logo
Syrian government still faces threat from Assad loyalists

Syrian government still faces threat from Assad loyalists

Yahoo07-03-2025
In January, days after the first-month anniversary of the fall of the Assad regime in a lightning Islamist-led rebel offensive in Syria, a group of young men - some of them armed - were gathered, checking their phones in the nearly empty interior ministry headquarters in Damascus.
With Bashar al-Assad gone, they had arrived from Idlib, a region in the country's north-west that for years was the only opposition-controlled province in the country.
Virtually overnight, they had been catapulted to positions once controlled by hand-picked Assad supporters and, led by Ahmad al-Sharaa, were in charge of a fractured country devastated by 13 years of civil war.
One of them, around 30 years old, had recently been appointed as a high-profile security official, and welcomed me to a room where any sign of the old regime had been removed. Tall and shy, the official made notes on his iPad while acknowledging that the new rulers faced enormous security challenges, including the threat coming from Assad loyalists.
From jihadist leader to politician: How Syria's president reinvented himself
'We are still at war': Syria's Kurds battle Turkey months after Assad's fall
The dismantling of the decades-old apparatus behind the oppressive machine of the Assads, such as the country's army and the ruling Baath party, meant the sacking of hundreds of thousands of people.
"There are Assad-affiliated people who haven't engaged with the reconciliation process," said the official, who requested anonymity to be able to discuss sensitive issues, citing the new authorities' call for former members of the security forces to surrender their weapons and ties to the old government.
"Our eyes are on everyone, but we don't want to give the impression that we're after them. That's why there haven't been massive raids."
Since then the violence has escalated, particularly in the coastal provinces of Latakia and Tartous, a stronghold of the Assad family, but clashes were relatively contained. Until Thursday.
As forces linked to the government carried out an operation in the countryside of Latakia province, targeting a former Assad official, they were ambushed by gunmen.
At least 13 members of the security forces were killed, according to the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, a UK-based monitoring group, in what a regional official described as a well-planned attack carried out by "remnants of the Assad militias".
Initially limited to the Jableh area, the unrest spread more widely. Videos posted online showed heavy gunfire in different areas. The authorities sent reinforcements and, on Friday, further clashes killed more than 120 people, the Syrian Observatory said.
It marked the most violent day since Assad's fall and the biggest challenge yet to interim President Sharaa's transitional government and his efforts to consolidate authority.
According to the Institute for the Study of War, a research group, former Assad regime members are likely to form the most effective insurgent cells against Syria's new rulers with the ability to coordinate attacks.
"[They] already have pre-existing networks that they can leverage to rapidly organize insurgent cells. These networks are military, intelligence, and political networks and criminal syndicates who were regime supporters and lost significant economic and political influence in the aftermath of Assad's fall," they said in a report.
Syria's coastal areas are also the heartland of Assad's Alawite minority, an offshoot of Shia Islam. Its members held prominent roles in the Assad government but, with the arrival of Sunni Muslim-led rebels, lost the power and privilege they once had. They now say they are under attack and discrimination, despite Sharaa's pledges to respect different religious sects.
On Friday, activists said gunmen had killed dozens of male residents in Alawite areas, which will further exacerbate tensions – and possibly drive support for insurgents in their anti-government push. The Syrian Observatory said the gunmen were from the government's security forces, although this has not been verified.
The authorities also faced resistance from the Druze forces in the south, although a deal was reached earlier this week
The government in Damascus does not control the whole of Syria, where different factions - supported by different countries - exercise power over different regions.
But for Sharaa, the challenge goes beyond the task of trying to keep the country safe.
As Western suspicions over his intentions continue, his authorities are also struggling to get crippling sanctions imposed on Syria under the former regime lifted, a vital move to revive the economy of a country where nine in every 10 people are in poverty.
Syria vows to destroy any remaining Assad-era chemical weapons
Inside a Syrian 'reconciliation centre' where Assad's soldiers give up their weapons
Syrian leader hails 'historic' dialogue conference
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Proscription was disproportionate – and has had a chilling effect
Proscription was disproportionate – and has had a chilling effect

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Proscription was disproportionate – and has had a chilling effect

Last month I was granted permission by the high court to legally challenge the proscription of Palestine Action. The judge said the ban was arguably unlawful on the grounds that it was disproportionate with rights to free speech and protest, and that the home secretary failed to consult Palestine Action or any human rights organisations. As my barristers argued, the proscription has had a chilling effect on thousands of people across the country. Examples include a former headmaster arrested for displaying a Private Eye cartoon, and protester Laura Murton being accused by police of potentially committing a terror offence by displaying a Palestine flag and a placard that said 'Free Gaza'. Even the UN human rights commissioner, Volker Türk, agrees the proscription is 'disproportionate and unnecessary'. The impact on free speech is evident even as I write this piece. I'm given less latitude to counter the home secretary's claims than she is afforded to advance them. Her decision to proscribe gives her a higher degree of control of the narrative, as many papers will be reluctant, for legal reasons, to publish a piece that may make the readers sympathetic to Palestine Action's aims. So all I am allowed to say on that is contained within my first witness statement. But I must do at least this. It is important that readers understand our case. As I explained to the court, Palestine Action 'take direct action against Israel's arms trade in Britain'. We 'put our bodies in the way of a military machine perpetrating genocide'. In my view the campaign has been effective, so I believe weapons firms and the Israeli embassy lobbied hard for ministers and police to crack down on Palestine Action. However, proscribing a domestic direct action group has sparked outrage. So far, more than 700 people have been arrested under the Terrorism Act for holding signs, while opposition to the ban is growing across the political spectrum. To save face, it seems to me the government has resorted to a smear campaign. Rather than solely litigating the case in the courts, they're also trying to litigate it in the media, where hard facts are swapped for soundbites. Their newest claim refers to supposed evidence of 'disturbing' plans and ideas. Yvette Cooper failed to reference any such evidence in court ahead of the 'permission hearing' to challenge the ban, instead launching the claims on TV. These allegations are not supported by the security assessments disclosed by her own department, and don't match the facts. The assessment to proscribe Palestine Action was made in March 2025, but it seems Cooper delayed proscription until the most politically convenient moment. If there were 'disturbing plans' and serious concerns of national security, why wait four months? Even Keir Starmer weighed in, making reference to 'Jewish-owned' businesses. The intention seemed to be to imply that Palestine Action was antisemitic. In reality, it targeted dozens of companies associated with Israel's biggest weapons producer, regardless of the identities of the owners. This fact is known by the government, yet they continue to weaponise antisemitism. I believe the idea behind the government's statements is to deliberately mislead the public and parliament. The group was banned due to 'serious property damage for a political cause', not because of racism or alleged violence against people. It is false to claim the organisation had violent intent against people. The home secretary's own security assessments say the direct action group didn't advocate violence or pose a threat to life. Cooper's attempt to justify her decision by misleading the public shows only what a huge political misstep she has made. Her political career will be marked by the most draconian attack on our civil liberties in a generation. Huda Ammori was co-founder of Palestine Action and is challenging its proscription in court Photograph by Antonio Olmos

‘My daughter Zoe is not a terrorist. Why has she spent a year in prison?'
‘My daughter Zoe is not a terrorist. Why has she spent a year in prison?'

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

‘My daughter Zoe is not a terrorist. Why has she spent a year in prison?'

Zoe Rogers has not been charged with a terrorist offence. on Saturday, she marked a year in detention without trial inside HMP Bronzefield, a high-security prison in Surrey. Rogers, 21, was arrested during a Palestine Action raid on a site run by Israeli weapons manufacturer Elbit in Filton, near Bristol, last August. 'My daughter is not a terrorist,' said her mother, Clare Hinchcliffe. 'They charged them with violent disorder, criminal damage and aggravated burglary,' she added, referring to her daughter and her co-defendants, who are collectively known as the Filton 24. Palestine Action had not yet been banned as a terrorist organisation – a move that has seen more than 700 people arrested for public displays of alleged support for the group since 5 July, when it was proscribed under the Terrorism Act 2000. Shy and autistic, Rogers is one of two dozen defendants in that case who have been denied bail. She has pleaded not guilty. Hinchcliffe, a senior campaigner for the London Cycling Campaign, said her daughter had been questioned by counter-terrorism police for five days and that she and others had faced 'the full force of the counter-terror police against them', adding: 'That has been absolutely terrifying.' The Crown Prosecution Service said that it would be seeking to argue that the alleged offences had 'a terrorist connection'. Under legislation drawn up in 2020 in response to two Islamist knife attacks, a terrorist connection is an aggravating factor, meaning that it could be applied by a judge when sentencing. The allegations in the case have been seen as a key part of the decision to proscribe Palestine Action and have contributed to the secrecy in the government's repeated defence of the ban, with ministers attempting to distinguish the issue from the broader right to protest and from deepening public outrage at what is happening in Gaza. Central to efforts to shore up the ban are as yet unproven accusations of violence against individuals. The attack on the Filton factory allegedly involved a ram-raid, using a decommissioned prison van to breach a loading bay. Samuel Corner, 23, faces charges of grievous bodily harm, and two counts of actual bodily harm involving injuries to two police officers. The charges are the only significant acts of violence against a person in the group's 356 actions since it was established in 2020. Corner has pleaded not guilty. Hinchcliffe said she had been angered by what she viewed as the Home Office attempting to cloud matters with smears against the defendants. The first officers who knocked on Hinchcliffe's door in Southgate, north London, last August explained that her daughter had been arrested and they had a warrant to search her room. 'When I got over the shock of having four police officers standing on my doorstep early one morning, they told me she was under arrest in Bristol police station. I asked when I could speak to her and they said it was usually after 24 hours.' That night, Rogers, who was then 20 and had secured a place to study interdisciplinary problem solving at university, was rearrested by counter-terrorism officers. It would be another five days before she saw her mother. 'It was very emotional, seeing her through two layers of security glass because I was in a box and she was in a box. She was with two others, flanked by officers. I'm so proud of her. She was sitting between the other two. The other two looked very distressed and she was looking strong. She was holding their hands.' Their lawyer saw no legal reason Rogers would not be granted bail and her grandparents had offered a large amount of money in surety, but it was denied. Hinchcliffe said: 'But then the judge decides: 'No, I'm refusing bail' – something about the risk of reoffending – and within seconds they were being led out of the room and I just felt viscerally like she was being ripped from my arms.' After almost two weeks, mother and daughter finally managed their first phone call, Hinchcliffe said. 'I guess the feeling was relief to have finally spoken to her, relief that she sounded kind of OK, and anger – why was she in prison? Those first few weeks, I was just in shock.' She added: 'I had a Fitbit at the time. My resting heart rate was constantly higher than it used to be. I was kind of in fight-or-flight mode. I remember just lying down and trying to sleep and my heart pounding. You've got this kind of irrational sense of: 'I have to go and save her and I can't.'' Soon after, the house was raided by a dozen counter-terrorism officers. 'They were trying to be discreet but that's a bit hard with 12 officers in forensic aprons and gloves going in and out. My neighbours just thought someone had been murdered.' She said they seized a laptop belonging to her younger daughter, Ffion, as well as her classics homework. Hinchcliffe, a devout Christian, said her minister was among the hundreds of protesters arrested just over a week ago for holding signs in support of Palestine Action. 'It's been surreal. I think it's great to see how ridiculous a government's being made to look by all these brave people who are prepared to face arrest.' She said that in the weeks after Hamas's surprise attack on Israel in October 2023, her daughter had started attending marches. Hinchcliffe remembers, too, when Rogers began to lose hope after months of protests as the bombing and aid blockades continued in Gaza. 'It's the deaths of the children that she cannot bear. She decided she was going to write all the names of the children who'd been killed so far and their ages on this big bedsheet. And she never wrote a single name. She just couldn't face it. 'She just became overwhelmed. She didn't go to the march, she didn't leave her bedroom the whole weekend. I think that was the point when she decided: the marches aren't working; our government's not listening.' Standing in her daughter's undisturbed bedroom, Hinchcliffe unfurled a black screenprint that showed the text of a poem Rogers, who faces trial in November, wrote from prison. 'When they ask why,' she wrote, 'I tell them about the children…I tell them about the boy found carrying his brother's body inside his bloody backpack. I tell them about the girl whose hanging corpse ended at the knees. I tell them about the father holding up his headless toddler.' The final line reads: 'It was love, not hate, that called me.'

Bolivia heads to the polls as its right-wing opposition eyes first victory in decades
Bolivia heads to the polls as its right-wing opposition eyes first victory in decades

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

Bolivia heads to the polls as its right-wing opposition eyes first victory in decades

LA PAZ, Bolivia (AP) — Bolivians headed to the polls on Sunday to vote in presidential and congressional elections that could spell the end of the Andean nation's long-dominant leftist party and see a right-wing government elected for the first time in over two decades. The election on Sunday is one of the most consequential for Bolivia in recent times — and one of the most unpredictable. Even at this late stage, a remarkable 30% or so of voters remain undecided. Polls show the two leading right-wing candidates, multimillionaire business owner Samuel Doria Medina and former President Jorge Fernando 'Tuto' Quiroga, locked in a virtual dead heat. Many undecided voters But a right-wing victory isn't assured. Many longtime voters for the governing Movement Toward Socialism, or MAS, party, now shattered by infighting, live in rural areas and tend to be undercounted in polling. With the nation's worst economic crisis in four decades leaving Bolivians waiting for hours in fuel lines, struggling to find subsidized bread and squeezed by double-digit inflation, the opposition candidates are billing the race as a chance to alter the country's destiny. 'I have rarely, if ever, seen a situational tinderbox with as many sparks ready to ignite,' Daniel Lansberg-Rodriguez, founding partner of Aurora Macro Strategies, a New York-based advisory firm, writes in a memo. Breaking the MAS party's monopoly on political power, he adds, pushes 'the country into uncharted political waters amid rising polarization, severe economic fragility and a widening rural–urban divide.' Bolivia could follow rightward trend The outcome will determine whether Bolivia — a nation of about 12 million people with the largest lithium reserves on Earth and crucial deposits of rare earth minerals — follows a growing trend in Latin America, where right-wing leaders like Argentina's libertarian Javier Milei, Ecuador's strongman Daniel Noboa and El Salvador's conservative populist Nayib Bukele have surged in popularity. A right-wing government in Bolivia could trigger a major geopolitical realignment for a country now allied with Venezuela's socialist-inspired government and world powers such as China, Russia and Iran. Conservative candidates vow to restore US relations Doria Medina and Quiroga have praised the Trump administration and vowed to restore ties with the United States — ruptured in 2008 when charismatic, long-serving former President Evo Morales expelled the American ambassador. The right-wing front-runners also have expressed interest in doing business with Israel, which has no diplomatic relations with Bolivia, and called for foreign private companies to invest in the country and develop its rich natural resources. After storming to office in 2006 at the start of the commodities boom, Morales, Bolivia's first Indigenous president, nationalized the nation's oil and gas industry, using the lush profits to reduce poverty, expand infrastructure and improve the lives of the rural poor. After three consecutive presidential terms, as well as a contentious bid for an unprecedented fourth in 2019 that set off popular unrest and led to his ouster, Morales has been barred from this race by Bolivia's constitutional court. His ally-turned-rival, President Luis Arce, withdrew his candidacy for the MAS on account of his plummeting popularity and nominated his senior minister, Eduardo del Castillo. As the party splintered, Andrónico Rodríguez, the 36-year-old president of the senate who hails from the same union of coca farmers as Morales, launched his bid. Ex-president Morales urges supports to deface ballots Rather than back the candidate widely considered his heir, Morales, holed up in his tropical stronghold and evading an arrest warrant on charges related to his relationship with a 15-year-old girl, has urged his supporters to deface their ballots or leave them blank. Voting is mandatory in Bolivia, where some 7.9 million Bolivians are eligible to vote. Doria Medina and Quiroga, familiar faces in Bolivian politics who both served in past neoliberal governments and have run for president three times before, have struggled to stir up interest as voter angst runs high. 'There's enthusiasm for change but no enthusiasm for the candidates,' said Eddy Abasto, 44, a Tupperware vendor in Bolivia's capital of La Paz torn between voting for Doria Medina and Quiroga. 'It's always the same, those in power live happily spending the country's money, and we suffer.' Conservative candidates say austerity needed Doria Medina and Quiroga have warned of the need for a painful fiscal adjustment, including the elimination of Bolivia's generous food and fuel subsidies, to save the nation from insolvency. Some analysts caution this risks sparking social unrest. 'A victory for either right-wing candidate could have grave repercussions for Bolivia's Indigenous and impoverished communities,' said Kathryn Ledebur, director of the Andean Information Network, a Bolivian research group. 'Both candidates could bolster security forces and right-wing para-state groups, paving the way for violent crackdowns on protests expected to erupt over the foreign exploitation of lithium and drastic austerity measures.' All 130 seats in Bolivia's Chamber of Deputies, the lower house of Parliament, are up for grabs, along with 36 in the Senate, the upper house. If, as is widely expected, no one receives more than 50% of the vote, or 40% of the vote with a lead of 10 percentage points, the top two candidates will compete in a runoff on Oct. 19 for the first time since Bolivia's 1982 return to democracy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store