‘Funds are depleted': Mecklenburg County has less energy assistance available this winter
Many in the Carolinas have been seeing some of the highest energy bills they've ever received.
As we've reported, the combination of colder temperatures, higher rates from Piedmont Natural Gas, and the pass-through costs of high natural gas prices is having a big impact on neighbors. Mecklenburg County's Department of Community Resources has been fielding hundreds of calls and applications every week from folks looking for help.
Chanda Martin, the program coordinator for the county's energy assistance programs, said the Low-Income Energy Assistance Program, which is specifically available only during the winter, is in high demand.
'They're on fixed income, you have low-income residents, that's a shock to the system,' she said. 'It's here to help them and it's a huge benefit.'
The Crisis Intervention Program helps customers experiencing heating/cooling emergencies with a final notice or past due utility bill, but it's unavailable because all of its funds have already been allocated.
'We assisted a lot of families, so the funds are depleted,' Martin said.
According to the department, the funding was used up before the end of November. The funds usually become available each July, but it was earliest Mecklenburg County has ever used all its state allocation. Staff said the funding was smaller than they'd seen in previous years and the need over the summer was unusually high.
As for this winter, Martin encourages anyone who might be eligible to apply before the program ends on March 31. To be eligible, you must be at or below 150% of the federal poverty level.
So far, she said the department has received 3,346 applications and processed more than 2,300.
These programs are state-funded and available in every North Carolina County, more information is available here. Both Duke Energy and Piedmont Natural Gas have their own programs to assist low-income customers or customers who have fallen behind on their bills.
North Carolina also recently launched Energy Saver NC, a program funded by the Inflation Reduction Act, which aims to help low and moderate-income households reduce their energy bills by making their homes more energy efficient. The DEQ is still taking applications on the program's website.
The agency said in a statement: 'DEQ is closely watching any federal actions that may change the operations of the program. As of this time, funding through these programs remains available.'
It's not just your natural gas bill going up either. Duke Energy says it saw record demand during a recent cold snap, and the Environmental Defense Fund says that will be reflected in your bill.
The EDF says Duke relies on gas-powered plants, and customer bills include the fuel they use to generate electricity.
Duke responded saying that residential customers had rate drops at the start of the year.
'The only reason prices are going down now is because bills jumped last year to pay for the cold winter the year before,' said Will Scott with the Environmental Defense Fund. 'So again, we're just on a roller coaster here, and it's coming down from historic highs, but it's gonna go back up again next year, because we had a cold winter this year.'
Duke Energy plans to build several new natural gas powered-plants and add turbines to existing facilities within the next 10 years. The utility says that buildout is necessary to ensure the Carolinas have reliable power all the time.
(VIDEO: Duke Energy at center of class action lawsuit over data breach)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
4 hours ago
- The Hill
Trump rails against green tax credits in big, beautiful bill
President Trump railed against the green energy tax credits included in his big, beautiful bill in a Truth Social post on Saturday. 'I HATE 'GREEN TAX CREDITS' IN THE GREAT, BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL. They are largely a giant SCAM,' Trump posted. His comments come amid a GOP internal debate over the big, beautiful bill on how to roll back former President Biden's green energy tax credits. The Senate is taking a more lenient approach on this topic, while the House voted to 'sledgehammer' the tax credits. This is another point of disagreement that could slow the leadership's ability to meet the July 4 deadline to pass the bill in the Senate. Trump continued by saying he would rather the money be used anywhere else and that 'Windmills, and the rest of this 'JUNK,' are the most expensive and inefficient energy in the world, is destroying the beauty of the environment, and is 10 times more costly than any other energy.' 'None of it works without massive government subsidy (energy should NOT NEED SUBSIDY!). Also, it is almost exclusively made in China!!! It is time to break away, finally, from this craziness!!!' he continued. In August 2022, the Democrat-controlled House passed the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), which included $369 billion for energy security and climate investments. This move underlined the need for domestic, clean energy manufacturing and decreasing greenhouse gas emissions. The Senate is debating how to decrease these investments. The text now allows the construction of clean energy infrastructure, such as solar panels and wind farms, to begin this year to receive the full credit amount. Before, when the bill was in the House, it demanded that those projects start only 60 days after the bill passed, essentially leaving no time for new clean energy investments. The Senate is also allowing projects that begin construction in 2026 to receive 60 percent of the credit, in 2027 to receive 20 percent and in 2028 to receive no credits at all. The House version would give no credits at all to projects that did not start producing electricity by 2028. The Senate is still slashing Biden's IRA significantly. Before the bill's passage in the House, some moderate Republicans issued a joint statement claiming that sledgehammering the IRA would 'provoke an energy crisis or cause higher energy bills for working families.' Nevertheless, the bill still moved up to the Senate.
CNBC
7 hours ago
- CNBC
Republican Party has nearly five times more cash on hand than the Democrats
The Republican National Committee has almost five times the cash on hand as its Democratic counterpart, as Democrats seek to regain their footing following a disappointing 2024 cycle. The RNC reported having $72 million on hand at the end of May, compared to just $15 million for the DNC, according to campaign filings out Friday. While the RNC has for months held a cash advantage over the Democratic National Committee, the $57 million gap is the widest disparity between the two parties since at least July 2020, according to California Target Book's Rob Pyers. It's still early, but the GOP's cash edge could give the party an early boost as it looks to build out campaign infrastructure ahead of next year's midterms. "The single most important thing the DNC can and should be doing right now is raising money," Democratic strategist Adrienne Elrod told CNBC. The filings come as the DNC has faced internal tension since President Donald Trump's return to the White House. Earlier this month, leaders of two large labor unions each declined their nominations to continue serving on the committee, dealing a blow to Chair Ken Martin. Martin has also overseen internal divisions over ex-DNC Vice Chair David Hogg's bid to challenge sitting Democratic incumbents. Hogg stepped down from his role earlier this month amid backlash. Some Democrats say that the fundraising gap underscores deeper concerns within the party. "The base of the party and donors alike do not have confidence in the direction of the party," said Cooper Teboe, a Democratic strategist in Silicon Valley. Teboe said that the party has not presented "a positive, inspiring vision." The DNC, however, points to a surge in grassroots support. The party says it raised roughly $40 million in individual donations since Martin became chair in February, a record for that four-month period. The contributions go to a range of areas, according to the DNC, including "building up critical infrastructure from tech to organizing to in-state investments for critical, target races." "This is only the start, but it's a record-setting start that allows Democrats to meaningfully invest in every part of the country," Martin said in a statement. The DNC's war chest is roughly double what it held during the same period in 2017, suggesting there is time for them to catch up. "The goals Chair Martin has set out — investing in all 50 states and building the state of-the-art infrastructure necessary to win back the White House in 2028 — are ambitious and necessary, but they can only be achieved by raising money," Elrod said. Looking ahead, Teboe said that Democrats may be successful in next year's midterms "as a reaction to Trump's overreach but it will take a new generation of voices to get the party out of this mess." "Those voices will emerge in the 2028 primary and we will have the chance to rebuild a stronger Democratic Party outside of the influence of the old guard that seems incapable of understanding what motivates normal Americans," he said. The Republicans' money advantage comes after a 2024 election cycle during which Tesla founder Elon Musk poured nearly $300 million into helping elect Republicans. Musk's surge of donations to help elect Trump certainly took some pressure off the rest of the party's fundraising apparatus. It's unclear what the RNC might have decided to pay for last year's elections, were it not for Musk's millions. Musk last month said that he was going to do "a lot less" political spending in the future. It's also unclear how Trump will use the millions he has raised in a group of PACs since he won the November election. Should Trump choose to donate to Republican candidates and get out the vote efforts next year, the RNC could again find itself under less pressure to shell out cash than the DNC. But Trump's financial support has traditionally not been geared towards helping the party at large. Rather, Trump has contributed relatively small amounts to help elect his closest allies. He has also played a significant role in Republican primary races, endorsing MAGA candidates who, in some cases, have struggled to win the backing of moderate Republicans and independent voters.
Time Magazine
15 hours ago
- Time Magazine
What Conflict in the Middle East Means for Climate Change
The consequences of the increasingly urgent hostilities between Israel and Iran are multifold—humanitarian, geopolitical, and so on. If the situation deepens, it could also have important implications for energy markets and, by extension, climate change and the energy transition. Central to that picture are oil prices. In the past month, oil prices have risen nearly 25% as hostilities have deepened. On its own, Iran is a significant supplier of oil to global markets, producing roughly 4 million barrels of oil daily, and traders fear that its supply could be cut off. A bigger conflagration could mean significantly higher prices with fears about supply issues across the region, especially as traveling through the Strait of Hormuz grows trickier. Governments play a key role shaping everything related to the production and consumption of energy, but nonetheless energy is not divorced from market fundamentals broadly and, specifically, the effect of prices. And perhaps no price is more closely tracked in energy markets than the price of a barrel of crude. But how a high-price environment for oil would shake out is complicated—with some clear pluses for decarbonization efforts as well as some big challenges. On the one hand, high oil prices incentivize investment in alternatives, in this case electrification. Consumers may take a closer look at electric vehicles to save at the pump. Or they may just buy smaller, more fuel efficient cars, a climate win. Meanwhile, companies may take another look at the numbers for ditching diesel in heavy industry. On the other hand, high oil prices incentivize fossil fuel companies to drill more to try to take advantage of high prices. Projects that looked too expensive when prices were low start to take on a new sheen when they're on the rise. None of these factors are likely to play out in a straightforward fashion—and we don't have to look too far back for a similar analogue. In 2022, oil prices rose dramatically following Russia's invasion of Ukraine, quickly shifting the conversation around clean energy. Clean energy advocates responded vociferously that renewables could provide stability as Europe tried to wean itself off of Russian energy. In the U.S., they argued, renewables would contribute to energy security. These arguments helped advance clean energy—even if they weren't decisive. The RePowerEU initiative, launched in the wake of the invasion, helped accelerate the expansion of wind and solar power in the bloc. And energy security was among the arguments that helped get the Inflation Reduction Act across the finish line. At the same time, oil companies largely avoided bringing new oil production online. It was hard to predict how long the high price environment would be sustained. Moreover, executives concluded that they could easily reap the financial benefits of higher prices and resulting higher profitability without taking on the risk of big new investments. This time around we can certainly expect Trump to double down on his pressure on the industry to drill more to keep prices down (Biden did this, too). But up to this point the industry has largely rebuffed these entreaties. So how should companies understand the oil price dynamic? For one, it's helpful to keep an eye on the long-term trajectory. In its annual oil market report released this week, the International Energy Agency found the market to be well supplied in the medium term even as demand continues to grow because of planned increases in output from the U.S., Canada, Brazil, Guyana, and Argentina But for companies the volatility is also a reminder of some of the greatest strengths of renewable energy: it's local and not prone to geopolitical disruption. And, while production may vary day-to-day as the winds blow, prices can be set for decades—immune from the whipsaws of global commodity prices. To get this story in your inbox, subscribe to the TIME CO2 Leadership Report newsletter here.
