UK council wins bid to move asylum seekers from hotel amid anti-immigration protests
Anti-immigration protesters and pro-immigration groups have gathered outside the hotel since an Ethiopian asylum seeker was charged in July with sexual assault and other offences. He has denied the charges and is due to stand trial next week. Judge Stephen Eyre granted the council an interim injunction against the owner of the hotel, ruling that asylum seekers should be removed by September 12. The hotel's owner said it would seek to appeal the ruling.
Eyre also dismissed a last-minute attempt on Tuesday by the Home Office, Britain's interior ministry, to intervene in the case in support of the hotel owner. The Home Office's lawyer, Edward Brown, had argued the injunction would have a "substantial impact" on the government's ability to comply with its legal duty to provide accommodation, describing the hotel as "a key part of national asylum accommodation infrastructure." Border Security Minister Angela Eagle said in a statement: "We will continue working with local authorities and communities to address legitimate concerns. Our work continues to close all asylum hotels by the end of this Parliament (2029)." Hundreds of people have protested outside the Bell Hotel since two asylum seekers were charged over separate incidents, with 16 people also having been charged in relation to what Essex Police described as criminal disorder in Epping. Care4Calais, a charity supporting asylum seekers and refugees, said some residents have felt frightened and frustrated after being threatened, chased, and had objects thrown at them since the protests in Epping began. Local police have been on high alert after nationwide rioting last summer, when racist unrest involving far-right supporters broke out after misinformation that the murderer of three girls in Southport was a radical Islamist migrant.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer has pledged to stop thousands of migrants arriving in Britain via small boats, but his government is struggling to do so and faces mounting pressure to show voters he can counter illegal immigration, with support rising for Nigel Farage's right-wing Reform UK party.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
a minute ago
- The Hindu
T.N. Governor, CM pay tributes to freedom fighter Ondiveeran
Tamil Nadu Governor R.N. Ravi and Chief Minister M.K. Stalin on Wednesday paid tributes to freedom fighter Ondiveeran on his death anniversary. In a post on X, Mr. Ravi said Ondiveeran, the fearless commander, visionary leader, and valiant freedom fighter, made the supreme sacrifice fighting the tyrannical British. 'His unmatched courage and sacrifice inspired the nation's long struggle for freedom. His enduring legacy continues to guide us in building a resilient and self-reliant Viksit Bharat 2047,' he said. Mr. Stalin, in a post on X, said by refusing to pay paddy as tax to the British, Ondiveeran, a brave warrior, challenged foreign domination. On this day, let us take a pledge to spread across India the heroic history of valiant warriors of southern Tamil Nadu — Pulithevan and Ondiveeran — who waged battles against the British even a century before the Sepoy Mutiny, he added.
Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Why ‘Normal People' author Sally Rooney could face arrest in Britain?
Sally Rooney, the Irish novelist whose bestselling works Normal People and Conversations with Friends turned her into a literary star, is at the center of a growing controversy in Britain. After pledging to donate her book royalties to Palestine Action, which is a group the UK government recently designated as a terrorist organisation, Rooney now faces the possibility of arrest under Britain's sweeping counterterrorism laws. The episode has raises concerns over the reach of anti-terror legislation, the boundaries of free speech, and the risks cultural figures, who openly support a political causes, face. 'The ramifications for cultural and intellectual life in the UK will be profound,' Rooney wrote in The Irish Times, adding: 'I would happily publish this statement in a UK newspaper – but that would now be illegal.' In her essay, Rooney defended Palestine Action, which stages disruptive protests against Britain's arms industry. She compared its tactics to earlier movements of civil disobedience. 'Activists who disrupt the flow of weapons to a genocidal regime may violate petty criminal statutes, but they uphold a far greater law and a more profound human imperative: to protect a people and culture from annihilation,' she wrote. Rooney pledged to redirect all proceeds from her books and adaptations: 'I want to be clear that I intend to use these proceeds of my work, as well as my public platform generally, to go on supporting Palestine Action and direct action against genocide in whatever way I can.' Palestine Action was banned by the British government in July after activists broke into an RAF base in Oxfordshire and vandalised aircraft. Under the Terrorism Act 2000, providing funds to, or publicly endorsing, a proscribed group is a criminal offence. Legal experts warn that Rooney could face arrest if she entered Britain or even voiced her views at a UK literary festival. Rooney herself acknowledged this: 'If this makes me a 'supporter of terror' under UK law, so be it.' Downing Street reiterated that 'support for a proscribed organisation is an offence under the Terrorism Act,' while noting the difference between legitimate protest and unlawful endorsement. Since the ban, more than 700 people have been arrested, including many at a peaceful protest in Parliament Square earlier this month. The United Nations Human Rights Office has criticised the British government's decision, warning that it risks misusing counterterrorism law. 'The U K Government's decision to label 'Palestine Action' a terrorist group raises serious concerns that counter-terrorism legislation is being applied to a group that is not terrorist in nature and risks hindering the legitimate exercise of fundamental freedoms,' the statement said. 'The decision could lead to a further chilling effect on the lawful exercise of these rights by many people.'
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Himachal Pradesh Assemblys historic Council Chamber completes 100 years
Shimla (Himachal Pradesh) [India], August 20 (ANI): The Himachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly's historic Council Chamber on Wednesday completed 100 years since its establishment, with Speaker Kuldeep Singh Pathania describing it as a 'living witness to the history of democracy" where decisions taken have given 'a new direction" to India's politics and on the occasion, Pathania said the chamber has been a silent spectator to many historic events from the British era to the present day. 'This building is not merely a structure of stone, but an integral part of India's democratic journey. Democratic values were established here, which gave a new direction to society," he said while speaking with the of the building began in 1920 and was completed on August 20, 1925. At the time, the Government of India Act, 1919, had come into effect, under which the British Indian Government comprised 145 members – 104 elected and the rest nominated. The summer sessions of the Legislative Assembly were held in Shimla during that was in this chamber that Vitthalbhai Patel was elected the first Indian President (then referred to as the 'President" of the Council) and where the proposal to grant women the right to vote was noted that the Speaker's chair he occupies today once bore the symbol of the Crown during the British Raj. 'After Independence, the national emblem of the Ashoka Pillar was placed there," he said, adding that the chamber stands as a symbol of India's political evolution.'From here, democratic values were established, giving society a new direction," Pathania Speaker also reflected on the functioning of the state legislature, pointing out that Himachal Pradesh's Assembly sessions run longer than those in most other states. 'In many large states, the Assembly does not function even for 15-20 days in a year. Here, we have longer and more substantive sessions," he urged both the Treasury benches and the Opposition to engage in debates with seriousness and decorum. 'I expect both sides to maintain dignity and have meaningful discussions," he centenary celebration is expected to be followed by a series of events highlighting the chamber's legacy and its role in shaping parliamentary democracy in India. (ANI)
