Dean Winter hopeful he will become Tasmanian premier, despite stalled negotiations with the Greens
A motion of no confidence in Premier Jeremy Rockliff's government, and confidence in a Labor minority government, will be moved when state parliament resumes on Tuesday, August 19.
Labor won 10 seats at last month's state election, meaning it needs the support of the five Greens MPs and three other crossbenchers to be successful.
Mr Winter said conversations with the crossbench MPs had been "mostly really positive", including at a meeting on Tuesday, that he claimed the Greens chose not to attend.
"They had accepted to come along to the meeting and then decided instead of participating they would go out and make a media statement instead," he said.
Greens leader Rosalie Woodruff said on Tuesday that Labor's lack of compromise on policy positions meant she could not support Mr Winter becoming premier "at this stage", following a second meeting in two days with the Labor leader.
Mr Winter defended his bargaining position, arguing this term of state parliament needed to work differently if it was to last the full four years after three consecutive early elections.
"If it's about horse trading at the start where we're giving away policy and we're asking them to compromise as well then it's not going to last very long," he said.
"This is much more serious than one or two policies early, it has to be about a lasting parliament.
Mr Winter has indicated he is open to discussing policy compromise once Labor has formed government — including on measures to protect the environment, which he said was "really important to me".
He committed to a "policy framework" that would see ideas from all members of parliament considered in detail.
Mr Winter also said all ideas to improve the state's budget position would be considered as part of the party's budget roundtable process, including ideas to generate additional revenue by increasing current taxes or imposing new ones.
But he has refused to agree to the Greens' demand that he provide concessions up front.
"I'd like to sit down and discuss where we can find common ground and there are areas around housing, around budget repair, around integrity where we can work together," Mr Winter said.
"But what Rosalie has effectively said, she's issued an ultimatum, unless we do X, Y and Z then it's a no, and I don't think issuing ultimatums is the way to work together and no-one else on the crossbench has done the ultimatum approach either.
"The conversations have been really positive with the independents and the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers, that's the kind of engagement I want to have.
A Greens spokesperson said the decision to not attend Tuesday's meeting with Labor and crossbench MPs was also agreed to by Mr Winter.
"It was jointly acknowledged that the conversation between Labor and the Greens had not progressed far enough," the spokesperson said.
"It's hardly good faith for Mr Winter to claim otherwise.
"The Greens' door is still open. We hope Labor comes back to the table to negotiate tangible outcomes for the people of Tasmania."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

AU Financial Review
20 minutes ago
- AU Financial Review
Albanese rejects Trump ‘disgust' over Palestine call
Anthony Albanese's decision to recognise Palestinian statehood continues to create pressure from both sides, with the Trump administration disgusted by the move while Palestine's former top diplomat in Canberra warns it needs to be matched with sanctions against Israel. The prime minister on Friday dismissed US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee's criticism over the Labor government's decision to side with France, Canada and the United Kingdom to recognise Palestine next month, saying Australia was a sovereign country that made its own decisions.

News.com.au
31 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Ex-Liberal MP Daryl Maguire fights to avoid jail
Prosecutors have called for former MP Daryl Maguire to be jailed after he was found guilty of giving misleading evidence to ICAC, a court has been told. Following a trial earlier this year, the former Liberal and Wagga Wagga MP was found guilty by a magistrate of one count of giving false or misleading evidence at a public inquiry. Maguire will learn his fate when he fronts a Sydney court next week, with his legal team arguing he should be allowed to serve his sentence in the community. Maguire pleaded not guilty, however Magistrate Clare Farnan found he gave knowingly misleading evidence to the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) in July 2018 about the potential sale of a property at Campsie in Sydney's south-west and whether he intended to be paid to broker the deal. In 2016, ICAC began a probe into the Canterbury City Council under Operation Dasha. During the ICAC hearing, Maguire was questioned whether he and former councillor Michael Hawatt were set to benefit financially if the site was sold to a Chinese developer. The court was previously told that Maguire had an association with the company, Country Gardens 'through his extensive activities with members of the Chinese community, and through his travel to China'. ICAC began lawfully tapping Mr Hawatt's phone in 2016. Ms Farnan said in her findings handed down earlier this year that it was 'clear' that Maguire was 'pursuing Mr Hawatt's assistance in identifying possible development sites on behalf of a 'big developer'.' The court was told that during a May 9, 2016 call, Maguire referred to a 'client' with 'mega money'. The Crown prosecution argued Maguire intended to receive a benefit by introducing the property's owner, through Mr Hawatt, to the Chinese developer. Maguire has claimed he was motivated by a friendship with an employee of Country Garden and did not expect a financial benefit. However Ms Farnan found beyond a reasonable doubt that 'if the sale of the Harrisons site to Country Garden went through, Mr Maguire expected to receive half of Mr Hawatt's commission on that sale'. His defence argued that some of the questions asked of him at the ICAC hearing were imprecise and open to interpretation. But he was found to have given misleading evidence, and Ms Farnan dismissed the possibility that he may have given incorrect answers because of carelessness or misunderstanding. 'I am satisfied that … at the time of giving evidence, Mr Maguire did know that he had expected to share commission with Mr Hawatt, but had determined not to give that evidence before ICAC,' Ms Farnan found. Maguire appeared before the Local Court on Friday, with Crown Prosecutor Phil Hogan arguing it was the 'will of the people' to 'eradicate corruption' and that there was an expectation of a 'significant period of fulltime custody for this type of offending'. Mr Hogan told the court there was an expectation that people holding public offence would 'behave with honesty and integrity'. The court heard Maguire never received a financial benefit, but Mr Hogan argued that didn't lessen the seriousness of the offending. He likened the case to that of former Federal Court judge Marcus Einfeld, who was jailed for two years for making a false statement under oath and attempting to pervert the course of justice. However, Maguire's barrister Rebecca Gall argued that his charges were not as serious as Einfeld's. The court was told that Maguire had tendered a character reference from former deputy prime minister Michael McCormack which referred to his strong 'work ethic'. Ms Gall also pointed to a report which assessed Maguire as being a low risk of reoffending as she argued that any sentence should be served in the community. Maguire faces a maximum penalty of two years in jail when he is sentenced next Wednesday. Maguire resigned from the Liberal Party as a result of the ICAC probe and later resigned from Parliament. In 2021, the ICAC found that Mr Hawatt 'engaged in serious corrupt conduct'. He was charged with two counts of giving false/misleading evidence at a public inquiry and is due to face court again in December. A separate ICAC investigation revealed that Maguire had been in a secret relationship with then Premier Gladys Berejiklian. In June 2023, the ICAC found that Maguire and Ms Berejiklian engaged in 'serious corrupt conduct.' No charges were brought against Ms Berejiklian.

ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Former immigration minister Alex Hawke calls for action on bridging visa backlog with thousands left in limbo
Rathy Barthlote and her family are caught up in a tricky situation. Her 11-year-old daughter Lolitta, born in Australia, became a citizen with full rights at the age of 10. But Ms Barthlote, her husband and 16-year-old daughter Logitha are all asylum seekers with few rights. They've been living in Australia since 2014 while their refugee claims go through the system. "Their friendships, schooling and sense of belonging are all here," Ms Barthlote said. "One child has everything, the other child is worried about her future." Ms Barthlote said the prospect of deportation remained a daily fear for the family. "My older daughter has occasionally asked whether she would be separated from her younger sibling," she said. Soon after Ms Barthlote and her family came to Australia by boat in 2013, the then-Abbott government introduced the so-called 'Fast Track' system to process the claims of boat arrivals. This system limited their procedural rights compared to other asylum seekers. Labor criticised the system, labelling it unfair and when it came to power, abolished it. But the Albanese government didn't solve the problems the Fast track system created. Ms Barthlote is one of around 8,000 asylum seekers who arrived between 2012 and 2013 and whose claims the system rejected. Many asylum seekers are still appealing those decisions, arguing the process was unfair. Most live on bridging visas, and while some like Ms Barthlote and her family have work and school rights, others don't. Now, former Coalition immigration minister Alex Hawke is calling on the government to resolve their status. "People have been here a long time. And the reality of their condition is that they will be staying here," Mr Hawke said. "We now have to deal with the actual reality of the situation." While the previous Coalition government did not solve the issue when it was in power, Mr Hawke is now saying he supports action. "It's time the Labor Party committed to resolving the issues. Some of those are tricky, but a lot of them are now no longer tricky," Mr Hawke said. Perhaps the most high-profile member of this group is Priya Nadesalingam, the Tamil asylum seeker whose cause was championed by the Queensland town of Biloela. Ms Barthlote and Ms Nadesalingam arrived in Australia on the same boat in 2013. Both are members of Sri Lanka's Tamil minority, which fought a long and bloody civil war against the majority Sinhalese. Both fled their country to live in refugee camps in India. And both had their claims for asylum knocked back under the Fast Track system. After a four-year community campaign, the Nadesalingams were granted the right to live here permanently. But Ms Barthlote and thousands of others still face great uncertainty. Ms Barthlote's case has been working its way through the system for more than a decade. When her first claim for refugee status was rejected by the Fast Track system's Immigration Assessment Authority (IAA), she appealed that decision and won. The court sent her case back to be reassessed by the IAA which again rejected it. Ms Barthlote appealed this decision in mid-2019 and six years on, she's still waiting for a hearing. While they wait for a resolution, Ms Barthlote and her husband Barthlote Selvaraja have built a life in Melbourne's western suburbs. Her frustration with being left in limbo has led her to campaign publicly about the situation she and thousands of others find themselves in. Ms Barthlote has been employed for a number of years in aged and disability care and and works part-time at a union. Her husband holds down two jobs, as a forklift driver and as a worker in aged care. Logitha is in Year 11 and wants to study forensic science at university but Ms Barthlote fears they won't be able to afford the fees. If Logitha is still on a bridging visa in two years, she will have to enrol in university as a foreign student, and won't be able to access the student loans scheme, HECS. "She wants to have a dream but she can't get that dream," Ms Barthlote said. In contrast, Logitha's younger sister Lolitta will be able to enrol in university as a local student. There are other differences. Unlike her sister, it's difficult for Logitha to leave the country, as she doesn't have a passport. She doesn't have automatic access to Medicare but must reapply every year. Logitha won't be able to vote when she turns 18 and her long-term future in Australia is uncertain. Since coming to power in 2022, the Labor government has acted on its promise to resolve the status of about 20,000 people found to be refugees under the Fast Track system, but who were still living on temporary protection visas. That group is now on what the government calls a "permanent visa pathway". But those working in the sector say it isn't clear how the government plans to manage this remaining cohort of 8,000. The home affairs minister continues to use his powers of ministerial intervention to provide people in this group with a pathway to permanent residency but it is on a case-by-case basis. Sanmati Verma, legal director at the Human Rights Law Centre, said the criteria for these visas to be granted is largely unknown. "There is no clear rationale or consistency as to who is afforded this treatment and who is not", Ms Verma said. Ms Verma dubbed the current policy as "cruel", and said it divided families. "[The government should] recognise that people who have been here for a decade or more are now part of our community, and grant them permanent visas to reflect that reality," she said. In a statement to Australian Story, a spokesperson for the Home Affairs Department said the government was not offering permanent visas to people whose claims were rejected under the old system and which have failed on appeal. "People … who have exhausted all avenues to remain in Australia are expected to depart Australia voluntarily and may be provided assistance to depart," a department spokesperson said. "Those with new, credible protection claims relating to changes in their country of origin or personal circumstances may request Ministerial Intervention." Ms Barthlote and her family are desperate to secure a future in the country they've called home for more than a decade. "We are part and parcel of this community. We have no home to return to in Sri Lanka," she said.