
Kinfra clarifies delay in RTI response on land purchase
Thiruvananthapuram:
Kerala Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation
(Kinfra) clarified that they have not denied any RTI request submitted by
Nirmal Krishna Nidhi Nikshepa Samarakshana Samithi
. Kinfra authorities stated that the Samithi has posed 26 queries, which require detailed information gathering from multiple departments, thus causing the delay.The clarification was issued following the allegations raised by the Samithi that details sought on the land purchased in Kinfra by the key accused in the Nirmal Krishna deposit fraud were denied by Kinfra authorities.The authorities claimed that "the RTI petition from the Samithi dated March 17 was received at the Kinfra head office on April 19.
As per the RTI Act, the prescribed time limit for responding to an RTI application is 30 days from the date of receipt. Accordingly, the final reply to the said petition is scheduled to be sent on May 18."The information needs to be collected from the legal department, allotment department and Kinfra International Apparel Park. The process of gathering the necessary information is currently underway, the authorities said."We would like to emphasise that Kinfra has not denied the RTI request submitted by the Samithi members and the process to reply to the same is in progress. Kinfra has not violated any provisions of the RTI Act," said a statement issued by Kinfra.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
7 hours ago
- The Hindu
Denial of rightful share of wealth to the deserving might trigger revolution: Santosh Hegde
Former Lokayukta N. Santosh Hegde on Sunday, June 8, said the country might witness a revolution if the deserving people do not get rightful share of wealth for which they are entitled to. When scams to the tune of thousands of crores rupees take place, the country would not witness development and also peace would not prevail, he said. Mr. Hegde was responding after receiving Late George Fernandes Memorial Award instituted by Jayashreekrishna Parisara Premi Samithi in Udupi. Humanity had been the value built by the elders. It was required to ensure peace in society, Mr. Hegde said. If there was injustice or social unrest in society, the society itself was responsible for the mess. While the society used to penalise wrongdoers in earlier days, it is now behind power and money, he said. He regretted citing examples persons accused in criminal activities being felicitated after are released on bail. If the society had boycotted wrongdoers, the right ones would have got recognition, he said. Everyone has the duty to bring in social change to tell people to earn money through legal ways and not by snatching from someone else's pockets. Greed was the root cause for all the injustice in society, he said. Udupi-Chikkamagaluru MP Kota Srinivas Poojary presented the award to Mr. Hegde. Samithi president Nityananda D. Kotian, MLC Ivan D'Souza, former MLC Capt. Ganesh Karnik, Samithi founder Jayashreekrishna Shetty A. Shetty and others were present.


Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
State Information Commission recommends cyberfraud cases to be brought under RTI purview
Ahmedabad: The State Information Commission has recommended to the state home department that cyberfraud cases be brought under the purview of the Right to Information Act. It suggests supplying details about cyber offences and investigations to complainants by making amendments in the notification. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now At present, the cybercrime cell refuses to share details about investigations and progress made in cyberfraud cases, citing that the cell functions under CID (Crime), which is exempted from the obligation of furnishing information under the provisions of Section 24 of the Act. Information Commissioner Nikhil Bhatt has suggested the state govt withdraw the investigation of cyberfraud cases from the exemption granted to CID (Crime) by making amendments in its gazette notification of Oct 25, 2005, under the provisions of Section 25(3)(j) of the Act. The commission further stated that the govt has granted exemption to the local crime branch and crime branch in rural and urban areas from RTI obligations. It has recommended the withdrawal of this exemption in connection with these agencies as well, as far as cybercrime complaints are concerned. It has sought a periodic report of progress in this direction if the home department agrees to do it. "If the amended notification is issued by the state govt as recommended by the commission, a copy of it shall be sent to the commission," the order reads. The commission's recommendation came after one Rakesh Prajapati, a complainant in a cyberfraud case, sought details under RTI provisions regarding progress in the investigation of his case. However, he was denied the information by the authorities on the grounds that the cybercrime cell functions under CID (Crime), which is exempted from RTI obligations. The commission said that innocent citizens lose their hard-earned savings in cyberfraud, and they file complaints with the Cybercrime Cell. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now They are eager to know when they will get their money back and what action has been taken on their complaints. Upon denial of such information, they feel dejected. "This commission firmly believes that information related to cyber offences registered with the Cybercrime Cell, which functions under CID (Crime) at present, should be shared with the victims of cyberfraud. " The commission further said that CID (Crime) probes sensitive cases and hence is exempted from RTI purview. However, cyberfrauds are less serious in nature and it is not a "core activity" of CID (Crime). Moreover, the Cybercrime Cell was not in existence when CID (Crime) was exempted from RTI obligations. "The commission does not agree with the decision of not sharing information related to cyberfrauds under the guise of secrecy or by taking the shield of exemption granted under Section 24 of the RTI Act," it said.


Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Wife forged house docus to show self as owner: FIR
Mumbai: A senior citizen has accused his wife of fraud. A complaint lodged by the 66-year-old man at Matunga police station states that his 58-year-old wife had transferred documents — the BEST electricity bill and flat-related documents to her name. The man, YH Savla, registered the FIR on June 5 against his wife after obtaining details through Right to Information (RTI) act from BEST. He has stated that the electricity bill now showed her name while the wife's name was shown as the first flat owner. Their home in Matunga is slated for redevelopment. Since 1995, Savla has resided in Wadala for nearly two decades following discord with the wife, who stayed at in the Matunga flat. To verify the allegations made, the police have sought details from BEST along with documents that the wife had submitted, said an officer from Matunga police station. The elderly man has alleged that the wife had has also forged the maintenance bill which shows her as the owner of the property.