logo
Weekend NHL rankings: A top 16, oddly specific playoff predictions and Gold Plan standings

Weekend NHL rankings: A top 16, oddly specific playoff predictions and Gold Plan standings

New York Times14-04-2025
Welcome to the last Weekend Rankings of the 2024-25 season.
Longtime readers know what that means: You're getting a top 16 instead of a top five, with every playoff team ranked. We'll also check in on what the Gold Plan standings would look like in the bottom five, and we'll even make a few oddly specific predictions.
Advertisement
When the schedule first came out, I was a bit nervous about the season ending on a Thursday, since that meant the last rankings would come out when each team still had a game or two left. What if there was a furious race down to the wire, and I couldn't do a top 16 because there were 20 or more teams still battling it out for the final spots?
Luckily, the NHL heard my concerns and responded accordingly, delivering an absolute dud of a late-season race in which we basically already know all the playoff teams and most of the matchups. Yay?
We'll get to the rankings in a bit. But first, let's make five oddly Round 1 specific predictions, a tradition inspired by the annual regular-season version we all love so much. And unlike the regular-season picks, I can actually claim to come into the postseason version on a bit of a hot streak. I went 2-for-5 on last year's predictions, finding paydirt on Mark Stone scoring the Golden Knights' first goal and the Oilers scoring seven times in their opener. I also predicted that a goalie who had a shutout in Game 1 would lose his starting job, and while there were no Game 1 shutouts in Round 1, the first goose egg of the postseason came from Stuart Skinner, who did indeed lose his job to Calvin Pickard for a few games.
In the oddly specific prediction game, like in baseball, hitting .400 basically makes you Ted Williams. Although to be honest, I'll happily settle for Mario Mendoza.
5. Brady Tkachuk will Brady Tkachuk — At some point in the near-certain Maple Leafs series, he's going to do something controversial and vaguely dirty that will A) have Toronto fans calling for a suspension, B) not result in that suspension, and C) make you kind of hate both fan bases over how unbearable they're being about the whole thing. In the prediction business, this is the equivalent of taking the free space on a bingo card.
Advertisement
4. The Oilers will win the first game in Los Angeles — And we'll all make snide remarks about playing all year for home ice only to immediately cough it up. But it's OK, because this one comes with a bonus prediction: The Kings will win the first game in Edmonton.
3. The Stars/Avalanche series will be a sweep — This is one of those predictions where we think of the best possible outcome for fans and then assume the hockey gods will serve up the opposite. Let's just say I better be wrong here.
2. The Habs will shut out the Capitals in one of the first two games — It goes without saying that this will make everyone freak out and conjure the memories of Jaroslav Halak. Then the Caps win the series in five.
1. The eventual Stanley Cup champion will lose their opener in overtime — And yes, this means that if your team goes to OT in Game 1, you have to root against them.
By the way: If you don't like these predictions, or think yours would be better, there's good news: The playoff prediction contest returns later this week. One question, which you will get wrong. Or will you? Make sure you get your entry in, and let's find out.
The five teams with the best chances of winning the Stanley Cup.
All 16 playoff teams, in order from least to most likely to win the Cup, based on everything we know about matchups and seeding as of this morning (which isn't quite everything, but should be enough). Each team gets two sentences each, no more, no less.
16. Montreal Canadiens — Just being here at all feels like a minor miracle, so they should just be happy to be there and bow out quickly. Then again, we've said that a few times about this team over the years, and that's exactly when they shock us.
15. Minnesota Wild — There are no bad teams in the NHL playoffs anymore. There are occasionally mediocre ones, though, and that's what I think we have here.
Advertisement
14. St. Louis Blues — If they'd kept winning right to the finish line, this would have been a much trickier call. As it stands, they'll be dangerous but probably overwhelmed.
13. New Jersey Devils — Damn, the Friday guys had them dead last. I don't think it's that bad, but without Jack Hughes, this doesn't feel like their year to go all the way.
12. Los Angeles Kings — After lots of back and forth, I've finally made my decision on whether I believe in them against the Oilers, even with home ice. I think this ranking tells you what that decision was.
11. Ottawa Senators —They'll have a goalie, a winnable matchup their fans will be rabid for and some legitimate 'nobody believes in us' energy. If you're looking for a wild-card team that could make a surprise run, this is the one, so don't act like you weren't warned.
10. Toronto Maple Leafs — Another postseason, another matchup they should probably win and another sinking feeling that we know how it's going to end. The Leafs could absolutely win a Cup with this roster, but it feels more and more like it would take a 2018 Capitals type of year, and we're well past 'believe it when I see it, not before' territory here.
9. Tampa Bay Lightning — I'm not sure how to get them any higher. But if it all comes together and they win it all, it's going to seem super obvious in hindsight.
8. Edmonton Oilers — I'm just not feeling it this year, even as all the pieces are clearly in place. Well, almost all of the pieces, depending on whether Mattias Ekholm can return (and how you feel about them deciding to entrust another McDavid/Draisaitl-era playoff run to Stuart Skinner).
7. Colorado Avalanche — I have no idea how to factor in what kind of boost, if any, they get from a Gabriel Landeskog return. Beyond that, we can all see that the Central is brutal, but these guys could absolutely be the ones to take it.
👏 Congrats to Gabriel Landeskog on recording on his first AHL goal as he continues his journey back to the @NHL . @ColoradoEagles @Avalanche pic.twitter.com/pbyE6DgIl9
— American Hockey League (@TheAHL) April 13, 2025
6. Florida Panthers — My Atlantic pick is no surprise if you've read the rankings all year, but I believe in them more than the standings say I should. But in a minor surprise, it turns out I don't believe in them nearly as much as the Friday guys apparently do.
5. Washington Capitals — This ranking represents a late-season drop, and I guess I lost a bit of my nerve, even as I still have them higher than the actual oddsmakers do. Don't worry, Caps fans — just think of how great it will be when they're in the Final and you all get to make fun of people like me for overthinking it.
Advertisement
4. Dallas Stars — They looked dominant all season, then completely broken for the last week, and recency bias is a hell of a drug. I'm scared about their path out of the Central, but if they do emerge with a healthy Miro Heiskanen, they'll be clear favorites.
3. Carolina Hurricanes — They're my Metro pick, edging out the Caps. There are more than a few flaws here, especially in terms of scoring, but I still think it adds up to a team that can at least get back to the conference finals, and maybe more.
2. Vegas Golden Knights — The first-round matchup should be an easy win, the second round no longer looks as scary as it once did, and the Central winner should be exhausted by the conference finals. They may not be the best team, but I'm not sure anyone has a more obvious path to the Cup.
1. Winnipeg Jets — I've had my doubts all year, but they've got the best goalie, lots of scoring, a fan base that's absolutely starving for a Stanley Cup and a whole country ready to get behind them if they go deep. Screw it, we ride.
Not ranked: Calgary Flames and Columbus Blue Jackets — Barring a miracle, they're both done. But thank you for being the only teams that were even vaguely trying to give us a late-season playoff race.
The five teams headed toward dead last and the best lottery odds for a top pick that could be James Hagens, Matthew Schaefer or someone else.
This is the time of year when we unveil what the race for the top pick would look like under the Gold Plan, an alternate method of determining draft order that I've been advocating for years. While there's little indication that the NHL has any appetite for adopting the plan, the momentum among fans has been building, helped by the PWHL embracing the plan last year.
In short, the idea here is that the top pick goes to the team that earns the most points after being eliminated from the playoff race. So the bad teams still get an advantage, in the form of a head start when they're eliminated early, but now they have to win their way to the pick. That would mean no more cheering for your own team to lose down the stretch, plus the occasional late-season matchup between bad teams that would feel like a playoff game. (For example, yesterday's Bruins/Penguins would feel important, instead of like a waste of everyone's time.)
Advertisement
It goes without saying that not everyone loves the idea, because we're hockey fans and we can never agree on anything. I've tried to tackle the various objections over the years, but I also want to be an advocate instead of a zealot, which means I have to acknowledge when the other side might have a point.
So I have to admit … yeah, this year wasn't a great one for the Gold Plan. One of the arguments against the idea has been 'What happens if the conferences are so unbalanced that one side gets eliminated way earlier than the others?' And the answer was always 'The odds of that happening in a meaningful way are small enough to essentially ignore.' Oops. It did happen this year, thanks to an Eastern wild-card race so tepid that it means all the conference's worst teams couldn't pass the elimination mark until the season was nearly over. Meanwhile, the West's worst teams were happily banking Gold Plan points for weeks, even though their overall records weren't much worse than the East.
So is this a reason to dump the Gold Plan, or a one-off we can live with? That's up to you, but we can at least admit this year's standings get weird.
Bonus fun fact: We can't end the section without one last piece of bottom-five misery. The Blackhawks are in Montreal tonight to play the Canadiens, a team they previously beat in their only other matchup this year. With a loss, they'll become the first team in NHL history to lose to 31 teams in a season, and the first team since 1992-93 to lose to every other team in the league at least once.
That will do it for another season. Thanks everyone for reading, and especially to all of you who argued your favorite team's case in a way that made the comment section slightly less of a trainwreck than other comment sections. Enjoy the playoffs and the offseason, and before you know it we'll be back in October with Week 1 rankings that will look absolutely terrible in hindsight.
(Photo of Brady Tkachuk: Ed Mulholland / Imagn Images)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How naturally lean NHL prospects bulk up to physically compete with the pros
How naturally lean NHL prospects bulk up to physically compete with the pros

New York Times

timea few seconds ago

  • New York Times

How naturally lean NHL prospects bulk up to physically compete with the pros

As of July, Will Moore weighed 182 pounds. It took him work to get there. During a four-week training program for June's NHL Draft Combine, the 18-year-old gained 10 pounds. Moore, a second-round pick of the Boston Bruins, was fighting genetics. 'My family's all very lean,' the wiry Moore said of parents Vanusa and Patrick. 'Very fit, very healthy.' Advertisement The 6-foot-3 Moore is just getting started. To become a No. 2 NHL center, one of Moore's mandates is to become big enough to battle with juggernauts such as Tage Thompson (6-foot-6, 220 pounds), Auston Matthews (6-3, 217 pounds) and Aleksander Barkov (6-3, 214 pounds), men who are as large as they are skilled. As challenging as the ask may be, Lane Hutson, Jared Spurgeon, Clayton Keller and Elias Pettersson are proof that naturally skinny players can join the league's elite. Moore, who will be a Boston College freshman, is on this journey as an ectomorph: tall, lean, designed to burn calories. Prospects like Moore, known in the fitness category as hard gainers, must be stricter than their peers about following a three-pillar plan of training, eating and sleeping, all while improving as hockey players. 'To be an elite athlete, it's a job. Just like any other job,' said National Team Development Program head strength coach Joe Meloni, who trained Moore during his two-year NTDP residency. 'You have to put in the hours. For some people, those hours are in the weight room. Some people, those hours they need to develop their skills on the ice. For some people, it's in the kitchen.' For these players, patience is nonnegotiable. 'There's no quick solution,' Meloni said, 'to get super big as quickly as possible.' For his combine prep, Moore trained specifically for the 10 tests, such as the bench press and 5-10-5 shuttle run, required of every participant. He did so with two parameters in mind: improving technique and results for each test while burning the minimum amount of calories. Since then, Moore's goals have shifted. He is pursuing body-wide hypertrophy to increase the size of his muscles. In the gym, that means volume. A larger player chasing strength gains, for example, might squat four sets of five repetitions with heavy weights. In comparison, a leaner player would decrease the weight, but he might perform four sets of 12 reps. Advertisement He could also incorporate eccentric tempo. On a squat, this would mean descending slowly to increase the muscles' time under tension. To work the upper body, a hypertrophic-centered exercise could be pull-ups using a band. 'He's doing more volume, meaning more reps and sets, with more time under tension. Which means slower reps,' Meloni said. 'Slower time under tension. Time under tension is what creates change in the muscle in terms of hypertrophy.' These are challenging workouts, designed to test muscles. The player who wants changes in body composition, in all likelihood, will be spending more time in the gym than peers seeking improvement in speed, strength or power. 'When you're training, what you're doing, in a way, is damaging muscle to some extent,' said Meloni. 'The more time you spend under tension, the more damage occurs on the muscle, the more it needs to rebuild itself, the more it grows.' At the NTDP, an important window is a six-week segment during the Under-17 season once games conclude. The goal during this phase is to build muscle for all players, not just the lean ones. The players are not just hammering the weights at this time. They are eating whenever they can. For part of the summer, Moore lived with teammate Andrew O'Neill. Mother Jamie O'Neill was in charge of the cooking. Moore approved of her work. 'I don't leave the table,' said Moore. 'You've got to make sure you're always eating. If you're ever hungry, then that's a problem. You've got to be full basically at all times of the day. Even when you're full, you've still got to eat. It's a lot. It's tough. But I love the results.' Moore finds breakfast to be tricky. If he works out in the morning, sometimes he loses whatever he ate earlier. He could handle Jamie O'Neill's breakfast sandwich: three eggs and five bacon slices. That, plus a protein shake, would serve him well for his morning workout. Advertisement After the gym, Moore usually hits Chipotle for steak, rice and beans. In the afternoon, he'd have a protein shake and snacks. For dinner, he liked steak, chicken, mashed potatoes and vegetables. He didn't stop there. 'Not afraid to throw some dessert in there. Because all calories are good for me,' Moore said. 'Usually, a big bowl of ice cream. That's a good one.' Sometimes he'd finish the day with a final evening shake. Like Moore, Vashek Blanar is naturally skinny. The 6-foot-4 Blanar, a fourth-round pick of the Boston Bruins in 2025, weighed 185 pounds in July. The 18-year-old defenseman's goal is to gain 10 pounds in 2025-26 when he plays in Sweden. It's unlikely the reed-like Blanar will ever resemble the likes of Victor Hedman (245 pounds). 'It's been hard,' Blanar said of gaining weight. 'I've been at it for about a year.' Blanar usually eats seven meals a day. He'll start with eggs, bacon, yogurt and fruit. He snacks before and after his morning workouts. For lunch, he rotates between salmon and chicken. He has more snacks in the afternoon before his first dinner. IF Troja-Ljungby, Blanar's 2024-25 team in Sweden, provided each player with boxed meals. He would take two: one to eat then and another for his second dinner between 9 and 10 p.m. He would usually have chicken, spaghetti, rice and vegetables. 'Until I get full, until I can't eat anymore,' Blanar said of his intake routine. 'You just can't be hungry when you're trying to gain weight. You have to be full all the time.' Jonathan Morello knows the feeling. One year ago, the 6-foot-1 Morello weighed 182 pounds. The Bruins' 2024 fifth-round pick returned to his second development camp 10 pounds heavier. It requires diligence at every meal and in between. For breakfast, he might have four eggs, two bagels, fruit and orange juice. For lunch, usually after a workout, Morello often eats a chicken or steak sandwich with salad. After an afternoon protein shake, the 19-year-old likes chicken breasts for dinner, sweet potatoes, asparagus and broccoli. Protein bars and shakes are common for between-meals snacks. Advertisement 'There's times where I'm eating something and I'm like, 'I don't want this at all,'' the 19-year-old said. 'But I need to force myself a bit.' All this training and eating does not leave much downtime. But none of this works without sleep. 'I know lots of people that can run on low amounts of sleep and be fine,' Morello said. 'For me, that's just not the case.' Some nights, Morello can go down for 11 hours. On others, eight will serve him well. On average, he goes to bed around 9:30 p.m. He wakes up around 8:30 a.m. prior to breakfast and a gym session. He does not consider himself a morning person. Conversely, Elliott Groenewold has no trouble getting going at 7:30 a.m. The 19-year-old defenseman, who will be a sophomore at Quinnipiac this season, made sure to finish his homework and hit the sheets around 9:30 p.m. 'The best thing you can do to recover is sleep,' said Groenewold. 'Eight hours of sleep is good. But for athletes like us, we need more. If we want to recover to the best of our abilities, we need nine, nine-and-a-half hours of sleep. It takes discipline to go to sleep early, especially being in college.' During waking hours, a player can go all out on the ice, in the gym and at the table. But none of it works without recovery. Under the sheets, players repair the muscles damaged during training, release growth hormone for restoration and refresh the brain from the stress of on-ice performance. So if sleep is compromised by procrastination, screen time or any other kind of diversion, it can reduce any gains from earlier in the day. Like with others, there is no ideal amount of sleep for skinny players. Some need eight. Others require 10. Whatever the amount, it has to be quality sleep. 'We might train, we might practice, for two, three hours a day,' said Quinnipiac strength and conditioning coach Brijesh Patel. 'Sometimes, with your habits you have off the ice and away from the gym, you can undo exactly what you did within those two or three hours of what you did in the gym. When I train and practice, I'm not actually getting better. Advertisement 'What you're doing is you're creating systemic fatigue. You're creating a stimulus to improve. But the only time your brain actually learns what you did and your body can actually recover from the demands you put on it is during the recovery process.' (Photo of William Moore: Michael Miller / ISI Photos / Getty Images) Spot the pattern. Connect the terms Find the hidden link between sports terms Play today's puzzle

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store