Over 6,000 cases of Russian use of chemicals recorded over 2 years, Ukraine says
Russia has been intensifying its use of chemical agents on the battlefield in Ukraine. Since the beginning of the all-out war, Ukraine's radiation, chemical, and biological intelligence units have been monitoring and recording the use of hazardous chemicals in attacks.
For a recent report by the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), experts analyzed the materials provided by Ukraine, including four Russian RG-Vo type gas grenades, as well as soil and grass samples.
Two OPCW laboratories confirmed that they contained riot control agent known as CS. Among other hazardous chemicals, chloroacetophenone (CN), as well as chloropicrin and mercaptans (malodorants) were found, according to the statement.
By using them, Russia violates Article 1 of the Chemical Weapons Convention, the Foreign Ministry said.
"The international community must demonstrate its unity in countering the aggressor, and a practical element of this should be the establishment of an international coalition to hold the Russian Federation accountable for the violation of its obligations under the Chemical Weapons Convention," the statement read.
Since the start of Russia's full-scale invasion, more than 2,000 Ukrainian soldiers have been hospitalized with chemical poisoning, and three have died, Ukrainian Colonel Artem Vlasiuk said in December 2024.
Ukraine struck back at Russia's use of illegal chemical weapons on Dec. 17, when the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) assassinated Lieutenant General Igor Kirillov, the head of the Russian Armed Forces' radiation, chemical, and biological defense troops.
The previous day, Ukrainain prosecutors charged Kirillov in absentia for the use of banned chemical weapons in Ukraine.
Read also: Editorial: America is folding. Europe, will you step up?
We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
a few seconds ago
- New York Post
AI bots deliver garbage based on Wikipedia
Here's alarming news: AI bots rely heavily on Wikipedia, which feed them a diet of half-truths, ideological bias and leftist lies — and then pass along the propaganda to millions of unsuspecting readers. A new study from Axios reveals that ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude — three of the most popular AI bots — use Wikipedia extensively for training their Large Language Models. Yet 'Wokepedia,' the user-maintained online encyclopedia, is so slanted to the left, it's in danger of tipping over. Advertisement The result is the public gets a perversely skewed view of the world. Indeed, Wikipedia actually keeps a blacklist of sources editors can't cite. Want to guess which outlets are redlined as 'unreliable'? That's right: conservative sources like Fox News, the Daily Wire, the Daily Caller and even The Post. Advertisement Which get the green light? Leftist outlets like AP, Vox, The Guardian, The Nation and — hold on while we spit out our tea — MSNBC. All the outlets, that is, that promoted the Russia hoax, blamed Trump for COVID and dismissed The Post's 100% accurate Hunter Biden-laptop story Russian disinfo. Yet the biased material Wikipedia spreads is used to train AI bots to answer billions of questions from people outsourcing their minds to Big Tech, misinforming millions. Advertisement AI's leftist bias is obvious to anyone who asks it questions about, say, January 6, gun control or some other hot-button issue. But don't take our word for it. The British Centre for Policy Studies also found consistent bias, especially on housing, free-speech and energy issues. Even AI bots themselves will tell you they have a leftist bias. Part of the problem is that the culture of Silicon Valley skews left. Advertisement The techies designing the AI algorithms are more liberal than the average American, so their bias works its way through the system. 'Garbage in, garbage out' is an old saying in computer programming. Meaning, computers are dumb. They process what we give them. If LLMs keep feeding off the same biased sources, then future content will reflect that bias, and continue to feed LLMs in a recursive loop. We will be stuck in a conceptual world that has no outside reference. Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters This is exactly what George Orwell warned about. President Donald Trump just released an 'action plan' that puts Big Tech on alert. AI companies will need to feed their LLMs a balanced diet of information or risk losing federal contracts. But the companies should be look to reform voluntarily, if they care about their credibility. If they insist on using lefty sources like Wikipedia, the least they can do is provide a warning with every answer they supply.


The Hill
a few seconds ago
- The Hill
Trump-Obama feud erupts over Russia interference allegations
The long-simmering feud between President Trump and former President Obama erupted this week after Trump accused his predecessor of treason, a startling escalation in the fight between the two leaders. The Trump administration's barrage of attacks and document releases around the Obama administration's handling of Russian interference in the 2016 election prompted a rare public rebuke from Obama against the current Oval Office occupant. The confrontation pits two of the most powerful figures in politics, and arguably the most popular Republican and Democratic politicians in the country, against one another. For Trump and the White House, going after Obama, particularly over Russian influence in the 2016 election, is seen as a political winner and a way to unite the party amid a turbulent stretch born out of the Trump Justice Department's handling of disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein and files related to his criminal case. The Russia investigation has been a fixation of GOP lawmakers and members of Trump's base dating back to 2017 and has fueled distrust in the FBI and intelligence community. 'The leader of the gang was President Obama. … He's guilty. It's not a question,' Trump said Tuesday in the Oval Office. 'I like to say let's give it time. It's there. He's guilty. This was treason. This was every word you can think of.' Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard's office released documents last Friday and again on Wednesday purporting to show Obama and some of his top aides misled the public about the nature of Russia's efforts to interfere in the 2016 election. Gabbard has alleged Obama officials ' manufactured intelligence ' about Russia's election interference and that Russia did not prefer Trump in that election, as the intelligence community had previously established. Obama's name was uttered roughly a dozen times at a Thursday White House press briefing, where Gabbard spoke to reporters about the latest release of documents, as contained in a House Intelligence Committee report drafted in 2017, when Republicans led the panel, and published in 2020. 'The evidence that we have found and that we have released directly points to President Obama leading the manufacturing of this intelligence assessment. There are multiple pieces of evidence and intelligence that confirm that fact,' Gabbard said, telling reporters her office was referring documents to the Justice Department for potential criminal charges. Gabbard had previously accused Obama and his White House aides of a 'treasonous conspiracy,' though on Thursday she repeatedly sidestepped questions about what specific crime Obama would have committed. Critics have panned the documents released by Gabbard as out of step with intelligence community findings and the findings of a bipartisan report from the Senate Intelligence Committee released in 2020, which both established that Russia attempted to interfere in the 2016 election and preferred Trump to win. The Obama White House said at the time Russia did not change any votes in the election. The allegations against Obama were so severe, and in the view of some Democrats so outlandish, that it elicited a rare public statement from the former president's office. 'Out of respect for the office of the presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response,' Obama spokesperson Patrick Rodenbush said in a statement. 'But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one. These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction. 'Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes,' Rodenbush added. Multiple investigations have concluded that Russia interfered in the 2016 election. A 2019 report by former special counsel Robert Mueller found that Russia interfered in the election, partly through a social media campaign that favored Trump. The Senate Intelligence Committee in 2020 released a bipartisan report that also affirmed the findings of the U.S. intelligence community that Russia interfered in the 2016 election, and that the Russian government 'demonstrated a preference for candidate Trump.' Numerous Democrats have noted this week that Secretary of State Marco Rubio served on the Senate Intelligence Committee at the time. But even if the focus on Russian interference and Obama's role don't lead to criminal charges, it has the added benefit of shifting attention away, if only temporarily, from an undesirable news cycle for the White House. The Beltway has been consumed in recent weeks with stories about the case of Epstein, the sex predator who died in 2019, and calls among many of Trump's own supporters for more transparency. To the chagrin of Trump and his allies, The Wall Street Journal published a story shortly after Gabbard's White House appearance ended reporting that Attorney General Pam Bondi had informed Trump in May that his name was among many that appeared in the Epstein documents. 'He's treating his supporters like he thinks they're stupid with these lies about other presidents and every other random tangent,' said Andrew Bates, a former spokesperson in the Obama and Biden administrations. 'This is a different version of Trump because you can feel the panic behind his Epstein excuses.' In addition to being red meat for Trump's base, Obama has been a target of Trump's personal animus dating back to before he was in office. It was Trump who led the racist 'birther' conspiracy that claimed Obama was not born in the United States. Trump spent much of his first term claiming Obama 'spied' on his campaign in 2016. And the president spent part of the 2024 campaign attacking Obama and former first lady Michelle Obama over their fiery remarks at the Democratic National Convention, which portrayed Trump as a nuisance only focused on his problems. Democrats view Trump's attacks on former President Obama as returning to a tired playbook at a time when he is facing unrest from some in his own party over the Epstein case and criticisms from political rivals over the potential backlash to his key policy accomplishment. 'When you have nothing to present that's affirmative to the American people, Republicans blame Barack Obama,' House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) said Wednesday. 'It's laughable.


Boston Globe
a few seconds ago
- Boston Globe
Gabbard uses surprise White House appearance to attack Trump's enemies on the Russia investigation
'They conspired to subvert the will of the American people,' she said, claiming they fabricated evidence to taint Trump's victory. Little of what she said was new, and much of it was baseless. Gabbard said her investigation into the former Democratic administration was designed to stop the weaponization of national security institutions, but it spurred more questions about her own independence atop a spying system intended to provide unvarnished intelligence. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Gabbard, a former Democratic congresswoman from Hawaii who ran for president herself before joining Trump's idiosyncratic political ecosystem, seemed prepared to use her presentation to burnish her own standing. She was trailed by her cinematographer husband, who held a video camera to capture the moment. Advertisement And Trump, who had previously expressed public doubts about Gabbard's analysis of Iran's nuclear program, appeared satisfied. He posted a video of her remarks, pinning them at the top of his social media feed. It was a display that cemented Gabbard's role as one of Trump's chief agents of retribution, delivering official recognition of Trump's grievances about the Russia investigation that shadowed his first term. The focus on a years-old scandal also served Trump's attempts to shift attention from the Jeffrey Epstein case and questions about the president's own association with an abuser of underage girls. Advertisement Gabbard touts her latest release During her White House remarks, Gabbard said she has referred the documents to the Justice Department to consider for a possible criminal investigation. Obama's post-presidential office declined to comment Wednesday but issued a rare response a day earlier. 'These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction,' said Patrick Rodenbush, an Obama spokesman. The White House rejected questions about the timing of Gabbard's revelations and whether they were designed to curry favor with Trump or distract attention from the administration's handling of files relating to Epstein. Still, Trump was quick to reward Gabbard's loyalty this week, calling her 'the hottest person in the room.' On Wednesday, she released a report by Republican staff of the House Intelligence Committee during the first Trump administration. It does not dispute that Russia interfered in the 2016 election but cites what it says were tradecraft failings in the assessment reached by the intelligence community that Russian President Vladimir Putin influenced the election because he intended for Trump to win. Gabbard went beyond some of the conclusions of the report in describing its findings from the White House podium. She, along with the report, also seized on the fact that a dossier including uncorroborated tips and salacious gossip about Trump's ties to Russia was referenced in an annex of an intelligence community assessment made public in 2017 that detailed Russia's interference. It was not the basis for the FBI's decision to open an investigation in July 2016 into potential coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia, but Trump supporters have seized on the unverified innuendo in the document to try to undercut the broader probe. Advertisement Timing of the reports prompt questions Gabbard said she didn't know why the reports weren't released during Trump's first administration. Her office did not respond to questions about the timing of the release. Responding to a question from a reporter about Gabbard's motivations, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt accused journalists of looking for a story where there wasn't one. 'The only people who are suggesting that she would release evidence to boost her standing are the people in this room,' Leavitt said. Trump, however, has said he wants the media, and the public, to focus on Gabbard's report and not his ties to Epstein. 'We caught Hillary Clinton. We caught Barack Hussein Obama ... you ought take a look at that and stop talking about nonsense,' Trump said Tuesday. CIA Director John Ratcliffe served briefly as director of national intelligence during Trump's first term but did not release any of the information declassified by Gabbard. The CIA declined to comment on Gabbard's remarks Wednesday. Trump and Gabbard's evolving relationship Gabbard told Congress in April that Iran wasn't actively seeking a nuclear weapon, and Trump dismissed her assessment just before U.S. strikes on Iran. 'I don't care what she said,' Trump said in June on Air Force One when asked about Gabbard's testimony. Gabbard recently shared her findings in an Oval Office meeting with Trump, according to two administration officials who requested anonymity to discuss a private conversation. Afterward, one of the officials said, Trump expressed satisfaction that Gabbard's findings aligned with his own beliefs about the Russia investigation. Other recent releases on the Russia investigation On Friday, Gabbard's office released a report that downplayed the extent of Russian interference in the 2016 election by highlighting Obama administration emails showing officials had concluded before and after the presidential race that Moscow had not hacked state election systems to manipulate votes in Trump's favor. Advertisement But Obama's Democratic administration never suggested otherwise, even as it exposed other means by which Russia interfered in the election, including through a massive hack-and-leak operation of Democratic emails by intelligence operatives working with WikiLeaks, as well as a covert influence campaign aimed at swaying public opinion and sowing discord through fake social media posts. Earlier this month Ratcliffe released a report earlier this month criticizing the 2017 investigation into the election, but it did not address multiple investigations since then, including a report from the Republican-led Senate Intelligence Committee in 2020 that reached the same conclusion about Russia's influence and motives. Democrats call for Gabbard's resignation Lawmakers from both parties have long stressed the need for an independent intelligence service. Democrats said Gabbard's reports show she has placed partisanship and loyalty to Trump over her duty and some have called for her resignation. 'It seems as though the Trump administration is willing to declassify anything and everything except the Epstein files,' Sen. Mark Warner of Virginia, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, said in a statement Wednesday. Warner predicted Gabbard's actions could prompt U.S. allies to share less information for fear it would be politicized or recklessly declassified. But Gabbard enjoys strong support among Republicans. Rep. Rick Crawford, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said she and Ratcliffe were working to put the intelligence community 'on the path to regaining the trust of the American people.' Rep. Jim Himes, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence panel, said Gabbard hasn't offered any reason to ignore the many earlier investigations into Russia's efforts. Advertisement 'The Director is free to disagree with the Intelligence Community Assessment's conclusion that Putin favored Donald Trump, but her view stands in stark contrast to the verdict rendered by multiple credible investigations,' Himes said in a statement. 'Including the bipartisan report released by the Senate Intelligence Committee.'