Fast-tracked housing fund will help Saint John build more than 1,100 new units, official says
A pot of money worth $9.2 million will help Saint John build hundreds of urgently needed new housing units over the next two years, a city official says.
Carrie Smith, project manager of the city's housing accelerator project, said the funding is linked to plans for 1,158 new units by the end of 2026.
"We're all just elated and we're looking forward to doing more good work around housing in the city," Smith told Information Morning Saint John.
Smith also said that half of what is being developed will be affordable housing, well above the 101 units earmarked in the city's action plan for the fund.
In an interview, Smith said Saint John is trying to improve on a tight vacancy rate that hovers around two per cent.
"I think we have a pretty big gap," Smith said, adding that demand for housing continues to grow each year.
"Our growth is projected to be about two per cent. So we're not making any progress if we can't get more units built, and we need places for people to live if they want to work and grow the city."
Administered by CMHC, or the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp., the Housing Accelerator Fund aims to fast-track housing work across the country to address high costs, low inventories and poor access.
Smith said access to the program has already led to results.
"The grant programs that we've launched as part of this have really revitalized some stalled housing projects, and a number of projects that have been kind of in the wings are now looking to move forward within the next year or so," Smith said.
In a statement, CMHC said the program will "help cut red tape" and help add at least 112,000 new homes across Canada by 2028.
The fund's action plan states that homes being constructed are a combination of single-unit houses and multi-unit buildings.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Toronto Star
a day ago
- Toronto Star
Government adviser slams Mark Carney for promoting ‘decarbonized' oil pipelines
OTTAWA — The co-chair of the federal government's climate action advisory group is slamming Prime Minister Mark Carney for using fossil fuel 'marketing speak' at Monday's summit with provincial leaders, when he endorsed the idea of building new pipelines for 'decarbonized' oil. Simon Donner, a climate scientist at the University of British Columbia who co-chairs the Liberal government's Net Zero Advisory Body, alleged the term is misleading because it falsely suggests there is a way to burn fossil fuels without creating greenhouse gas emissions that cause climate change. 'There is no such thing as decarbonized oil and gas. Oil contains carbon. It is high school chemistry. And they emit carbon dioxide when they're used,' Donner told the Star. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW Prime Minister Mark Carney says there are discussions about building new pipelines to ship what he called decarbonized barrels of oil. But he says the range of the discussion is about more than just pipelines, involving the Western-Arctic corridor to move a broader number of products. (June 3, 2025 / The Canadian Press) 'The government is going to embarrass itself by using such industry and marketing speak.' Leaving a cabinet meeting on Parliament Hill Tuesday, Natural Resources Minister Tim Hodgson and Environment Minister Julie Dabrusin ignored questions about what the government means by 'decarbonized' oil. Carney made the statement at Monday's meeting with the premiers in Saskatoon, where his plan to fast-track development projects 'of national interest' took centre stage. Alberta Premier Danielle Smith — a staunch promoter of the fossil fuel sector who has long opposed federal climate policies like carbon pricing and regulations to limit emissions — said she was encouraged by the new government's approach. That included what she called a 'compromise' to allow new fossil fuel infrastructure to be built outside the current federal review process, which critics have blamed for blocking projects. Smith also said there was a 'grand bargain,' where the federal government would make it easier for the private sector to build new fossil fuel pipelines, while supporting plans under the 'Pathways Alliance' of oilsands companies to build a huge carbon capture project. During question period in the House of Commons on Tuesday, Hodgson referred to Smith's comments, describing the 'grand bargain' as a plan to 'build our energy superpower in an … environmentally responsible way, in consultation' with Indigenous Peoples. 'We support new pipelines if there is a national consensus,' Hodgson added. With billions of dollars in federal tax credits on the table, the Pathways carbon capture project is meant to reduce emissions from the extraction of fossil fuels, a process that is responsible for the largest share of any economic sector, as measured in Canada's most recent national tally of greenhouse gas pollution. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW In an emailed statement, Pathways president Kendall Dilling said the group is 'encouraged' by recent signs, including at this week's first ministers' meeting. 'We need every industry, including the oilsands, thriving and making vital contributions to the economy,' Dilling said. Janetta McKenzie, director of oil and gas at the Pembina Institute, a climate and environmental policy think tank, said Tuesday that it's important for Canada to press to reduce emissions from the production of oil, as greenhouse gas pollution from oil and gas extraction has increased by 70 per cent from 2005 to 2023, according to the national emissions tally. But with questions about when the Pathways project could come online, McKenzie said policies like carbon pricing and regulations to limit emissions are needed if high levels of production can continue without blowing Canada's effort to hit its emissions targets over the next decade. 'If we do want decarbonized barrels to be moving through this pipeline, there's something missing,' McKenzie said. The discussion highlights a political tightrope for the federal government on climate and energy policies, with pressure from environmentalists and those concerned about climate change to help the global crisis by reducing emissions, and demands from others to promote Canada's lucrative oil and gas sector. The industry generated $187 billion of economic activity in 2022, when it accounted for 30 per cent of Canada's total exports and employed almost 172,000 people, according to Natural Resources Canada. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW The government has said it remains committed to fighting climate change, but early signals of support for potential fossil fuel projects have prompted environmentalists to urge Carney to ' pick a lane ' between increased oil production and serious commitment to reducing emissions. Carney suggested last month that his government could change previous policies like the plan to create a regulatory cap to limit and start reducing emissions from the oil and gas sector to at least 19 per cent below 2019 levels between 2030 and 2032. Carney removed the national requirement for provinces and territories to have a consumer carbon price, while promising to strengthen industrial carbon pricing and other measures to ensure Canada hits its emissions targets. Canada is responsible for 1.41 per cent of global emissions in 2023, according to European Union figures. It has pledged to slash national emissions to 40 per cent below 2005 levels by 2030, and at least 45 per cent below 2005 levels by 2035. Emissions were 8.5 per cent below 2005 levels in 2023, according to the most recent government tally. Politics Headlines Newsletter Get the latest news and unmatched insights in your inbox every evening Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. Please enter a valid email address. Sign Up Yes, I'd also like to receive customized content suggestions and promotional messages from the Star. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Politics Headlines Newsletter You're signed up! You'll start getting Politics Headlines in your inbox soon. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page.
Winnipeg Free Press
2 days ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Manitoba ‘particularly vulnerable' to tariff-fuelled core building materials price hikes: CMHC
Due to a reliance on imports, tariffs on core building materials could hit Manitoba harder than other provinces. A Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. report in February flagged Manitoba and Saskatchewan as facing the highest potential cost increases because of a 'heavy' reliance on imported U.S. steel, aluminum and concrete. The market insights report was assembled as Canadians braced for sweeping 25 per cent tariffs. It was shared with the Free Press recently via a freedom of information request. MIKE DEAL / FREE PRESS FILES A Winnipeg Construction Association memo notes a 10.7 per cent drop in permit numbers during the first three months of 2025. At the time, the CMHC projected Manitoba could see a 3.7 per cent price increase on core building materials: steel, aluminum, concrete and softwood. 'Regions like Manitoba and Saskatchewan are particularly vulnerable due to limited local production capacity,' the report reads. Four months later, blanket 25 per cent tariffs haven't appeared. However, a levy applies to all steel and aluminum imports to the U.S.; Canada reciprocated with a swath of 25 per cent tariffs on inbound steel and aluminum. U.S. President Donald Trump doubled his tariff on the two core building materials Wednesday. 'This report certainly shows that the construction industry in Manitoba has exposure to the evolving tariff situation,' said Darryl Harrison, Winnipeg Construction Association director of stakeholder engagement. Industry members have been altering their supply chains to minimize costs. It includes sourcing more Canadian steel and ensuring contracts don't specify American products, Harrison said. Manitoba imported $32.9 million worth of U.S. iron and steel more than it exported in 2023, per Statistics Canada data. It saw a similar deficit — but $51.9 million — for aluminum. Despite the economic uncertainty, Manitoba contractors have more bidding opportunities now than a year ago, Harrison said. The Winnipeg Construction Association has an online tender platform. The projects awarded during the first three months of 2025, however, was a noticeable drop from the same period in 2024. 'The tariffs certainly would have an impact,' Harrison said. U.S. levies — and Canada's reciprocal fees — came online in March, after months of threats and uncertainty. A Winnipeg Construction Association memo notes a 10.7 per cent drop in permit numbers during the first three months of 2025. Then, $988 million worth of permits were awarded; the number was $1.1 billion a year earlier. Institutional permit numbers plunged 53 per cent; industrial followed with a 36 per cent decline. Commercial and residential permits bucked the trend with year-over-year increases. 'My feeling is that people are more comfortable (now) in trying to find ways to manage the uncertainty of tariffs,' Harrison said. But the recent doubling of American steel and aluminum import tariffs — and possible reactive tariffs from Canada — could have an impact, he added. Supply-Build Canada hasn't clocked big differentials in tariff exposure across the country, said president Liz Kovach. Some U.S. suppliers have eaten tariff costs. 'I don't know how long they're going to be able to do that,' Kovach said. '(And) now that the tariffs have doubled, it's going to take a little while to see what that impact will be on the industry.' Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. Canadian construction firms also face a headwind from an ongoing softwood lumber dispute with the U.S., Kovach added. She's bracing for a doubling of duties on such exports this year. Manitoba exported more softwood to the U.S. than it imported in 2023, at a net export of $244 million. Freight costs — and the distance required to get material — seems to be a large factor in price fluctuations, Kovach said. The CMHC hasn't analyzed whether core building material prices have increased since February, but stakeholders say rising prices are affecting construction, spokesman Leonard Catling wrote in a statement. 'We continue to closely monitor housing market activity.' Gabrielle PichéReporter Gabrielle Piché reports on business for the Free Press. She interned at the Free Press and worked for its sister outlet, Canstar Community News, before entering the business beat in 2021. Read more about Gabrielle. Every piece of reporting Gabrielle produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press's tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates. Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
Winnipeg Free Press
2 days ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Supreme Court blocks Mexico's $10B lawsuit alleging US gunmakers have fueled cartel violence
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Thursday blocked a $10 billion lawsuit Mexico filed against top firearm manufacturers in the U.S. alleging the companies' business practices have fueled tremendous cartel violence and bloodshed. The unanimous ruling tossed out the case under U.S. laws that largely shield gunmakers from liability when their firearms are used in crime. Big-name manufacturers like Smith & Wesson had appealed to the justices after a lower court let the suit go forward under an exception for situations in which the companies themselves are accused of violating the law. Mexico had asked the justices to let the case play out, saying it was still in its early stages. The case began in 2021, when the Mexican government filed a blockbuster suit against some of the biggest gun companies, including Smith & Wesson, Beretta, Colt and Glock. Mexico has strict gun laws and has just one store where people can legally buy firearms. But thousands of guns are smuggled in by the country's powerful drug cartels every year. The Mexican government says at least 70% of those weapons come from the United States. The lawsuit claims that companies knew weapons were being sold to traffickers who smuggled them into Mexico and decided to cash in on that market. The companies reject Mexico's allegations, arguing the country's lawsuit comes nowhere close to showing they're responsible for a relatively few people using their products to commit violence. A federal judge tossed out the lawsuit under a 2005 law that protects gun companies from most civil lawsuits, but an appeals court revived it. The 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston found it fell under an exception to the shield law for situations in which firearm companies are accused of knowingly breaking laws in their business practices. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. That exception has come up in other cases, including in lawsuits stemming from mass shootings. Families of victims of the 2012 mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, for example, argued it applied to their lawsuit because the gunmaker had violated state law in the marketing of the AR-15 rifle used in the shooting, in which 20 first graders and six educators were killed. The families eventually secured a landmark $73 million settlement with Remington, the maker of the rifle. ___ Follow the AP's coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court at
