
NDTV Decodes: Engines Shut, Fuel Cut Off - Inside Doomed Air India Flight
On June 12, Air India Flight 171, a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner, departed Ahmedabad's Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport at 1:39 pm, bound for London Gatwick. Within 32 seconds of takeoff, the aircraft crashed into a medical hostel near the airport, killing 241 of the 242 passengers and crew on board and 19 people on the ground.
The sole survivor was a British-Indian man seated in row 11A. This was the first fatal crash of a Boeing 787 since its commercial debut in 2011.
A probe report by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) was released last night. The report points to a series of possibilities and also raises multiple questions on what transpired inside the doomed flight.
Add image caption here
The Takeoff and Aftermath
According to data extracted from the aircraft's Enhanced Airborne Flight Recorder (EAFR), commonly referred to as the black box, Flight 171 carried out a routine takeoff. The Dreamliner accelerated to a takeoff speed of 153 knots or roughly 283 kmph. It then reached a maximum airspeed of 180 knots or roughly 333 kmph, climbing steadily as expected. The flap setting was recorded at five degrees, and the landing gear lever remained in the 'DOWN' position, both standard takeoff procedures.
Weather conditions posed no threat, skies were clear, visibility was good, and winds were light. Yet, within seconds, the fuel control switches for Engine 1 and Engine 2 moved from the "RUN" to "CUTOFF" position, one after the other, within a one-second interval.
These switches govern the flow of fuel to the engines, and their transition to "CUTOFF" halted the supply, causing both engines to lose thrust. The black box data shows that thrust levels began to decrease from their takeoff values almost immediately, triggering a rapid de-throttling process.
The Cockpit Exchange
The cockpit voice recorder (CVR), one of two black box components, captured a brief exchange between the pilots. Captain Sumeet Sabharwal, the commander and pilot monitoring (PM), and First Officer Clive Kunder, the pilot flying (PF), were both experienced and medically fit, with no reported issues that could have compromised their flying. As the engines faltered, one pilot -- identity unconfirmed -- asked, "Why did you cut off?" The other responded, "I didn't."
This dialogue is now at the centre of the investigation.
Was it a misunderstanding, an unacknowledged action, or an external factor beyond the pilots' control? The fuel control switches on a Boeing 787 are not simple toggles.
Each switch features a guard rail. To move a switch from "RUN" (forward) to "CUTOFF" (aft), a pilot must lift and shift it downward. This design minimises the risk of accidental movement, such as a hand brushing against it during flight.
The switches for Engine 1 and Engine 2 are spaced approximately two to three inches apart, making it improbable for both to be moved simultaneously without intent. Yet, the data confirms that both transitioned to "CUTOFF" within a single second.
The Pilots' Response
As thrust diminished, the aircraft's altitude began to drop. The black box indicates that the pilots acted swiftly, moving both fuel control switches back to the "RUN" position. This action, executed approximately 10 seconds after the initial cutoff, aimed to restore fuel flow and restart the engines.
Engine 1 responded and its core speed deceleration halted, reversed, and began to recover, with thrust levels rising. Engine 2 also relit, but its core speed continued to decelerate despite repeated attempts to reintroduce fuel and accelerate recovery. The thrust levers, found near idle in the wreckage, had remained forward until impact, per the flight data recorder (FDR).
Simultaneously, the Ram Air Turbine (RAT), a small propeller deployed automatically in the event of dual engine failure, extended from the fuselage during takeoff. CCTV footage from the airport captured this deployment.
The RAT provides emergency power to sustain critical systems, but it cannot generate thrust. With the aircraft barely a few hundred feet above ground, the partial recovery of Engine 1 proved insufficient.
At 1:39:32 pm, Flight 171 struck the hostel, sparking a fireball that devastated the site.
The Key Focus
The AAIB's preliminary report, spanning dozens of pages, drew on data extracted from the heavily damaged black box units, one located in the forward section, the other in the rear.
These devices, designed to withstand extreme temperatures and impact, house memory chips that record flight data. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) of the United States provided specialised equipment to retrieve this data.
The investigation now centres on the fuel control switches. Three primary theories are under scrutiny:
Human Action: Did one pilot deliberately or inadvertently move the switches? The cockpit exchange suggests neither accepted responsibility.
"No pilot in their right mind would do this. The switches require intentional effort-lifting and moving them past a guard rail. It's not a light switch you flick by mistake," Captain Saurabh Bhatnagar, a former senior commander at Air India Express, told NDTV.
Mechanical Failure: Could a defect have caused the switches to move independently?
External Factors: Could fuel flow have ceased despite the switches remaining in "RUN"? The report finds no evidence of this.
The AAIB has ruled out other variables. No significant bird activity was detected, negating a bird strike theory.
The Auxiliary Power Unit (APU), a rear-mounted mini jet engine, was operational and attempted an autostart to assist engine relight, but its role was secondary to the switches' position. Crucially, the report states there is "no immediate evidence of sabotage."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
FAA sees no mechanical issue with 787 Boeing fuel control unit after Air India crash
OSHKOSH, Wisconsin -The head of the Federal Aviation Administration said on Thursday the fatal crash last month of an Air India Boeing 787 jet does not appear to have been caused by a mechanical issue or inadvertent movement of the fuel control unit or switches. FAA sees no mechanical issue with 787 Boeing fuel control unit after Air India crash "We can say with a high level of confidence is it doesn't appear to be a mechanical issue with the Boeing fuel control unit," Bryan Bedford, the FAA's administrator, told reporters on the sidelines of an air show in Wisconsin. He said FAA employees had taken the units out, tested them and had inspectors get on aircraft and review them. "We feel very comfortable that this isn't an issue with inadvertent manipulation of fuel control," he said. The probe into the Air India crash, which killed 241 of the 242 people on board and 19 on the ground, is focused on the fuel control switches of the Boeing 787 jetliner. The switches control fuel flow to aircraft engines, allowing pilots to start or shut them down on the ground, or manually intervene during in-flight engine failures. Air India said on Tuesday it has completed precautionary inspections of the fuel control switch locking mechanism on all 787 and 737 aircraft, with no issues detected. A preliminary report from India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau earlier this month found the switches had almost simultaneously flipped from "run" to "cutoff" shortly after takeoff, causing the engines to lose power. Reuters reported last week, citing a source, that the cockpit recording on the Air India flight from Ahmedabad to London Gatwick suggested the captain cut fuel to the engines. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Basin bridge can't handle traffic load; govt yet to act
Chennai: Each morning, traffic piles up for more than a kilometre near Basin Bridge flyover, making the commute from North Chennai a daily ordeal. With no alternative routes, more than one lakh people including office-goers, schoolkids, and hospital-bound patients are forced to crawl across the city's oldest and most congested bridge, built between 1869 and 1873 by the British. The bridge, with just a 6m-wide ascending arm and 19m descending arm, cannot accommodate the 20,000 vehicles that try to cross it during peak hours. The situation has worsened in recent months with traffic from the under-construction Ganeshapuram and R K Nagar flyovers being diverted here, adding more pressure on an already saturated stretch. Ambulances are among the worst hit. Basin Bridge is the only direct link between major hospitals such as Rajiv Gandhi Govt General Hospital and Stanley Medical College Hospital. "Emergency vehicles that have turned on their sirens are stranded in the jam. We have to run alongside and request two-wheelers to move," said a traffic constable posted at the junction. You Can Also Check: Chennai AQI | Weather in Chennai | Bank Holidays in Chennai | Public Holidays in Chennai In April 2025, highways minister E V Velu told the Tamil Nadu Assembly that the govt would inspect the site and explore options to either widen the existing bridge or construct a new one. But three months later, officials say there has been no follow-up. "We've heard nothing since from the minister on Basin Bridge inspection," said a senior highways department official. Residents and civic groups say the issue has been ignored for too long. "The bridge should be rebuilt above the Highest Flood Level (HFL) such as Stephen's Road Bridge," said AJ Gopi, a Kodungaiyur resident. For long-term decongestion, some have suggested a larger overhaul. "We need a temporary Bailey bridge now to ease peak-hour pressure," said G Sarathkumar, founder of Vyasai Thozargal. "Eventually, Diamond Junction should be modernized with smart signals, secure railway crossings, and Buckingham Canal should be desilted. All these contribute to the gridlock." Meanwhile, even simple interventions such as widening footpaths or installing signboards — proposed months ago by Greater Chennai Traffic Police — remain unaddressed.


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Gaekwad family to revive 90-year-old Kirti Mandir
Vadodara: Time has finally caught up with Kirti Mandir — Vadodara's majestic royal cenotaph that has stood tall for nine decades. For the first time since it was built in 1936, the iconic structure is set to undergo restoration as age begins to wear down its grandeur. Perched near the Vishwamitri river, the monument has developed cracks in its roof and central dome, leading to water seepage that may threatens priceless frescoes by legendary artist Nandlal Bose. Concerned about its deteriorating condition, the royal Gaekwad family has decided to restore the heritage structure, built in 1936. "After the floods last year, we noticed water seeping in through the central dome and parts of the terrace. Cracks have developed that need urgent attention, especially since this is a heritage site," said Samarjitsinh Gaekwad, scion of the royal family. "We have engaged heritage experts to assess the damage. Restoration of such structures must be carried out with extreme care to avoid further deterioration. Once the assessment is complete, the repair work will begin," Gaekwad told TOI. Commissioned by Maharaja Sayajirao Gaekwad to commemorate the diamond jubilee of his reign, Kirti Mandir is built in the Indo-Saracenic style. Shaped like the letter E, it features a 35-metre-tall intricately carved 'Shikhar' (central dome) symbolizing the sun, moon, and earth, along with an undivided map of India. "The central dome is built using stone in the traditional jack arch style. The main issue is water leakage, which has displaced mortar at several points, leading to corrosion in some of the supporting beams," said Jaswant Arlekar, a structural engineer and expert in heritage restoration. "We plan to recreate the mortar mix and patch the cracks. The restoration work will begin after the monsoon. Fortunately, most of the sandstone structure remains in good condition," Arlekar added. Kirti Mandir also houses the urns of deceased members of the Gaekwad royal family, preserved in separate rooms. The structure remains closed to the public except during the annual Diwali rangoli exhibition. Box Nandlal Bose's timeless frescoes adorn Kirti Mandir's walls Padma Vibhushan Nandlal Bose, who beautifully decorated each page of the original handwritten Constitution of India, created frescoes on the walls of the main hall in Kirti Mandir in the 1940s. The paintings depict Kurukshetra battle scenes in the Mahabharat, the life of Mirabai, and the Buddhist story of King Bimbisara. Born in 1882, Bose, who was the principal of Kala Bhavan, Santiniketan, was known for his Indian style of paintings. His works were influenced by the murals of the Ajanta Caves. These paintings were restored by the royal family in 2018 with the help of INTACH.