ICC issues arrest warrants for Taliban leaders over persecution of women
The International Criminal Court on Tuesday issued arrest warrants for two Taliban leaders in Afghanistan including supreme spiritual leader Haibatullah Akhundzada, accusing them of the persecution of women and girls.
The ICC said there were reasonable grounds to believe that Akhundzada and Abdul Hakim Haqqani, chief justice of the Taliban, had committed the crime against humanity of persecution on gender grounds against girls, women and other persons non-conforming with the Taliban's policy on gender, gender identity or expression.
Since the Islamist Taliban returned to power in 2021 it has clamped down on women's rights, including limits to schooling, work and general independence in daily life.
The Taliban condemned the warrants as an example of hostility towards Islam.
"We neither recognize anything by the name of an international court nor do we consider ourselves bound by it," the Taliban government's spokesman, Zabihullah Mujahid, added in a statement.
It is the first time judges of the ICC have issued a warrant on charges of gender persecution.
"While the Taliban have imposed certain rules and prohibitions on the population as a whole, they have specifically targeted girls and women by reason of their gender, depriving them of fundamental rights and freedoms," the court said.
The full warrants and details on the specific incidents they are based on remain under seal to protect witnesses and victims, the court said.
NGOs hailed the warrants and called on the international community to back the ICC's work.
"The international community should fully back the ICC in its critical work in Afghanistan and globally, including through concerted efforts to enforce the court's warrants," Human Rights Watch International Justice director Liz Evenson, said in a statement.
The ICC has been under increased criticism from non-member states such as the United States, Israel and Russia.
Last year the court issued an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity during the Gaza conflict. The ICC also issued an arrest warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin in 2023 on suspicion of deporting children from Ukraine.
Neither Russia nor Israel is a member of the court and both deny the accusations and reject ICC jurisdiction.
Last month the United States imposed sanctions on four ICC judges including two who were involved in a ruling that allowed prosecutors to open a formal investigation into war crimes and crimes against humanity in Afghanistan, including alleged crimes committed by American troops.
The ICC said it was an attempt to undermine the independence of an international judicial institution that provides hope and justice to millions of victims.
© Thomson Reuters 2025.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Diplomat
4 hours ago
- The Diplomat
Diplomatic Maneuvering Intensifies Ahead of US-Russia Alaska Summit
As Ukrainian officials look to Europe for backing, Putin looks to Asia and BRICS; Trump keeps his eyes on the spotlight. On August 6, U.S. Special Envoy Steven Witkoff met with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow. Media reports suggested that the visit was at the Kremlin's request, coming in the wake of comments from U.S. President Donald Trump, expressing dissatisfaction at Russia's slow pace in reaching peace with Ukraine. The same day, Trump issued an executive order titled 'Addressing Threats to the United States by the Government of the Russian Federation,' which targeted India with additional tariffs stemming from its import of Russian oil. Although Russia, in the executive order, is characterized as a threat to U.S. national security, the order itself punishes India most directly. The Russian and American presidents are set to meet in Alaska on August 15. Over the weekend, the White House was reportedly considering inviting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to the Alaska summit, but whether the bilateral meeting will become a trilateral one is not known. On August 7, in response to media questions, Putin said, 'I have already said many times that I have nothing against [meeting with Zelenskyy] in general, it is possible. But for this to happen, certain conditions must be created. Unfortunately, we are still far from creating such conditions.' The August 9 comments from Russian Presidential Advisor Yuri Ushakov focused on the bilateral nature of the planned meeting. Meanwhile, British Foreign Secretary David Lammy hosted U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance for a meeting with Ukrainian officials, as well as representatives from France, Germany, Italy, Finland, and Poland on August 10. Chair of Ukraine's parliamentary foreign affairs committee, Oleksandr Merezhko, told Newsweek that inviting Zelenskyy to the Alaska meeting would align with the 'nothing about Ukraine without Ukraine' principle. But it's unclear if such an invitation will be forthcoming, or if such a trilateral would yield genuine progress. Russia and Ukraine remain far apart on an approach to peace, primarily due to the reality that Russia does not want to give up territory it has seized, and Ukraine has no interest in making territorial concessions. Trump's desire to achieve a deal is not rooted in respect for Ukraine's territorial integrity or sovereignty; it's rooted in his desired self-perception as a master dealmaker (although many 'deals' settled by Trump have either unraveled, as in the case of North Korea in his first administration, or were rooted in considerable diplomatic work that pre-dated his administration, as in the case of Armenia and Azerbaijan). Trump's shifting position on Ukraine has most recently yielded comments that 'There will be some swapping of territories, to the betterment of both.' Kyiv may not be keen on that approach. The diplomatic maneuvering is widespread as all sides seek to bolster their position and line up partners. In the days after the Putin-Witkoff meeting, Putin made a series of phone calls that sketch out Russia's array of partners across Asia in particular. Aside from scheduled negotiations with Malaysia on August 6, and a visit by UAE President Mohammed Al Nahyan on August 7, Putin met with Indian National Security Adviser Ajit Doval, also on August 7. Then the phone calls began. Putin spoke via phone with South African President Cyril Ramaphosa (August 7), Uzbek President Shavkat Mirziyoyev (August 8), Kazakh President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev (August 8), Chinese President Xi Jinping (August 8), Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko (August 8), Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi (August 8), Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva (August 9), Tajik President Emomalu Rahmon (August 10), and Kyrgyz President Sadyr Japarov (August 10). The Kremlin readouts for all the above-mentioned phone calls vary slightly, but each one notes that Putin shared the 'main results of the conversation' he had with Witkoff. As Ukrainian officials look to Europe for backing, Putin looks to Asia and BRICS; Trump keeps his eyes on the spotlight.
The Diplomat
5 hours ago
- The Diplomat
Israeli Tourist Boom in Sri Lanka's Arugam Bay Stirs Local Unease
Colombo has been slow to crack down on unruly Israelis as it fears punitive action from the U.S. and other Western countries that could adversely hit tourist arrivals. A few weeks ago, Australian DJ Tom Monagle filmed a walk-through of Arugam Bay, a popular surfing destination in Sri Lanka's Eastern Province. Walking through the tourist town, Monagle pointed at Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) stickers on walls, and Hebrew signboards outnumbering those in Sinhala, Tamil, and English, and wondered aloud whether he was in Tel Aviv. Mongle's clip went viral in Sri Lanka because it mirrored a growing unease among many Sri Lankans about what was happening in the country's east coast: a visible and growing Israeli footprint, and a sense that some visitors are not just holidaying but operating outside the rules. Tourism is one of the key foreign revenue generators for Sri Lanka. The country earned over $1.7 billion from tourism in the first half of 2025, and the government expects that this year, earnings from tourism will be their highest ever. However, while most Sri Lankans understand the importance of a vibrant tourist sector, there is a growing unease among Sri Lankans about the behavior and activities of tourists from certain countries, especially Israelis. Since Sri Lanka reopened its borders to tourists in 2022, the number of tourists from Israel has risen rapidly. There were 19,517 arrivals in 2023, 24,845 in 2024, and 13,014 by the end of July 2025. Given that most tourists arrive in the latter months of the year, it is likely that this year, Sri Lanka will see its highest number of tourists from Israel. Most Israelis gravitate to surf towns in the island's south and east, especially Arugam Bay. The increase in Israeli tourists can be traced to the efforts of Presidents Gotabaya Rajapaksa and Ranil Wickremesinghe. As Sri Lankan journalist Hassaan Shazuli highlights in a recent Substack post, in early 2022, the Rajapaksa administration assisted an Israeli film crew to shoot a movie titled 'Arugam Bay.' According to promotional material for the movie, 'the story of a group of childhood friends from Israel, all surfers in the same commando unit in the Israeli army, who visit Sri Lanka to heal from a traumatic experience.' Wickremesinghe's administration kept channels open and his ministers in charge of tourism and foreign employment pushed for closer ties with Israel. Within a year following the rapid influx of Israelis, Sri Lankan journalists reported that some of the Israeli tourists had started running illegal businesses, especially in Arugam Bay. In June 2023, the Sunday Times reported that 'a whole bunch of new school people who set up surf schools, photography schools, yoga schools and so on, which are unregulated,' and that in the South 'even legitimate Israeli businesses bring down Israeli workers on tourist visas to construct their buildings.' Things have decidedly taken a turn for the worse since Israel's military offensives in Gaza in October 2023. Tension between Israeli tourists and businesses and Muslims in Arugam Bay has increased. In late 2024, the United States issued a travel advisory against Sri Lanka over alleged threats to Israelis in the country. The U.S. embassy in Colombo said they have 'credible information warning of an attack targeting popular tourist locations in the Arugam Bay area.' The Sri Lankan government arrested three people following these reports, but insisted that there was no concrete evidence against those who have been arrested. A few months later Sri Lankan authorities arrested a young man for pasting pro-Palestinian stickers. He was released recently and the police have admitted that they had 'found no evidence' against the young man. Despite the growing tensions, Sri Lanka has allowed visa-free travel to Israeli tourists in recent weeks. Monagle's TikTok went viral at a time when growing numbers of Sri Lankans were uneasy not only about Israel's actions in Gaza, but also about the rising presence of Israelis in their country. Concerns were heightened by the activities of certain fringe groups supporting Israel and fears that mounting anger over these issues could escalate into a national security threat. There is also speculation that the National People's Power (NPP,) a staunch pro-Palestinian political entity, is under pressure from the United States to take action against any anti-Zionist sentiments in Sri Lanka. This unease over Israeli tourists is not a sentiment unique to Sri Lankans. In India, the so-called Hummus Trail routes ex-soldiers through Kasol, Goa, and Himachal Pradesh for months of low-cost, high-freedom living. Documentaries and reporting there have chronicled drug use, psychotic flip-outs, and the role of Chabad and Israeli rescue outfits in retrieving travelers who get themselves into precarious situations. Visa overstays, unlicensed nightlife, and scuffles with pro-Palestinian locals seem to be an increasing phenomenon associated with Israeli tourists. So why is Sri Lanka slow to crack down? American support for Israel underlies the Sri Lankan government's reluctance to rein in the Israeli tourists. Israel's leverage runs through Washington. Any forceful, public action against Israeli visitors would trigger blowback beyond Jerusalem. U.S. travel advisories are usually repeated by other western countries. These could devastate tourist bookings in peak season. The U.S. could also increase tariffs on Sri Lankan exports. U.S. President Donald Trump warned Canada, a close ally and a member of the Five Eyes, not to extend recognition to a Palestinian state as that would adversely affect trade negotiations. One doesn't have to accept his stated rationale to grasp the risk. Sri Lanka needs tourism receipts and export growth; discretionary shocks hurt. The opposition political parties criticized the government's alleged tilt toward Israel, pointing to visa-free entry for Israeli tourists as proof that the traditionally pro-Palestinian National People's Power (NPP) has changed its stance. But the same opposition would likely hit the streets if firm action on Israeli tourists sparked a U.S. tariff snapback or a slump in arrivals. The government is squeezed between values (nonalignment, empathy for Palestinians) and vulnerabilities (dollars, debt, and jobs). In that gap, symbolism often beats substance and enforcement gets deferred. There are several procedural practices the state can implement to minimize public anger and reduce illegal activities by foreigners. However, given who is backing Israel and Sri Lanka's extreme dependence on the U.S. market, in the short term, there is little that can be done against the IDF stickers on walls, Israeli businesses that have crowded out the others, or religious structures Israelis have built. There is also nothing the government can do to reduce the anger of Muslims, especially those who live in the east. In the end, Sri Lanka's dilemma over the surge in Israeli tourism is less about a single nationality and more about the structural vulnerabilities that limit the country's room for maneuver. Sri Lanka has been suffering from balance of payment issues for decades, and these issues have only grown following the dismantling of the country's industrial base since the late 1970s. Successive governments have promoted services and encouraged Sri Lankans to seek employment in other countries. While tourism and remittances help keep the country's economy afloat, they also make Sri Lanka highly dependent on volatile markets and actors. In the long run, only a more resilient economy, less dependent on volatile external flows, will give Sri Lanka the freedom to set and enforce its own red lines without fear of economic or political blowback.
Nikkei Asia
6 hours ago
- Nikkei Asia
Nvidia, AMD to pay 15% of China chip sale revenue to US, official says
(Reuters) -- Nvidia and AMD have agreed to give the U.S. government 15% of revenue from sales to China of advanced computer chips, a U.S. official said on Sunday, in an unusual move likely to faze American companies. U.S. President Donald Trump's administration halted sales of H20 chips to China in April, but Nvidia announced last month Washington had said it would allow the company to resume sales and it hoped to start deliveries soon. Another U.S. official said on Friday the Commerce Department had begun issuing licenses for the sale of H20 artificial intelligence chips to China. Both the U.S. officials declined to be named because details have not been made public. The new levy could also hurt margins for the two companies, analysts warned. Shares of Nvidia and AMD fell about 1% and nearly 2%, respectively, in premarket trade on Monday. The deal to pay the U.S. government from sales in China is unusual for a president and marks Trump's latest intervention in corporate decision-making. Trump harangues company executives to invest in America to shore up domestic jobs and manufacturing, and last week, he demanded new Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan immediately resign, calling him "highly conflicted" due to his ties to Chinese firms. The U.S. official said the Trump administration did not feel the sale of H20 and equivalent chips was compromising national security. "It's wild," said Geoff Gertz, a senior fellow at Center for New American Security, an independent think tank in Washington, D.C. "Either selling H20 chips to China is a national security risk, in which case we shouldn't be doing it to begin with, or it's not a national security risk, in which case, why are we putting this extra penalty on the sale?" When asked if Nvidia had agreed to pay 15% of revenues to the United States, an Nvidia spokesperson said in a statement: "We follow rules the U.S. government sets for our participation in worldwide markets." "While we haven't shipped H20 to China for months, we hope export control rules will let America compete in China and worldwide." Nvidia has warned that being unable to supply H20 chips to China could slice $8 billion off sales from its July quarter, while AMD had forecast a $1.5 billion hit to revenue this year owing to the curbs. AMD did not respond to a request for comment on the news that was first reported by the Financial Times earlier on Sunday. "The Chinese market is significant for both these companies so even if they have to give up a bit of the money, they would otherwise make it looks like a logical move on paper," AJ Bell investment director Russ Mould said. "That said, it is unprecedented and there is always the risk the revenue take could be upped or that the Trump administration changes its mind and reimposes export controls." The U.S. Department of Commerce did not immediately respond to a request for comment. China's Foreign Ministry, approached for comment on Monday, said the country had repeatedly expressed its position on the issue of U.S. chip exports. The ministry in the past has accused the U.S. of using technology and trade issues to "maliciously contain and suppress China." The Financial Times said the chipmakers agreed to the arrangement as a condition for obtaining the export licenses for their semiconductors, including AMD's MI308 chips. The report said the Trump administration had yet to determine how to use the money. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said last month the planned resumption of sales of the AI chips was part of U.S. negotiations with China to get rare earths and described the H20 as Nvidia's "fourth-best chip" in an interview with CNBC. Lutnick said it was in U.S. interests to have Chinese companies using American technology, even if the most advanced was prohibited from export, so they continued to use an American "tech stack." The U.S. official who spoke about the 15% levy said they did not know when the agreement would be implemented nor exactly how, but said the administration would be in compliance with the law. Alasdair Phillips-Robins, who served as an adviser at the Commerce Department during former President Joe Biden's administration, criticized the move. "If this reporting is accurate, it suggests the administration is trading away national security protections for revenue for the Treasury," Phillips-Robins said. Nvidia generated $17 billion in revenue from China in the fiscal year ending Jan. 26, representing 13% of total sales. AMD reported $6.2 billion in China revenue for 2024, accounting for 24% of total revenue. Giving away some revenue from these chips to the U.S. government would bring the gross margins for these processors down by 5 to 15 percentage points, resulting in an impact of "a point or so" to their overall gross margins, Bernstein analysts said in a note.
