
Now freed, Mahmoud Khalil files $20M claim against Trump administration
For a moment, the outspoken Palestinian activist found himself uncharacteristically speechless.
'I cannot describe the pain of that night,' Khalil said finally, gazing down as the baby, Deen, cooed in his arms. 'This is something I will never forgive.'
Now, weeks after regaining his freedom, Khalil is seeking restitution. On Thursday, his lawyers filed a claim for $20 million in damages against the Trump administration, alleging Khalil was falsely imprisoned, maliciously prosecuted and smeared as an antisemite as the government sought to deport him over his prominent role in campus protests.
The filing — a precursor to a lawsuit under the Federal Tort Claims Act — names the Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the State Department.
Story continues below advertisement
It comes as the deportation case against Khalil, a 30-year-old recent graduate student at Columbia University, continues to wind its way through the immigration court system.
The goal, Khalil said, is to send a message that he won't be intimidated into silence.
'They are abusing their power because they think they are untouchable,' Khalil said. 'Unless they feel there is some sort of accountability, it will continue to go unchecked.'
1:56
Mahmoud Khalil released from ICE custody after more than 3 months in jail
Khalil said he plans to share any settlement money with others targeted in Trump's 'failed' effort to suppress pro-Palestinian speech. In lieu of a settlement, he would also accept an official apology and changes to the administration's deportation policies.
A White House spokesperson deferred comment to the State Department, which said its actions were fully supported by the law.
Story continues below advertisement
In an emailed statement, Tricia McLaughlin, a spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security, called Khalil's claim 'absurd,' accusing him of 'hateful behavior and rhetoric' that threatened Jewish students.
Harsh conditions and an 'absurd' allegation
The filing accuses President Donald Trump and other officials of mounting a haphazard and illegal campaign to 'terrorize him and his family,' beginning with Khalil's March 8 arrest.
On that night, he said he was returning home from dinner with his wife, Noor Abdalla, when he was 'effectively kidnapped' by plainclothes federal agents, who refused to provide a warrant and appeared surprised to learn he was a legal U.S. permanent resident.
Get breaking National news
For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
He was then whisked overnight to an immigration jail in Jena, Louisiana, a remote location that was 'deliberately concealed' from his family and attorneys, according to the filing.
Inside, Khalil said he was denied his ulcer medication, forced to sleep under harsh fluorescent lights and fed 'nearly inedible' food, causing him to lose 15 pounds (7 kilograms). 'I cannot remember a night when I didn't go to sleep hungry,' Khalil recalled.
Meanwhile, the Trump administration publicly celebrated the arrest, promising to deport him and others whose protests against Israel it dubbed 'pro-terrorist, anti-Semitic, anti-American activity.'
Khalil, who has condemned antisemitism before and since his arrest, was not accused of a crime and has not been linked to Hamas or any other terror group. 'At some point, it becomes like reality TV,' Khalil said of the allegations. 'It's very absurd.'
Story continues below advertisement
View image in full screen
Mahmoud Khalil, right, speaks to Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., after arriving at Newark International Airport, Saturday, June 21, 2025, in Newark, N.J. Seth Wenig / The Associated Press
Deported for beliefs
A few weeks into his incarceration, Khalil was awoken by a fellow detainee, who pointed excitedly to his face on a jailhouse TV screen. A new memo signed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio acknowledged Khalil hadn't broken the law, but argued he should be deported for beliefs that could undermine U.S. foreign policy interests.
'My beliefs are not wanting my tax money or tuition going toward investments in weapons manufacturers for a genocide,' Khalil said. 'It's as simple as that.'
By then, Khalil had become something of a celebrity in the 1,200-person lock-up. When not dealing with his own case, he hosted 'office hours' for fellow immigrant detainees, leaning on his past experience working at a British embassy in Beirut to help others organize paperwork and find translators for their cases.
Story continues below advertisement
'I'm pretty good at bureaucracy,' Khalil said.
At night, they played Russian and Mexican card games, as Khalil listened to 'one story after another from people who didn't understand what's happening to them.'
'This was one of the most heartbreaking moments,' he said. 'People on the inside don't know if they have any rights.'
View image in full screen
A people gathered in Foley Square, outside the Manhattan federal court, in support of Mahmoud Khalil, Wednesday, March 12, 2025, in New York. Stefan Jeremiah / The Associated Press
Lost time
On June 20, after 104 days in custody, Khalil was ordered released by a federal judge, who found the government's efforts to remove him on foreign policy grounds were likely unconstitutional.
He now faces new allegations of misrepresenting personal details on his green card application. In a motion filed late Wednesday, attorneys for Khalil described those charges as baseless and retaliatory, urging a judge to dismiss them.
Story continues below advertisement
The weeks since his release, Khalil said, have brought moments of bliss and intense personal anguish.
Fearing harassment or possible arrest, he leaves the house less frequently, avoiding large crowds or late-night walks. But he lit up as he remembered watching Deen taking his first swim earlier in the week. 'It was not very pleasant for him,' Khalil said, smiling.
View image in full screen
Pro-Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil and his wife, Dr. Noor Abdalla, hold their baby Deen during an interview, July 3, 2025, in New York. Yuki Iwamura / The Associated Press
'I'm trying as much as possible to make up for the time with my son and my wife,' he added. 'As well thinking about my future and trying to comprehend this new reality.'
Part of that reality, he said, will be continuing his efforts to advocate against Israel's war in Gaza, which has killed more than 57,000 Palestinians, more than half of them women and children, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. On the day after his release, he led a march through Manhattan, draped in a Palestinian flag — and flanked by security.
Story continues below advertisement
As he poured Deen's milk into a bottle, Khalil considered whether he might've done anything differently had he known the personal cost of his activism.
'We could've communicated better. We could've built more bridges with more people,' he said. 'But the core thing of opposing a genocide, I don't think you can do that any differently. This is your moral imperative when you're watching your people be slaughtered by the minute.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Global News
2 hours ago
- Global News
Ford acknowledges water bomber pilot shortage, launches request for national fire plan
Premier Doug Ford has acknowledged that his province has a shortage of pilots trained in the difficult task of flying water bombers over forest fires, as blazes continue to rage across northern Ontario. Earlier in the season, the union representing front-line firefighters said planes in the province were grounded because Ontario didn't have enough pilots to fly the water bombers it currently owns. It's a claim the Ministry of Natural Resources confirmed to Global News, although it did not say exactly how many planes are grounded or how often. On Tuesday, at a meeting of the nation's leaders in Muskoka, Ont., Ford said there were pilots in the province, but suggested they don't have the training to fight fires. 'We have lots of pilots, but you have to also understand you can't just have any pilot with these water bombers,' he said. Story continues below advertisement 'And then we have the helicopters, too, that carry an enormous amount of water as well. So I think it's all hands on deck as well.' The Ford government has said it is ordering new water bombers, but the premier complained they take up to four years to build. Ford, as the chair of the Council of the Federation, is leading a push from the country's premiers to have the federal government take on a bigger role in fighting fires. 'What happens every single year, and we know what's going to happen, there's wildfires right across the country,' Ford added on Tuesday. 'We need a national program that we can call on for resources.' Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy That request is being floated for the first time this year during a potentially record-breaking summer for the country, where more than five million hectares of land have already burned. Story continues below advertisement At the close of the second day of a leaders' summit in Huntsville, Ont., this week, Canada's premiers agreed to a joint statement requesting that the federal government provide 'adequate and flexible federal funding' for emergencies. The request was also made for help in creating national standards and co-ordinating during emergencies. The plan is one that New Brunswick Premier Susan Holt said was talked about for the first time this week. 'That's a new one that we started discussing in light of the fires that are being experienced across a lot of provinces,' she said on Tuesday. 'So we started the conversation on what provinces need to be able to respond as quickly as possible and what level of communication is helpful, and what level isn't.' Wildfires have devastated the northern reaches of provinces across Canada this year. Figures last week showed more than 5.5 million hectares had burned since January, more than double the 10-year average of 2.12 million. In Manitoba, roughly 5,000 residents were evacuated from Flin Flon because of wildfires earlier this year. Twelve months ago, in Alberta's Jasper, 25,000 people were forced to flee two massive fires that ripped through the heart of the mountain community. Story continues below advertisement Ontario has evacuated at least 650 people from its northern communities in July alone. Exactly what federal support would look like remains to be seen. British Columbia Premier David Eby said he was a 'cautious supporter' of the idea and would be supportive if the federal government could help to standardize systems to make it easier for different fire services to come together. 'The caution that we have is the closer you get to the ground, the more effective the fire service is, in my experience,' he said. 'There is a potential role for the federal government, but I want to make sure it adds and doesn't create bureaucracy or delay.' View image in full screen Ontario Premier Doug Ford, left, and Quebec Premier Francois Legault listen to questions from the media during the 2025 summer meetings of Canada's Premiers at Deerhurst Resort in Huntsville, Ont., on Wednesday, July 23, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Nathan Denette Back in Ontario, however, opponents of the Ford government say it has failed to invest in the program and stress federal support is no substitute for a well-run local program. Story continues below advertisement 'Every part of the country, every part of the world has different kinds of fires, depending on what kind of wood is there,' NDP MPP Lise Vaugeois said. 'Whether we're talking about bogs or peatlands or boreal forests or old-growth forests in British Columbia, they all burn differently.' — with files from Global News' Ari Rabinovitch


Global News
2 hours ago
- Global News
Law experts, observers raise questions as Ontario adds virtual courtroom restrictions
Ontario's lower courts are introducing restrictions on who can attend proceedings virtually after what they describe as an escalation of interruptions, a move that law experts and observers say raises questions about transparency. The Ontario Court of Justice released a new policy last week that would stop observers from accessing court proceedings online unless they receive authorization from the judge or justice of peace overseeing the case. Those interested in attending court cases are encouraged to show up in person, the policy says. It does not apply to proceedings at the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. The lower court attributes the move to a rise in deliberate disruptions of court proceedings referred to as 'Zoom bombings,' which is when participants disturb a virtual call with inappropriate content or messages. 'These disruptions are an impermissible attack on the integrity of the justice system and the administration of justice,' an interim policy notice said, adding that they often cause delays and can have negative effects for participants, court staff and jurists. Story continues below advertisement Boris Bytensky, president of the Criminal Lawyers' Association, says changes to the observer policy were needed because of the 'despicable acts of disruption' caused by certain attendees in virtual courts. 'This is the only way to ensure that proceedings that are conducted by Zoom and bring the significant benefits to the system and to the parties that virtual proceedings offer are free from any unacceptable interference,' Bytensky said in an emailed statement. But some experts warn that the policy could be a step back when it comes to openness. Virtual court hearings on Zoom were first adopted in 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic so court processes could continue amid government-mandated physical distancing rules. The continued use of videoconferencing technology in courtrooms since then has created a level of access people now expect, complicating the decision to change the policy, said Teresa Scassa, law professor at the University of Ottawa. Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy 'At this point, the meaning of open courts or what is an open court has changed, and now you're taking away something that's there,' she said in an interview. While the new policy says physical attendance is still on the table, that is not an option for everyone, Scassa said. People with disabilities, those who don't drive and anyone who lives far away from courts do not always have the option to attend in person, she said. Story continues below advertisement 'I have some sympathy for the challenges the courts are dealing with. But I do have some questions about whether the route that they've chosen is really the route that best respects the open court principles,' said Scassa. A small number of court proceedings only take place virtually. To observe these cases, the court says people need to request permission by emailing the court's communications officer — the same contact that media use to request access to virtual proceedings. Scassa said she has questions about how judges will decide who should and shouldn't get access: 'Does everybody get permission? Who gets denied permission? Is there some hierarchy?' The Ontario Court of Justice did not respond to a request for more information about the authorization process before deadline. Avid court observer Jenny Pelland said the court's new policy isn't surprising, as they've witnessed Zoom bombings many times over the past few years, especially in high-profile cases. 'I've seen some where it's been very graphic,' Pelland said in an interview, adding that the disruptions often display violent or pornographic content. Since the observer policy was announced, Pelland said courts have already been applying the rules differently, with some posting notices in the Zoom waiting room that public access is banned and others allowing access but requiring attendees to provide their full legal name or have their camera turned off. Story continues below advertisement Such differences are not novel, with Pelland saying they've noticed limitations on access even in cases when they reached out to a judge or court clerk for permission in advance. 'For some courts in Ottawa, it's been almost impossible to log in for the past few months,' Pelland said. 'Some judges don't allow observers at all and it's not something new.' Alyssa King, associate professor of law at Queen's University, said understaffing is already a concern in Ontario courts, and adding more administrative burden for judges will cause inconsistencies in the way policies are applied across the province. 'It's not because anybody is acting in bad faith or trying to prevent the public from accessing the court,' she said. 'But they are people with a big workload and sometimes very high stress decisions that they need to make quickly … so any time you add to what they have to do administratively, that's tough.' A different process is still followed to allow access to virtual courts for victims and complainants. The court says they should get in touch with their local Crown attorney's office or victim witness assistance program. Jasminder Sekhon, director of community engagement, EDI and policy at Victim Services Toronto, said the court should consider updating its policies on that process to make sure it is more accessible and survivor-informed. Story continues below advertisement 'Not just the victims should be able to apply, but also people should be able to apply on their behalf,' Sekhon said, adding that people who support survivors should also be considered to receive virtual access. For Linda McCurdy, a criminal defence lawyer based in Windsor, Ont., adding an extra step to prevent disruptions is a good way to preserve the integrity of the courts. 'I barely notice people in the court, but you really notice people on Zoom when they're doing stuff,' said McCurdy, adding that people tend to forget about formalities when calling in from their own homes. 'If you want to come and watch the proceedings, come to the court, come sit in the court. That's the way it's always been.'


Vancouver Sun
2 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
Canada condemns Israel over Gaza aid crisis, but CIJA says Hamas to blame
OTTAWA — Prime Minister Mark Carney on Thursday accused the Israeli government of failing to prevent a rapidly deteriorating humanitarian crisis in Gaza and of violating international law by denying aid. In a post on X, Carney said Israel's control of aid distribution must be replaced by 'comprehensive provision' of humanitarian assistance led by international organizations. 'Canada calls on all sides to negotiate an immediate ceasefire in good faith,' he said. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. 'We reiterate our calls for Hamas to immediately release all the hostages, and for the Israeli government to respect the territorial integrity of the West Bank and Gaza.' Israel's parliament on Wednesday approved a symbolic motion to annex the West Bank. Carney said Canada supports a two-state solution, with Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand set to attend a UN conference next week in New York on the issue. Canada condemns the Israeli government's failure to prevent the rapidly deteriorating humanitarian disaster in Gaza. Israel's control of aid distribution must be replaced by comprehensive provision of humanitarian assistance led by international organizations. Many of these are… Israel and the U.S. recalled their negotiating teams from Qatar on Thursday and President Donald Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, said Hamas's latest response to proposals for a deal showed a 'lack of desire' to reach a truce. It's unclear when negotiations will resume. The Centre for Jewish and Israel Affairs (CIJA) said Hamas is not negotiating in good faith. 'We all want to see the hostages returned, the humanitarian situation in Gaza resolved, and a ceasefire agreement reached. Tragically, negotiations collapsed today, with mediators concluding that while Israel agreed, Hamas was acting in bad faith. Despite these developments, Prime Minister Carney condemned Israel and called on 'both sides' to negotiate an immediate ceasefire in good faith. It's obvious that Hamas does not want an agreement. It wants to survive and retain power at any cost,' said the centre's chief executive, Noah Shack, in a statement. CIJA said statements like the one from Carney only help Hamas to retain control in Gaza. 'This is why we see Hamas thanking governments — including Canada's — for statements that embolden it to continue subjecting both Gazans and Israelis to further suffering,' Shack said. 'At the NATO summit last month, Prime Minister Carney was clear: a two-state solution requires the Palestinian leadership to recognize the right of the Jewish nation to live safely in our ancestral homeland.' We all want to see the hostages returned, the humanitarian situation in Gaza resolved, and a ceasefire agreement reached. Tragically, negotiations collapsed today, with mediators concluding that while Israel agreed, Hamas was acting in bad faith. Despite these developments,… Anand said it is 'inexcusable' that women and children in Gaza are without adequate access to food and water. 'The Israeli government must allow the uninhibited flow of humanitarian aid to reach Palestinian civilians, who are in urgent need,' she said on X. Their comments came on the same day French President Emmanuel Macron announced his country would recognize a Palestinian state. Macron said in a post on X that he would formalize the decision at the UN General Assembly in September. 'The urgent thing today is that the war in Gaza stops and the civilian population is saved,' he wrote. France is now the biggest western power to recognize a Palestinian state, and the move could pave the way for other countries to do the same. More than 140 countries recognize a Palestinian state, including more than a dozen in Europe. The Palestinians seek an independent state in the occupied West Bank, annexed east Jerusalem and Gaza, territories Israel occupied in the 1967 Mideast war. Canada was one of more than two dozen countries, including the United Kingdom, Japan and Australia, that issued a joint statement this week calling for an immediate end to the war in Gaza. — The Canadian Press, with files from National Post and The Associated Press Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .