Single jab will offer ‘protective bubble' to premature babies this winter
Experts say the drug will give thousands of vulnerable infants 'their own suit of armour' for their first winter.
From late September, the health service will offer nirsevimab to protect babies born before 32 weeks against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV).
The jab, which offers six months protection in a single dose, will replace monthly injections of palivizumab previously offered.
RSV is a common cause of coughs and colds and usually gets better by itself, but can cause severe illness for babies and older adults.
It is estimated that about 30,000 youngsters are admitted to hospital with the virus every year in the UK, with about 30 babies dying.
According to NHS England, data shows premature babies are three times more likely to go to hospital with RSV and are 10 times more likely to need intensive care when compared to full-term babies.
Health systems in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland will also offer nirsevimab from autumn, meaning about 9,000 babies in the UK are set to benefit.
Dr Claire Fuller, co-national medical director for NHS England said: 'This injection will provide premature babies with a protective bubble against RSV just in time for the colder months.
'It will offer a long-lasting defence helping to avoid unnecessary hospitalisations and serious illness – giving babies the best possible start in life and shielding them from harm.'
Since September 2024, pregnant women have been eligible for an RSV jab from 28 weeks onwards to boost their immune system and pass antibodies to their unborn babies to protect them in the first weeks of life.
However, this new drug works differently to the jab, as premature babies born before 32 weeks have limited or no protection given from the vaccinations recommended for pregnant women.
Dr Conall Watson, consultant epidemiologist at the UK Health Security Agency, said: 'Having an RSV vaccine from week 28 in every pregnancy is key to protecting your baby against RSV bronchiolitis. Most RSV hospital admissions in babies can be prevented by vaccination.
'This new NHS nirsevimab immunisation programme will offer really important protection for very premature babies born before they can be protected by mum's antenatal vaccination.'
John Stewart, director of specialised commissioning at NHS England said: 'For babies born very prematurely, the risk of contracting RSV in their first winter is high and extremely serious.
'This new medication will provide vulnerable infants with their own suit of armour that protects against what can be a life-threatening infection.'
Public health minister Ashley Dalton said: 'By rolling out nirsevimab this September, we're ensuring that our most at-risk infants, including those who are born too early to benefit from maternal vaccination, are protected in the best possible way.'
Trial data shows nirsevimab offers more than 80% protection against RSV compared to about 55% with palivizumab, NHS England said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Western Telegraph
an hour ago
- Western Telegraph
Report highlights ‘significant concerns' over hospital maternity services
More than 100 recommendations have been made to improve maternity care at Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust. The trust has apologised to families and said that a 'comprehensive improvement plan' is in place. One of the most damning areas of concern is issues that have blighted maternity services have been allowed to continue because of a lack of learning Rachelle Mahapatra, Irwin Mitchell A report by NHS England's Maternity Safety Support Programme highlights how maternity services in Leeds 'had a challenge in responding to families who have experienced harm and poor outcomes' which led to several families seeking an independent inquiry. It highlights a 'challenging' culture in the organisation. The report says learning from incidents was 'not robust' and describes how staff felt safety concerns were de-escalated without being resolved. Around 9,000 babies are born each year across St James University Hospital and Leeds General Infirmary, which are run by the trust. The trust is one of several which are being examined as part of a national review into NHS maternity care. The first part of the review will see experts investigate up to 10 of the most concerning maternity and neonatal units, including Leeds, with a view to give affected families answers as quickly as possible. A major NHS review of Leeds' maternity services has issued more than 100 recommendations for improvement. Our expert @RachelMcPatrick, who's helping families affected by maternity care failings in Leeds, says the report lays bare the scale of problems: — Irwin Mitchell (@irwinmitchell) July 28, 2025 The second will be a 'system-wide' look at maternity and neonatal care, uniting lessons from past maternity inquiries to create one clear set of actions designed to improve national NHS care. The investigation will report back before the end of the year. Law firm Irwin Mitchell said that it is representing a number of affected families, including parents whose babies have either died or been left with life-long disabilities or mothers who have been injured while giving birth. Medical negligence lawyer Rachelle Mahapatra, from the firm's Leeds office, said: 'This latest report yet again lays bare the scale of the problems within Leeds's maternity services. 'That more than 100 recommendations have been made will yet again cause concerns and upset among families, including those we continue to represent. 'One of the most damning areas of concern is issues that have blighted maternity services have been allowed to continue because of a lack of learning. I would like to apologise to all the families who have received maternity care with us which has fallen short of the high standard we aim to provide Rabina Tindale, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust 'It's imperative that when something goes wrong in the NHS, families are listened to, problems are analysed and reviewed – and any recommendations implemented to prevent the same mistakes happening time and time again.' Rabina Tindale, chief nurse at Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, said: 'This report has highlighted significant areas where we need to improve our maternity services, and my priority is to make sure we urgently take action to deliver the recommendations. 'I would like to apologise to all the families who have received maternity care with us which has fallen short of the high standard we aim to provide. 'It is vital that as a trust we listen more to our families and understand their experiences and concerns so we can address these and ensure everyone's experience is of the highest standard. 'We have already started making improvements to our services, and have a comprehensive improvement plan in place. 'Our commitment is to ensure every family feels safe, supported, and respected throughout their maternity journey with us.'
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Travel expert says popular products are a 'waste of money' - what not to buy
The travel experts at Which? have called out the travel health products that are a "waste of money" and have warned consumers against purchasing them ahead of a summer holiday While many of us enjoy making the most of the good weather next to a pool or beach, jetting off during the summer holidays often costs more than it would if you travelled off-peak. Whether it's sticking to hand luggage or bagging a last-minute flight for less than £20, many of us are also conscious of making our money go further when planning a summer holiday, but there are certain items you could be splashing cash on that simply aren't worthwhile. There are, however, some things you simply can't plan for, and that's falling ill while travelling. Investing in some mosquito repellent to ensure you don't spend the entire holiday scratching at them, or stockpiling on allergy medicines in local Boots might seem like an essential task to do before travelling, but it could be a waste of time and money depending on what you purchase. While many of us want to avoid getting sick on holiday, the travel gurus at Which? have revealed the travel health products that are actually a "waste of money", reports the Express. In a clip shared on Instagram, the travel specialists highlighted the popular items many of us buy to ensure we feel our best before jetting off, which aren't entirely essential and could be setting you back more than they're worth. Mosquito wristbands Remembering to reapply repellent can prove tricky whilst on holiday, which explains why numerous holidaymakers opt for wristbands as an alternative. Emitting a combination of components that deter the insects, Which? warned that they're not actually the most efficient. Whilst it may shield your wrist or at least the upper portion of your body, the specialists noted: "You're better off using a spray or lotion with 20% to 50% DEET on all exposed skin." Travel sickness bands If you're facing a lengthy car journey from the airport to your accommodation, or need to board a ferry, you might splash out on an anti-travel sickness band. A type of acupressure that's claimed to ease queasiness and nausea, the experts at Which? said: "The NHS says there's little scientific evidence that these work and when we put them to the test at a fairground, they didn't work either." Instead, they recommended buying tablets such as Kwells which contain hyoscine, a medication that prevents nausea signals. Once-a-day sunscreen Whilst once-a-day sunscreen may appear to be a perfect answer if you forget to reapply it, Which disclosed that they discovered a 74% reduction in protection throughout the day. It's safer for your skin to use sunscreen that you can reapply during the day, and you should top it up every two hours. Branded medicines Numerous branded medications are frequently pricier than generic alternatives available in supermarkets, despite containing identical ingredients. Which? recommended that whilst brands such as Piriteze and Clarityn might cost you £11, supermarket alternatives of the allergy treatment typically cost under half the price, and the same principle applies to Immodium. Search for the active component loperamide hydrochloride, and save cash by switching to an unbranded alternative.
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Model who said docs left her struggling to walk filmed 'strutting' at festival
Kae Burnell-Chambers claimed a blunder by NHS doctors led to nerve damage which left her struggling to walk, get out of a car or even dress herself, and she sued for millions An artist and model is facing jail over a "fraudulent" £3m NHS compensation claim after she was filmed parading in fantasy body paint at a festival despite claiming she needed a stick or wheelchair to get around. Kae Burnell-Chambers claimed a blunder by NHS doctors led to nerve damage which left her struggling to walk, get out of a car or even dress herself, and she sued for millions. But explosive video unveiled at the High Court instead showed the 44-year-old model and artist posing and strutting while painted as a fantasy warrior at the Kustom Culture Blast Off festival in 2019. The video was filmed months before she launched her multimillion pound damages bid over delayed diagnosis of her cauda equina syndrome - a condition involving damage to nerves at the end of the spinal cord. While the condition was genuine, she later admitted exaggerating her symptoms after social media videos emerged, revealing she had been working as a body-painting artist and parading as a model with no sign of having difficulty getting around. Ms Burnell-Chambers admitted she had "misrepresented" her symptoms during her claim. She is now facing a potential jail sentence after Judge Jonathan Glasson KC found her guilty of contempt of court. Cauda equina syndrome is a crippling condition which occurs when the bundle of nerves below the end of the spinal cord, known as the cauda equina, is damaged. Symptoms include low back pain, numbness and pain which radiates down the leg, but early diagnosis and treatment can lead to long term effects being much reduced. Sadie Crapper, barrister for Northern Lincolnshire and Goole NHS Foundation Trust, told the court that after NHS doctors missed early signs of the condition in 2016, Ms Burnell-Chambers, from Lincs, launched a bid for damages in 2019. She attended medico-legal appointments complaining of "a whole array of disabilities," saying she needed help to dress and to get out of the car. When she went to see a doctor had "displayed a laboured gait and used a stick," the barrister said. She went on to drop her claim in 2022 after social media videos and surveillance footage showed her claim was "fundamentally dishonest," said Ms Crapper. One of the videos was filmed the same morning she saw the medico-legal expert displaying high levels of disability, but the film showed her "at a petrol station with her mum walking with no problem". A core part of the NHS case was based on a series of social media videos showing her working as a bodypaint artist and model at a series of conventions and festivals around the UK. One particular video from the Kustom Kulture Blast Off in August 2019 "shows her having her body extensively painted and then parading in a show where she walks freely and dances without need for a walking aid," the barrister said. "By no later than 2017, she had recovered well enough to make a return to body painting. What you see in these videos is somebody who goes to conventions around the country. She's seen to walk without a mobility aid, crouch and converse about the work she's doing freely and without any sign of pain. "The person seen on the videos is markedly different from the person seen in the medico legal documents and her witness statement. She has at all times known she participated in these conventions, undertook this painting and modelling, and could walk as she did on the footage now available." She said it was the NHS Trust's case that Ms Burnell-Chambers had "fraudulently exaggerated her symptoms for the purposes of her clinical negligence claim". "[Ms Burnell-Chambers] now admits that she is in contempt of court and accepts that the custody threshold has been crossed in respect of her wrongdoing," she added. The court heard Ms Burnell-Chambers admitted her condition varies and her mobility is almost normal on good days, and that she had been exaggerating when she saw the medico legal expert doctor. "She admitted she had been fundamentally dishonest," but nevertheless has real "ongoing disabilities," her barrister Ben Bradley KC told the court. The judge, giving his ruling, said she had signed an admission that she had "deceived" the examining doctors "and deliberately changed my presentation", and that in doing so had "deliberately interfered with the administration of justice". In her admission statement, she said her mobility is near normal "on good days", but "on bad days" she considers herself to be disabled. When she saw some experts in the claim, she deliberately attempted to demonstrate what she perceived her function was at its worst, without telling the experts that was what she was doing. "I know it was wrong to misrepresent my presentation whilst making a civil claim. I accept that I deserve to be punished as a result," she added. At the end of a half-day hearing, the judge concluded: "I find the defendant guilty of contempt of court on the basis of her admissions." Ms Burnell-Chambers will now be sentenced in October. The maximum term for contempt of court is two years' imprisonment.
