Youth Homelessness Advocate Says Budget Fails Most Vulnerable
The head of a group that helps the homeless fears proposed changes could push some young people into harm's way.
, Māori News Journalist
A youth homelessness advocate says this year's Budget delivered no support for young people, calling proposed changes to benefit access 'cold' and 'harsh'.
Manaaki Rangatahi Pou Arahi (chief executive) Bianca Johanson told RNZ she was hopeful the Budget would offer targeted relief for Māori and unemployed rangatahi (young people) – but that hope quickly faded.
'We knew there wasn't going to be a lot for Māori,' she said.
'But we were hopeful there'd be something for rangatahi, seeing that such a high rate of them are unemployed… but we didn't see any alleviation.'
Johanson said, 'Māori were ignored in this budget.'
'That has been disheartening.'
Manaaki Rangatahi is a national youth homelessness collective dedicated to ending youth homelessness in Aotearoa.
It was established in 2018 as a way of consolidating the mahi of different organisations who are also trying to tackle youth homelessness.
Johanson said the sector was seeing the impact of the cost of living crisis, particularly on youth facing housing insecurity – the majority of them Māori.
'For us at Manaaki Rangatahi, we see homelessness, we see a lot of the struggle. People are really hurting.'
A call for Manaakitanga
Minister for Social Development Louise Upston announced in this year's Budget that from July 2027, 18 and 19-year-olds would now have their Jobseeker and emergency benefits tested against their parents' incomes.
The policy is forecast to save the government about $163 million over four years, but the income levels parents would be tested against have not yet been decided by Cabinet.
Johanson said the proposed changes were likely to make things harder for the already most vulnerable.
'If the rangatahi is the one that has to do all that advocacy for themselves, go and get their parents' details – this is a very complex situation.
'There are so many people who are the 'working poor' having to support an 18 or 19-year-old on top of all their other expenses. It could actually drive rangatahi out of home.'
She fears the proposed changes could create more tension within households and push some youth into harm's way – such as crime and violence.
'I see a lot of these decisions as causing more harm and putting rangatahi and whānau into stressful situations which can create harm. There's no way that this is going to create any kind of unity in the whānau, or support whānau to be together.'
'[Māori] are the head of really terrible statistics in Aotearoa – so this Budget and many of the policies that the government have brought forward, aren't exactly addressing them.'
She believed kaupapa Māori principles, like manaakitanga, should be at the forefront of decisions made by the government.
'If we're looking at this government and the manaaki that they've shown to Māori, and to rangatahi, it's very absent,' Johanson said.
'We see culture as a solution and as a tool of healing. It is what heals our rangatahi in a lot of our youth housing programmes.'
'Rangatahi are our future'
Johanson said as it stood, New Zealand did not have a strategy dedicated to support those that were the most vulnerable – rangatahi impacted by homelessness.
'Rangatahi are our future and we're not investing in the future,' she said.
'We are damning our children and our rangatahi, the most vital, important people for our future as a country to what? Living on the streets? To be without work? To have really high mental health and suicide stats? I don't understand the logic.'
Upston previously said the purpose of the welfare system was to support those who needed it the most.
'With this announcement, we're clearly saying that 18- and 19-year-olds who don't study or work and can't support themselves financially, should be supported by their parents or guardians, not by the taxpayer.'
Johanson believed this response was out of touch.
'It's harsh, it's cold, 'she said.
'Most people in Aotearoa want to give others a fair go. But we've got kaumātua and kuia working into their 70s and 80s to survive. We've got rangatahi who've been born into homelessness, who don't know what it's like to have their own bedroom – and now we expect their parents to provide support too?'
In response, Upston said the government was 'taking steps to make sure work, training or study is the focus for all young people'.
'This government recognises that the welfare system should be available for those who most need it. However, we aren't willing to watch any young New Zealanders get stuck on the benefit,' she said.
'Recent forecasts show that people under the age of 25 on Jobseeker Support will spend an average of 18 or more years on a benefit over their lifetimes – 49 percent longer than in 2017. That's why I prioritised Welfare that Works in Budget 2025.'
Upston said the 'Welfare that Works' package included secure funding for two years of Community Coaches and bonus payments – 'giving Jobseekers under 25 years more coaching, an assessment of their needs, an individual plan and holding them accountable for achieving that plan.'
In terms of the specific policy settings for the 18-19-year-old initiative, final decisions on the parental assistance test will be made later this year, including settings for access to hardship and supplementary assistance.
'The design of the test is likely to take into account a range of considerations including (but not limited to) parents' income level, nature of relationship with the 18- or 19-year-old and circumstances such as whether the parent or guardian are in hospital or in prison.'
Minister for Māori Development and Associate Minister of Housing Tama Potaka said the government was investing in rangatahi Māori through education and housing initiatives.
'The government is investing in rangatahi Māori through the overall increase in education funding as well as the extra investment in Māori education specifically, which includes additional funding for kura, te reo Māori proficiency and training for kaiako [teachers].
'Our aspirations are the same as those shared by many parents across the motu: we want to see all rangatahi make the most of their talents. That's why we're saying 18 and 19-year-olds who aren't working or studying should be supported by their parents or guardians, not the taxpayer.'
He said it was 'wrong' to say the government did not care about housing for vulnerable young people.
'Our housing policy has lifted hundreds of Māori whānau and tamariki out of dire emergency housing and into better homes. That can mean a world of difference for young people in terms of better health, regular school attendance or maintaining employment.'
'Talk to us'
Johanson was calling for the government to engage with those directly affected.
'We always ask the government to come talk to us before they make some of these quite strange sanctions and expectations on whānau,' she said.
'We are the sector experts. Rangatahi are the experts. Come and talk to us.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
37 minutes ago
- Otago Daily Times
Future of Right to Repair Bill uncertain
By Anneke Smith of RNZ Green Party co-leader Marama Davidson says she's not giving up on her bill that would give consumers the right to get goods repaired. The Consumer Guarantees (Right to Repair) Amendment Bill would compel manufacturers to make repair parts available locally to consumers to extend the lifetime of products and reduce waste. The legislation was sent to Select Committee after passing its first reading in February this year with support from Labour, the Greens, Te Pāti Maori and New Zealand First. It appeared to have enough support to progress into law, but the Economic Development, Science and Innovation Committee has now recommended, by majority, that the bill not be passed. What the Consumer Guarantees (Right to Repair) Amendment Bill proposes: • Retain requirements for manufacturers to make repair facilities, parts, software, tools and information available to consumers. • Allow consumers to request that goods be repaired, rather than replaced. • Prevent the use of unauthorised repairers and parts from voiding manufacturers' guarantees. Davidson told RNZ New Zealand First appeared to have pulled its support for the legislation. "The reason we got it through first reading is because we had [support from] all of the opposition parties, plus New Zealand First, so we were able to get it to Select Committee, which was fantastic. "We heard from submitters, oral submissions, written submissions, overwhelming support for the bill. At the end of the select committee process, the bill was reported back, and, at least at this stage, the New Zealand First members have voted against progressing the bill." She said she would not give up on the bill, especially when she had adopted changes, including narrowing the goods covered to above $100 in value at the suggestion of government members. "It's a little rough to have done all that deep work to make the bill better but the positive is we have now got incredible improvements that we know government members were in support of because they helped us make them. "So there is massive mandate there for the public to have what they've asked for, which is the right to repair their own goods. " New Zealand First has not responded to RNZ's requests for comment. 'Serious concerns' about process raised in Select Committee report The committee's report on the Right To Repair Bill notes opposition parties had "serious concerns" about the way the committee had conducted its work on the bill. "Opposition members participated in this work in the reasonable expectation that such engagement was aimed at building genuine cross-party agreement," it said. "The result was otherwise. The committee spent significant time, and drew on the resources of Parliamentary Counsel and departmental advisors, to explore and draft changes to resolve the concerns of government members that they then ultimately chose not to support," the report states. "That decision is of course within their rights. But when extensive collaborative work is undertaken with the tacit implication that it might secure support, only for that support to be withheld, the effect is to undermine trust between members. "It also risks the perception that the process was used to keep the committee occupied rather than to improve the bill, at a cost to the public purse." The decision comes as the government rolls back a series of waste-reduction measures. The container-return scheme has been scrapped, plastic bans pared back and product stewardship rules delayed. In December 2024, the government quietly cancelled several waste minimisation initiatives focused on recycling and kerbside food scraps composting. Four out of five planned policies will no longer go ahead, including mandatory kerbside composting and recycling for all urban areas. A planned national Circular Economy & Bioeconomy Strategy was also put on hold.
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
Law Change Could Save Farmers And Taxpayers Millions
Federated Farmers is throwing its support behind a new Member's Bill that could bring much-needed clarity to New Zealand's climate change laws - and save millions in legal costs. National MP Joseph Mooney's Climate Change Response (Restriction on Civil Proceedings) Amendment Bill aims to confirm a common-sense principle: if a person or business is complying with national climate change laws, they can't be sued for causing climate-related damage. "It sounds very obvious, but that's not how the law appears to be working right now," Federated Farmers climate change spokesperson Wayne Langford says. "It's crazy that companies like Fonterra and Dairy Holdings, who are fully meeting their legal climate obligations right now, can still be dragged into court and sued for allegedly causing harm through emissions. "We fully support Joseph Mooney's Bill, which will restore some much-needed common sense and save farmers, food processors and taxpayers millions of dollars in court costs." Climate activist Mike Smith is taking seven major New Zealand companies, including Fonterra and Dairy Holdings, to court over their greenhouse gas emissions. He says the emissions are harming Māori land and culture, and is claiming public nuisance, negligence, and breach of a duty to stop contributing to climate change. The High Court threw out two of the claims but allowed the third to proceed. After appeals from both sides, the Supreme Court has now reinstated all three claims, allowing the case to go to trial, and the matter is now back in front of the High Court. Federated Farmers says the case sets a dangerous precedent. "Every New Zealander contributes to climate change in some way," Langford says. "When you turn on a light switch, cook dinner, drive your car - even an EV - you're using energy and consuming goods. All of that has emissions behind it." In most cases, those emissions come from companies operating within New Zealand's legal framework - following rules set out under the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), reporting requirements, and other regulatory obligations. "So, it's silly stuff to then try and sue those law-abiding companies," Langford says. He points out that long-lived carbon dioxide emissions are already captured under the ETS, and the Government is actively investing in research and tools to help farmers reduce their short-lived methane emissions. "If these companies are following the rules, there has to be some certainty and protection in that, or the legal risk becomes unmanageable." Mooney's Bill would provide that certainty by spelling out in law that private legal action cannot be taken against individuals or companies for their greenhouse gas emissions, provided they're complying with climate laws already set by Parliament. "Rather than force the courts to debate and decide what the law in New Zealand is, this Bill would allow Parliament to exert its authority and define the law," Langford says. He says it's no different from how things work in other areas of law. "If a property developer gets resource consent to build a high-rise apartment, the neighbours can't turn around and sue them for the shade or noise. "That's because we recognise the developer has done everything required under the law to get permission. "Why should climate law be treated any differently?" Smith's lawsuit covers major electricity generators, petrol retailers, dairy farming and dairy processing. Langford warns that if Smith's case is successful, it would see a host of vital industries face major cost and risk. The case could open the floodgates to further lawsuits against other industries that also produce emissions, even if they're fully compliant with New Zealand's climate regulations. "In practice, the only way for those industries to avoid legal risk would be to stop emitting entirely - meaning they'd effectively have to shut down overnight." He says that would be economically disastrous and would leave the Government scrambling to urgently rewrite the law to protect the economy. "If the case is successful, Parliament will simply be forced to urgently change the law. Let's not wait for that crisis. Parliament should clarify the law now, before this goes any further." Federated Farmers is urging the Government to adopt Mooney's Bill as a Government Bill, which would significantly speed up its passage through Parliament. "Rather than wait for Fonterra and Dairy Holdings to go through a lengthy and expensive High Court process - something that will also cost taxpayers dearly - the Government should step in now and provide certainty. "We need to focus our time, energy and taxpayer dollars on solutions that actually reduce emissions, not on endless litigation against companies doing everything the law requires."
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Local body elections needed for only some Waikato council seats
Photo: RNZ / Isra'a Emhail A handful of general wards and half of the Waikato region's Māori wards have been filled unopposed for the upcoming local body elections. Eleven councils (one regional, nine district, and one city) make up local government in Waikato. Only half will be holding elections for one or all of their Māori seats. Two (South Waikato and Waitomo) do not have specific democratic representation for Māori. All the other councils have either Māori wards, or in the case of the regional council a Māori constituency. Waikato District was one of the areas where a single candidate, Tilly Turner, had been elected unopposed to one of their Māori wards, Tai Runga Takiwaa (Waikato district's other Māori ward, Tai Raro Takiwaa, has three candidates standing for the seat). Waikato district's Western Districts general ward was also filled unopposed by Carolyn Eyre. Both Turner and Eyre have been councillors this term. "I put my application in, and I had no one stand against me and I don't know whether that's good or bad," Turner said. Last election three people stood for the seat. Turner believed at least one of the past candidates would stand again. "She was young, talented, but her business is going well... she said no, she has no intention of standing again, because her business is starting to pick up." Turner said the feedback she had received was that she had done a really good job so far and people were happy for her to continue. She had been ready to stand down, but the binding poll on Māori wards, which the government has legislated must occur, motivated her to keep going. "I didn't want to step away and look like I never had confidence in that space, that it wasn't any good." She wasn't certain that the district would be able to retain its two Māori wards in the poll, but it was important to her that people saw her express confidence in the seats. "I need to let people see that I'm really backing the Māori wards, I stood for the first three [years] and I'm happy to stand again," she said. A district where an election for the Māori ward will happen is Ōtorohanga. Five candidates have stood for the two Rangiātea Māori Ward seats, one of whom is the current councillor, Jamiee Tamaki. She said some people wondered why they should get involved when she was already there. "It wasn't just about me, it was about growing our capacity in those spaces, so I just went out and said 'come on you fellas'." She said more candidates allowed people to have a choice. "We can't make change if we're not part of the change," she said. Asked why she thought so many seats in the region had not been contested, Turner thought the amount of central government legislation, which was coming at councils without consultation, was a factor. Abuse of local representatives was another. "The other part of it, which I haven't actually experienced, is the endangerment that councillors are experiencing from people just really ripping into them because of what is going on," Turner said. Tamaki said she also had not experienced any abuse as a councillor and had had an amazing experience in local government. "And I think maybe I'm lucky, I've never had any negativity," she said. Turner believed the Māori voice in local government is going would be important and helpful in the future. However, if the door closed on the Māori wards because of the referendum, she worried it would be hard to open again. "If we can't do it this time, I don't know that we'll ever get to do that connecting between Māori and Pākehā where the Treaty is concerned, and I'm hopeful we can because Māori have a lot to offer - we know how to survive in the toughest of times and this time is getting tougher," she said. Voting for the local body elections opens on 9 September. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
