
Trump slams GOP Sen. Rand Paul for opposing 'big, beautiful bill' due to $5 trillion debt ceiling hike
President Donald Trump on Tuesday blasted Sen. Rand Paul after the Kentucky Republican criticized the massive Trump-backed budget bill over its provision to raise the debt ceiling by trillions of dollars.
Paul, a staunch libertarian, said on CNBC's "Squawk Box" that he is "just not open to supporting $5 trillion ... in debt ceiling increase" that the Senate's version of the bill currently includes.
Trump lashed out soon after, writing on Truth Social that the senator "has very little understanding" of the budget plan that the president has dubbed the "one big, beautiful bill."
Trump claimed Paul does not grasp that the bill, which includes a slew of tax and spending cuts but is projected to significantly widen national deficits, will spur "tremendous GROWTH."
"He loves voting 'NO' on everything, he thinks it's good politics, but it's not," Trump said of the senator.
In a follow-up post, Trump attacked Paul in more personal terms.
He "never has any practical or constructive ideas," Trump wrote, adding, "His ideas are actually crazy (losers!). The people of Kentucky can't stand him. This is a BIG GROWTH BILL!"
A spokesperson for Paul's Senate office did not immediately reply to a request for comment on Trump's posts.
The president's heated reaction is part of a broader pressure campaign to convince Republican holdouts to vote for the massive bill, the centerpiece of Trump's domestic policy agenda.
The budget package narrowly passed by the House last month would extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts, and add new exemptions on workers' tips and overtime, seniors' Social Security and more.
It would also impose work requirements for the government-run health insurance program Medicaid, and it would reform the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, known as SNAP, that millions of low-income Americans rely upon.
The version of the bill that passed the House in late May would also increase the U.S. debt limit by $4 trillion. The version currently pending in the Senate would hike the debt ceiling even more, $5 trillion total.
The debt ceiling increase is "the main thing that I object to," Paul said Tuesday on CNBC.
Setting the ceiling at $5 trillion is "an indication that we'll borrow that much," he said. "It's an indication that will put the debt on the back burner."
"I do want the tax cuts. I want them to be permanent. I'm throwing a lot of spending cuts, but I'll compromise and get as much as I can," he said.
"I'm just not going to take responsibility for the debt," said Paul.
The bill is moving through Congress via the reconciliation process, which would enable to the 53-47 Republican Senate majority to bypass the traditional 60-vote threshold and approve the bill without any Democratic support.
But that also means that Republicans can only afford to lose three votes in the chamber.
Paul said Sunday that he believes there are currently four Republicans opposed to the package as it stands. But if the debt ceiling hike were cut from the bill, Paul said, then he would vote for it.
"I would be very surprised if the bill, at least, is not modified in a good direction," he told CBS' "Face the Nation."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
7 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Regenxbio's Gene Therapy Helps Kids with Deadly Muscle Disease
Children with a deadly muscle disorder had more control of their bodies after getting an experimental gene therapy from Regenxbio Inc. in a small study. The results foreshadow a potential rivalry with Sarepta Therapeutics Inc. and a critical test for the Trump administration's new drug regulators. The first five children with Duchenne muscular dystrophy to receive a higher dose of Regenxbio's treatment showed 'consistent benefit' after nine months, with improvements in motor function and the time it took to stand, walk and climb, the company said Thursday. It's conducting a larger study involving about 30 patients that it expects to be in full swing by the end of the year, with the potential to file for approval by mid-2026.


Bloomberg
7 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump's China Envoy Seeks to Calm US Firms as Trade Ties Fray
US Ambassador David Perdue sought to reassure American businesses in China that the countries will maintain their commercial ties, as tensions flare between the world's largest economies over export controls. The envoy told US business groups on Thursday the Trump administration is looking for ways to cooperate with China and supports their presence in the country, according to people familiar with the matter. The exchanges took place as a dispute over China's grip on critical materials threatens to derail tariff talks that the US said has stalled.


San Francisco Chronicle
11 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Letters: Taking Harvey Milk's name off Navy ship won't silence what he stands for
Regarding 'Trump reportedly to strip Harvey Milk name off naval vessel' (Politics, June 3): The order to remove Harvey Milk's name from a Navy ship is a stunning and shameful act of political erasure. Milk, a Navy veteran who served during the Korean War, was assassinated after becoming one of America's most courageous and pioneering LGBTQ+ civil rights leaders. To claim that his name no longer reflects 'the Navy's values' or the 'warrior ethos' is not just revisionist — it's malicious. The timing is no accident. On the first days of Pride month, this move speaks volumes about the stories the Trump administration seeks to silence. This decision is not about standards. It's about politics and an insult to every LGBTQ+ American who has served this country with honor. I am the beneficiary of Milk's groundbreaking efforts to have LGBTQ+ people treated with respect, dignity and the opportunity to love who we choose. The name Harvey Milk endures — in the hearts of those who carry his legacy forward and in every Pride flag raised this month. Jonathan Finck, San Francisco Stand with veterans On Friday, the anniversary of D-Day, I'll be in Washington, D.C., marching alongside thousands of other veterans and families at the Unite for Veterans rally. We're not showing up to make noise. We're showing up because we believe in something worth defending: the promise this country made to those who served. I served in Afghanistan as an Army infantry officer. I've spent my civilian career working to improve systems for veterans, at a Bay Area tech company and at the Department of Veterans Affairs, and I can tell you this: Undermining veteran care doesn't reduce waste, it reduces access, stability and dignity for those who earned it. The Department of Veterans Affairs is under threat. The systems veterans rely on for health care, housing and mental health are being hollowed out. At the same time, disinformation is spreading about how these systems work and who they serve. This isn't about one party or one president. It's about priorities. We've never hesitated to invest in national defense and caring for veterans is part of that commitment. So I'm standing up. And I'm asking others to do the same. Demand that this country keep its word to those who wore the uniform. George Chewning, San Francisco Train not so smart Regarding 'Enthusiasm 'sky high' as Sonoma-Marin rail service expands northward' (Bay Area, May 31): The story about SMART train reaching Windsor reads like a promo piece. A deeper look shows that the boom in ridership occurred after SMART started giving free rides to kids and seniors. And even with that incentive, it has yet to reach the 5,000 riders a day to which it aspires. SMART has been a huge boondoggle. It's a single-track rail line that runs through flood-prone fields, utilizing diesel engines, with no flexibility in case of earthquake or fire (unlike unsexy buses). The policy seems to be to build so much infrastructure that citizens will feel they must send good money after bad, but they're not consistently biting. Jean Arnold, Mendocino Learn more languages The more languages you know fluently, the better you understand your native language. I helped write courses of study for many languages. My granddaughters attended Spanish immersion classes and are now bilingual, opting to study additional languages. While I agree that English literacy should be better, students are immersed in English all day long though social media is eroding their grammar and punctuation. This is a separate battle that won't be improved by outlawing immersion classes. To improve communication and alternate ways of organizing reality, I say we should offer more immersion classes.