New Bill Could Ban Pornography Across US
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
A new bill introduced by Utah Senator Mike Lee, a Republican, would create a federal ban on pornography by redefining what qualifies as "obscene" under law.
The legislation, called the Interstate Obscenity Definition Act (IODA), seeks to modernize the standard for prosecuting explicit content online, replacing a decades-old test established by the Supreme Court.
Newsweek has contacted the proponents of the bill for more information on the legislation via email.
Why It Matters
If passed, IODA could dramatically change how sexual content is treated under federal law, especially in online spaces. The bill proposes stripping the "intent" requirement from the current Communications Act of 1934, meaning individuals could face prosecution for sharing or hosting content deemed to be sexually explicit and lacking "serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value."
What To Know
The bill, introduced on Thursday, is co-sponsored by Illinois Representative Mary Miller, another Republican, and represents the third attempt by Lee to pass such legislation since 2022.
The legislation would revise the obscenity standard that authorities have used since the Supreme Court's 1973 Miller vs. California decision, which critics say is outdated and difficult to enforce, especially in the digital age.
The Miller Test, named after the 1973 decision, currently includes three criteria: whether the average person would find the work appeals to prurient interest, whether it depicts sexual conduct in an offensive way, and whether it lacks value.
The age-restriction warning screen of the website PornHub is displayed on two digital screens.
The age-restriction warning screen of the website PornHub is displayed on two digital screens.
Getty Images
In place of that test, the new bill's definition of obscenity would now include any content that "appeals to the prurient interest in nudity, sex, or excretion," and "depicts, describes or represents actual or simulated sexual acts with the objective intent to arouse."
If passed, the bill would pave the way for the prosecution of obscene content disseminated across state lines or from foreign countries and open the door to federal restrictions or bans regarding online pornography.
It would broaden what kinds of explicit content may be considered a federal crime, potentially criminalizing large amounts of adult content, including consensual expressions of sexuality.
What People Are Saying
In a statement on X, formerly Twitter, Utah Senator Mike Lee said: "Obscenity is not protected by the First Amendment. But hazy, unenforceable definitions have allowed pornography companies to infect our society, peddle smut to children, and do business across state lines unimpeded.
"Today I introduced the Interstate Obscenity Definition Act with Representative Mary Miller, establishing a comprehensive definition of obscene materials under federal law.
"This is a first and necessary step to stopping the people and companies that profit from degrading their fellow human beings and ruining countless lives."
What Happens Next
Congress will consider the legislation this month, though it is not clear if it will receive bipartisan support.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
a few seconds ago
- Politico
Another megabill? Senate Republicans have their doubts.
And Senate Finance Committee Chair Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) said he's open to considering as many as 200 tax proposals from his members that were ultimately not included in the first megabill. But most senators have questions about what could go into another reconciliation package — and they're casting doubts on whether it's even politically possible to do this all over again. 'You have to have a reason to do it,' said Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.). 'It's not easy to do, so you have to have a purpose for doing it in the first place.' That unifying purpose for Republicans the first time around was a desire to deliver Trump a major legislative victory early in his second term and prevent a tax hike that they feared would weaken the economy. Republican leaders' decision to throw in a debt limit extension through 2026 as Treasury warned the nation would soon exceed its borrowing authority added a do-or-die incentive. 'Without the pressure, I don't see how you get it done,' said one Republican senator, granted anonymity to speak freely, about prospects for passing a second reconciliation bill without an existential impetus for action. 'I don't think I see what the pressure is here.' At the same time, despite the White House's enthusiasm for another reconciliation bill, administration officials have not yet told lawmakers what policies they want considered, according to three people speaking on condition of anonymity. Sens. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) — chairs of the committees on Armed Services and Budget, respectively — also said before leaving for recess they have not received guidance from the White House. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), chair of the Senate Commerce Committee, said he still hadn't heard from the administration about its broader set of legislative priorities heading into the fall. At this point, the loudest reconciliation push in the Senate is coming from deficit hawks like Sen. Ron Johnson, who wants to use another bill to cut spending further than what conservatives were able to achieve in the first package.
Politico
7 minutes ago
- Politico
The mysteries of megabill 2.0
IN TODAY'S EDITION:— A Senate buzzkill for megabill 2.0— California Dems prep new congressional map— Murphy looks to revive doctor pay revamp Republicans are going through the motions on the road to megabill 2.0. But a growing number of GOP lawmakers are skeptical about what's to come. Despite Speaker Mike Johnson's push for second and third budget reconciliation bills, it's becoming clear that Senate Republicans aren't so sure what the party can deliver after a grueling battle over the 'big, beautiful' tax and spending plan that became law last month. Mia, Jordain Carney and Cassandra Dumay are out this morning with a look at the big reasons why GOP skepticism abounds. No direction — A White House official tells Mia that President Donald Trump really does want Congress to craft another domestic policy bill using the party-line budget reconciliation process. But Republicans say they're still waiting for the administration to provide specific instructions about what they should consider. Among those in the dark are committee leaders including Budget Chair Lindsey Graham and Armed Services Chair Roger Wicker. Commerce Chair Ted Cruz says he doesn't even know what the administration's broader legislative priorities are heading into the fall. 'You have to have a reason to do it,' Sen. Mike Rounds says. 'It's not easy to do, so you have to have a purpose for doing it in the first place.' Some Senate Republicans are working to fill in the gaps. Sen. Ron Johnson, a deficit hawk, is looking to cut spending. Senate Finance Chair Mike Crapo says he'll sort through roughly 200 tax proposals that were left out of the first reconciliation bill. No deadlines — Even if the White House floats some policy asks, it's not likely Republicans will feel as much pressure to advance a bill. With megabill 1.0, they had to avert a year-end expiration of Trump's 2017 tax cuts and head off a debt ceiling crisis. 'Without the pressure, I don't see how you get it done,' says one Republican senator granted anonymity. 'I don't think I see what the pressure is here.' GOOD MONDAY MORNING. Mia's out for the week. Email us: crazor@ and bguggenheim@ THE LEADERSHIP SUITE The latest on redistricting Democratic state lawmakers in California are expected to unveil a new congressional map this week. One draft that's circulating would give Democrats five new seats, potentially offsetting a GOP redistricting effort underway in Texas. Gov. Gavin Newsom wants to put the redistricting effort on the ballot in November. 'We discovered that we indeed could, consistent with the Voting Rights Act, put five Republican seats in play,' Rep. Zoe Lofgren, chair of the California Democratic congressional delegation, told CNN Sunday. 'We're unanimous in wanting to move forward.' As the White House ramps up pressure on red states to pursue redistricting, Vice President JD Vance said in a Fox News interview that he told Indiana state officials last week 'we want a unified Republican team.' Vance also said a new census sought by Trump could add 10 GOP seats and lead to 9 fewer Democratic seats. POLICY RUNDOWN COURT AFFIRMS CONGRESS' POWER OF THE PURSE — The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals is giving the Trump administration until Friday to put back online a public database that tracks federal spending, Kyle Cheney and Josh Gerstein report. The three-judge panel's unanimous decision over the weekend comes after the administration decided in March to shut the database down, claiming it threatened Trump's ability to manage federal spending. The judges declared that action was an affront to Congress' authority over government spending. MURPHY PREPS DOC PAY REVAMP — Rep. Greg Murphy, a House Ways and Means member and co-chair of the GOP Doctors Caucus, is looking to revive legislation aimed at shielding doctors from recurring cuts to their Medicare payments. It's a potential menu item for a year-end health care deal that lawmakers are beginning to sketch out. Doctors have seen declines in their Medicare payments for decades even as the cost of health care has steadily increased. The tax law that Trump enacted last month included a 2.5 percent bump for 2026, after Senate Republicans scrapped a House-backed provision that would have permanently tied the doctor fee scale to an index that tracks rising medical costs. Murphy wants a second shot. 'I cannot overemphasize how much damage these persistent cuts to the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule have done,' Murphy tells Benjamin. Best of POLITICO Pro and E&E: THE BEST OF THE REST Affairs, fraud and attack ads: The dirty fight for the Texas Senate, from Benedict Smith at The Telegraph Bernie Sanders thinks Democrats have turned on their base. Now it's time to fight back, from Veronica Stracqualursi at CNN THE CARRYOUT Welcome back to your Inside Congress hosts' favorite recess activity: sharing lawmakers' Capitol Hill food recommendations. Sen. Jeanne Shaheen said her go-to is a ham and swiss sandwich on rye from Capitol Hill Supermarket. What's your regular order in the neighborhood? Email crazor@ CAMPAIGN STOP CHIP ROY FOR AG? — Rep. Chip Roy is eyeing a bid for Texas attorney general as current AG Ken Paxton campaigns to oust Sen. John Cornyn, reports Mychael Schnell in The Hill. IOWA WATCH — Arizona Sen. Ruben Gallego attended the Iowa State Fair over the weekend. Asked by a reporter about a potential 2028 bid for president, the Arizona Democrat said he's 'focused on 2026' for now. TUNNEL TALK NEW EATERIES ON CAMPUS — The renovated Rayburn Cafeteria is scheduled to open this morning. It features the new CHA Street Food, which is available today, and Java House, which is expected to open Tuesday. Also opening today is the Starbucks Kiosk and Longworth Convenience Store, as well as the Common Grounds coffee shop in the Cannon basement. The Longworth and Ford cafeterias are closed for renovations. HAPPY BIRTHDAY Former Rep. Dan Kildee … former Sen. Tim Hutchinson … Billy Long (7-0) … NYT's David Brooks and Lyndsey Layton … Charles Blow … POLITICO's Toby Eckert, Michael Roberts and Danielle Bello … Lauren Maddox of Holland & Knight … Jesse Barba of Cengage Group … Kedrin Simms Brachman … former USTR Charlene Barshefsky … Marissa Secreto … Colin Cunliff … Thad Huguley … Greg Michaelidis … Ilana Drimmer … Sam Myers Jr. … National Journal's Emily Akhtarzandi TRIVIA FRIDAY'S ANSWER: Jim Wholey correctly answered that Theodore Roosevelt was the first president to receive the Nobel Peace Prize. TODAY'S QUESTION, from Calen: Name the current senators who have cast more than 10,000 votes. The first person to correctly guess gets a mention in the next edition of Inside Congress. Send your answers to insidecongress@
Newsweek
31 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Israel Reacts to Australia's Palestine Move
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Israel's ambassador to Australia accused Canberra of rewarding terrorism after Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said his country would formally recognize a Palestinian state in September. Australia is the latest major country to announce the move to recognize the State of Palestine, following the U.K., France, and Canada, amid escalating concern about the dire situation in Gaza as Israel wages war against the Hamas militant group. Albanese said that a "two-state solution was the basis of peace and security for the peoples of the region," though Australian recognition comes with certain conditions, including demilitarization of Gaza and democratic elections. "Peace is built by ending terror, not rewarding it," Amir Maimon, Israeli ambassador to Australia, said in a statement on Monday. "By recognising a Palestinian state while Hamas continues to kill, kidnap, and reject peace, Australia undermines Israel's security, derails hostage negotiations, and hands a victory to those who oppose coexistence." Maimon continued: "Let us be clear: this decision will not change the reality on the ground. Peace is not achieved through declarations; it is achieved when those who have chosen terror abandon it and when violence and incitement end. "Rewarding those who use terror as a political tool sends the dangerous message that violence brings political gains. "By recognizing a Palestinian state now, Australia elevates the position of Hamas, a group it acknowledges as a terrorist organisation, while weakening the cause of those working to end violence and achieve genuine, lasting peace." This is a developing article. Updates to follow.
