Prediction: This Will Be The First Major Stock Purchase by Berkshire Hathaway in the Post-Buffett Era
Berkshire Hathaway's portfolio holds a number of financial services businesses across insurance, banking, investing, and payments.
While Buffett is known to avoid stocks that trade for a premium, some other top personalities at Berkshire have shown more lenience for growth stocks.
SoFi Technologies is an interesting combination of financial services and technology, making it an intriguing opportunity for Berkshire in a post-Buffett era.
10 stocks we like better than SoFi Technologies ›
Besides news about tariffs, one of the bigger storylines in the financial world as of late has to do with Warren Buffett stepping down as CEO of Berkshire Hathaway at the end of the year.
While his resignation came as a shocker for most, tapping Greg Abel as his successor wasn't much of a surprise. Still, the big question on everyone's mind right now revolves around what Berkshire may look like in a post-Buffett era.
With a mind-boggling $348 billion of cash and short-term investments on Berkshire's balance sheet, Abel and his team will have a profound level of financial flexibility. I'll break down why I think SoFi Technologies (NASDAQ: SOFI) could be the first major purchase Berkshire makes once Abel takes over as CEO.
Two of Buffett's top investment criteria include steady, predictable growth and positive cash flow. The financial services industry is perhaps one of the best ways to achieve both of these parameters. For this reason, Buffett loves investing in banks and insurance. Some of Berkshire's notable positions in the financial sector include American Express, Bank of America, Moody's, Chubb, Visa, and Mastercard.
Admittedly, the majority of these companies are much larger compared to where SoFi is today. Moreover, most of these companies have brand moats -- providing them with strong customer loyalty and positions of dominance in their respective pocket of the broader financial services realm.
Nevertheless, I see SoFi as a strong candidate as a potential Berkshire investment. Similar to many of the companies referenced above, SoFi offers a variety of lending, investing, and insurance products. This model has helped SoFi build a one-stop-shop ecosystem supporting a variety of financial needs. And if there's one thing Buffett loves in addition to predictable cash flow, it's diversification.
Another one of Buffett's investment philosophies is rooted in not paying a premium, even for a quality business. Over the last couple of years, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite have experienced unprecedented runs -- thanks primarily to the artificial intelligence (AI) revolution. But while many of Buffett's cohorts were hitting the buy button repeatedly, Berkshire was actually selling stock in droves -- trimming many of its core positions, including Apple. The reason was simple: Buffett doesn't chase lofty valuations, even in quality growth stocks.
While that strategy has clearly paid off for Buffett, I think Abel and top Berkshire lieutenants Todd Combs and Ted Weschler will be more open-minded when it comes to valuation. When you look at the price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio and price-to-book (P/B) value for SoFi, it's clear the stock is far from cheap -- especially for a bank stock.
SOFI PE Ratio data by YCharts
With that said, more mature banks such as Bank of America or Wells Fargo boast lower P/B multiples compared to SoFi, given their maturity as a business. In other words, it's normal for growth stocks to command premiums earlier in their life cycle and then witness normalization in valuation multiples over time as the business matures.
One of Berkshire's smaller positions includes Amazon. SoFi CEO Anthony Noto has previously explained that his vision is to build the banking platform into the "AWS of fintech." AWS is Amazon's cloud infrastructure business, which generates over $100 billion in annual revenue and is responsible for a majority of the company's operating profits.
Unlike traditional executives, Noto brings a unique combination of investment banking and operational expertise to SoFi. Prior to SoFi, Noto was a partner at Goldman Sachs and previously served as CFO for the National Football League (NFL) and Twitter. I think this experience will sit particularly well with Abel, who himself is more of an operator as opposed to a typical stock-picking money manager.
Noto has helped transform SoFi into an end-to-end financial services platform through both acquisitions and building an ecosystem that keeps customers loyal and sticky. Over time, these positive unit economics have turned SoFi into a consistently profitable business.
In addition to Amazon, Berkshire also previously held a small position in fintech company Nu Holdings. Nu is a comparable business to that of SoFi -- with the primary difference being that it focuses primarily on the banking sector in Latin America.
While Berkshire has exited its position Nu Holdings and Amazon is less a prominent position in the portfolio, I think the post-Buffett era will feature more flexibility when it comes to high-quality businesses disrupting industries that Buffett himself may have been less comfortable exploring. Another way of looking at it is that I think Berkshire will be less dialed in over traditional earnings-based multiples in select circumstances and be more willing to consider pricier growth stocks.
In a way, investors have already gotten a glimpse of this when Berkshire decided to take a position in high-flying AI stock Snowflake prior to its IPO. Notably, Berkshire exited its position in Snowflake after a couple of years -- as the company was late to the game in capitalizing on AI tailwinds.
I see SoFi as an interesting combination of what Nu Holdings represents in banking and what AWS has achieved in the world of tech-enabled services. For these reasons, I predict that Berkshire will make a splash and broaden its traditional strategy in financial services by initiating a position in SoFi stock.
Before you buy stock in SoFi Technologies, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and SoFi Technologies wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $642,582!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $829,879!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 975% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join .
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of May 19, 2025
Adam Spatacco has positions in SoFi Technologies. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Prediction: This Will Be The First Major Stock Purchase by Berkshire Hathaway in the Post-Buffett Era was originally published by The Motley Fool
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
21 minutes ago
- CNBC
International stocks are ahead of the U.S. so far this year—how to add them to your portfolio
For investors, the U.S. has been the place to be in recent years. Over the past decade and a half, the S&P 500 — a measure of the broad U.S. stock market — has returned an annualized 14.2%. The MSCI ACWI ex-USA index, which measures the performance of stocks from pretty much everywhere else, logged a return of 6.5% over the same period. Since the start of 2025, however, investors are eschewing U.S. stocks in favor of international names. So far this year, the ACWI ex-USA index has returned 15.7%, trouncing the 1.5% return in the S&P. "In 2025 thus far, there are some clear indications that investors are adopting the 'ABUSA' ('Anywhere But the USA') mindset," says David Rosenstrock, a certified financial planner and director of financial planning and investments at Wharton Wealth Planning. "This shift is partly driven by concerns over market volatility in the U.S., uncertainty regarding policies and relatively weaker performance compared to global counterparts," he says. So is it time to invest in foreign stocks? Yes and no, say financial pros. You shouldn't make any wholesale changes to your portfolio mix based on short-term market results, they say. But if you have little or no foreign exposure, diversifying is likely a savvy move over the long term. Here's why. If you were born in the 90s, you may have never been invested during a sustained period during which foreign stocks outperformed domestic names, as they did in the back half of the 80s and much of the early 2000s. If that's the case, you may be tempted to continue ignoring foreign stocks, even after the recent uptick. "The problem is those trends tend to tend to reverse over time," says Amy Arnott, a portfolio strategist at Morningstar. "So even if the U.S. is outperforming over a very long period, like it did [in the 15 years] through 2024, eventually that trend reverses." While it may feel like the U.S. has dominated stock markets forever, it wasn't that long ago that foreign firms were delivering better returns. From 2001 to 2010, for instance, the ACWI ex-US index submitted a cumulative total return of 71.5% compared with a 15% gain in the S&P 500. Adding some foreign stocks to your portfolio can help guarantee at least some exposure to whichever side is performing better over the many years you're likely to invest. "True diversification means tapping into different economic cycles, monetary policies and growth drivers. It offers exposure to unique industries," says Marcos Segrera, a CFP and principal at Evensky & Katz/Foldes Wealth Management. "Furthermore, owning foreign stocks is a crucial way to diversify away from U.S.-specific risks." If you're looking to invest in foreign stocks, the most effective way to do it is by adding a low-cost index mutual fund or exchange-traded fund, says Arnott. "That way, you can get international diversification in one package and get exposure to a large number of companies and countries outside of the U.S.," she says. Market watchers generally divide foreign stocks into two camps: those that come from "developed" economies, such as those in Japan, Australia and several European countries, and emerging markets, such as China, India and much of Latin America. You can buy funds which invest in either, but "to keep things simple," owning a "total international stock" fund — such as one that tracks the MSCI ACWI ex-USA or something similar — will get you exposure to both, says Arnott. And while you may have powerful convictions about the future of a particular country and its economy, you'd be wise to avoid tilting your foreign exposure too much in that direction, Arnott says. Putting all your eggs in one country or region's basket, she says, can result in big swings in your portfolio. "It can be tempting to do that when there's a lot of excitement about Asia Pacific stocks or Latin America, or things like that," she says. "But it's difficult to use those types of funds in a portfolio just because they are more volatile, more narrowly defined, and people unfortunately have a tendency to sometimes see performance over the past few years and buy in at the wrong time."
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump-Musk induced Tesla slide points to market risks from massive stocks
By Lewis Krauskopf NEW YORK (Reuters) -The rift between President Donald Trump and Tesla chief Elon Musk has captivated the world as a political drama, but it has also become a Wall Street spectacle, highlighting the risk to equity markets from the world's biggest stocks. Tesla shares slid 14% on Thursday as Musk and Trump feuded largely on social media, including the president threatening to cut off government contracts to Musk's companies. Although the stock modestly rebounded on Friday, Thursday's decline dragged down some of the most closely followed equity indexes, which are more heavily influenced by companies with the largest market values. Tesla's fall accounted for about half of Thursday's declines for both the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq 100, which fell 0.5% and 0.8% respectively, on the day. The S&P 500 is generally considered the benchmark for the U.S. stock market while the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 is the basis for the Invesco QQQ Trust, one of the most popular exchange-traded funds. "It's a widely held stock," said Robert Pavlik, senior portfolio manager at Dakota Wealth. "When this big-name company that represents a sizable portion of the index sells off, it has an overall effect on the index, but it also has a psychological effect on investors." Tesla's decline points to the risk that many investors have long warned about, of indexes being heavily influenced by a handful of megacap stocks. Tesla is the smallest by market value of a group of massive tech and growth companies known as the "Magnificent Seven," which overall drove equity index gains in 2023 and 2024. The group has had a rockier 2025 so far, but more recently has been rebounding. The Magnificent Seven, which include Apple, Microsoft and Nvidia, had a combined weight of nearly one-third in the S&P 500 overall as of Thursday's close. "If you're an investor and you own the S&P or the Nasdaq 100 ... you just need to be aware that you own a lot of exposure to a very small cohort of names," said Todd Sohn, ETF and technical strategist at Strategas. Tesla's decline on Thursday knocked about $150 billion off its market value, while its weights in the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 stood at 1.6% and 2.6%, respectively. Tesla shares rebounded somewhat on Friday, up about 5% in mid-day trade, putting its market value around $970 billion. Microsoft and Nvidia, whose market values exceed $3 trillion, held weights of 6.9% and 6.8% in the S&P 500 as of Thursday. Tesla shares are down some 37% since mid-December, a period that has seen the S&P 500 fall about 1%, meaning its influence in the index has also declined over that time. The shares hold a broad influence among ETFs. Tesla has a varying presence in about 10% of the total universe of about 4,200 ETFs, according to Sohn. Those include the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund, which sank 2.5% on Thursday, and the Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF, which dropped 2.6%. "It's very important to know holistically what is in all your ETFs, because a lot of them are overlapping," Sohn said. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why ABM Industries Stock Is Down Today
ABM delivered a quarter roughly in line with expectations, but the full-year forecast suggested some downside to expectations. Given the macro headwinds, investors seem to see more downside potential than upside from here, leading to a sell-off in the stock. 10 stocks we like better than Abm Industries › ABM Industries (NYSE: ABM) largely met Wall Street expectations for the quarter, but costs are on the rise and full-year guidance implies some risk of weakness compared to estimates. Investors are on the defensive, sending ABM shares down 13% as of noon ET. ABM supplies cleaning, parking, and other services to a wide range of facilities from office buildings to factories and airports. The company earned $0.86 per share in its fiscal second quarter ending April 30, a penny shy of expectations, on revenue that was in line at $2.1 billion. The quarter marked a return to organic revenue growth thanks to strength in the prime commercial office market. ABM also secured $1.1 billion in new bookings in the first half of its fiscal year, up 11%. Revenue growth was 3.4%, compared to a 3% rise in operating expenses and a 9% rise in selling, general, and administrative expenses. "We remain constructive on the outlook for our core markets, particularly high-quality office buildings, manufacturing and distribution facilities, commercial aviation, and microgrids," CEO Scott Salmirs said in a statement. "Further, projects delayed in the second quarter are expected to be realized in the third quarter." The quarter was fine, but investors appear to be reacting to the company leaving in place full-year guidance for earnings of $3.65 to $3.80 per share. At the midpoint that's below the $3.77 consensus. Investors came into this earnings season looking for more of an acceleration than what ABM could deliver and given the broader macro uncertainty there appears to be more downside risk than upside in the months to come. A slowdown in manufacturing, or layoffs that eat into office building occupancy, could hit results. Given the uncertainty, investors are likely wise to move to the sidelines right now. Before you buy stock in Abm Industries, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Abm Industries wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $674,395!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $858,011!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 997% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Lou Whiteman has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends ABM Industries. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why ABM Industries Stock Is Down Today was originally published by The Motley Fool Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
