
C1M Biomarker May Predict Joint Damage in Early Arthritis
Higher baseline serum levels of C1M, a biochemical marker of type I collagen degradation, were associated with higher odds of progression of total joint damage in patients with early arthritis at 1 and 5 years; however, the C2M marker showed no association with progression.
METHODOLOGY:
Researchers investigated the association between baseline serum C1M and C2M levels and the radiographic progression of joint damage in a cohort of patients with early undifferentiated inflammatory arthritis and recently developed rheumatoid arthritis (the ESPOIR cohort).
They included 813 patients (mean age, 48.1 years; 76% women) having two or more swollen joints, with the swelling lasting more than 6 weeks but less than 6 months, and no previous use of disease-modifying drugs or steroids.
Radiographs of the hands, wrists, and feet were obtained and scored according to the van der Heijde-modified Sharp score (mSS), assessing erosion, joint space narrowing, and total radiographic scores for each patient; serum C1M and C2M levels were assessed using biochemical assays.
Radiographic progression was defined as an increase from baseline in the mSS score of at least 1 point at 1 year and of at least 5 points at 5 years.
TAKEAWAY:
Baseline serum levels of C1M were 42% higher in patients who had progression of total joint damage at 1 year than in those without progression (median, 68 ng/mL vs 48 ng/mL; P < .0001).
Patients with baseline serum levels of C1M in the highest quartile had increased odds of progression of total joint damage (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.12; P = .03) and bone erosion (aOR, 3.80; P = .005) after adjusting for the Disease Activity Score-28, C-reactive protein levels, and anti-citrullinated protein antibody positivity.
Median baseline serum levels of C1M were 33% higher in patients with progression of total joint damage at 5 years than in those without progression (P = .0037); each ng/mL increase in baseline serum levels of C1M was associated with an increased risk for progression after adjusting for age, sex, and BMI (P = .016).
No significant associations were found between baseline serum levels of C2M and radiologic progression at either 1 or 5 years.
IN PRACTICE:
"[The] biological marker [C1M] may be combined with other biomarkers of disease activity to improve the identification of patients with early arthritis at high risk for progression," the authors wrote.
SOURCE:
This study was led by Patrick Garnero of Inserm, Lyon, France. It was published online on July 10, 2025, in RMD Open.
LIMITATIONS:
At 5 years, radiologic data were available for only 60% of patients, limiting the robustness of the findings. Relationships of C1M and C2M levels with clinical progression were not analysed using the Disease Activity Score-28. Additionally, the effect of treatment groups during follow-up was not considered.
DISCLOSURES:
This study received an unrestricted grant from Merck Sharp and Dohme, with additional support from Inserm to support part of the biological database. The ESPOIR cohort study was supported by the French Society of Rheumatology, Pfizer, Abbvie, Lilly, Fresenius, and Biogen. One author disclosed being an employee of and owning stocks in Nordic Biosciences.
This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
French left urges Macron to act over US plan to destroy contraceptives
France's left-wing politicians on Saturday called on President Emmanuel Macron to intervene over US plans to destroy nearly $10 million worth of female contraceptives in Europe, calling it an "affront" to public health. A State Department spokesperson told AFP this week that "a preliminary decision was made to destroy certain" birth control products from "terminated Biden-era USAID contracts." The US Agency for International Development, the country's foreign aid arm, was dismantled by Donald Trump's administration when he returned to office in January, replacing former president Joe Biden. Under the plan, some $9.7 million worth of implant and IUD contraceptives stored in Belgium are reportedly set to be incinerated in France. An open letter signed by French Green leader Marine Tondelier and several female lawmakers called the US decision "an affront to the fundamental principles of solidarity, public health and sexual and reproductive rights that France is committed to defending." In the letter, they urged the French president "not to be complicit, even indirectly, in retrograde policies," saying women's contraception products such as IUDs and implants were intended for "low- and middle-income countries." "Cutting aid for contraception is shameful, destroying products that have already been manufactured and financed is even more mind-boggling," Tondelier told AFP. The Greens urged Macron to request the suspension of the plan "as part of a joint initiative with the European Commission." They also called on him to back humanitarian organisations that say they are ready to redistribute the contraception products. Separately, Mathilde Panot, parliamentary leader of the hard left France Unbowed (LFI) party, also urged Macron and Prime Minister Francois Bayrou to take action. "You have a responsibility to act to prevent this destruction, which will cost lives," she said on X. "These resources are vital, particularly for the 218 million women who do not have access to contraceptive care." The US plan has sparked outrage from global health NGOs, with Doctors Without Borders denouncing the "callous waste." "It is unconscionable to think of these health products being burned when the demand for them globally is so great," said Rachel Milkovich of the medical charity's US office. The State Department spokesperson said the destruction will cost $167,000 and "no HIV medications or condoms are being destroyed." Doctors Without Borders says that other organisations have offered to cover the shipping and distribution costs of the supplies, but the US government declined to sign off. US lawmakers have approved slashing some $9 billion in aid primarily destined for foreign countries. sde-ama-as/ach


Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Scientists discover less invasive way to collect babies' stem cells
Researchers have come up with a less invasive way to collect amniotic stem cells — a development they say could reduce dangers for pregnant women and other pregnant individuals as well as fetuses and help researchers grow cells that can help children born with congenital conditions. Scientists use amniotic stem cells to treat congenital anomalies such as spina bifida and heart defects.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Hot vs cold: which is better for muscle recovery? New study says this is the answer
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. We're hardly short on ways to boost muscle recovery, whether it's pummeling ourselves with the best massage guns or paying a visit to the local physiotherapist. But a debate has been simmering in the background about hot and cold therapy, and it's this: is heat or ice better for muscle recovery? Or both? Growing up, I've always been taught to apply ice to swollen ankles or sore muscles post-workout, but then the rise of heat therapy came along, and suddenly, you're either jumping into an ice bath, braving an infrared sauna, or flipping between the two in something called 'Contrast Water Therapy.' Now, a study says this is the real answer. Here's what it shows. What is the study? A study published in the Journal of Physiology looked at the effects of hot water and cold water therapy on muscle recovery in 34 participants. They found evidence to suggest that hot water immersion therapy significantly improved recovery compared to cold water. They found evidence to suggest that hot water immersion therapy significantly improved recovery compared to cold water. Researchers simulated a muscle injury in a lab setting, then used several modalities to see which would offer the most improvement. Participants were offered three recovery methods: cold (15 minutes at 12 degrees Celsius / 53.6 Fahrenheit), hot (60 minutes at 42 degrees Celsius / 107.6 Fahrenheit) and room temperature (30 minutes at 12 degrees Celsius / 53.6 Fahrenheit), all performed daily for 10 days. Recovery was monitored using inflammation markers, muscle biopsies and performance testing. While strength improvements were similar in each setting, hot water showed to reduce perceived muscle pain and improve muscle damage markers; cold water didn't improve perceived muscle pain or reduce markers of damage. In short, the experiment found that hot water immersion could be more beneficial than cold water and room temperature immersion recovery methods for muscle regeneration and injury. Benefits of cold water immersion Whether it's wild swimming, cryotherapy, or ice plunges, subjecting the body to temperatures below 15 degrees Celsius (59 degrees Fahrenheit) has been thought to have multiple benefits for the body, including boosting mood and focus and enhancing recovery. One study published in Biology reported participants felt more alert and attentive and less nervous or distressed after cold water bathing. The American Heart Association (AHA) warns of some risks associated with cold water immersion, and the data surrounding the practice is limited, so always exercise this form of recovery with caution and seek medical advice if you're unsure. Benefits of hot water immersion There are many types of heat therapy, such as infrared saunas, traditional saunas, steam rooms and heat packs. However, it's hot water immersion — think hot tubs or similar — that could be the most effective. A study found that soaking in a hot tub, or soaking in hot water in general, could boost blood flow, immune response and cardiovascular health compared with traditional or infrared saunas when assessing heat methods. This could be in part because the immersion method helps raise core body temperature more effectively, which could be a key stimulus for the responses the study found. Then, there's contrast therapy, or hot and cold therapy (as it's also known). This involves switching between both methods in the same recovery session, allowing you to benefit from the energizing and mood-boosting benefits of cold water, followed by the soothing and relaxing benefits of heat. Here's a little evidence to support the method: a study published in PLoS One found that contrast therapy outperformed passive recovery or rest in reducing muscle pain after workouts in athletes. The next time you're faced with the decision: Hot or cold? Now you know which way to swing. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button. More from Tom's Guide Forget running and swimming — study finds this sport adds 10 years to your life Forget running — new study shows this exercise can burn body fat as much as cardio Forget 10,000 steps — study reveals the real number of minimum daily steps you should take, according to your age