
I spent years feeling like an outsider in Canada — until my children helped me see it as home
"What's so wrong with being Canadian?" my nine-year-old child asked me at dinner. "We're Montrealers. We're Canadian."
My skin crawled.
I always saw myself as a Pole living in Canada. Not a Canadian. I built this moat around me based on my experiences immigrating to Toronto from Warsaw, Poland.
My parents and I moved with a single suitcase in the dead of winter in 1990, shortly after the fall of the Berlin Wall.
But my two children were born in Montreal and knew only this land as home — a stark contrast to the moat I had imagined for myself. My child sensed my conflicted feelings.
Around the time of U.S. President Donald Trump's re-election, my nine-year-old began questioning the antagonistic sentiments about Canadian identity they had grown up hearing in their own home. But this was the first time they'd ever questioned my feelings about Canadian identity so pointedly.
I fumbled through an explanation about how we as Polish-Greek Jews celebrate our bountiful heritage and its customs, but the justifications I had built up over decades were suddenly inadequate against a child's clear-eyed logic. If being Canadian was so wrong, what was I doing here?
Microaggressions in Canada
When I moved to Canada, I didn't know English. I didn't know about Canadian culture. I didn't know how cold it could get. Most of all, I didn't know how this country could ever be my home.
My welcome as a tween didn't help.
"You know what Polish people are called?" a classmate said.
"No," I said, narrowly opening my mouth to accentuate the "o" so as not to betray my hard syllable-timed Polish accent.
"Kielbasa," he said, rolling the 'i" and anglicizing the word. "Fat, juicy, stinky kielbasa."
Each harsh syllable reinforced the idea that I didn't belong here, widening the gap between who I was and who I thought I needed to become.
Despite growing up in a city teeming with immigrants and first-generation kids, it felt like being Canadian meant following a white middle-class lifestyle. Or carrying a name that never made anyone pause or stumble over syllables.
At 11, I insisted that my parents officially anglicize my name, only to return to my birth name a decade later.
I wanted so badly to fit in, yet I derided where I would be fitting into. My parents, filled with acculturation stress — the psychological strain of adapting to a new culture — weren't equipped to help me navigate this either.
But the contempt I held for the world I was trying to enter may have kept me from seeing my place within it. The moat I thought was widening between me and this country was actually filling up with the sediments of daily belonging.
Belonging to Canada
In 2011, when I moved to Montreal and later became a mom, the disconnect between identity and belonging started to narrow further. Quebec gave me an identity that eventually became perennial: an allophone mother.
I had to put in effort for Montreal's language and cultural differences to experience its bountiful offerings. This effort at understanding was the welcome I was waiting for when I arrived in Canada, now realizing it could only flourish with my tending.
In our yard, my daughter asks to plant flowers, so we do — native flowers such as wild bergamot, fireweed and yarrow. I choose the latter two, because they grow both in Warsaw's forests and along Quebec's roadsides.
We bike around with books to share with Les Croque-livres (little free libraries).
"Mama, I love our neighbourhood," my nine-year-old says, holding up an Elise Gravel comic they found tucked in a turquoise free library in a ruelle verte (green alley) near our home.
When I overhear them explain Orange Shirt Day to their sister over nalesniki (Polish crepes) with maple syrup, while they both don matching Every Child Matters shirts, or when they make up rhymes in Frenglish about the MPs on posters during election time, I realize this is what it means to be Canadian.
I'm the immigrant parent observing my children's fluency in languages I'm still struggling with, but they've shown me the many reasons that being Canadian is not succumbing to nationalism or bumper sticker cliches or letting the past wholly define me.
It's using my own experience of cultural erasure and alienation — being seen as a stereotype rather than a whole person — to teach my children about xenophobia and to fight against it. It's ensuring that Indigenous presence is never erased from our understanding of what it means to be Canadian.
It wasn't until that incisive question from my child that I realized that my efforts to fit in over the years were actually gestures toward building a more welcoming Canada for all.
By participating in the historic Quebec student strikes, co-ordinating a "Yes In My Backyard Festival" for years, teaching Canadian cinema that foregrounds Indigenous stories and taking my children when I vote, I was helping shape a more inclusive Canada.
I've realized that belonging in and to this country can take many forms. Like plants, it relies on cross-pollination to flourish.
I'm grateful my children's fresh eyes taught me to embrace what was already blooming around me.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


National Post
31 minutes ago
- National Post
Joel Kotkin: The case for defanging Ottawa
When globalism was hot, then-prime minister Justin Trudeau tried to be hotter by deciding that Canada has 'no core identity, no mainstream,' and suggesting Canada had become a 'post-national state.' Now that nationalism is back in vogue, Prime Minister Mark Carney, unwilling or unable to counter U.S. President Donald Trump's taunts and tariff barrage, has become an odd recipient of Canada's quest for a U.S.-like national identity. Even as he rails against America's temperamental chief executive, he has shown little interest in curbing his country's own protectionist policies. Article content Article content But Canadians, indulging in a rare burst of nationalist authoritarianism, may be jumping on the wrong train. Even as people reject globalism, the 'national state' is also losing its appeal — not only in the United States, but throughout Europe and the United Kingdom, as well. Some of this, on the left at least, reflects anti-western ideology, epitomized by DEI and the mandatory acknowledgement of First Nations land rights, which are now deeply entrenched in the education systems of the U.S., Canada and Europe. Article content Article content Support for a highly centralized state also represents a rejection of Canadian and American attempts to balance national and regional concerns. As enormous countries, we each have populations that have predominately different origins and exist in often wildly different economies. A suburbanite at the edge of the Golden Horseshoe or in the endlessly expanding sprawl north of Dallas has very different ideas and priorities, whether in terms of schools or support for terrorism, than an arts or non-profit worker in central Toronto or Manhattan. Article content The differences get greater when you look across the continental expanse. Alberta and the Prairie provinces depend on raw material production, which is not exactly in line with Carney's ultra-green vision, as Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has rightly pointed out. British Columbia inhales new urbanist dogma and seeks to reduce fossil fuels, and Ontario remains divided between its industrial base and its greener-than-thou urban elites. Like them, Carney seems more focused on things other than finding ways for Canada's various communities to thrive. Article content Article content But more power to the provinces or the states does not really go far enough. For most things, outside of national defence and foreign relations, the real goal should be to bring decision-making down to as local a level as possible. This notion is popular among Canadians, most of whom wish to see decisions made closer to home. Article content This notion is also embraced in the U.S., notes Gallup. Big companies, banks and media receive low marks from the public, but small business continues to enjoy widespread support across party lines. Millennials, largely liberal on issues such as immigration and gay marriage, are as one commentator suggests, more 'socially conscious,' but they do not necessarily favour the top-down structures embraced by earlier generations; many prefer small units to larger ones.


National Post
31 minutes ago
- National Post
Jamie Sarkonak: DEI gardening — the new Liberal priority for agriculture
Article content On its face, that list doesn't make sense: race alone doesn't render a person 'at risk,' nor does speaking French in non-Quebec Canada, nor does living outside a city. Typically, in English, that term is used to describe homeless and low-income people. Article content The agriculture department's explanation isn't reflected in the actual record, either. The applicant guide for the Local Food Infrastructure Fund presents a closed list of 'equity-seeking groups' that a potential grant recipient can claim to help: Indigenous peoples, persons with disabilities, visible minorities, women, youth, 2SLGBTQI+, 'Not applicable' and 'Decline to identify.' The government (which actually prefers the term 'equity-denied group' over 'equity-deserving group) limits the scope of the definition to race, gender, sexuality, religion and disability. Article content What's certain is that the scope of this grant program is unclear, and that public-facing documents are giving potential applicants the impression that food programs serving, say, low-income, country-dwelling white seniors of Saskatchewan aren't deserving of government support. Neither would be a replacement freezer for a food bank serving the poor — regardless of race — in small-town Atlantic Canada. A curious choice for the minister of agriculture, Prince Edward Islander Heath MacDonald. Article content Meanwhile, a free set of raised beds for a community garden in an upper- to middle-class, predominantly non-white neighbourhood of Toronto would appear to meet the program's stated criteria, even though such endeavours are largely recreational. Indeed, the same can be said for low-income communities. Neighbourhood gardens can't achieve the economies of scale found in industrial farming or the year-round stability of the grocery store, which is why a local Loblaws or Metro does a lot more for food security than a few raised beds. Article content This is just one grant, but it's emblematic of the whole federal government's approach to public service. It's not enough to support food programs for the poor; the feds must also support the gardening hobbies across the cultural mosaic. Similarly, it's not enough to hire deserving students as youth employment hits 20-year lows; the feds must select their new hires on the basis of identity. It's not enough that Supreme Court justices are highly competent in the law — instead, they must be half-decent at their craft, bilingual and be the first person with their combination of diversity characteristics to join the court. Article content To the feds, managing a diverse population doesn't just mean ensuring that discrimination doesn't happen — it means actively discriminating to redistribute the goods of society. Even something as essential as food isn't immune. Article content


CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Saskatchewan Premier Moe, federal minister to meet on China canola tariff
A 1957 Helio Courier is seen on a landing strip bordered by the pilot's canola crop near Cremona, Alta., Thursday, July 17, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jeff McIntosh SASKATOON — Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe is set to meet today with federal Agriculture Minister Heath MacDonald, along with industry groups, to discuss the steep Chinese tariff on Canadian canola seed. Kody Blois, the parliamentary secretary for Prime Minister Mark Carney, and Saskatchewan Agriculture Minister Daryl Harrison are also to attend the meeting in Saskatoon. A press conference is scheduled following the discussion. China imposed the tariff of nearly 76 per cent last week, causing the price of one of Canada's most valuable crops to fall and wiping out millions of dollars in its value. It comes one year after China launched an anti-dumping investigation into Canadian canola, a move in response to Canada's 100 per cent tariff on Chinese electric vehicles. Farmers and Ottawa have rejected the dumping claim, saying exporters have followed rules-based trade. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 21, 2025.