFW) — an independent nonprofit founded by Oceana in partnership with Google and SkyTruth. Notably, the analysis reflects only a partial view of China's fishing activities during this time, as it includes only those vessels flagged to China and transmitting automatic identification system (AIS) data, making them 'visible' to public tracking systems. Background Illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing is a low-risk, high-reward activity, especially on the high seas where a fragmented legal framework and lack of effective enforcement allow it to thrive. IUU fishing can include fishing without authorization, ignoring catch limits, operating in closed or protected areas, targeting protected wildlife, and fishing with prohibited gear. These illicit activities can destroy important ocean habitat, severely deplete fish populations, and threaten global food security. These actions not only contribute to overfishing, but also give illegal fishers an unfair advantage over those who play by the rules. Oceana released the results of a nationwide poll in 2024, which found that American voters overwhelmingly support transparency and traceability in the seafood supply chain. Included among the key findings, 90% of voters agree that imported seafood should be held to the same standards as U.S. caught seafood. Additionally, 91% of voters agree that seafood caught using human trafficking and slave labor should NOT be bought or sold in the U.S. Eighty-five percent of voters agree that all seafood should be traceable from the fishing boat to the dinner plate, and 88% say consumers should be reassured that the seafood they purchase was legally caught. Oceana's poll, conducted by the nonpartisan polling company Ipsos using the probability-based KnowledgePanel®, surveyed 1,053 registered U.S. voters from June 28 to 30, 2024. Read more about Oceana's campaign . *Any and all references to 'fishing' should be understood in the context of Global Fishing Watch's (GFW) fishing detection algorithm, which is a best effort to determine 'apparent fishing effort' based on vessel speed and direction data from the automatic identification system (AIS) collected via satellites and terrestrial receivers. As AIS data varies in completeness, accuracy, and quality, and the fishing detection algorithm is a statistical estimate of apparent fishing activity, it is possible that some fishing effort is not identified and, conversely, that some fishing effort identified is not fishing. For these reasons, GFW qualifies all designations of vessel fishing effort, including synonyms of the term 'fishing effort,' such as 'fishing' or 'fishing activity,' as 'apparent' rather than certain. Any/all GFW information about 'apparent fishing effort' should be considered an estimate and must be relied upon solely at your own risk. GFW is taking steps to make sure fishing effort designations are as accurate as possible. All references to EEZ boundaries and sovereignty are based solely off the Marine Regions "World EEZ v12" definitions. **Global Fishing Watch, a provider of open data for use in this analysis, is an international nonprofit organization dedicated to advancing ocean governance through increased transparency of human activity at sea. The views and opinions expressed in this press release and fact sheet are those of the authors, which are not connected with or sponsored, endorsed or granted official status by Global Fishing Watch. By creating and publicly sharing map visualizations, data and analysis tools, Global Fishing Watch aims to enable scientific research and transform the way our ocean is managed. Global Fishing Watch's public data was used in the production of this fact sheet. Oceana is the largest international advocacy organization dedicated solely to ocean conservation. Oceana is rebuilding abundant and biodiverse oceans by winning science-based policies in countries that control one-quarter of the world's wild fish catch. With more than 325 victories that stop overfishing, habitat destruction, oil and plastic pollution, and the killing of threatened species like turtles, whales, and sharks, Oceana's campaigns are delivering results. A restored ocean means that 1 billion people can enjoy a healthy seafood meal every day, forever. Together, we can save the oceans and help feed the world. Visit to learn more. Attachment Oceana's Analysis on China Fishing CONTACT: Oceana mjordan@ in to access your portfolio
9 hours ago
California's Yurok Tribe gets back ancestral lands that were taken over 120 years ago
ON THE KLAMATH RIVER, Calif. -- As a youngster, Barry McCovey Jr. would sneak through metal gates and hide from security guards just to catch a steelhead trout in Blue Creek amid northwestern California redwoods. Since time immemorial, his ancestors from the Yurok Tribe had fished, hunted and gathered in this watershed flanked by coastal forests. But for more than 100 years, these lands were owned and managed by timber companies, severing the tribe's access to its homelands. When McCovey started working as a fisheries technician, the company would let him go there to do his job. 'Snorkeling Blue Creek ... I felt the significance of that place to myself and to our people, and I knew then that we had to do whatever we could to try and get that back,' McCovey said. After a 23-year effort and $56 million, that became reality. Roughly 73 square miles (189 square kilometers) of homelands have been returned to the Yurok, more than doubling the tribe's land holdings, according to a deal announced Thursday. Completion of the land-back conservation deal along the lower Klamath River — a partnership with Western Rivers Conservancy and other environmental groups — is being called the largest in California history. The Yurok Tribe had 90% of its territory taken during the California Gold Rush in the mid-1800s, suffering massacres and disease from settlers. 'To go from when I was a kid and 20 years ago even, from being afraid to go out there to having it be back in tribal hands … is incredible,' said McCovey, director of the Yurok Tribal Fisheries Department. ___ EDITOR'S NOTE: This is part of a series of on how tribes and Indigenous communities are coping with and combating climate change. ___ Land Back is a global movement seeking the return of homelands to Indigenous people through ownership or co-stewardship. In the last decade, nearly 4,700 square miles (12,173 square kilometers) were returned to tribes in 15 states through a federal program. Organizations are aiding similar efforts. There's mounting recognition that Indigenous people's traditional knowledge is critical to addressing climate change. Studies found the healthiest, most biodiverse and resilient forests are on protected native lands where Indigenous people remained stewards. Beth Rose Middleton Manning, a University of California, Davis professor of Native American Studies, said Indigenous people's perspective — living in relation with the lands, waterways and wildlife — is becoming widely recognized, and is a stark contrast to Western views. 'Management of a forest to grow conifers for sale is very different from thinking about the ecosystem and the different plants and animals and people as part of it and how we all play a role," she said. The Yurok people will now manage these lands and waterways. The tribe's plans include reintroducing fire as a forest management tool, clearing lands for prairie restoration, removing invasive species and planting trees while providing work for some of the tribe's more than 5,000 members and helping restore salmon and wildlife. One fall morning in heavy fog, a motorboat roared down the turbid Klamath toward Blue Creek — the crown jewel of these lands — past towering redwoods, and cottonwoods, willows, alders. Suddenly, gray gave way to blue sky, where an osprey and bald eagle soared. Along a bank, a black bear scrambled over rocks. The place is home to imperiled marbled murrelets, northern spotted owls and Humboldt martens, as well as elk, deer and mountain lions. The Klamath River basin supports fish — steelhead, coho and Chinook salmon — that live in both fresh and saltwater. The Klamath was once the West Coast's third largest salmon-producing river and the life force of Indigenous people. But the state's salmon stock has plummeted so dramatically — in part from dams and diversions — that fishing was banned for the third consecutive year. 'We can't have commercial fishing because populations are so low,' said Tiana Williams-Claussen, director of the Yurok Tribe Wildlife Department. 'Our people would use the revenue to feed their families; now there's less than one salmon per Yurok Tribe member." Experts say restoring Blue Creek complements the successful, decades-long fight by tribes to remove the Klamath dams — the largest dam removal in U.S. history. This watershed is a cold-water lifeline in the lower Klamath for spawning salmon and steelhead that stop to cool down before swimming upstream. That's key amid climate-infused droughts and warming waters. 'For the major river to have its most critical and cold-water tributary … just doing its job is critical to the entire ecosystem,' said Sue Doroff, co-founder and former president of Western Rivers Conservancy. For more than 100 years, these lands were owned and managed for industrial timber. Patchworks of 15 to 20 acres (6 to 8 hectares) at a time of redwoods and Douglas firs have been clear cut to produce and sell logs domestically, according to Galen Schuler, a vice president at Green Diamond Resource Company, the previous landowner. Schuler said the forests have been sustainably managed, with no more than 2% cut annually, and that old growth is spared. He said they are 'maybe on the third round' of clear cutting since the 1850s. But clear cutting creates sediment that winds up in streams, making them shallower, more prone to warming and worsening water quality, according to Josh Kling, conservation director for the conservancy. Sediment, including from roads, can also smother salmon eggs and kill small fish. Culverts, common on Western logging roads, have also been an issue here. Most "were undersized relative to what a fish needs for passage,' Kling said. Land management decisions for commercial timber have also created some dense forests of small trees, making them wildfire prone and water thirsty, according to Williams-Claussen. 'I know a lot of people would look at the forested hillsides around here and be like, 'It's beautiful, it's forested.' But see that old growth on the hill, like way up there?' asked Sarah Beesley, fisheries biologist for the Yurok Tribe, sitting on a rock in Blue Creek. 'There's like one or two of those." Fire bans, invasive plants and encroachment of unmanaged native species have contributed to loss of prairies, historically home to abundant elk and deer herds and where the Yurok gathered plants for cultural and medicinal uses. Western Rivers Conservancy bought and conveyed land to the tribe in phases. The $56 million for the conservation deal came from private capital, low interest loans, tax credits, public grants and carbon credit sales that will continue to support restoration. The tribe aims to restore historic prairies by removing invasive species and encroaching native vegetation. The prairies are important food sources for elk and the mardon skipper butterfly, said Kling from the conservancy. Trees removed from prairies will be used as logjams for creeks to create habitat for frogs, fish and turtles. The tribe will reintroduce fire to aid in prairie restoration and reestablish forest diversity and mature forests to help imperiled species bounce back. Members know its going to take decades of work for these lands and waterways to heal. 'And maybe all that's not going to be done in my lifetime,' said McCovey, the fisheries director. 'But that's fine, because I'm not doing doing this for myself.'
Newsweek
9 hours ago
- Newsweek
'Game-Changing' Anti-Ship Weapon Tested by US Stealth Bomber
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. An American stealth bomber recently tested a "game-changing" weapon designed to sink warships amid China's rapid naval buildup to challenge the United States in the Pacific. The new weapon—known as Quicksink—is capable of "rapidly and efficiently" sinking maritime targets, the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory said in a news release on Wednesday. Newsweek has contacted the Chinese Defense Ministry for comment by email. Why It Matters China has the largest navy in the world by hull count, according to the Pentagon, with more than 370 ships and submarines—including two aircraft carriers in active service—enabling Beijing to expand its military reach and presence within and beyond the western Pacific. Facing China's growing naval threat, the U.S. has been arming its allies and partners in the Pacific—Australia, Japan and Taiwan—with various anti-ship weapons and deploying the Maritime Strike Tomahawk, the ship-sinking variant of the Tomahawk cruise missile. A United States Air Force B-2 stealth bomber returning to Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri on May 9. A United States Air Force B-2 stealth bomber returning to Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri on May 9. Senior Airman Devan Halstead/U.S. Air Force What To Know The test—which took place at a Gulf test range near Eglin Air Force Base in northwestern Florida—involved a B-2 stealth bomber and the 500-pound variant of the Quicksink maritime weapon. Official photos indicate the test was conducted in late April. Quicksink is a U.S. Air Force weapons program aimed at creating "air-delivered, low-cost, surface vessel defeat capability" to enhance Washington's power projection and maintain freedom of navigation in critical waterways, the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory said. The weapon itself is a modified Joint Direct Attack Munition—a family of precision-guided bombs—enhanced with anti-ship capabilities. The 2,000-pound Quicksink variant was successfully tested during an exercise in the Pacific last year, according to the news release. The new, smaller Quicksink variant is modified from the GBU-38 Joint Direct Attack Munition and is set to expand the B-2 bomber's targeting capabilities. The bomber is designed to penetrate the "most sophisticated defenses" and can carry up to 40,000 pounds of weapons. This capability provides a rapid response to maritime threats, the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory said, significantly bolstering the Air Force's counter-maritime deterrence and operations. However, it remains unclear whether the weapon has been officially fielded. A United States airman preparing GBU-38 Joint Direct Attack Munitions to be loaded onto a B-2 stealth bomber at Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri for a Quicksink test on April 22. A United States airman preparing GBU-38 Joint Direct Attack Munitions to be loaded onto a B-2 stealth bomber at Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri for a Quicksink test on April 22. Senior Airman Joshua Hastings/U.S. Air Force Tom Shugart, a former U.S. Navy submariner and an adjunct senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security, wrote on X, formerly Twitter, that he would be "pretty surprised" if the stealth bomber flew within range of Chinese warships to drop the bomb. "Are we 1,000 percent sure that their air defense systems aren't going to get a sniff?" he asked. The B-2 bomber is one of the U.S. Air Force's most valuable assets, with only 19 aircraft in service. What People Are Saying General David Allvin, the U.S. Air Force's chief of staff, wrote on X on Wednesday: "We unleashed a new QUICKSINK weapon, which significantly enhances our ability to strike stationary or moving surface vessels. This is a true game-changer for the [Department of Defense] and is exactly what [President Donald Trump] means by PEACE THROUGH STRENGTH!" The U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory said on its website: "QUICKSINK is an answer to the need to quickly neutralize menacing maritime threats over vast areas around the world. … QUICKSINK is unique because it can provide new capabilities to existing and future DoD weapons systems, giving combatant commanders and our national leaders new ways to defend against maritime threats." What Happens Next It remains to be seen whether the U.S. Air Force and other service branches will develop entirely new weapons or modify existing armaments to neutralize enemy warships.
