
Louisiana uses nitrogen gas for first time in death row execution
Louisiana has carried out its first execution using nitrogen gas, an experimental method for judicial killings that has only been used by one other death-penalty state.
Jessie Hoffman Jr, 46, was executed at the Louisiana state penitentiary at Angola shortly after 7pm local time on Tuesday evening. He had been convicted of the 1996 rape and murder in New Orleans of Mary Elliott, a 28-year-old advertising executive.
Last-minute appeals for a reprieve failed when the US supreme court declined to take Hoffman's petition. The court had similarly refused to intervene in the earlier nitrogen executions carried out by Alabama.
Five of the six rightwing supreme court justices voted to allow the execution to proceed, with the three liberal-leaning justices saying they would have halted it. The sixth conservative, Neil Gorsuch, said he would have stayed the killing to give time to consider Hoffman's religious objections.
Hoffman's death marks the resumption of capital punishment in Louisiana. The state last carried out an execution 15 years ago.
It also marks the spread of the controversial technique of nitrogen gas as a killing method. Hoffman's lawyers had argued that the procedure, which involves piping pure nitrogen through a gas mask to induce fatal oxygen deprivation, would violate the prisoner's constitutional rights by inflicting cruel and unusual punishment.
The four previous executions carried out using nitrogen in Alabama led to distressing scenes in the death chamber. Eyewitnesses reported that Kenneth Smith shook violently, and writhed and convulsed on the gurney.
Hoffman's lawyers also argued that death by nitrogen hypoxia – forcing the condemned man to breathe only nitrogen – would interfere with his religious practices as a Buddhist. They said that meditative breathing at the time of death was integral to the religion.
Louisiana also faces questions about how it got hold of the nitrogen used in Hoffman's execution. Last year, the Guardian revealed that three of the biggest manufacturers of medical-grade nitrogen in the US had put a block on their products being used in executions.
Airgas, Air Products and Matheson Gas all took steps to prevent their nitrogen from reaching departments of correction in death-penalty states.
Yet photographs put into the public record in ongoing litigation in Louisiana show that the corrections department obtained canisters of nitrogen gas produced by Airgas, in apparent contravention of the company's strict rules. In a statement to the Guardian, Airgas said that it had been in direct contact with the department of corrections to affirm its position.
'Airgas has not and will not supply nitrogen or other inert gases to induce hypoxia for the purpose of human execution,' the company said. 'We have not supplied medical grade NF nitrogen and the facility does not have any such cylinders owned by Airgas, according to our records.'
The statement added: 'The department of corrections in Louisiana has acknowledged our letter prohibiting the use of any nitrogen for execution purposes.'
Before the execution went ahead, the sister-in-law of Hoffman's victim called for him to be pardoned. 'Executing Jessie Hoffman is not justice in my name, it is the opposite,' Kate Murphy wrote.
Earlier on Tuesday Arkansas became the fifth state to adopt nitrogen hypoxia as an execution method, after Louisiana, Alabama, Mississippi and Oklahoma. Arkansas currently has 25 people on its death row.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Metro
11 hours ago
- Metro
Harvey Weinstein found guilty of sexual assault after bombshell retrial
Harvey Weinstein has been found guilty of one charge in his sex crimes retrial, after lengthy proceedings in New York. The disgraced film mogul was initially convicted of a criminal sexual act in the first degree and rape in the third degree, in February 2020. However, his 23-year sentence was overturned last year, sparking a three-week retrial in Manhattan. After a second round of hearings, the 73-year-old was convicted of sexually assaulting Miriam Haley. He was also acquitted of a second charge stemming from sexual assault accusations made by Kaja Sokola, with the jury struggling to reach a unanimous verdict on a third count involving Jessica Mann. According to the Guardian, Judge Curtis Farber encouraged them to continue deliberating in the hopes they can find a verdict. Deadline reports that each count of first-degree criminal sexual act carries a maximum sentence of 25 years. Weinstein's previous conviction for sex crimes in New York was overturned last April by the Court of Appeal, after it was ruled that he didn't receive a fair trial in 2020. In September, he was then indicted on new sexual assault charges – but has denied all accusations against him. Earlier today, Weinstein addressed Judge Farber to plead for a mistrial, but was quickly denied. 'This is my life that's on the line, this is not fair,' the former movie producer said. 'I'm not getting a fair trial.' Although the sentencing hearing has not yet taken place, the conviction will be in addition to a 16-year sentence he is yet to serve in LA. Weinstein has been at the center of rape or sexual misconduct allegations from more than 100 people, with some claims dating back to the 1970s. More Trending The allegations sparked the Me Too movement, which highlighted sexual violence in the film industry, as well as worldwide. He has been behind bars for the last few years, and filed a lawsuit against Rikers Island at the end of 2024, calling out the conditions and services at the prison facility after suffering a number of health problems. In documents obtained by Deadline, his legal team confirmed they were seeking 'no less than $5,000,000', and demanding 'monetary damages arising from negligence, carelessness, recklessness, gross negligence, medical malpractice, intentional and/or reckless and/or negligent deprivation of medical treatment, deprivation of civil and constitutional rights, and negligent and intentional torts' that he claimed have been 'committed by officers, agents, and employees of the New York City Department of Correction'. They also named New York City Health & Hospitals Corporation, Rikers Island Correctional Facility, and New York City Health & Hospitals Corporation/Bellevue.' Got a story? If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you. MORE: Beach Boys co-founder Brian Wilson dies aged 82 MORE: Brooke Shields podcast episode criticising Meghan Markle quietly removed from platforms MORE: Reality TV legend's husband 'deported from US after being detained for 4 months'


The Guardian
13 hours ago
- The Guardian
Defenders of the Amazon: inside the 13 June Guardian Weekly
It's three years since the murders of the journalist Dom Phillips and the Indigenous activist Bruno Pereira, who were both killed on a visit to the remote Javari valley in the Brazilian Amazon. Dom was a Guardian contributor based in Brazil, whose reporting often appeared in the Guardian Weekly. Last week his widow, Alessandra Sampaio, came to visit our London offices along with Beto Marubo, an Indigenous leader from the Brazilian Amazon. From the other side of the world it's easy to feel far removed from the activities of criminal gangs that threaten the Amazon's Indigenous people and plunder its natural resources. But hearing Beto and Alessandra speak so powerfully about the impact of Dom and Bruno's work reminded me why we need to stay focused on a region that defies easy scrutiny. With that in mind, for this week's big story, Tom Phillips (no relation), our Latin America correspondent who worked closely with Dom and Bruno, made a perilous return to the Javari valley to learn how Indigenous defenders are continuing to try to protect their communities and environment. I'd also like to draw your attention to two other projects that continue Dom and Bruno's legacy. First is the Guardian's new audio podcast investigation series Missing in the Amazon, in which Tom for the first time tells the full story of what happened to Dom and Bruno. The second is the book Dom was working on at the time of his death, How to Save the Amazon, which has since been completed by a team including writers and editors at the Guardian. (In this extract, published in the Weekly last month, Dom explains why protecting the Amazon and its people is so important.) Reporting from the Amazon is a costly and dangerous business, but subscribing to the Guardian Weekly magazine is a great way to support our investigative journalism. For more details and to give the Weekly a try, click here. Get the Guardian Weekly delivered to your home address Spotlight | The story of a Gaza mother killed in search of foodA family is reeling from the killing of a woman who walked for hours to an Israeli-backed distribution point with her son and daughter. Malak A Tantesh and Emma Graham-Harrison report Science | How the 'evil twin' of the climate crisis is threatening our oceansIn seas around the world, pH levels are falling. Scientists fear the problem is not being taken seriously enough, as Lisa Bachelor finds at a seawater testing station Interview | Bernie Sanders on Biden, billionaires – and why the Democrats failedThe senator and former Democratic presidential hopeful talks to Zoe Williams about why he and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez are trying to build a new progressive movement Opinion | Want to live to 100? It's not just diet and exercise that will helpEvery time her mind goes down the 'optimisation' route, Devi Sridhar is reminded of her job as a public health scientist, looking into the factors that affect how long we will live Culture | CMAT: pop's gobbiest, gaudiest starThe Irish singer-songwriter is going supernova – and whether opining on trans rights, body shaming or capitalism, she's more forthright than ever, as Alexis Petridis found This evocative picture essay had everything to whet my appetite: decaying buildings beautifully photographed by Oscar Espinosa and a story about the aftermath of the fall of the Soviet Union that took me back to a 1990 trip along the Abkhazian Black Sea coast when the guide proudly named all the sanatoria visible from the boat and which Soviet workers they were designated for. Isobel Montgomery, deputy editor Streaming fraud is a growing concern, undermining fairness and transparency in the creative industry. Technology plays both sides — enabling fraud but also offering tools to fight it. As trust, safety and privacy become more critical in the industry, we must guide it in the right direction, because how we use technology ultimately defines what it becomes. Hyunmu Lee, CRM executive Audio | Inside Australia's mushroom murder trial Video | The Bone Hunter: unearthing the horror of war in Okinawa - documentary Gallery | Pigeons, hats and naps: the best photos from the French Open We'd love to hear your thoughts on the magazine: for submissions to our letters page, please email For anything else, it's Facebook Instagram Get the Guardian Weekly magazine delivered to your home address


BreakingNews.ie
21 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Diesel clothing advert banned for objectifying Katie Price
An ad for clothing brand Diesel featuring the model Katie Price was irresponsible and likely to cause serious offence by objectifying and sexualising women, a watchdog has ruled. The ad, which appeared on the Guardian news website on March 26th, included an image of Price wearing a bikini and holding a handbag in front of her chest. Advertisement The UK Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) received 13 complaints that the ad objectified and sexualised women and featured a model who appeared to be unhealthily thin. The banned Diesel ad featuring Katie Price (ASA/PA) Diesel said the ad was part of a brand campaign called 'The Houseguests', which was designed to challenge stereotypes and support diversity and inclusion in the fashion industry by reflecting a wide range of body types. It believed the ad was compliant with the advertising rules but said it removed the ad from the Guardian website. The brand said Price was 46 years old and had a body type that was not usually included in high fashion campaigns, explaining that the average age for editorial models was between 16 and 23. Advertisement Diesel believed the image was a 'celebration of Ms Price's sexuality and empowerment and was not objectifying, degrading or sexualising', and 'showed Ms Price clearly in control in an active and dynamic pose where she proudly showed off her body and the handbag'. Diesel added that Price was 'well-known for her exaggerated appearance and larger-than-life personality and her large lips and breasts formed part of her curated public image', and this 'exaggerated, eccentric and altered appearance' formed part of the creativity of the campaign. Finally, Diesel said although Price was slender, she had excellent muscle tone and was not unhealthily underweight. The Guardian said it received a complaint directly about the ad on April 4th and blocked it from appearing again because it did not consider it complied with their policies. Advertisement Partly upholding the complaints, the ASA said the bikini only partially covered Price's breasts, and it considered the positioning of the handbag, in front of her stomach with the handle framing her chest, drew viewers' attention to, and emphasised, that part of her body. The ASA said: 'While we acknowledged that Ms Price was shown in a confident and self-assured pose and in control, we considered that because of the positioning of the handbag, which had the effect of emphasising and drawing attention to her breasts, the ad sexualised her in a way that objectified her. 'We therefore considered the ad was likely to cause serious offence, was irresponsible and breached the Code.' The ASA did not uphold complaints about Price appearing to be unhealthily thin, and concluded that the ad was not irresponsible on that basis. Advertisement The watchdog ruled that the ad must not appear again, adding: 'We told Diesel to ensure their future ads were socially responsible and did not cause serious or widespread offence.' Diesel said: 'Diesel's latest Houseguests campaign continues its tradition of challenging norms and embracing individuality. A key image features model Katie Price, 46, showcasing a body type rarely seen in high fashion, proving that women of all shapes and ages deserve representation. The photo celebrates confidence and empowerment without objectification. 'Shared in over 100 countries, it has not received any regulatory complaints, highlighting Diesel's commitment to respectful, inclusive storytelling.'