Bar hails new Chief Justice with track record of upholding judicial integrity
Malaysian Bar president Mohamad Ezri Abdul Wahab said Wan Ahmad Farid's past conduct — particularly his 2022 decision to recuse himself from a sensitive case and his strong remarks on judicial independence — reflected a deep commitment to upholding the rule of law and preserving public confidence in the judiciary.
"The Malaysian Bar recalls that, in 2022, Wan Ahmad Farid recused himself from hearing a high-profile matter concerning the admission of Queen's Counsel Jonathan Laidlaw in a case involving former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak.
"In doing so, he made several significant statements on the importance of public confidence in the judiciary, stating that the perception of judicial independence must not be placed in doubt, and that it is not a matter of trial and error.
"He also reminded that an independent judiciary is a precious gift to any society — and once it is lost, anarchy reigns.
"These statements demonstrate a profound understanding of the judiciary's sacred role in upholding the rule of law. We hope that under the stewardship of these new judicial office bearers, the judiciary will continue to uphold the highest standards of independence, integrity and service to the nation," he said in a statement today.
Last night, the Chief Registrar's Office announced that His Majesty Sultan Ibrahim, King of Malaysia, had consented to Wan Ahmad Farid's appointment in accordance with Article 122B(1) of the Federal Constitution.
Wan Ahmad Farid succeeds Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat, who retired on July 2.
Datuk Abu Bakar Jais has been appointed as the President of the Court of Appeal, while Datuk Azizah Nawawi has been named the Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak.
Commenting further, Ezri said that while these appointments were much welcomed after months of uncertainty and anticipation, the Bar remained hopeful that outstanding vacancies across the Federal Court, the Court of Appeal and the High Court would be filled promptly and transparently.
"We are relieved by the announcement of Wan Ahmad Farid as the new Chief Justice. We extend our congratulations and wish him every success in leading the judiciary with distinction, courage and unwavering commitment to justice.
"We also congratulate Abu Bakar on being appointed President of the Court of Appeal, and Azizah as Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak.
"We remain hopeful that the remaining vacancies in the Federal Court, Court of Appeal and High Court will be filled without delay, and in a manner that reinforces public confidence in the judiciary and strengthens the administration of justice."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
6 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Opposition to provide legal support for anti-Anwar demonstrators
KUALA LUMPUR: The Opposition said it would provide legal assistance to any civil servants facing action for participating in the upcoming "Turun Anwar" rally, scheduled for Saturday. Pendang member of parliament Datuk Awang Solahuddin Hashim said legal support would be extended to those who face action for taking part in the rally. "I want to emphasise that if any civil servant faces action (for joining the rally), we will provide them with lawyers," he said when debating the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (Suhakam) 2023 Annual Report and Financial Statements in the Dewan Rakyat today. Awang said this after Chief Secretary to the Government Tan Sri Shamsul Azri Abu Bakar and the Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) reminded civil servants not to participate in the opposition-organised rally. Awang said Article 10 of the Federal Constitution guarantees citizens the right to free speech and peaceful assembly. On Sunday (July 20), Shamsul Azri said civil servants must adhere to the pledge enshrined in the Rukun Negara. "They cannot attend. Civil servants recite the pledge every day, every week. The Rukun Negara includes the principle of loyalty to the king and country... Have they forgotten? Be loyal to the king and country," he said. Yesterday, the AGC in a statement said civil servants who participate in the rally may face disciplinary action for breaching civil service regulations. The AGC stressed that civil servants are bound by the pledge outlined in the Public Officers (Appointment, Promotion and Termination of Service) Regulations 2012, as well as the Public Officers (Conduct and Discipline) Regulations 1993.
Malay Mail
6 hours ago
- Malay Mail
When integrity gets twisted into accusation — Mohd Said Bani CM Din
JULY 24 — It is both disappointing and ironic that, in a time when we should be celebrating the institutional strength of independent audit and accountability, the appointment of Auditor-General Wan Suraya Wan Radzi has come under fire from some politicians, not for failing in her duties, but for excelling at them while refusing to play political cheerleader. To suggest that her appointment is 'tainted' simply because she is a civil servant is both legally unfounded and ethically disingenuous. Article 105 of the Federal Constitution clearly provides for the Yang di-Pertuan Agong to appoint the Auditor-General on the advice of the Prime Minister — after consultation with the Conference of Rulers. This process was duly followed. The idea that a civil servant, by default, lacks independence is an insult not only to her professionalism but to the integrity of the Malaysian Civil Service as a whole. In fact, the suggestion that only retirees are 'independent' is laughable. Since when did age or retirement status become the gold standard for objectivity? Is independence defined by being out of service — or by having the strength to serve without fear or favour? Wan Suraya brings with her 29 years of administrative service, deep knowledge of government operations, and a track record unmarred by scandal. If anything, this positions her to understand — and scrutinise — government mechanisms with greater precision than someone parachuted in from outside with no institutional insight. Auditor-General Wan Suraya Wan Radzi at a recent official function. Her appointment has sparked political debate, despite constitutional backing and a track record of public service spanning nearly three decades. — Bernama pic As a communications professional, I must also highlight that this debate reflects a larger challenge — the erosion of ethics and integrity in public discourse. True communication isn't just about broadcasting opinions; it is about educating the public with context, accuracy, and respect for institutions. When we distort narratives for political mileage, we not only mislead the public but undermine trust in democratic processes. Ethical communication, especially in public service, must be upheld — not attacked — if we are to strengthen national confidence and civic understanding. And let's talk about this so-called 'cheerleading' for Madani. If public servants attending a national event or sharing an official Facebook post constitutes propaganda, then we might as well shut down every government event since Merdeka. By that logic, any participation in public discourse becomes a conflict of interest. Perhaps next we'll be told that liking a post on workplace safety makes you unfit to investigate construction sites. Let us be clear: auditors are not monks, nor are they mute. Their duty is not to hide in a cave until summoned — it is to engage with governance, communicate transparently, and uphold public trust. Selective outrage over a social media post, or over a conflict of interest exemption that is both legitimate and previously exercised under certain contexts, reeks more of political theatre than constitutional concern. Instead of applauding the fact that the National Audit Department continues to produce thorough, timely reports, certain quarters would rather question the messenger — simply because the message is inconvenient. To the critics: if your goal is to discredit institutional integrity, do so with facts — not conjecture laced with sarcasm and double standards. And please, let's not pretend this is about transparency when it is clearly about politics. Malaysia doesn't need a silent Auditor-General. It needs a courageous, competent, and constitutionally appointed one. And, fortunately, it has one. *Prof. Mohd Said Bani CM Din is president of the Public Relations and Communications Association (PRCA) Malaysia. **This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
Free Malaysia Today
7 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Aussie court says women can sue Qatar Airways over strip-search ordeal
Today's ruling paves the way for the women to sue Qatar Airways. (EPA Images pic) SYDNEY : A group of Australian women strip-searched after boarding a Qatar Airways flight in Doha won a court victory today that paves the way for them to sue the airline. In an incident that sparked international outrage, Qatari authorities pulled women off 10 planes in Doha in 2020 and forced them to take invasive gynaecological exams. Authorities were hunting for the mother of a newborn found abandoned in an airport bathroom. Five Australian women caught up in the ordeal lodged legal action against Qatar Airways, claiming they were assaulted and falsely imprisoned. Australia's federal court last year ruled they could not directly sue the airline. But that decision was reversed today on appeal, with three federal court judges stating the case should be heard at trial. Australia's government cited the incident as a reason to block Qatar Airways from operating more flights into the country. Qatar's then prime minister, Khalid bin Khalifa bin Abdulaziz Al Thani, at the time offered his 'sincerest apologies for what some female travellers went through'.
