Peers hike their own overnight allowance by a 21 per cent
Members of the unelected chamber, who Parliament heard 'make great sacrifices', waved through the allowance increase of more than a fifth without a vote.
Changes made to the remittance system last year enabled peers living outside the capital and attending the House of Lords to claim £100 towards the cost of 'hotels, clubs or similar accommodation' on production of receipts.
This was on top of the daily attendance payment that can be claimed of up to £361 and travel expenses.
Changes made by peers include:
The overnight allowance will now swell to £125 – a 21% rise.
A payment will also be made available to contribute towards other London accommodation costs that may be incurred to attend sittings at Westminster, such as for those who rent or own a property that is not their main address. This has been set at £63 or half the overnight allowance after rounding up.
Outlining the proposals in Parliament, Lords leader Baroness Smith of Basildon said the existing overnight rate of £103 'is not a realistic reflection of the cost of hotels across the capital'.
As such the House of Lords Commission, on which she sits, recommended this was increased to £125-a-night.
Lady Smith added: 'As previously, claims are linked to attending the House on a sitting day, and receipts must be provided.'
READ MORE: Scottish Labour by-election candidate flounders after dodging question 11 times
On the proposed flat-rate allowance for alternative accommodation in London, the Cabinet minister said: 'This will again be tied to attendance in the House, with a robust system of verification.
'For members whose main address is outside London, they would be able to claim £63-per-night to spend at a designated property in Greater London where they stay and are responsible for the costs.
'To claim, peers must have stayed in the property the day before or the day after attending the House, and the finance team will require documentation to support the claim.'
'Many people here make great sacrifices'
Her Conservative counterpart Lord True, who when in Government introduced the overnight allowance last year, said: 'It is always difficult to strike a balance, and I think that the commission… has struck a reasonable balance which will support people who come to this House from all over the country, who wish to work hard on behalf of the House and on behalf of the country.'
He (below) added: 'There is a lot of loose talk outside this House about people in this House being lazy and lining their pockets.
'You do not become rich by becoming a member of the House of Lords. Many people here make great sacrifices.
'We should not claim that we are poor or that we are underprivileged, but it is right that the House makes provision to enable those of us who come here to do a hard day's work to enable us to do so in the most reasonable fashion.
'Obviously, there is a duty on us to behave with honesty and clarity, as we all do and will all do, I have no doubt, under these new proposals. I support them.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
19 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Davy Russell: Who is the newly-elected Scottish Labour MSP from the Hamilton by-election?
He was criticised for being invisible during the election campaign - but now he is an MSP in the Scottish Parliament. Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... 'Can you see me now?'. Those were the words of Davy Russell, the newly elected Scottish Labour MSP for Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse. Mr Russell managed to clinch victory in Thursday's by-election with 31.5 per cent of the vote, ahead of the SNP on 29.4 per cent and Reform UK on 26.2 per cent. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad During the campaign, both Scottish Labour and Mr Russell were criticised for being 'invisible' after the party's candidate repeatedly refused to do broadcast interviews and declined invitations to attend televised hustings. Labour candidate Davy Russell wins the by-election and celebrates alongside party leader Anas Sarwar and his deputy Jackie Baillie. | Lisa Ferguson But he will be invisible no more - he is now one of the 23-strong group of Scottish Labour MSPs in Holyrood. Who is Davy Russell? So what do we know about Mr Russell? The 63-year-old grandfather has never stood for election before, with party leader Anas Sarwar branding him a community candidate. Mr Russell lives in Quarter in South Lanarkshire, the small former mining village where he was born and grew up. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad As a child, Mr Russell went to school in Hamilton and went on to gain a civil engineering certificate from Motherwell Technical College. He started off as an apprentice fixing roads, and eventually became a senior manager at Glasgow City Council, looking after roads, transport and waste. Mr Russell is deputy lord lieutenant, making him King Charles III's local representative in South Lanarkshire. He also likes to raise money for charity and is a charity trustee. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Why did Russell win the by-election? Others within the Labour Party say he manages to connect with the voters because he is one of them. In fact, much has been made of his working-class roots during this campaign. Brian Leishman, the Labour MP for nearby Alloa and Grangemouth, congratulated Mr Russell and said: 'What a result for Scottish Labour and a community champion in Davy Russell. 'People want change and believe Scottish Labour can provide it next May. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Credit to Davy for being dignified in a horrible classist campaign from some opponents. He's a credit to the working class.' Mr Sarwar added: 'In Davy Russell we had a candidate and now an MSP who cares about his community and understands his community and is a champion for his community.
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Starmer: Scots 'voted for change' in Hamilton by-election
The by-election was triggered following the death of SNP MSP Christina McKelvie, who had held the seat since 2011. Mr Russell overturned a significant SNP majority, winning with 8,559 votes, just over than 600 votes more than the SNP on 7,957. Reform UK placed third place with 7,088 votes, while the Conservative result plummeted to 1,621. Posting on social media on Friday morning, Sir Keir said: 'People in Scotland have once again voted for change. 'Next year there is a chance to turbo-charge delivery by putting Labour in power on both sides of the border. 'I look forward to working with you.' Read more: Disdain for Davy Russell comes back to bite political elites Labour wins Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election breakdown in full Labour's candidate, who is the deputy lord lieutenant of Lanarkshire, beat the SNP's Katy Loudon – who fell to her third defeat since 2023. he win comes against the backdrop of national polls which place Scottish Labour in third place behind the SNP and Reform UK – and will undoubtedly give a boost to Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar's bid to become first minister in next year's election. Mr Sarwar told BBC Radio Scotland's Good Morning Scotland programme he is confident Labour can win that contest. Congratulations to @DavyRussell4HLS and the team on a fantastic victory. People in Scotland have once again voted for change. Next year there is a chance to turbo charge delivery by putting Labour in power on both sides of the border. I look forward to working with you. — Keir Starmer (@Keir_Starmer) June 6, 2025 When asked if his party can defeat the SNP, which has been in power in Scotland since 2007, Mr Sarwar declared: 'Absolutely. I believed it before this by-election and I continue to believe it now. 'Next year the choice is simple – a third decade of the SNP with John Swinney as first minister or a new direction for Scotland with me as first minister. 'That is the choice facing the people of Scotland, that is the campaign over the next year, and that is a campaign I am confident we can win. 'I think what the people of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse did yesterday was lead the way to that change of government next year and a Scottish Labour government next year.' He also said he will 'continue to challenge the poison of Reform', making clear he is 'talking about the people who lead Reform' and not those who 'may be tempted' to vote for them. Read more: How The Herald is covering crucial Hamilton by-election Find all articles on the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election Much of the by-election campaign had been dominated by Reform's advert – branded racist by Labour and other political opponents – which had alleged Mr Sarwar would 'prioritise' the Pakistani community, something he did not say. A surge in support for Nigel Farage's party saw it come in third place in Hamilton, just 800 votes behind the SNP – although there had been speculation Reform could come second or possibly even win the seat. Reform UK deputy leader Richard Tice insisted the party is 'delighted' with the result. But Mr Russell used his victory speech to suggest the community had rejected the 'poison' of Reform. He said: 'This community has sent a message to Farage and his mob tonight. The poison of Reform isn't us – it isn't Scotland and we don't want your division here.' Mr Swinney said Ms Loudon had 'fought a superb SNP campaign' and that he was 'clearly disappointed' his party was unable to win. 'Labour won by an absolute landslide in this area less than a year ago – we came much closer tonight, but the people of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse have made clear that we still have work to do,' he added. 'Over the next few days, we will take time to consider the result fully.'
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Labour support for assisted dying law falls as more MPs switch position to oppose change over coercion fears and effect on vulnerable people
Labour support for legalising assisted dying appears to be falling as more MPs publicly question the law change. The Commons will next week debate changes to the plan to allow terminally ill people with less than six months to live to end their own lives, ahead of a crunch vote later this month. But fresh concerns have been raised about the The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill that is being led through Parliament by backbencher Kim Leadbeater. Opponents have complained the Bill does not have enough protections and has been rushed through, with the criticism coming days after two royal medical colleges voiced their doubts on the legislation in its current form. And now even supporters of the principle of legalising assisted dying are questioning the process. Labour MP Markus Campbell-Savours, who voted for the bill in a preliminary vote last year, told the BBC he now planned to vote against it because in its current form it crossed his 'red lines for protecting the vulnerable'. 'I want to see safeguards that will ensure that assisted dying is not overextended to include those in situations where there are alternative ways to improve the quality of their lives,' said Campbell-Savours. 'I would also be very concerned if legislation produced a situation where people who considered themselves a burden on their families and friends felt pressured to end their life.' The Commons will next week debate changes to the law allowing terminally ill people with less than six months to live to end their own lives, ahead of a crunch vote later this month. And fellow Labour MP Josh Fenton-Glynn told the broadcaster he will vote against the bill, having abstained last year. 'We see quite a few of the amendments which are specifically aimed at stopping coercion being opposed by the supporters of the bill,' he said. 'I don't think chances to make the bill safer have been taken.' At the end of November last year, the Commons backed the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill by 330 votes to 275, a majority of 55 votes. But campaigners believe enough have changed their mind to put its chances of becoming law onto a knife-edge. The proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death. This would be subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. The terminally ill person would take an approved substance, provided by a doctor but administered only by the person themselves. The implementation period has been doubled to a maximum of four years from royal assent, rather than the initially suggested two years. If the Bill was to pass later this year that would mean it might not be until 2029, potentially coinciding with the end of this Government's parliament, that assisted dying was being offered. A Government impact assessment published last month estimated that between 164 and 647 assisted deaths could potentially take place in the first year of the service, rising to between 1,042 and 4,559 in year 10. The establishment of a Voluntary Assisted Dying Commissioner and three-member expert panels would cost an estimated average of between £10.9 million to £13.6 million per year, the document said. It had 'not been possible' to estimate the overall implementation costs at this stage of the process, it added. While noting that cutting end-of-life care costs 'is not stated as an objective of the policy', the assessment estimated that such costs could be reduced by as much as an estimated £10 million in the first year and almost £60 million after 10 years.
