Civil organisations call out Ramaphosa over silence on Edgar Lungu's burial controversy
Image: Rogan Ward/Reuters
Civil organisations have questioned President Cyril Ramaphosa's silence regarding the controversy surrounding the burial of late former Zambian President Edgar Lungu.
The organisations under the banner Progressive Forces For South Africa that include, The South African Concerned Citizens Association, March and March and Reakga Community Project among others laid their concerns bare during a press briefing in Midrand on Thursday.
A dispute has erupted between the Zambian government and Lungu's family over whether he should be buried in South Africa or repatriated to Zambia for a state funeral.
Lungu died last month in South Africa and his remains have become the centre of a dispute.
In the Pretoria High Court, the Zambian government filed an urgent application to prevent Lungu's burial in South Africa.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
They argued that as a former president, Lungu "belongs to the nation of Zambia" and should be interred there. Zambian President Hakainde Hichilema underscored this point, drawing a parallel to the precedent of founding President Kenneth Kaunda's burial in Zambia, which occurred despite his family's desires.
Lungu's family, however, had opted for a private ceremony in South Africa. The High Court halted plans for the burial in South Africa just as it was about to start, following an agreement between the parties.
The court has given the Zambian attorney general until a specified date to submit papers in support of Lungu's repatriation to Zambia, with the matter to be heard on August 4, 2025.
Leader of the organisation, Mthetho Ngcukayithobi is questioning why Ramaphosa has remained silent on the matter saying that South Africa has a diplomatic stance when it comes to former presidents of other states.
Ngcukayithobi also alleged that Lungu was admitted into a Pretoria hospital under a fake name prompting more questions for the South African government.
'The Lungu saga makes us ask critical questions about our own government. Who did the authorities declare dead?...When a former president dies on foreign soil there are diplomatic processes…But in this case it seems none of the steps were followed. Why is our government silent on this?' Ngcukayithobi asked.
"We are saying go and clear your name. We are also saying the former president cannot be buried in a foreign country when he was a president in Zambia. The Zambians deserve to bury their leader," said Ngcukayithobi.
The organisation expresses concerns about potential land claims by the Lungu family in South Africa if he is buried there, highlighting the country's ongoing issues with land claims.
'We, in South Africa, have land issues, with some claims still being processed. We don't want a situation where Lungu's descendants come to claim land here because their ancestor is buried here,' Ngcukayithobi said.
Ngcukayithobi also pointed out that members of Lungu's family are facing serious corruption charges in Zambia, including charges related to proceeds of crime and money laundering against his children.
"The former first family are facing serious corruption charges back home. This is about state capture and asset looting in Zambia. These beneficiaries live in SA comfortably," said Ngcukayithobi.
The dispute over Lungu's burial underscores the tense relationship between him and his successor, President Hichilema, which continued even after Lungu's death.
During Lungu's presidency, Hichilema was arrested for treason.
Lungu's family during a press briefing recently asserted that the reason they did not want the former president to be buried in Zambia was because they feared his remains would not be properly buried because of the feud with the current president.
South African presidency spokesperson Vincent Magwenya had not responded to the allegations at the time of going to print
mashudu.sadike@inl.co.za
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
5 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
US-SA trade deal still in limbo as tariff deadline looms
The Trade and Industry Ministry says it is still awaiting 'substantive feedback' from the US on its trade proposal as the 1 August deadline looms. South Africa and the US have still not reached a trade deal, days before US President Donald Trump's 30% tariff on South African goods is due to take effect. In a statement on Tuesday, 29 July, the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition (DTIC) said it remained committed to the conclusion of a trade agreement with the US, as it waits for feedback from the Trump administration on its trade proposal. 'The intersection of geopolitical, domestic and trade issues best defines the current impasse between South Africa and the United States, and a reset is unavoidable,' read the statement. 'Our view is that negotiations remain the best tool to deal with the issues that are on the table… We remain committed to the cause as we await substantive feedback from our US counterparts on the final status [of] our framework deal,' it continued. Earlier this month, Trump announced that he would impose a 30% tariff on South African exports to the US from 1 August. Multiple other countries are also facing varying tariff rates. While some countries, including the UK, Japan and Vietnam, have bagged trade agreements with the US, not a single African nation has reached a deal with America. 'Prepared for several potential scenarios' After Trump announced his global ' reciprocal ' tariffs in April, before agreeing to suspend their application for 90 days, Pretoria was eager to begin negotiations with America over tariffs. It proffered a proposed framework deal to US trade representatives in Washington in May, before President Cyril Ramaphosa and Trump met at the White House. Pretoria was later told it needed to revise this proposal, in accordance with the Trump administration's new template for US trade with sub-Saharan Africa, which it was told would be shared ' soon '. However, it appeared that as of Tuesday, Pretoria was still waiting for this template. 'As the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition, we have been in a period of intense negotiations with the United States. We have signed a condition precedent document and have readied our inputs for entry into the template, which is to follow from the US,' it said. Department of International Relations and Cooperation (Dirco) director-general Zane Dangor said on Tuesday, there were no guarantees of a trade deal with the US by 1 August, with issues such as black economic empowerment (BEE) obscuring matters, according to a News24 report. If implemented, Trump's punishing tariffs will kneecap South African industries, including the automotive sector and the citrus industry. But the DTIC suggested it was preparing for other eventualities should a deal not be signed. 'Despite the challenges that have been presented by this period, we have put our best foot forward, bringing together the subject specialists within our ranks that have dug deep to ensure that our country is adequately prepared for a number of potential scenarios. 'We have planned for these scenarios and have not sat idle. We are working with other government departments on a response plan, which includes a support desk within the DTIC. Our response package also focuses on demand side interventions in the impacted industries,' it said. The DTIC said it had no intention of 'decoupling' from the US. Details of the trade proposal Pretoria's initial trade proposal included deals on agriculture, critical minerals, automotives and other exports. According to the DTIC, some of the elements of the framework deal include: Importing 75-100 petajoules of liquefied natural gas from the US for a 10-year period, unlocking $12-billion. The simplification of US poultry exports under the 2016 tariff rate quota, which is expected to unlock about $91-million in trade. In addition, readiness to open market access for blueberries, subject to the necessary protocols. A commitment from South African firms to invest $3.3-billion in US industries such as mining and metals recycling, with an agreement from both governments to pursue joint investment in critical minerals, pharmaceuticals and agricultural machinery. The exemption of specific sectors from reciprocal tariffs to preserve supply chains. For example, ship-building, counter-seasonal agricultural trade, and exports from MSMEs [micro, small and medium enterprises] of less than $1-million per year. DM
Daily Maverick
5 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
EFF turns 12: Can Malema's newfound maturity overcome his troubled past?
As the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) recently celebrated its 12th anniversary, Julius Malema — its co-founder and self-styled commander-in-chief — stood at the symbolic centre of a political movement that has defied expectations, disrupted the status quo, and, undeniably, altered the terms of public debate in South Africa. But as the EFF matures, so too must we sharpen our scrutiny — not only of its political contributions but of the ethical terrain its leadership has traversed. There is no gainsaying the fact that Malema has, in recent years, displayed a notable degree of political maturation. The man once derided as the enfant terrible of South African politics has increasingly adopted a more measured, calculated posture. The inflammatory rhetoric, frequent provocations and theatrical defiance that once defined his engagements have, at times, been replaced with disciplined messaging and tactical manoeuvring. This shift is a welcome development and could well signal a new chapter for his party, and South African politics more broadly. Yet, this apparent evolution cannot be appraised in isolation from Malema's chequered history — a history marked not only by political controversy but by deeply troubling allegations of corruption, the abuse of power, and ethical compromise. Long before the red overalls and parliamentary theatrics, Malema's political ascent was shadowed by his entanglement in what many regard as the systematic plunder of Limpopo's public coffers. Central to this was his association with On-Point Engineering, a company controversially awarded multimillion-rand contracts by the Limpopo Department of Roads and Transport during his tenure as president of the ANC Youth League. A 2012 Public Protector's investigation found that On-Point had only one shareholder, Guilder Investments, which in turn was owned equally by the Gwangwa Family Trust and the Ratanang Family Trust. Beneficial ownership Critically, the Ratanang Family Trust's sole beneficiary was Malema's young son. Initially, Malema himself was the sole trustee, later joined by his then 83-year-old grandmother, raising serious questions about beneficial ownership, financial oversight and governance. The investigation revealed that On-Point was not merely a service provider, but played a gatekeeping role in procurement decisions — effectively influencing the awarding of subcontracts, some of which were suspected of being structured to benefit politically connected individuals. This was not a lapse in judgement; it pointed to a deliberate and concealed enrichment scheme involving public funds. Soon after, Malema came under fire from the South African Revenue Service (SARS), which conducted a forensic audit that exposed undeclared income and lifestyle expenditures grossly disproportionate to his known earnings. SARS estimated his tax debt to exceed R16-million, leading to the attachment and auctioning of his assets, including an incomplete Sandton mansion, a farm in Limpopo and other property. For a self-proclaimed revolutionary, these revelations laid bare a disconcerting contradiction between rhetoric and reality. Yet perhaps the most corrosive episode in Malema's recent political career is his and his party's alleged indirect benefit from the looting and eventual collapse of VBS Mutual Bank — a scandal that devastated vulnerable municipalities and poor rural depositors. While Malema has yet to be charged, forensic reports and investigative journalism suggest that he and individuals close to him — notably former deputy EFF leader Floyd Shivambu — benefited from illicit payments, some of which reportedly funded EFF events and lifestyle costs. His denials have been vociferous, but remain unaccompanied by transparency or accountability measures within the party. Taken together, these episodes reflect a troubling pattern: one in which 'revolutionary credentials' are paired with allegations of corruption, asset concealment, and the opportunistic use of public institutions for private gain. The EFF, which positions itself as a moral antidote to ANC rot, has yet to reconcile these contradictions or offer credible self-correction. And yet, we now see a more measured Malema — an ostensibly more mature figure engaging more constructively in parliamentary debates and public discourse. His interventions around land reform, economic justice and youth unemployment have been impactful. He commands a loyal political base and has injected energy into a lethargic political ecosystem. But maturity in politics is not merely about improved tone or tactical discipline. It is fundamentally about ethical consistency and principled leadership. If the EFF is to be taken seriously as a party of the future, it must demonstrate that it can rise above the temptations of patronage and personal aggrandisement that have engulfed its political adversaries. Its internal culture must mirror the constitutional accountability it demands of others. The EFF's decision to provide a platform to amaXhosa King Buyelekhaya Dalindyebo — who used the occasion of the party's birthday celebrations to hurl wild, intemperate invective at President Cyril Ramaphosa — and Malema's persistent posture on the Dubul' iBhunu chant undoubtedly sullied the optics. That the mercurial monarch, himself a controversial figure with a chequered past, was afforded such a platform not only undermined the dignity of the event but raised questions about the party's judgement and its selective application of respect for democratic decorum. Criminal case For Malema, who is currently awaiting the outcome of a criminal case stemming from his public discharge of a firearm, the challenge is even more acute. To lead meaningfully in the next phase of our democracy, he must move beyond carefully curated optics and face the hard reckoning of past conduct. That means cooperating fully with law enforcement agencies, inviting independent scrutiny of his personal and party finances, and upholding the rule of law even when it is inconvenient. The moral high ground cannot be claimed while cloaked in unresolved allegations. Poignantly, recent developments in the conviction of a self-confessed accused — and the ongoing trial of other co-accused — in the assassination of Sindiso Magaqa, Malema's former trusted Youth League lieutenant for whom he has long demanded justice, must surely come as a welcome relief to him. As the EFF celebrates its 12th year of existence, it stands at a crossroads. Its success will be determined not only by its ability to mobilise and inspire, but by its willingness to hold itself to the standards it professes. South Africans are tired — not just of corruption, but of hypocrisy masquerading as radicalism.
Daily Maverick
5 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
How UK investment is powering South Africa's jobs revolution
UK investment and partnerships are turbocharging South African jobs, housing and digital markets — with real on-the-ground impact. On Monday, 28 July, the United Kingdom (UK) Minister for Employment Alison McGovern visited Cape Town ahead of the G20 Employment Ministerial in George this week, engaging with two flagship initiatives supported by the British High Commission that are driving job creation and economic opportunity in South Africa. According to Jenna Kretzmann, communications officer of the British Consulate General, UK firms now employ more than 100,000 South Africans, fuelling vital job creation and strengthening economic resilience in a country grappling with a 32.9% overall unemployment rate and a youth unemployment rate that reached 62.4% nationally for those aged 15 to 24 in the first quarter of this year alone. UK-backed initiatives are also seeking to address deep-rooted structural challenges—in particular, the legacy of spatial segregation that continues to shape South African cities. One such initiative, Divercity, was founded in 2018, with UK-backed British International Investment playing a key role since 2021 in funding urban renewal projects that deliver affordable housing and employment. At Divercity's Salt River housing development, the Herringbone development, supported by British International Investment (BII), is powering an urban renewal engine aimed at breaking the cycle of spatial segregation that has long plagued South African cities. This project includes funding for more than 2,500 residential units, with more than 5,500 people benefiting from it. The initiative is also expected to create up to 4,000 construction and permanent jobs, offering both roofs and opportunities. 'Almost all new affordable housing delivery since 1994 has taken place at the urban periphery, entrenching spatial segregation,' noted Carel Kleynhans, CEO of Divercity, highlighting how their partnership with BII enabled commercially viable affordable housing in prime locations. E-commerce empowerment In a separate initiative, Takealot, South Africa's largest e-commerce platform, is unleashing the digital economy through its Township Digital Market Access Programme, supported by the UK-SA Tech Hub. The top 50 SMMEs in the programme have already generated about R5.7-million in sales and 39 jobs in one year. More broadly, Takealot has created 21,000 jobs and helped more than 7,500 township Small, Medium and Micro Enterprises (SMMEs) reach new markets, illustrating how public-private innovation can fuel growth. 'We are opening up the e-commerce ecosystem, particularly to township-based entrepreneurs and small businesses…'We believe that this approach will meaningfully increase household incomes as we help create more opportunities for entrepreneurship, SMME growth and job creation,' said Fred Zietsman, CEO of Takealot. What this means for you Job seekers: UK investments mean more openings in construction, digital commerce and urban development — especially promising for youth and women. Entrepreneurs and SMMEs: More inclusion in e-commerce platforms can dramatically boost business opportunities. Urban dwellers: Projects like Divercity reduce commute costs and improve living conditions with safer, affordable housing in well-connected locations. Policy buffs: The UK-South Africa alliance models how international partnerships can go beyond aid, driving real economic transformation through sustainable jobs and innovation. DM
