Angela Rayner denies being ‘aggressive' in meeting with Grenfell survivors
Angela Rayner has denied being 'aggressive' during a meeting of the Grenfell bereaved and survivors when informing them about the decision to dismantle the tower.
The Deputy Prime Minister said it is 'not a possibility' for Grenfell Tower to remain in its current state.
The tower will be brought down to ground level, with some parts returned where possible to be included in a memorial 'if the community wishes'.
The Government has officially announced the west London block's future, having been met with criticism from some bereaved and survivors of the 2017 fire following a private meeting earlier this week.
It was put to Ms Rayner that the BBC was told the meeting was a 'car crash' and that a survivor suggested the Deputy Prime Minister was 'defensive, even aggressive'.
'Well, I certainly don't feel like I was aggressive, and if anyone felt that way, then I would be sincerely upset about that,' she told the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg programme.
'I think what I tried to do is take a really difficult meeting and explain to people, and make sure that those that were bereaved had that information, and the survivors had that information before the decision was made public.'
She added: 'Now I know that some people in that room felt that they hadn't been given the opportunity before then.
'I listened to what they said and my conclusion was still that there was, there is not a possibility, really, for that tower to remain as it is going into the future.
'And I tried to deliver that message as sensitively as I possibly could, knowing full well that it was going to be really upsetting for people to hear that.'
Some expressed upset and shock after the meeting with Ms Rayner on Wednesday, saying they felt they had not had their views considered before the decision was taken.
Grenfell United, which represents some bereaved and survivors, said it appeared from the meeting room that 'no-one supported' the Government's decision.
Housing minister Matthew Pennycook said it was not 'fair' to suggest Ms Rayner's manner made survivors and bereaved 'feel that she wasn't really paying attention to them'.
He told Sky News's Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips programme: 'I understand why the bereaved, survivors, the community are frustrated about the pace of change in this area, the lack of justice that they've been given.
'There's a lot of frustration in the community. It's an incredibly sensitive topic.
'The Prime Minister and the building safety minister have engaged extensively with the community. They've had an ongoing dialogue. They've had multiple avenues to feed in.
'It is a sensitive issue, and I think the crux of the issue is there's no consensus on what should happen to the tower, some people want to see that tower remain.'
What is left of the tower has stood in place in the years since the fire, with a covering on the building featuring a large green heart accompanied by the words 'forever in our hearts'.
The June 2017 disaster claimed the lives of 72 people.
Mr Pennycook added: 'We are going to bring it down because through independent expert advice we've been told that it's unsafe, that it is degrading. We're going to bring it down, though, I think importantly in a sensitive way.'
The Grenfell Tower Memorial Commission has been consulting on plans for a permanent memorial in the area of the tower, with recommendations including a 'sacred space', designed to be a 'peaceful place for remembering and reflecting'.
It is expected a planning application for a memorial could be submitted in late 2026.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Court documents: Trump administration calls for dismissal of Kilmar Abrego Garcia's Maryland case
GREENBELT, Md. () — The Trump administration filed a motion in Maryland's District Court on Tuesday, re-emphasizing its call for the dismissal of Kilmar Abrego Garcia's case against them. This comes less than a week after Abrego Garcia was returned to the U.S., having spent months of imprisonment in a Salvadorian facility. The Maryland husband and father now faces criminal charges stemming from a 2022 traffic stop in Tennessee. Lawyers have been petitioning for his return since his erroneous deportation to El Salvador back in March, with administration officials fighting state and Supreme Court orders directing the government to facilitate his return. RELATED COVERAGE: Kilmar Abrego Garcia accused of years-long conspiracy transporting undocumented aliens to the US In the latest move filed by the defendants in Greenbelt, Md., the government is calling for a stay of all case deadlines and the eventual dismissal of the case against them. Lawyers defending the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) initially filed a motion last week, arguing in a one-page notice that since Abrego Garcia has been returned to the U.S., the preliminary injunction should be dissolved. Abrego Garcia's team opposed this request for a stay, that the goverment arranged for Abrego Garcia's return — 'not to Maryland in compliance with the Supreme Court's directive' — but rather to Tennesee 'so that he could be charged with a crime in a case that the Government only developed while it was under threat of sanctions,' court documents read. 'Instead of facilitating Abrego Garcia's return, for the past two months Defendants have engaged in an elaborate, all-of-government effort to defy court orders, deny due process, and disparage Abrego Garcia,' his lawyers stated. His lawyers called the government's efforts 'chilling.' 'Two things are now crystal clear,' court documents state. 'First, the Government has always had the ability to return Abrego Garcia, but it has simply refused to do so.' 'Second, the Government has conducted a determined stalling campaign to stave off contempt sanctions long enough to concoct a politically face-saving exit from its own predicament,' they continued. PREVIOUS COVERAGE: Abrego Garcia to return to US to face charges His team claimed the Trump administration has hidden behind 'questionable assertions' of government privileges and deliberately dragged their feet on discovery, stonewalling Abrego Garcia and the Court's efforts to 'get at the truth.' Even if his return to the U.S. resolved every claim made, the Maryland court still retains jurisdiction to find contempt and impose sanctions against the government, they argued. 093114932274Download In a , DHS lawyers re-emphasized their request for a stay of all case deadlines. Since being ordered on April 4 to 'facilitate … the return of Plaintiff Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia to the United States,' the administration said it has 'made diligent efforts to pull down domestic barriers preventing Abrego Garcia from entering our country.' This included 'appropriate diplomatic discussions' with Salvadorian officials to facilitate his release and return to the U.S., the government's attorneys argued in court documents. They called Abrego Garcia's team's response to his return to the U.S. and their fight to keep the Maryland case open 'desperate and disappointing.' INITIAL COVERAGE: Maryland man mistakenly deported to El Salvador due to 'administrative error,' court filings say 'In the face of Abrego Garcia's return to the United States, they baselessly accuse Defendants of 'foot-dragging' and 'intentionally disregard[ing] this Court's and the Supreme Court's orders,' when just the opposite is true,' court documents read. The administration accused the plaintiffs of trying to 'stoke this [Maryland] Court's anger against' them, claiming there was no legal basis for their accusations and arguments. '[T]he proof is in the pudding—Defendants have returned Abrego Garcia to the United States just as they were ordered to do. None of Plaintiffs' hyperbolic arguments change that or justify further proceedings in this matter,' the attorneys for the defendants wrote. The lawyers said they intend to file their motion for dismissal on mootness grounds by June 16. 093114938071-1Download In a statement shared with DC News Now after the government's filing on Tuesday, Abrego Garcia's attorney Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg wrote: Two months ago, the Supreme Court ordered not just that Kilmar Abrego Garcia be released from custody in El Salvador and brought back to the United States, but furthermore that his case be handled 'as it would have been had he not been improperly sent to El Salvador.' That hasn't happened yet, and so there's still work to be done in this case. Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Huckabee suggests Muslim countries should give up land for Palestinian state
The US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee has suggested "Muslim countries" should give up some of their land to create a future Palestinian state. In an interview with the BBC, Huckabee said "Muslim countries have 644 times the amount of land that are controlled by Israel". "So maybe, if there is such a desire for the Palestinian state, there would be someone who would say, we'd like to host it," he said. The ambassador also called a two-state solution - a proposed formula for peace between Israel and the Palestinians that has generally received international backing, including from multiple US administrations - "an aspirational goal". The two-state solution envisages an independent Palestinian state in the occupied West Bank and in Gaza, with East Jerusalem as its capital. It would exist alongside Israel. In a separate interview with Bloomberg, Huckabee said the US was no longer pursuing the goal of an independent Palestinian state. State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce later said the ambassador "speaks for himself", and it is the president who is responsible for US policy in the Middle East. Later this month at the United Nations in New York, French and Saudi diplomats will host a conference aimed at laying out a roadmap for an eventual Palestinian state. Although Huckabee did not say where any future Palestinian state could be located specifically or whether the US would support such an effort, he called the conference "ill-timed and inappropriate". "It's also something that is completely wrongheaded for European states to try to impose in the middle of a war," he said, arguing that it would result in Israel being "less secure". "At what point does it have to be in the same piece of real estate that Israel occupies?" he said on the BBC's Newshour programme. "I think that's a question that ought to be posed to everybody who's pushing for a two-state solution." Asked if the US position was that there could not be a Palestinian state in the West Bank, Huckabee said: "I wouldn't say there can never be, what I would say is that a culture would have to change. "Right now the culture is that it's OK to target Jews and kill them and you're rewarded for it. That has to change." Israel rejects a two-state solution. It says any final settlement must be the result of negotiations with the Palestinians, and statehood should not be a precondition. Huckabee has previously been a strong supporter of the idea of a "greater Israel", seeking permanent Israeli control of the Occupied Palestinian Territories, and using the biblical term "Judea and Samaria" for the West Bank. Some of his language echoes positions frequently taken by ultranationalist groups in Israel. Some in this movement, including far-right ministers in the Israeli governing coalition, have argued for the expulsion of Palestinians from the occupied West Bank and Gaza, saying any future Palestinian state could exist in Arab or Muslim countries. If such a policy was enacted, rights groups and European governments say it would be a clear violation of international law. The ambassador also strongly criticised US allies for sanctioning two far-right Israeli ministers over "repeated incitements of violence against Palestinian communities" in the occupied West Bank. The sanctioning of National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich was part of a joint move announced by the UK, Norway, Australia, Canada and New Zealand on Tuesday. British Foreign Secretary David Lammy said the Israeli officials had "incited extremist violence and serious abuses of Palestinian human rights". The men were banned from entering the UK and will have any assets in the UK frozen. Israel registered strong objections to the move, and Huckabee called it a "shocking decision". "I have not yet heard a good reason for why these two elected ministers have been sanctioned by countries that ought to respect the country's sovereignty and recognise that they have not conducted any criminal activity," he said. The war in Gaza began after Hamas attacked Israel in October 2023, killing some 1,200 people and taking around 251 others hostage. There are 56 hostages still being held by Hamas in Gaza, at least 20 of whom are believed to be alive. Since October 2023, at least 54,927 Palestinians have been killed, according to the territory's Hamas-run ministry of health. The UN estimates that more than a quarter of them are children. UK sanctions far-right Israeli ministers for 'inciting violence' against Palestinians Gaza health workers say four killed by Israeli gunfire near aid centre The unseen map that promised to bring peace to the Middle East
Washington Post
3 hours ago
- Washington Post
Trump says governors should be able to handle disasters without FEMA
President Donald Trump said Tuesday that his administration plans to 'wean' states off of Federal Emergency Management Agency assistance after this year's hurricane season, offering in the most explicit terms yet his plans for states to respond to natural disasters and other emergencies on their own. 'We're moving it back to the states, so the governors can handle. That's why they're governors,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. 'If they can't handle it, they shouldn't be governor.'
