Medical aid in dying bill discussed at legislature, powerful testimony presented in Las Vegas
Assembly Bill 346, sponsored by Democratic Assem. Joe Dalia and Republican Assem. Danielle Gallant would make it legal for a terminally ill patient to request medication to end their own life under certain circumstances.
This follows a similar bill passed through the legislature in 2023 that Republican Governor Joe Lombardo later vetoed.
Patient must be at least 18 years old.
Patient has been diagnosed with a terminal condition by at least two practitioners.
Patient has made an informed and voluntary decision to end his or her own life.
Patient is mentally capable of making such a decision.
Patient is not requesting the medication because of coercion, deception or undue influence.
'I believe the time is now for us to fix this,' Assemblymember Dalia said in his proposal. 'And to allow terminally ill patients to choose their own ending.'
Many for and against the proposal provided testimony in Carson City and Las Vegas.
'This legislation empowers terminally ill people to preserve their dignity and autonomy,' Tia Smith, attorney for ACLU Nevada, said.
Those behind it believe it gives people who are dying the power to choose and stops suffering.
Death doula Melissa Chanselle-Hary shared her experience, speaking to lawmakers in Carson City.
'For those in favor,' Chanselle-Hary said. 'It is because they have lived through or are currently living through an excruciating experience.'
Those against the legislation said it could go against a doctor's Hippocratic oath to administer this kind of medication. Many said they also worry someone could opt for it before their health ultimately improves.
Christiane Mersch explained her stance to 8 News Now after Wednesday's hearing.
'It's not going to be the solution for our patients,' Mersch said. 'What we do need is more support for hospice, medical care.'
There were passionate pleas from both sides in this latest motion for change.
Medical aid in dying is currently legal in ten states and the District of Columbia.
To view the entire committee discussion, click HERE.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
a day ago
- The Hill
NIH broke law by withholding funding: GAO
A congressional watchdog determined Tuesday that the Trump administration broke the law when it directed the National Institutes of Health to cancel hundreds of research grants earlier this year. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) found that the NIH violated the Impoundment Control Act when it canceled 1,800 grants in an effort to follow a series of executive orders aimed at cutting federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, according to a report from the agency. The 1974 law regulates how the president can cancel or delay federal funds that Congress has already appropriated. The GAO also found that the NIH violated the law when it awarded $8 billion less in grants between January and June of this year compared to the same time in 2024 because of following the Trump administration's executive orders. President Trump issued several executive orders shortly after taking office in January targeting diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives. One of those orders instructed federal agencies to cancel all 'equity-related' grants and contracts within 60 days. A week later, the Trump administration directed the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in late January to order the NIH to stop posting notices of grant review meetings in the Federal Register and to remove any documents in the process of being posted to the publication. This move prevented the agency from reviewing and awarding grants for roughly two months, according to the GAO report. 'NIH's actions to carry out these executive directives, coupled with publicly available data showing a decline in NIH's obligations and expenditures, establishes that the NIH intended to withhold budget authority from obligation and expenditure without regard to the process provided by the Impoundment Control Act,' the report reads. In the report, the GAO notes that HHS did issue notices lifting the pause related to Federal Register notices and that they are aware of the White House directing NIH officials in July to pause 'grants, research contracts, and training,' which have since been reversed. But the agency could still not confirm that more money towards grant appropriations has returned. GAO's report findings are not legally binding in any way but have the power to influence Congressional opinion. A federal court ruled in June that the grant cancellations were illegal. Some Democratic lawmakers have called for the White House to stop pausing the flow of money to the NIH medical research, which could halt future medical advances. 'It is critical President Trump reverse course, stop decimating the NIH, and get every last bit of this funding out,' said Senator Patty Murray (D-Wash), in a statement. Murray serves as vice chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee. 'The longer this goes on, the more clinical trials that will be cut short, labs that will shutter, and lifesaving research that will never see the light of day.' A spokesperson for the White House and NIH could not be immediately reached for comment. A spokesperson for the HHS sent its response to the GAO report to The Hill, noting that the submissions pause to the Federal Register has been lifted and peer-review scheduling has resumed.
American Press
a day ago
- American Press
Rollins extends sugary drinks ban to six more states — including Louisiana
U.S. Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins approved six waivers to exclude sodas and energy drinks from federal nutrition programs on Monday. Rollins signed waivers exempting soda and energy drinks from being included in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Programs in Colorado, Florida, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Texas and West Virginia. The six states join Arkansas, Idaho, Iowa, Indiana, Utah and Nebraska in restricting sodas and energy drinks from SNAP. 'Since my confirmation, our department has encouraged states to think differently and creatively about how to solve the many health issues facing Americans,' Rollins said. 'One way is by not allowing taxpayer-funded benefits to be used to purchase unhealthy items like soda, candy and other junk food.' Critics of the new push to ban soda and energy drinks under SNAP say it unfairly targets lower-income families, limits consumer choice and won't result in better health outcomes. Colorado Gov. Jared Polis is the first Democrat governor to request a waiver of sugary drinks from the states SNAP program. 'This is not red or blue, Republican or Democrat. We are discussing and working with every state. So (I am) really excited to continue to work with Gov. Polis,' Rollins said. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Marty Makary, Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds and West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrisey joined Rollins for the announcement. Morrisey praised his state's inclusion as part of the SNAP waiver program. He said the lack of access to healthy foods in West Virginia contributes to the prevalence of chronic disease in residents. 'I'm happy now that West Virginia taxpayers are not going to be subsidizing soda and these sugary drinks, things that have no nutritional value and are directly linked to obesity, diabetes, and a lot of other terrible health care outcomes,' Morrisey said. HHS Secretary Kennedy agreed with Morrisey. He said the inclusion of soda and energy drinks in SNAP increases the cost to medicaid and medicare programs due to increased chronic disease. 'U.S. taxpayers should not be paying to feed kids foods – the poorest kids in our country – with foods that are the gift of diabetes. And my agency ends up through Medicaid and Medicare paying for those injuries,' Kennedy said. Kennedy also gave an update on the dietary guidelines for Americans that he is working alongside Rollins to complete. He said the guidelines will be complete in late September, 'three months ahead of schedule.' 'They will drive changes in the school lunch program, in prison lunches and military food, and they will begin to change America almost immediately,' Kennedy said. Not everyone agrees. 'Make no mistake, this waiver won't make an ounce of difference on health,' the trade organization American Beverage said when a waiver was being discussed in Ohio. 'Obesity has skyrocketed in the last two decades while beverage calories per serving have dropped by 42% – thanks to our industry's efforts to empower Americans with more choice and information. In fact, 60% of beverages Americans buy today have zero sugar due to our innovation.' The U.S. government spent $112.8 billion on SNAP in 2023, covering 100% of the cost of food benefits and 50% of states' administrative costs.
American Press
a day ago
- American Press
25 states file legal brief defending Trump ban on youth sex change procedures
On Monday, Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill joined 24 other Republican attorneys general in backing President Donald Trump's executive order aimed at halting federal funding for sex change procedures on minors, marking the state's latest push in a broader legal fight over transgender care. Three days earlier, Massachusetts filed a brief joined by 19 states challenging the same executive order. The states argue the order is unconstitutional, discriminatory, and violates the Spending Clause by tying federal health funds to ideological conditions. The Massachusetts-led brief contends that the order jeopardizes care for transgender youth, strips states of medical decision-making authority, and undermines long-standing Medicaid protections. The suit seeks a declaratory judgment and permanent injunction against implementation. The attorneys general defending the Trump order, led by Alabama's Steve Marshall, filed amicus briefs in the 4th and 9th U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeals, supporting Trump's order and urging the courts to overturn preliminary injunctions issued earlier this year in lawsuits out of Washington and Maryland. The Alabama-led briefs argue that continuing to fund such procedures violates both medical ethics and constitutional principles. 'Even though President Trump is in office, common sense and constitutional principles are under constant assault by radical leftist groups like the ACLU,' said Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall, who is leading the coalition. Marshall accused the ACLU of pushing courts to 'force taxpayers to fund sex-change procedures on children.' Murrill, who has been an outspoken critic of so-called 'gender-affirming' care for minors, did not release a separate public statement, but her participation in the brief underscores Louisiana's alignment with a growing number of Republican-led states that seek to limit access to such treatments. In recent years, Louisiana's Legislature has passed bans on puberty blockers and hormone treatments for minors. According to the coalition's legal filings, the brief draws on findings from Alabama's discovery in a now-dismissed challenge to its own ban on 'gender-affirming' care, where Marshall's office claimed to uncover a coordinated effort to remove age restrictions from national medical guidelines — a move he described as politically motivated rather than science-based. The Alabama-led team argues that federal funding for 'gender-affirming' care is based on 'discredited standards' and that such medical interventions for minors have irreversible consequences. 'The evidence says otherwise,' Marshall said. 'These harmful interventions have lasting consequences for vulnerable children.' The Alabama-led brief was filed in both the 9th Circuit and 4th Circuit federal courts of appeal. Louisiana was joined by attorneys general from Alaska, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wyoming in addition to Louisiana. The filings are part of a broader conservative legal strategy seeking to bolster state laws banning so-called 'gender-affirming' care while reinforcing Trump-era federal policy that frames such care as medically unnecessary and ideologically driven.
