Federal NDP to select a new leader in March after six month leadership race
OTTAWA — The federal New Democrats will select their new leader next March following a six-month leadership race, where contenders will have to submit a $100,00 entry fee, according to a source familiar with the decision.
Article content
The details come as the party's federal executive and council met to discuss the upcoming race, which will begin in September.
Article content
Article content
The NDP's top job opened up after former party leader Jagmeet Singh stepped down after losing his seat in the April 28 federal election, which delivered the party its worst electoral defeat yet.
Article content
The federal New Democrats were reduced to seven seats in the House of Commons, down from its previous 24.
Article content
Rebuilding the party will be the first order of business for the new leader, which will be no easy task considering the federal NDP is strapped for cash after the election, with hundreds of candidates failing to crack 10 per cent or more of the votes needed to qualify for campaign reimbursements from Elections Canada.
Article content
The upcoming race will be a critical way for the party to raise money, reconnect with party members, as well as draw in new supporters.
Article content
Recently, it announced that human rights and labour lawyer Emilie Taman, who has also been a candidate for the party, to steer its 2025 election review.
Article content
It has committed to sharing the results of the review with party members before the end of the year.
Article content
Interim NDP Leader Don Davies will steer the party's six-member caucus until a new leader is chosen.
Article content
Edmonton NDP MP Heather McPherson, one of the names floated as a possible leadership contender and one of the most prominent names among current MPs, recently posted a video to Facebook, saying she wanted to hear about how the party needs to change.
Article content
'The last election was a wake-up call,' she said in a short video shared on July 7.
Article content
'The NDP played it safe. We were neutral in a moment that demanded leadership. We stayed on the sidelines while people were asking us for solutions. And as a result, we lost trust.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
42 minutes ago
- CBC
Cumberland House women to travel Sask. spreading awareness of disruption of northern river delta
A group of Indigenous women from from Cumberland House Cree Nation in Saskatchewan say they want to raise awareness of the harmful effects of dams on the Saskatchewan River delta. For generations, the people of Cumberland House Cree Nation, located about 350 kilometres northeast of Saskatoon, have depended on the Saskatchewan River delta, the largest freshwater river delta in North America, stretching 9,700 square kilometres from northeast Saskatchewan into western Manitoba. In June, lawyers for the First Nation in northeastern Saskatchewan filed a statement of claim in Saskatoon Court of King's Bench, alleging the government has failed to uphold its treaty obligations. It names the government of Saskatchewan as the defendant. Now, a group of women calling themselves the Indigenous Saskatchewan Women's Environmental Water Advocacy Keepers Water Movement, or the Iskwewak Movement for short, are planning to travel the province sharing their knowledge of what has happened to the water system. Veronica Favel, one of the water advocates, said the delta is very important for northern people, who use the waterways to get from place to place. "Currently the waters are quite low and the river system is very hard to navigate," she said. She said in some places you come across sandbars, mud bars and rocks more often now because of low waters, which are also impacting land resources and wilderness camps. "It's very hard to navigate through that because of what's going on. It's actually dangerous to be out there if you don't know the waterways." Favel said there needs to be better management of water, because soon there will be no river delta. "We've been saying this for years," she said. "We've had elders that knew prior to this the existence of the dam. They knew that this was gonna have a huge impact, huge destruction. We've had research studies done on the Sask. River delta, which is our homeland, and we know what it's done to not only the environment, but to the animals that feed off it." Denise McKenzie, another water advocate in the Iskwewak movement, said water is essential to everyone for survival. "Water is life, to us it is sacred, and without clean, healthy water, we're done for," she said. McKenzie said the goal is to spread awareness to people all across Saskatchewan. "The way things are going now, we're not going to have a Saskatchewan River delta, especially after they put in the Gardiner Dam's $4-billion project plans they have for the irrigation project. That will be the final blow to the Saskatchewan river." McKenzie was referring to a massive, three-stage irrigation infrastructure plan Premier Scott Moe announced in 2020. Experts have said that a Saskatchewan government-funded report analyzing the costs and benefits of the project showed it is a risky venture that offers, at best, modest gains. The advocates' journey is set to begin on Aug. 4. They plan to drive from the E.B. Campbell dam in northern Saskatchewan, to Danielson Provincial Park, to Rotary Park in Saskatoon, then finally to Wascana Park in Regina. They say they will be doing ceremonies all along the way and speaking about the harmful effects the dams have on the waterway system. "Water is life. Without water nothing lives, and we see the devastation of what is happening," McKenzie said. "We know we have to do something about it. We need these much needed changes, we need to the protection." She said the Cumberland Lake used to be 30 miles (almost 50 kilometres) in length, and 30 to 40 feet deep. Since the establishment of the E.B. Campbell dam in the 1960s, the lake has drastically shrunk, she said. "Today it is less than two miles across, and it's only two feet of water with the rest sludge down below. You can't even go on a nice canoe trip across the lake," she said. Favel said this change is impacting her community's culture and way of life. "We as Indigenous people, we've always lived here and we've always been in connection with the land and what comes with the land.," she said. "We know that without the land or water our culture is going to die. It's a huge part of it. We're connected with all of that, we're the ones that experience it. We live with it, and we have children, grandchildren that are going to live here forever. So we need to do something about it, and that's this is our duty as protectors of water."
CBC
42 minutes ago
- CBC
Environmental groups launch legal campaign to stop Sask. coal plant extension
A group of citizens and climate advocacy groups have filed a court case to stop the Saskatchewan government from maintaining the province's three coal-fired power plants past 2030. Citizens for Public Justice, the Saskatchewan Environmental Society, and three people from Saskatchewan and Manitoba are behind the lawsuit. Represented by Saskatchewan-based environmental lawyer Glenn Wright, they have filed an application for judicial review against the government. "Coal is the dirtiest source of energy that we have. We argue that it has no place in any electricity grid in Canada," said Maryo Wahba, a Climate Justice Policy Analyst at Citizens for Public Justice. "Phasing out coal isn't just policy, it's also a moral imperative." On June 18, Crown Investments Corporation Minister Jeremy Jarrison sent a letter to SaskPower employees informing them of the province's decision to extend the life of the coal plants. They were previously scheduled to be closed by 2030 to help meet Canada's climate goals. The federal government wants to reduce Canada's greenhouse gas emissions to 40 per cent below 2005 levels by 2030, and reach net zero emissions by 2050. Saskatchewan currently has three coal-fired power plants: the Shand and Boundary Dam power stations near Estevan, and the Poplar River power station outside of Coronach. The groups hope for an interim stay to be placed on the province's extension plan until a judicial review. "The Government has not outlined any future process to determine whether such an extension is in the public interest, such as an environmental assessment. They simply made the decision. It is final, and therefore, ripe for judicial review." the plaintiff's court application said. The groups argue that the extension decision was made without sufficient public consultation, breaks federal clean energy regulations, contravenes the safety of future Canadian children under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and damages Canada's reputation as a climate-conscious country. "There are other options for the province," said Robert Halliday, the vice-president of the Saskatchewan Environmental Society. "Thus far SaskPower has not been really on board with taking those opportunities." "Renewable power is the way forward for Saskatchewan." According to the Canadian Energy Regulator, 41 per cent of Saskatchewan's energy generation is produced by coal. Natural gas makes up 44 per cent, while hydro, wind and solar power comprise 15 per cent. There are currently no nuclear power plants providing energy or being built. In his letter to SaskPower in June, Jeremy Harrison said the Saskatchewan government is still committed to the goal of net zero energy generation by 2050. Nevertheless, he said, coal power must be used as future nuclear plants are brought online. The Saskatchewan Government said that as the case is before the courts, it will not be commenting on it.
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
As premiers push for more immigration power, experts call for a fact-based debate
Ontario Premier Doug Ford speaks to the media during the 2025 summer meetings of Canada's premiers at Deerhurst Resort in Huntsville, Ont., on Wednesday, July 23, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Nathan Denette OTTAWA — Some premiers say they want to have more local control over the immigration system — but experts say what the system really needs is a national conversation on immigration reform that shores up public support. 'Most of the existing policies have been formulated on the fly without any evidence or serious impact evaluations of what the various classes of immigrants are, how they're performing economically and otherwise,' said Michael Trebilcock, a retired academic and co-author of two books on immigration policy. 'So it's basically research-free.' As the premiers and territorial leaders were wrapping up their three-day meeting in Huntsville, Ont., late last month, they called for an increase to economic immigration levels to fill local labour gaps and said they would use their constitutional powers to seize more control over immigration and issue work permits. Ontario Premier Doug Ford later walked back his vow to issue work permits to asylum seekers. 'Do I want the whole immigration system on the shoulder of the province? No. Would I like to be treated the same way as Quebec? Yes, and so would every other province and territory,' Ford said last Monday. Quebec has its own distinct immigration system through an agreement with the federal government. The province is able to choose who can immigrate to Quebec based on its own criteria, with French language skills being a significant factor. David Piccini, Ontario's immigration minister, said last Monday that the province also wants to see more financial support from Ottawa to help pay for social services strained by a high number of asylum seekers landing in Ontario. Ninette Kelley, a former United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees official and a former member of Canada's Immigration and Refugee Board, said that provincial control over immigration has grown significantly over the last two decades. 'They know what their provinces need today, and they want to make sure they get the labour in that is required to meet those demands,' she said. 'But at the same time, there's been absolutely no evaluation that I can see of how those programs are implemented or what effect they're having.' Trebilcock said the premiers' concerns need to be taken seriously because increased immigration boosts demand for health care and other provincial services. He said that it's 'disturbing' to see Canadians' support for immigration decline in multiple public opinion polls. He said current immigration policies lack broad support and he believes a comprehensive, public review is needed to rebuild that support through evidence-based policies. 'What we see at present is often piecemeal, on-the-fly changes in reaction to particular concerns that have surfaced in the media ... international students, temporary foreign workers,' he said. Kelley said that, instead of a multi-year exercise like a national inquiry, a top-to-bottom immigration system review could be conducted quickly with 'the right people at the table.' Saskatchewan Immigration Minister Jim Reiter told The Canadian Press that he and the other subnational immigration ministers have told Ottawa they want to be seen more as partners in immigration, not stakeholders. 'We need more influence in the decision-making of this because so much of the economic stream needs to be targeted depending on the specific needs of each province,' Reiter said. The federal government last year slashed the number of slots in the Provincial Nominee Program from 110,000 to 55,000 as part of broader efforts to rein in immigration. The program allows provinces and territories to nominate individuals for permanent residence based on their skills and ability to contribute to the economy. Each province and territory has its own set of program streams targeting different types of immigrants based on factors like skills or business experience. Reiter said provincial immigration ministers want to see the Provincial Nominee Program return to its previous levels. He said that while he understands the need to reduce the number of temporary visas, that shouldn't come at the expense of economic immigrants. 'We've had to restrict (the Saskatchewan Immigrant Nominee Program) down to three streams now to a large degree because we just don't have enough spots anymore,' Reiter said. Reiter said that of the 3,600 spots Saskatchewan has for its immigrant nominee program, three-quarters have to go to temporary workers, so the province is prioritizing nominees who work in health care and skilled trades. 'We've got the largest potash mine in the world being built ... just outside of Saskatoon and that company, BHP, every time we meet with them they raise the issue that skilled trades are an issue. So this is having a detrimental effect on economic growth,' he said. Trebilcock said that if provinces are focused on using immigration to strengthen their local labour markets, steps could be taken to make it easier to recognize immigrants' foreign credentials in fields like law and medicine. With federal immigration decisions having provincial consequences, Kelley said, running an effective immigration system requires close collaboration between all levels of government. 'So that speaks to the need for really tight co-operation between the federal government and the provincial government and municipalities, both in the setting of levels and in the housing and medical policies that are currently in place so that we can accommodate those who we're letting in,' she said. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 4, 2025. David Baxter, The Canadian Press
