Germany takes the fight to Russia in undersea cable war
But Stephan Haisch, a rear admiral in the Bundeswehr, Germany's armed forces, says those days are over.
As Germany prepares for an election on Sunday, with defence a hot-button issue, it is also taking the lead in a new Nato mission to defend the Baltic Sea from Russian sabotage.
Rear-Adml Haisch is the commander of Task Force Baltic (CTF), a German Navy-led Nato headquarters that opened last October in Rostock, on the country's northern Baltic coast.
His task: to survey and, if necessary, board suspicious ships which may be involved in Russian attempts to cut critical cables on the Baltic seabed.
'Germany is ready and willing to take on responsibility for the Baltic Sea, and is establishing itself as a strong partner,' Rear-Adml Haisch told The Telegraph.
He batted-away suggestions that Germany has been reluctant to take on a bigger role in defending Europe since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Channel 4
12 minutes ago
- Channel 4
Trump threatens severe consequences if Putin doesn't end war
Today's virtual summit was the last chance for Europeans to sway Donald Trump before the showdown in Anchorage with the Russian President. But while Europe's leaders emerged from the meeting optimistically restating Ukraine's goals, it may amount to very little. None of them are set to be in the room when Trump and Putin go face to face.
Reuters
38 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump asked Polish President Nawrocki to replace Tusk in Ukraine meeting
WARSAW, Aug 13 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump at the last minute requested MAGA-allied Polish President Karol Nawrocki join the Ukraine teleconference with European leaders on Wednesday, according to centrist Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk, Nawrocki's bitter political rival who had been expected to attend. Nawrocki, a conservative nationalist and eurosceptic, is an ally of Trump's right-wing populist MAGA political movement and visited the White House during Poland's presidential election campaign this year. He defeated the candidate of Tusk's pro-European, centrist party in June. "Just before midnight yesterday we received information, alongside our European partners, that the American side would prefer that Poland was represented by the president in contacts with President Trump," Tusk told a news conference. The White House did not comment whether the U.S. requested Nawrocki rather than Tusk take part in the call. A Polish government spokesperson said on Tuesday that Tusk, a former head of the European Council of leaders, would attend the call with Trump. But Nawrocki foreign policy adviser Marcin Przydacz told reporters he had "no information that Prime Minister Donald Tusk had previously planned to participate." He said Tusk's team showed it did not have good contacts with the Trump administration because it was under the impression Tusk would take part. Government spokesman Adam Szlapka said Tusk was representing Poland in two calls on Wednesday with European leaders but not Trump. Przydacz said the offices of the president and prime minister would exchange information about the meetings. European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy spoke to Trump ahead of the U.S. president's summit with Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday, stressing the need to protect Kyiv's interests. Krzysztof Izdebski, policy director at the Batory Foundation, said having two political opponents represent Poland created a risk of mixed messages. "This shows that, even in foreign policy, in such a key issue of security, we are simply hostage to internal politics and a certain competition between various state bodies," he said. He said this would undermine Poland's effort to present itself as a modern country working with leading nations on international political issues. Nawrocki and PiS are strong supporters of Ukraine in its war with invading Russian forces, as is Tusk and his government, but they differ on issues such as abortion, family values and the rule of law. Tusk said that he respected the U.S. request to keep contacts at the presidential level, but this should not be used to "play Poles against each other".
Telegraph
42 minutes ago
- Telegraph
MoD refuses to say if Chagos deal counts toward defence spending
The Ministry of Defence has refused to say whether the Chagos Islands deal will count toward its Nato spending target. Labour ministers repeatedly faced questions over whether the £35bn agreement, described as a 'surrender deal' by critics, would be included as part of the newly announced goal of spending 5 per cent of GDP on defence by 2035. The Chagos deal was announced earlier this year as part of a large settlement with Mauritius, which claims sovereignty over the archipelago. Opponents said counting the Chagos payments towards the Nato total would undermine the credibility of the pledge, allowing ministers to claim they were spending more on defence without providing additional resources for the Armed Forces. 'Creative accounting' James Cartlidge, the shadow defence secretary, accused the Government of 'smoke and mirrors', adding that counting the sum towards the target would be 'a total con'. He told The Telegraph: 'With the threats we face, the UK needs to urgently increase defence spending. But this needs to be actual money for our Armed Forces, not smoke and mirrors. 'If Labour were to include the cost of Chagos in their declared Nato spend, that wouldn't just be creative accounting but a total con on the British public, inflating apparent defence spending with a £35bn commitment that makes us weaker. 'Labour must come clean on whether this massive waste of taxpayer's money will be included in our Nato spend.' Asked whether the Chagos payments would count towards the Nato total, the Ministry of Defence (MoD) directed The Telegraph towards an answer given in the House of Lords by Baroness Chapman, a Foreign Office minister. She told peers: 'The payments to Mauritius will be split between the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office and the MoD. The Nato qualifying status of these costs will be considered in the usual way.'
