Strategic posturing in a multipolar world
https://arab.news/ms6cr
US President Donald Trump's tour of the Gulf was far more than a ceremonial engagement. It was a choreographed exercise in strategic projection: part arms bazaar, part geopolitical theater, and part economic sales mission.
The timing was critical. US influence in the Middle East is no longer a given, and the region's aspirations have outgrown their historical dependencies. With China extending its reach and Gulf monarchies pursuing bold visions of transformation, the visit tested Washington's continued relevance in a world increasingly defined by multipolarity.
True to his brand as a dealmaker, Trump placed commerce at the center of his visit. Announcements of multibillion-dollar agreements dominated the headlines, ranging from expansive arms sales to Saudi Arabia and the UAE, to infrastructure investments, technology transfers, and fledgling partnerships in artificial intelligence and renewable energy.
For Trump, the logic was straightforward: These deals promise jobs back home, project strength abroad, and reinforce his campaign narrative of economic nationalism and American exceptionalism.
For Gulf states, Trump's visit reaffirmed their centrality to US strategic calculations. In a region where optics carry geopolitical weight, his presence underscored a clear message: The US is still engaged, and transactional loyalty remains a currency that yields dividends.
Gulf leaders extracted more than symbolism. The visit aligned with their sweeping national agendas, from Saudi Arabia's Vision 2030 and the UAE's industrial diversification to Qatar's long-term investments in energy, education, and technology. Trump's endorsement provides political cover for these domestic overhauls, while insulating them from Western scrutiny.
Yet this is not a return to Cold War binaries. Gulf capitals understand the precariousness of relying too heavily on American guarantees, particularly in an era of growing US isolationism. Their strategy is pragmatic: Hedge alliances, broaden partnerships, and deepen autonomy.
Looming behind Trump's Gulf tour was the expanding shadow of China. Over the past decade, Beijing has embedded itself across the region, investing in ports, logistics, digital infrastructure, and energy supply chains. It offers rapid deployment of capital, infrastructure efficiency, and diplomatic noninterference — an attractive alternative to the conditionality of Western engagement.
US President Donald Trump's tour of the Gulf was far more than a ceremonial engagement. It was a choreographed exercise in strategic projection.
Dr. John Sfakianakis
The Gulf is not forced to choose between Washington and Beijing. It is leveraging both to extract maximum strategic value. Trump's mission was not to displace China but to reassert America's competitive edge by offering what Beijing cannot: elite military capabilities, intelligence-sharing frameworks, and the legacy of long-term security cooperation. The defense and tech-focused agreements signed during this trip signaled a renewed American willingness to contest influence in the region, not relinquish it.
One question haunts the cascade of contracts: How will Gulf states finance these commitments amid persistently low oil prices? Although regional economies have amassed significant sovereign wealth over the past two decades, fiscal pressure is mounting. Budget deficits are widening, subsidy cuts remain politically sensitive, and diversification efforts are still nascent in terms of revenue generation.
The answer, for now, lies in the careful management of reserves, reprioritization of capital spending, and a bet that the return on strategic alignment with the US, in terms of security guarantees and investment access, will outweigh the short-term economic strain. But the risk is real; overextension, particularly in a volatile oil market, could jeopardize long-term fiscal stability and delay domestic reforms agendas.
Although not headline news during the visit, energy politics remained a critical undercurrent. Military alliances and diplomatic alignment invariably shape oil-production strategies. A revitalized US-Gulf relationship could yield informal coordination on output policy, especially in moments of global economic turbulence.
Yet the more profound shift is structural. Gulf economies are accelerating their transitions away from hydrocarbons, altering the very foundations of their relationships with the US. Investment, innovation and industrial collaboration are becoming the new pillars of engagement. This transition will redefine global capital flows, diminish the centrality of the petrodollar, and reshape energy diplomacy for decades to come.
Tactically, the visit delivered results. Trump walked away with deals he can market as economic and diplomatic victories. Gulf leaders secured visibility, AI deals, investment, and a reaffirmation of their strategic relevance.
But deeper uncertainties persist. Many agreements are aspirational or on the long-term horizon and could be derailed by future US policy reversals. Tying regional strategy too tightly to a single, polarizing figure risks instability should the American political landscape shift.
More fundamentally, the visit did not reverse the trajectory of an increasingly multipolar world. The US is now one player in a crowded strategic arena that includes China, Europe, and a rising class of autonomous regional actors.
Trump's Gulf visit reinvigorated a crucial relationship. But it did not end the game. That contest continues to unfold — in Washington, in Beijing, and in the Arab Gulf capitals of Riyadh, Abu Dhabi, and Doha.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
Israel admits to supporting anti-Hamas armed group in Gaza
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu admitted that Israel is supporting an armed group in Gaza that opposes the militant group Hamas, following comments by a former minister that Israel had transferred weapons to it. Israeli and Palestinian media have reported that the group Israel has been working with is part of a local Bedouin tribe led by Yasser Abu Shabab. The European Council on Foreign Relations (EFCR) think tank describes Abu Shabab as the leader of a 'criminal gang operating in the Rafah area that is widely accused of looting aid trucks.' Knesset member and ex-defense minister Avigdor Liberman had told the Kan public broadcaster that the government, at Netanyahu's direction, was 'giving weapons to a group of criminals and felons.' 'What did Liberman leak? That security sources activated a clan in Gaza that opposes Hamas? What is bad about that?' Netanyahu said in a video posted to social media on Thursday. 'It is only good, it is saving lives of Israeli soldiers.' Michael Milshtein, an expert on Palestinian affairs at the Moshe Dayan Center in Tel Aviv, told AFP that the Abu Shabab clan was part of a Bedouin tribe that spans across the border between Gaza and Egypt's Sinai peninsula. Some of the tribe's members, he said, were involved in 'all kinds of criminal activities, drug smuggling, and things like that.' Army spokesman Brigadier General Effie Defrin on Friday confirmed the military supported arming local militias in Gaza but remained tight-lipped on the details. 'I can say that we are operating in various ways against Hamas governance,' Defrin said during a televised press conference when questioned on the subject, without elaborating further. 'Gangster' Milshtein said that Abu Shabab had spent time in prison in Gaza and that his clan chiefs had recently denounced him as an Israeli 'collaborator and a gangster.' 'It seems that actually the Shabak (Israeli security agency) or the (military) thought it was a wonderful idea to turn this militia, gang actually, into a proxy, to give them weapons and money and shelter' from army operations, Milshtein said. He added that Hamas killed four members of the gang days ago. The ECFR said Abu Shabab was 'reported to have been previously jailed by Hamas for drug smuggling. His brother is said to have been killed by Hamas during a crackdown against the group's attacks on UN aid convoys.' Israel regularly accuses Hamas, with which it has been at war for nearly 20 months, of looting aid convoys in Gaza. Hamas said the group had 'chosen betrayal and theft as their path' and called on civilians to oppose them. Hamas, which has ruled Gaza for nearly two decades, said it had evidence of 'clear coordination between these looting gangs, collaborators with the occupation (Israel), and the enemy army itself in the looting of aid and the fabrication of humanitarian crises that deepen the suffering of' Palestinians. The Popular Forces, as Abu Shabab's group calls itself, said on Facebook it had 'never been, and will never be, a tool of the occupation.' 'Our weapons are simple, outdated and came through the support of our own people,' it added. Milshtein called Israel's decision to arm a group such as Abu Shabab 'a fantasy, not something that you can really describe as a strategy.' 'I really hope it will not end with catastrophe,' he said.
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
Israel army announces four soldiers killed in Gaza, thousands more troops needed
Israel's military announced Friday the deaths of four soldiers in Gaza, saying it needed thousands more troops to press its offensive, just as the premier's coalition faces the prospect of collapse over ultra-Orthodox conscription. News of the soldiers' deaths came as Gaza's civil defense agency reported 38 killed Friday in Israeli attacks across the territory, where Palestinians observed the Eid al-Adha holiday under the shadow of war for a second consecutive year. Military spokesman Effie Defrin said the four soldiers were killed as they 'were operating in the Khan Yunis area, in a compound belonging to the Hamas terrorist organization.' 'Around six in the morning, an explosive device detonated, causing part of the structure to collapse,' he said, adding that five other soldiers were wounded, one of them severely. 'The losses suffered today by the occupation in Khan Younis... illustrate what the occupation forces will face wherever they are present,' said a statement attributed to Abu Obeida, spokesman for the armed of Hamas, the Ezzedine al-Qassam Brigades, while urging the Israeli public to 'force its leaders to end the war of extermination or prepare to receive more of its sons in coffins.' The deaths bring to 429 the number of Israeli soldiers killed in Gaza since the start of the ground offensive in late October 2023. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu extended his condolences to the soldiers' families, saying they 'sacrificed their lives for the safety of all of us.' Israel recently stepped up its Gaza campaign in what it says is a renewed push to defeat Hamas, whose October 7, 2023 attack sparked the war. Conscription row Asked by a reporter about the issue of ultra-Orthodox conscription, which has emerged as a thorn in the side of Netanyahu's government, Defrin said 'this is the need of the moment, an operational necessity.' The army was short around 10,000 soldiers, he added, including about 6,000 in combat roles, adding that 'tens of thousands more notices will be issued in the upcoming draft cycle.' The conscription issue has threatened to sink Netanyahu's government, with ultra-Orthodox religious parties warning they will pull out of his coalition if Netanyahu fails to make good on a promise to codify the military exemption for their community in law. At the same time, much of the public has turned against the exemption amid the increasing strain put on reservists' families by repeated call-up orders during the war. In April, a military representative told a parliamentary committee that of 18,000 draft notices sent to ultra-Orthodox individuals, only 232 received a positive response. Netanyahu's office announced shortly after 1:00 am on Friday that he had met with a lawmaker from his Likud party who has recently pushed for a bill aimed at increasing the ultra-Orthodox enlistment and toughening sanctions on those who refuse. The premier's office said 'significant progress was made,' with 'unresolved issues' to be ironed out later. Netanyahu also faced scrutiny after he admitted to supporting an armed group in Gaza that opposes Hamas. Knesset member and ex-defense minister Avigdor Liberman had told the Kan public broadcaster that the government, at Netanyahu's direction, was 'giving weapons to a group of criminals and felons.' The European Council on Foreign Relations think tank describes the group a 'criminal gang operating in the Rafah area that is widely accused of looting aid trucks.' 'He wears a white shroud' The humanitarian situation in Gaza, meanwhile, has reached dire lows, with residents enduring severe shortages of food and other essentials, even after a more than two-month Israeli blockade on aid was recently eased. The shortages have made it all but impossible for many Gazans to celebrate Eid al-Adha, which fell on Friday and is traditionally marked with huge family meals and gifts of new clothes. Suad al-Qarra told AFP from Nasser Hospital on Friday that her son never got a chance to wear his new clothes. 'He went to get dressed and there was an explosion,' she said, her soft voice breaking. 'I took him to the hospital and (they) found him dead.' 'They took the children from us,' she continued. 'I bought him Eid clothes yesterday and he didn't wear them, instead he wears a white shroud.' In the Muslim faith, Eid commemorates the sacrifice Ibrahim -- known to Christians and Jews as Abraham -- was about to make by killing his son, before the angel Gabriel intervened and offered him a sheep to sacrifice instead. The Israeli military did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Friday's strikes. Hamas's unprecedented attack on Israel resulted in the deaths of 1,218 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official figures. According to the Gaza health ministry, at least 4,402 people have been killed since Israel resumed its offensive on March 18 after a brief truce, taking the war's overall toll to 54,677, mostly civilians.
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
US court says Trump can bar AP from key White House events for now
President Donald Trump can bar The Associated Press from some White House media events for now, a federal appeals court ruled Friday, pausing a lower court order to give access to the US news agency's journalists. AP journalists and photographers have been barred from the Oval Office and from traveling on Air Force One since mid-February because of the news agency's decision to continue referring to the 'Gulf of Mexico' -- and not the 'Gulf of America' as decreed by Trump. In April, district court judge Trevor McFadden deemed that move a violation of the First Amendment to the US Constitution, which guarantees freedom of speech and of the press. But on Friday, a panel of judges with the Washington-based federal appeals court ruled that, pending appeal, the government could go ahead and bar AP from 'restricted presidential spaces,' which it said did not fall under First Amendment protections. 'The White House therefore retains discretion to determine, including on the basis of viewpoint, which journalists will be admitted,' the ruling said. 'Moreover, without a stay, the government will suffer irreparable harm because the injunction impinges on the President's independence and control over his private workspaces,' it said. The AP, a 180-year-old organization that has long been a pillar of US journalism, has so far refused to backtrack on its decision to continue referring to the 'Gulf of Mexico.' In its style guide, it highlights that the Gulf of Mexico has 'carried that name for more than 400 years' and the agency 'will refer to it by its original name while acknowledging the new name Trump has chosen.' Trump has long had an antagonistic relationship with most mainstream news media, previously describing them as the 'enemy of the people.' Since his return to the presidency in January, his administration has sought to radically restructure the way the White House is covered, notably by favoring conservative podcasters and influencers. Two weeks after barring the AP, the White House stripped journalists of the nearly century-old power to decide which of the profession's own number will be members of a pool of reporters and photographers covering presidential events. His administration has also pressed to dismantle US government-funded overseas outlets Voice of America, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and Radio Free Asia, and is seeking to starve National Public Radio (NPR) and the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) of federal funds.
