Gaza Humanitarian Foundation 'here to stay', its chairman claims
The head of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation has defended his organisation from fierce criticism of its food delivery system and said its mission would continue even after Hamas and Israel eventually reach a ceasefire deal.
The US-backed GHF began giving out meals in May after Israel had prevented all aid, food and water from entering the Gaza Strip for nearly three months, leading to severe food shortages and famine warnings for the Palestinian territory's 2.3 million residents.
But scenes of chaos immediately unfolded at or near GHF distribution sites. More than 500 people have been killed while waiting to receive rations, the UN Human Rights Office said last week.
The GHF has denied that fatal shootings have occurred in the immediate vicinity of its aid points, and foundation chairman Johnnie Moore denied claims that contractors had hurt Palestinians.
'Any reports of GHF personnel harming anyone are false, 100 per cent false," he said in an interview with The National. "We haven't had a single violent incident within the GHF distribution sites, or in immediate proximity to the sites, except for one, and that is when Hamas threw two grenades at our American workers.
'We go to extraordinary means to make sure that our mission is to help people live … it's just like these lies that we're harming people … it's a lie.'
Hamas and Israel are close to agreeing on a ceasefire, US President Donald Trump said on Wednesday, perhaps by the end of this week. One remaining sticking point is how aid will be distributed. Mr Moore said the GHF would continue its operations after the ceasefire comes into effect.
'We believe GHF is here to stay,' he said. 'We just need to get as much food as possible, as quickly as possible, into the Gaza Strip, and we want to get as close to the people as we possibly can … hopefully we get a ceasefire, and we have a plan to do more.'
Palestinians are held behind gates before entering a food distribution site operated by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation in May. AP
He said there were 'plenty' of verified incidents where Hamas members threatened or harmed people so it would be blamed on the GHF.
Last week, AP quoted two American contractors alarmed by what they described as reckless and dangerous conduct by their colleagues. One contractor recalled seeing bullets fired indiscriminately, into the air, into the ground, and at times in the direction of Palestinians.
The US State Department, which is providing $30 million in direct funding to the GHF, says the foundation's efforts are vital to ensuring food gets into Gaza without being looted by Hamas.
Mr Moore said the GHF has delivered more than 70 million meals to about one million people in Gaza. He acknowledged concerns about those yet to receive assistance.
'We're very concerned about them. Every single day, we are pushing to try to get closer to them,' he said.
Mr Moore said the foundation had anticipated having more distribution sites running by now but had been hampered by resistance from the UN.
We 'didn't expect the boycott of the United Nations", he said.
The UN has declined to take part in the GHF's operations, accusing the group of militarising aid delivery and putting Palestinians at dire risk.
'Some people are getting food, people are also getting killed trying to get that food. That's not a way we would run our humanitarian operation,' UN spokesman Stephane Dujarric said.
'We will not work with people who do not meet those standards. Right now, if the GHF or any other group wants to work in a way that meets those standards, we will co-operate with any of them fully.'
Mr Moore defended the GHF's approach, saying the group uses 'incredibly experienced American veterans who are retired, who at this phase of their life just want to feed people".
He added that the UN has 'for a long time been OK with their preferred partners using guns in order to get a majority of the aid to people". He said that the main difference is who provides the security, not the principle of armed protection.
The GHF co-ordinates closely with the Israeli military. While it has acknowledged reports of violence, it says these occurred outside its areas of operations.
Global outrage has mounted over the deaths of Palestinians forced to make long and perilous journeys to reach any of the four GHF aid sites, which are inside Israeli-controlled military zones. The UN and other aid groups have called the GHF's operations a 'death trap.'
Mr Moore said the plan was never to replace the international community, rather to work with aid groups to help them get aid in securely.
Unfortunately, he said, like everything in the Israeli-Palestinian discussion, 'this became politicised immediately'.
Humanitarian organisations have criticised the foundation's aid distribution work for lacking independence from Israel, noting that Israeli soldiers stationed near the sites have repeatedly fired at Palestinians.
Asked why international media organisations were not allowed in to monitor and verify conditions, Mr Moore said it had always been the plan to let embedded observers see their operations in Gaza.
'The challenge with that at this phase of our operation in the Gaza Strip is that we are very, very lean,' adding it would require 'the diversion of significant resources'.
Palestinians rush to collect aid from the US-backed GHF, in Khan Younis, the southern Gaza Strip, on May 29. Reuters
Updated: July 10, 2025, 10:55 AM`

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The National
4 hours ago
- The National
Latest: Netanyahu to convene security cabinet to approve Gaza war plans
At least 20 killed as aid lorry overturns on crowd in Gaza Hezbollah says it will ignore Lebanese cabinet plan to disarm group Jordan says Israeli settlers attacked Gaza-bound aid convoy Egypt's El Sisi accuses Israel of waging war of 'starvation and genocide' Katz: Israeli army 'must carry out government orders on Gaza' At least 61,158 Palestinians killed and 151,442 wounded since Gaza war began


Middle East Eye
5 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Photo of Saudi Arabia's crown prince inside Jeffrey Epstein's mansion fuels criticism online
The New York Times on Tuesday ignited a wave of backlash after revealing a framed photograph of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman displayed inside the New York City mansion of convicted child sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The article, which takes readers inside the late convicted paedophile's seven-storey Manhattan home, features surveillance cameras positioned above his bed and in adjoining rooms, taxidermied animals, and provocative artwork, including a sculpture of a bride clutching a rope suspended from the ceiling in the atrium. Images from the home of Jeffrey Epstein show cameras in bedrooms and photos of him with: Donald Trump Steve Bannon Bill Clinton Elon Musk Larry Summers Mohammed bin Salman and more As well as memorabilia from Ehud Barak, Woody Allen, Bill Gates, and many others. Gift link 👇🏼 — Leah McElrath (@leahmcelrath) August 5, 2025 The revelation of the crown prince's photograph inside Epstein's mansion has sparked a storm of criticism on social media. Many social media users expressed their lack of surprise, with one remarking on another photograph of Mohammed bin Salman with George Nader, another convicted criminal and serial paedophile. 'Whenever Mohammed Bonesaw isn't orchestrating the murder of journalists (a reference to the Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi) and dissolving their remains in acid, he seems to enjoy posing for photos with pedophiles.' Another person commented, 'Personally, I think this is the least surprising one out of all of them.' New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Some questioned the public's reaction altogether. 'Is MBS considered a moral leader in any way?' one person asked, while others connected the scandal to Saudi Arabia's silence towards the ongoing war in Gaza, which several states, human rights scholars and institutions now qualify as a genocide. One Reddit user wrote, 'If this is true, it would explain a lot for why there's no coordinated military response to the genocide [in Gaza].' Another post on X added: 'This is why he supports 'Israel'.' Wonder why they're all working for Israel and against their people ? Saudi Arabia's King MBS, Pope, Emirati high level figure, Trump ... with their common pedophile friend Jeffrey Epstein. — MenchOsint (@MenchOsint) August 5, 2025 The criticism escalated as people connected the image to long-standing allegations of Gulf-Israeli collaboration. Sam Youssef, author and editor of American and International Affairs, asked: 'Do you now understand why Arab rulers kneel to Netanyahu and the Mossad?' Others saw the photograph as symbolic of regional betrayal. 'Basically, the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques was being managed by an Israeli agent. That's why Palestinians are helpless today. But not for long,' one person posted. Many expressed disbelief and concern over the Saudi crown prince's apparent proximity to Epstein. But the relationship between Epstein and Mohammed bin Salman isn't new. A year before his death, which was ruled a suicide in 2019, Epstein boasted of his ties to the crown prince during an interview with The New York Times. A 2019 report by The New York Times—Jeffrey Epstein claimed to have known Mohammed bin Salman (MBS), the de facto ruler of Saudi Arabia. During a 2018 interview with journalist James B. Stewart, Epstein gestured to a framed photograph of MBS displayed prominently in his… — Levantine Logic (@SyriaRetold) August 6, 2025 The crown prince was not the only high-profile figure whose image was exposed from inside Epstein's mansion. Framed photos of US President Donald Trump; former President Bill Clinton; Pope John Paul II; Mick Jagger; Elon Musk; Fidel Castro; CEO of DP World, Sultan Ahmed Bin Sulayem from the United Arab Emirates; and former prime minister of Qatar, Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jabr al-Thani were also in his home. Framed photograph in Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan home shows him with the UAE's Sultan Ahmed Bin Sulayem, the current group chairman & CEO of DP World (X) In 2008, Epstein was convicted in Florida for soliciting prostitution from a minor, serving just 13 months in jail under a controversial plea deal. A decade later, he was arrested again on federal charges of sex trafficking of minors, accused of abusing dozens of underage girls between 2002 and 2005 in his homes in New York and Palm Beach. On 6 July 2019, Epstein was arrested and held at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York City while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. He died in his cell on 10 August 2019. Epstein's death has done little to quell public scrutiny. His connections to influential individuals, including former US presidents, royals, and billionaires, continue to fuel speculation about the extent of his network and whether justice was truly served.


Middle East Eye
5 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Trump administration removes clause that cuts funding to states boycotting Israel
A clause in the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (Fema) guidelines threatening US states and territories that boycott Israel with the denial of federal funds for natural disaster preparation was discreetly removed from its terms and conditions directives on Monday after backlash. The change in status came after media reports on Monday explained how funding was conditional on states following Department of Homeland Security (DHS) conditions laid out in April. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (Fema) announced on Friday it was making nearly $1bn available to states to protect themselves from natural disasters, such as floods, tornadoes, hurricanes, and fires, as well as terrorist attacks and cyber disruptions. However, before being removed, the clause said: 'Discriminatory prohibited boycott means refusing to deal, cutting commercial relations, or otherwise limiting commercial relations specifically with Israeli companies or with companies doing business in or with Israel or authorized by, licensed by, or organized under the laws of Israel to do business,' according to 11 agency grant notices reviewed by Reuters. DHS, which oversees Fema, reportedly removed this clause from section 17 on anti-discrimination under its terms and conditions. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Fema had announced on Friday it was making nearly $1bn available to states to protect themselves from natural disasters, such as floods, tornadoes, hurricanes, and fires, as well as terrorist attacks and cyber disruptions. This $1bn allocation, which will apply to 15 different grant programmes, is part of the "Notices of Funding Opportunity amounting to more than $2.2 billion available to state, local, tribal and territorial governments to help them protect American citizens", Fema states on its website. DHS sent Middle East Eye a statement on Monday, saying: 'There is no FEMA requirement tied to Israel in any current NOFO. No states have lost funding, and no new conditions have been imposed. 'FEMA grants remain governed by existing law and policy and not political litmus tests. DHS will enforce all anti-discrimination laws and policies, including as it relates to the BDS movement, which is expressly grounded in antisemitism. Those who engage in racial discrimination should not receive a single dollar of federal funding.' BDS refers to the Palestinian-led Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement, which aims to "pressure Israel to comply with international law". Existing law Although the clause has been removed, more than 30 US states already have laws that require 'public entities to certify they do not and will not boycott Israel'. However, public outcry over the worsening humanitarian conditions in Gaza has led to institutions and companies coming under increasing pressure to divest from Israeli and international companies investing in Israel. The momentum for the BD movement in the US was spearheaded by students on college campuses across the country last year due to outrage over the war on Gaza, which to date has killed over 60,000 Palestinians, wounded over 100,000 and decimated the strips infrastructure. While many institutions have refused pressure to divest from Israel, a handful of institutions like Union Theological Seminary have applied new investment screenings to divest from companies profiting from Israel's war on Gaza. San Francisco State University also agreed to disclose its investments quarterly and added new screening policies for investment decisions last year. Following this agreement, San Francisco State University agreed to pull investments from three companies it claimed do not meet its human rights standards, including aerospace and defence company Lockheed Martin, stock positions in Italian defence company Leonardo, and US-based data analysis enterprise, Palantir Technologies.