Throwback Thursday: Remembering the Embarcadero Freeway
Long gone are the days where residents are advocating for freeway expansions — or giant concrete structures blocking prime waterfront views for that matter.
Yes, but: Back in the postwar era, such developments were all the rage thanks to urban planners like Robert Moses who championed the car as a symbol of modernity and progress.
Flashback: Construction for what was then called California State Route 480 began in 1953, with the first leg of the project connecting drivers to North Beach and Chinatown opening in 1959.
The goal was to connect the Bay and Golden Gate bridges and ultimately create a network of crisscrossing freeways across the city.
Friction point: The movement to stop its completion gained momentum with "The Freeway Revolt" in the early 1960s, led by local environmental and civic activists like Sue Bierman who galvanized throngs of angry San Franciscans to protest new freeway construction.
The other side: Business and community leaders in North Beach and Chinatown like activist Rose Pak, fiercely advocated for keeping the highway because it was seen as crucial to maintaining their local economies.
Her efforts proved victorious when voters rejected demolition proposals in 1986.
The intrigue: It wasn't until 1989 when the Loma Prieta Earthquake caused significant damage to the freeway that calls to tear it down would yield success.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
17-05-2025
- San Francisco Chronicle
Downtown S.F. rush hour traffic at pre-pandemic levels despite tepid return to office
San Francisco may be a transit-first city, but driving is the main way to get downtown, according to a new study by the County Transportation Authority. The primacy of automobiles was among several sobering findings in the Downtown Travel Study published this week, which was first reported by the Frisc. Focusing on the period between 2019 and 2023 that includes the COVID-19 lockdowns and nascent economic recovery, the study provides a window into how travel patterns are evolving — and how much people love their cars. While downtown trips declined 69% overall, with more people working remotely and fewer leaving their homes to shop or eat out, the share made by private automobiles grew from 24% to 37%. Walking and biking are still preferred modes for people zipping through the city, but by a narrowing margin. In 2019, pedestrians and cyclists made 43.4% of weekday trips to, from or within San Francisco's metropolitan center — which in the study extends from the waterfront to Van Ness Avenue on the north side, 11th Street in SoMa and 17th Street in the Mission and Dogpatch neighborhoods. By 2023, the share of trips made by foot or bike had dropped to just under 40%. At the same time, traffic has rebounded to pre-pandemic levels during evening rush hour, even as the return to offices has stagnated. Despite fervent efforts to lure workers back, workplace attendance at the end of 2024 was about 45% of what it had been prior to COVID, the study said. It attributed much of the current freeway congestion to workers driving from the East Bay to the Peninsula or South Bay. For a city and region where political leaders have long tried to wean people off cars, the results of the study may seem dispiriting. But the key points did not surprise Supervisor Myrna Melgar, who chairs the San Francisco County Transportation Authority. 'I'm grateful that the TA did this, and that it gave us a temperature check on where we're at,' Melgar told the Chronicle, noting that the data helped corroborate San Franciscans' day-to-day observations. Anyone who is out on the roads experiences the misery of downtown traffic and knows it is getting worse, she said. Melgar also views the study as a potential roadmap for city and regional policy. It shows the need, she said, to create incentives for people to walk, bike or take the bus. 'I'm afraid that the increasing traffic situation is going to deter people from coming to work in person, or going out after work with their friends, because they know that getting back in the car is going to suck,' she said.
San Francisco Chronicle
25-04-2025
- San Francisco Chronicle
S.F. unveils first curbside chargers for electric vehicles
As San Francisco residents convert to electric vehicles en masse, city officials want to make it easy to charge them – not just in a home garage or parking structure, but on a public street. With that goal in mind, leaders of three city departments will on Friday unveil the first of what could be numerous curbside chargers. Through a partnership with the Brooklyn startup its electric, the city installed two power supply devices at 55 Fillmore St. near Duboce Triangle, right outside the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Building. Mayor Daniel Lurie praised the new infrastructure for providing ease and convenience to drivers of electric vehicles, 'a critical step towards achieving our climate goals.' Those goals are daunting. By 2030, the city aims to increase electrification to 25% of all new registered vehicles. To get there, staff at the Municipal Transportation Agency, Environment Department and Public Works would need to put 1,760 chargers in public lots, streets and garages. Widespread, accessible charging helps lower the barrier and reduce 'the complexity' of EV ownership, said Tiya Gordon, chief operating officer of its electric. She and others envision a future in which San Franciscans plug in just about anywhere, and will no longer need to run an extension cable down a driveway. Supervisor Rafael Mandelman, whose district includes Duboce Triangle, said he's worked with the three departments 'to identify what it will take to scale up' to hit the 2030 mandate. So far, the results are promising. A third of cars sold in San Francisco over the past two years were EVs, and the city now has 1,152 publicly accessible charging ports, with 608 to go.
Axios
28-03-2025
- Axios
Throwback Thursday: Remembering the Embarcadero Freeway
Long gone are the days where residents are advocating for freeway expansions — or giant concrete structures blocking prime waterfront views for that matter. Yes, but: Back in the postwar era, such developments were all the rage thanks to urban planners like Robert Moses who championed the car as a symbol of modernity and progress. Flashback: Construction for what was then called California State Route 480 began in 1953, with the first leg of the project connecting drivers to North Beach and Chinatown opening in 1959. The goal was to connect the Bay and Golden Gate bridges and ultimately create a network of crisscrossing freeways across the city. Friction point: The movement to stop its completion gained momentum with "The Freeway Revolt" in the early 1960s, led by local environmental and civic activists like Sue Bierman who galvanized throngs of angry San Franciscans to protest new freeway construction. The other side: Business and community leaders in North Beach and Chinatown like activist Rose Pak, fiercely advocated for keeping the highway because it was seen as crucial to maintaining their local economies. Her efforts proved victorious when voters rejected demolition proposals in 1986. The intrigue: It wasn't until 1989 when the Loma Prieta Earthquake caused significant damage to the freeway that calls to tear it down would yield success.
