Ukraine appoints new prime minister in biggest wartime overhaul
Yulia Svyrydenko, 39, has been tasked by President Volodymyr Zelenskiy with boosting domestic weapons production and reviving Ukraine's loan-dependent economy.
In a speech to parliament, Zelenskiy said he expected his new government to increase the share of domestic weapons on Ukraine's battlefield to 50% from 40% within six months.
He also singled out deregulation and expanding economic co-operation with allies as other key aims of the biggest government reshuffle since Russia's February 2022 invasion.
Svyrydenko, an experienced technocrat who had served as first deputy prime minister since 2021, pledged to move "swiftly and decisively".
"War leaves no room for delay," she wrote on X.
"Our priorities for the first six months are clear: reliable supply for the army, expansion of domestic weapons production, and boosting the technological strength of our defense forces."
Svyrydenko is also well known to the Trump administration, having negotiated a deal giving the U.S. preferential access to Ukraine's mineral wealth. It was considered crucial to bolstering relations between Kyiv and Washington.
Addressing lawmakers on Thursday, Zelenskiy said further deals with the U.S. would be forthcoming but did not offer any specific details.
Parliament is also expected to appoint the outgoing prime minister, Denys Shmyhal, as defence minister after his nomination by Zelenskiy earlier this week.
Svyrydenko takes over the government as Russian forces press a grinding offensive across the sprawling, more than 1,000-km (621 mile) front line and intensify air strikes on Ukrainian cities.
Ukraine is betting on a budding defence industry, fuelled in part by foreign investment, to fend off Russia's bigger and better-armed war machine.
With state revenues going to defence, Kyiv will also need to find money to finance its ballooning budget deficit as foreign aid diminishes. Officials have said they could face a shortfall of about $19 billion next year.
Svyrydenko said her government would launch a full audit of public finances to achieve "real savings", as well as accelerate large-scale privatisations and help entrepreneurs.
She received 262 votes, a comfortable majority in the 450-seat parliament, according to several lawmakers reporting from inside the chamber. Ukraine's parliament does not broadcast its sessions in wartime.
The ministries of the economy, justice, energy and European integration will also receive new leaders. However, few are political outsiders.
Some opposition lawmakers voiced scepticism about the new government's ability to remain independent of Zelenskiy's administration, which wields significant wartime powers under Ukraine's constitution.
"They will be told by the president's office what they should really do," wrote Yaroslav Zheleznyak of the Holos party.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
11 minutes ago
- Reuters
Morning Bid: Buy the dip, we can worry about jobs later
Aug 4 (Reuters) - A look at the day ahead in European and global markets from Wayne Cole. It's been a case of buy the dip so far on Monday as U.S. and European stock futures edge up, along with the dollar. The Nikkei suffered a delayed reaction to Friday's Wall Street rout and a jump in the yen, but the rest of Asia fared better. Early trade saw Fed fund futures price in 65 bps of interest rate cuts by December, but that's back to 60 bps now. That's still a world away from the 33 bps seen before Friday's weak U.S. payrolls report, and September is still 83% for an easing. In fact, the 25 bps drop in two-year yields on Friday was essentially the market doing a Fed rate cut for them, given how borrowing costs in the States are tied to yields not the funds rate. Ten-year yields also fell a steep 14 bps but met resistance around 4.20%, a level they have repeatedly struggled to break under since October last year. Longer term, downward revisions to payrolls have seriously challenged the U.S. claim to economic out-performance and the dollar's crown of exceptionalism. The latter was also tarnished by President Trump firing the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, an institution with an invaluable reputation for scrupulous honesty that won the trust of investors worldwide. Or, at least, it used to be. Now, Trump says he will chose a new head for the BLS in the next few days. Will it be an independent-minded statistician dedicated to providing credible data, or a Trump loyalist eager to please their master? U.S. assets enjoy a trust premium that will be really hard to maintain as Trump bends all levels of government to his will. Trump also just floated the idea of using some of the windfall from tariffs to pay "dividends" to a lucky group of Americans chosen by him - no doubt with special cheques bearing a "TRUMP" logo. So you slap taxes on everyone that buys imports, whether they have a choice or not, and then use part of the revenue to pay money to those you favour, in your name rather than the government that's actually doing the work. Talking of tariffs, a U.S. appeals court late last week heard arguments on the legality of Trump's "reciprocal" levies and sounded inclined to support the original ruling that the tariffs were illegal. Such a ruling would likely still go to the Supreme Court, which has tended to favour unbridled presidential power. Yet, should the tariffs be found illegal, not only would all the trade deals agreed or underway be null and void, but the Treasury would have to refund all the money collected. Wouldn't that be fun... Key developments that could influence markets on Monday: Trying to keep up with the latest tariff news? Our new daily news digest offers a rundown of the top market-moving headlines impacting global trade. Sign up for Tariff Watch here.
Reuters
11 minutes ago
- Reuters
BP to update on cost-cutting progress as Elliot increases pressure, FT reports
Aug 4 (Reuters) - BP (BP.L), opens new tab will announce updates on its $5 billion cost-cutting initiative on Tuesday, amid growing pressure from activist investor Elliott Management to take stronger action to reduce its operating expenses, the Financial Times reported on Monday. Elliott wants BP CEO Murray Auchincloss to add another $5 billion of cost savings to the $4 billion-$5 billion in reductions by 2027 he announced in February from a 2023 baseline, the FT report said. Reuters could not immediately verify the report. BP and Elliott did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The hedge fund has "identified tens of thousands of BP support staff globally" as an example of the cost base, the report added. BP has already cut $750 million of costs towards its target in 2024, and is looking to reach its cost savings target through job cuts, divestment and streamlining supply chains, the FT report said. Reuters reported in April that the activist investor would like BP to cut its spending to around $12 billion a year, down from a current range of $13 billion-$15 billion, through to 2027, and deepen its cost cuts, especially on administrative expenses. Elliott, which holds a stake of little more than 5% in BP, also wants the oil major to replace its strategy chief and create separate units for upstream and downstream activities to improve accountability.
The Guardian
41 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Choir that drowned out Germany's AfD leader happy to ‘bend the ear' of country
It was while Alice Weidel was being interviewed on the terrace of a parliament building overlooking the River Spree in Berlin that members of the Corner Chor's mobile phones began to ping with alerts as their song in protest at her far-right party, Scheiß AfD Jodler (Shit AfD Yodellers), blasted out from a 100,000-watt sound system on the other bank. 'We were hugely surprised and truly happy to hear at that moment that our song was receiving such a public airing,' one choir member told the Guardian. The choir had not known of the carefully orchestrated plans by the Centre for Political Beauty (ZPS) – an association of action artists led by the philosopher Philipp Ruch – to use their song to disrupt the so-called summer interview, a regular annual TV fixture in which leaders of the main political parties are questioned in turn, typically in a relaxed setting. Neither had the authorities, nor the public broadcaster ARD. And disrupt it certainly did. The sweet-sounding 19th-century Styrian Christmas yodel, which Corner Chor had rewritten as a three-voice protest song against the far right, managed to drown out much of the hour-long exchange, prompting Weidel to lean into the interviewer Markus Preiß and tell him: 'I have problems understanding you against this noise.' She insisted on continuing with the interview, however, at the same time as accusing the choir of being state-funded, an erroneous slur increasingly used by the party to attack its opponents. The party's leaders later said they had been victimised and insisted on a rerun, which the broadcaster has so far refused to entertain. Ruch called the action less of a disruption and 'more of an embellishment'. The state had classified the AfD as rightwing extremists earlier this year, he said in an interview. He added ''[ARD] should have figured out for themselves that this in itself was an indecent idea.' Corner Chor, from the southern city of Augsburg, has been quietly making a name for itself as an activist choir, part of a growing trend in Germany. Established six years ago as a musical education project, it appears everywhere from street corners to festivals, performing its songs and mantras in myriad settings from river swims to squats, to underground passageways. Its topics, alongside anti-fascist activities, include campaigning for free sanitary products or against extortionate rents and the gender pay gap. It is a 15-strong collective of self-described feminist Flinta-friendly singers (a German acronym standing for women, lesbians, inter, non-binary, trans and agender people). The singers emphasise they are not just interested in political protest, also singing everything 'from sea shanties to Mozart'. However, the broadcast of their yodel has taken the collective into a new realm as well as heightening their sense of social responsibility, four members told the Guardian in a recent interview over Zoom, for which they did not want to be individually identified, citing their wish to be viewed as a collective voice, as well as fears for their safety. 'We simply wanted to expose the AfD's content in a non-aggressive way, through this very uncomplicated, mantra-like song, which has something very contemplative about it because it's usually sung at Christmas and allows us to express exactly what we wanted to say, as clearly as possible,' a second singer said. The song was inspired by a notorious 2023 meeting of neo-Nazis and other extremists that party members had taken part in, where the mass deportation of foreigners was a central topic, and which sparked a wave of nationwide protest. The singers, who come from all walks of life, admitted to being a little shocked by the resonance their song had enjoyed since going viral at the Weidel broadcast, having reached No 6 in the iTunes Germany charts. It received 60,000 plays on Spotify, drew thousands of new followers on their Instagram account and an innumerable number of downloads from SoundCloud of a Scheiß AfD ringtone. The choir has also attracted donations for forthcoming projects. The song has already been widely remixed by other musicians, picked up by choirs around the country and become a regular feature at demonstrations, including recent Pride marches, with many citing the 'earworm' quality of what the Corner Chor describes as '15 seconds of music against rightwing extremism'. Yet the reception has not been entirely positive. The choir, which describes itself and its weekly rehearsals as a 'safe space', has received threats and offensive posts on social media. Its critics have accused it of trying to silence the fifth of German voters who support the AfD, the largest opposition party in the Bundestag. 'We must ask ourselves: who exactly are we giving a platform to? And how loud are they allowed to be?' a third member said. 'Attempts to label us as a bunch of hysterical women are ill advised. We are humorously disruptive, peaceful protesters … We had not intended to bend the ear of the whole country but we're happy we've done so. People are speaking about this way beyond the event itself, about the AfD.'
