SC orders eateries, hotels on Kanwar Yatra route to comply with licensing, refuses to stay QR code directive
A bench of Justices M M Sundresh and N Kotiswar Singh said it was not going into the other issues over display of names of the hotel or dhaba owner and the QR code, Tuesday being the last day of the Kanwar Yatra.
"We are told that today is the last day of the yatra. In any case it is likely to come to an end in the near future. Therefore, at this stage we would only pass an order that all the respective hotel owners shall comply with the mandate of displaying the licence and the registration certificate as per the statutory requirements," the bench said.
The top court was hearing a plea filed by academician Apoorvanand Jha and others.
Senior advocate Singhvi submitted that the UP government should have sought the modification of the court's 2024 order before issuing the QR code directives.
Singhvi argued the state government was trying to ostracise and exclude minorities by its QR code directive for eateries along the Kanwar Yatra route.
"This is the most divisive initiative, to ostracise people during the yatra, as if these people are untouchables. Will my surname ensure that 'kanwariyas' receive good quality food not menu card? This is the most divisive initiative possible," the senior lawyer submitted.
Referring to news reports over the alleged attacks on certain shops by kanwariyas, the senior lawyer said, 'When you sow the seeds of divisiveness, the rest is taken care of by the populace.'
Responding to his submission, Justice Sundresh said people had different food choices and a vegetarian may choose to go to only a place serving exclusively vegetarian food, especially during a religious pilgrimage.
Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for the Uttar Pradesh government, said directions were issued in line with the requirements of the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India regulations.
"There are people in this country who will not eat in there brother's house if meat is cooked. There are sentiments of devotees," Rohatgi said, 'and as per the regulations under the Act they require photo identity. Why are you scared of showing your name? I don't understand.'
Senior advocate Huzefa Ahmadi, representing other petitioners, said the eateries along this route only sold vegetarian items during this period according to local regulations.
Justice Sundresh observed a customer must have the choice of knowing if a place was exclusively selling vegetarian items throughout.
"If a hotel is running as a vegetarian hotel all through, then the question of indicating names and other things will not arise. But if only for the purpose of yatra, somebody stops serving non-vegetarian and starts selling vegetarian, the consumer should know," the judge remarked.
He continued, "To that extent, consumers should have that flexibility. If one hotel was earlier serving non-vegetarian, and for the purpose of better business they serve only vegetarian during the yatra, it will be an issue for the consideration of the consumer. The choice is of the consumer. Consumer is the king."
The bench further said it was not inclined to examine the petition as the issue was infructuous considering it was last day of the yatra.
The Supreme Court last year stayed similar directives issued by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh governments, asking eateries along the Kanwar Yatra route to display the names of their owners, staff and other details.
Referring to a press release issued by the UP government on June 25, Jha, said, "The new measures mandate the display of QR codes on all eateries along the kanwar route which reveal the names and identities of the owners, thereby achieving the same discriminatory profiling that was previously stayed by this court."
The petitioner said the state government's directive asking stall owners to reveal religious and caste identities under "lawful license requirements" breaches the right to privacy of the shop, dhaba and restaurant owners.
A large number of devotees travel from various places with "kanwars" carrying holy water from the Ganga to perform "jalabhishek" of Shivling during the Hindu calendar month of "Shravan".
Many believers shun the consumption of meat during the month and even avoid meals cooked with onion and garlic.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
18 minutes ago
- Economic Times
SC dismisses plea for delimitation exercise in Andhra Pradesh,Telangana
The Supreme Court on Friday dismissed a plea for conducting delimitation exercise in Andhra Pradesh and Telangana for increasing the assembly seats in both the states.A bench of Justices Surya Kant and N Kotiswar Singh rejected the contention of alleged discrimination against the two states, saying provisions dealing with delimitation in states were different when compared to UTs. It held that the exclusion of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana from the delimitation notification issued for the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir was not arbitrary or discriminatory and hence constitutional. The top court dismissed the plea filed by K Purushottam Reddy who sought directions to the Centre to operationalise Section 26 of the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act which deals with delimitation of the assembly constituencies in both the states. Reddy has contended that delimiting the assembly and parliamentary constituencies of only the newly minted Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir, with the exclusion of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, created an unreasonable classification and was, therefore, unconstitutional. The top court said section 26 of the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act of 2014 was subject to Article 170 of the Constitution and as per which delimitation exercise can be held only after the first census conducted after top court said allowing the plea for fresh delimitation exercise will open the floodgates of litigation from other states seeking conduct of such exercise.
Hindustan Times
44 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Goa CM on DK Shivakumar's 'lost mental balance' jibe: 'Frustrated, shows Congress culture'
Goa Chief Minister Pramod Sawant on Friday hit out at Karnataka Deputy Chief Minister D K Shivakumar for making personal remarks over the Mahadayi river dispute, accusing him of exhibiting 'Congress-style politics' and speaking out of frustration. Goa CM Pramod Sawant.(PTI) Also Read - 'Terrible civic sense': Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw blasts BBMP for trash pile near cemetery in Bengaluru What Goa CM Pramod Sawant said? Responding to Shivakumar's sharp criticism a day earlier—where he claimed Sawant had "lost his mental balance"—the Goa CM said such language revealed the Congress mindset and showed the desperation among Karnataka's leadership. 'He (Shivakumar) is displaying the culture of Congress. When leaders are frustrated, they resort to such comments,' Sawant told reporters in Panaji. 'We are serious about protecting Mahadayi. Our legal battle continues in the Supreme Court and we are in constant touch with the Centre.' The exchange of words comes amid renewed tensions over Karnataka's Kalasa-Banduri project, which proposes diverting water from the Mahadayi river to improve drinking water supply in parts of North Karnataka. Goa, however, has consistently opposed the plan, saying it threatens the ecological balance of the state and endangers vital water sources. Also Read - Heavy rain alert in Karnataka: Schools, colleges shut in Dakshina Kannada today The war of words escalated after Sawant informed the Goa Assembly that the state would petition the Supreme Court against Karnataka's ongoing work on the river, even as the matter is sub judice. Shivakumar, reacting to this, said Sawant lacked understanding of the federal structure and had "lost his mental balance." Sawant, visibly critical, said, 'We will continue efforts to protect our river. Leaders in Karnataka seem to be competing over who can stoop lower. Such undignified remarks only reflect the culture they come from.' At the core of the dispute is Karnataka's Kalasa-Banduri project, which aims to divert water from Mahadayi to the Malaprabha river to meet the drinking water needs of districts like Dharwad, Belagavi, Gadag, and Bagalkote. The river flows through both Karnataka and Goa before emptying into the Arabian Sea. In Goa, it's known as the Mandovi and is one of the state's two lifelines. (With PTI inputs)
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
India Inc's rare earth magnet dependence
Not just automotive, which is using rare earth magnets for EVs aggressively, renewable energy, consumer electronics, and defense sectors are also in need of these products. India expects the government to clarify the uncertainties regarding the shortage of rare earth magnets, as the industry is struggling to manage alternative solutions. Here is my view on India vs. China debate and India's growing dependence on rare earth magnets, its risks and solutions. The world is once again learning that the materials of the future come with geopolitical strings attached. India, aspiring to be a global manufacturing hub and a clean-tech leader, finds itself hobbled by a shortage of rare earth permanent magnets, a problem that threatens to derail its electric vehicle (EV) push, defence readiness, and green energy plans. At the root lies a familiar issue: overdependence on China. China's decision in April 2025 to tighten export controls on rare earth magnets has sent tremors through Indian industry. These magnets, indispensable in EVs, wind turbines, consumer electronics and missile guidance systems, are now in short supply. Inventories are projected to run out in a matter of weeks. Automakers are already sounding alarm bells, while electronics manufacturers brace for cascading delays. This crisis has long been in the making. China supplies around 90 per cent of India's rare earth magnets and controls a similarly dominant share of global capacity. Its grip extends not just to raw materials but to refining and high-end processing—domains in which India is dangerously underdeveloped. Since the export curbs came into force, Indian companies have been required to seek end-use licences from Chinese authorities, a process marked by opacity and inertia. Russia, once viewed as a rising alternative, remains a fringe player. Other potential suppliers—Australia, Vietnam, and the United States—lack the capacity or speed to plug the gap. Meanwhile, India's own magnet demand has soared. From 12,400 tonnes in FY2021, usage has quadrupled to nearly 54,000 tonnes in FY2025, according to government estimates. The spike is a direct consequence of policy initiatives that promote green mobility, solar and wind capacity, and Make-in-India electronics . But infrastructure without inputs is futile. Mining time lost There are signs of action. The government has begun diplomatic engagement with Beijing in an effort to expedite clearances. More importantly, it is considering amendments to the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act to ease exploration of rare earths. Public-sector enterprise Indian Rare Earths Ltd has commenced work on a small-scale magnet plant, and broader production initiatives are under review. But this is reactive policymaking, not foresight. The processing and manufacturing of magnets requires not just raw materials but deep technical capabilities, years of investment, and robust supply chains. India is at least a decade behind where it needs to be. States like Andhra Pradesh and Odisha hold monazite-rich beach sands that could be tapped for rare earths, but red tape and regulatory inertia have kept them underexploited. Refining capacity—capital-intensive and environmentally sensitive—remains virtually non-existent. Without it, India will remain a shipper of ores and an importer of value-added goods. A rare opportunity in rare earths The current crunch ought to be treated not merely as a supply hiccup, but as a strategic wake-up call. India's vision of self-reliance must extend beyond finished goods to the materials that make those goods possible. This calls for nothing short of a rare earth industrial policy. The stakeholders seem to have understood the magnitude of the issue and are moving swiftly. The government is working on a production-linked incentive (PLI) scheme specifically for rare earth magnet manufacturing, offering tax incentives, bonuses based on output, and a simplified regulatory framework to support domestic mining and processing of rare earths like neodymium, praseodymium, and dysprosium. Public sector enterprises such as Indian Rare Earths Ltd have been asked to expand capacity, while private players—Sona Comstar, Uno Minda, and Mahindra & Mahindra among them—are exploring pilot projects to build magnet manufacturing facilities. India is also diversifying import sources, accelerating trade and mining partnerships with countries like Australia, Vietnam, and the United States to reduce dependence on China. Meanwhile, several public–private partnerships are in motion to create rare earth magnet recycling hubs to reclaim materials from used motors, while startups and research institutions are working on magnet-free electric motor technologies and ferrite-based alternatives. With these initiatives gaining traction, the Indian government expects to begin commercial production of rare earth magnets by late 2025, with an eye on scaling to global relevance by 2030. The transition marks not just a supply-side correction, but a long-term industrial strategy to secure India's position in critical green and strategic technologies. Ultimately, what India faces is not a commodity shortage, but a strategic constraint. As it builds its industrial future, it must ensure that core materials are not hostage to geopolitical volatility. The rare earth crisis of 2025 is both a cautionary tale and a call to action. India would do well to heed it—and place magnets, literally and figuratively, at the centre of its economic strategy.
