'Carnival's over': Peters celebrates Mallard's early exit
Foreign Minister Winston Peters is celebrating former Speaker of the House Trevor Mallard being replaced as Ambassador to Ireland.
Mallard was appointed for a three-year term in Dublin in 2022.
But in a statement this afternoon Peters named Angela Hassan-Sharp for the role.
Asked about Mallard, he said: "You know that famous song from The Seekers? Carnival's over".
He said Mallard was "coming home and he's coming home early".
Asked if he had a reason to bring Mallard home, he replied: "Yes, I do".
"It's a circus where instead of looking at the national interest, you've got people like Jacinda Ardern appointing politicians to important jobs - and that should not be happening.
"Their performance will never be up to scratch for goodness sake. You people surely understand that you train people, you give them decades of experience to get into important jobs, and all of a sudden you put a politician there with no training at all."
No politicians should ever be assigned to diplomatic roles, he believed.
"I'm saying, that we should not be having politicians in diplomatic jobs, full stop. I've opposed it in all my career, and soon I'll have corrected it for a third time."
Asked the last time he spoke to Mallard, he said: "I can't remember ... it's got to be, oh, five years ago."
"I cannot believe that Jacinda Ardern sent somebody like him after the way he behaved with respect to the protesters out here, turning up the noise, putting cold water over young children at night. This is a disgrace, and you guys should have been calling it out, not me," he told reporters.
In 2022, Peters criticised Mallard's appointment to the role, saying it should never have happened and Mallard did not have the diplomatic judgement required to be an ambassador.
"Mr Mallard has never demonstrated any understanding of the most fundamental elements of diplomacy itself," he said at the time.
The former Speaker had Peters trespassed from Parliament's grounds after the then-former Deputy Prime Minister attended the protest occupation of Parliament's grounds.
Peters sought a judicial review over the matter, and Mallard admitted at the High Court that issuing the trespass warning was "unreasonable and irrational" and that Peters had not acted in a way which would justify the move.
Adrian Rurawhe as Speaker apologised to Peters on Mallard's behalf over the trespass when Mallard resigned to take up the role of ambassador.
RNZ has sought comment from Mallard.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsroom
2 hours ago
- Newsroom
Alas, demonised Cunliffe
Would the devil please step forward. Grant Robertson's new political memoir Anything Can Happen trashes his former Labour leader David Cunliffe with the same loathing and even some of the same language as Jacinda Ardern in her book A Different Kind of Power. The word they both choose to describe him is 'inauthentic', meaning a phoney, a fake, more interested in power than Labour principles. Their various attacks position Cunliffe as vain and toxic. 'The disastrous Cunliffe saga,' writes Robertson, thinking back to his 2014 campaign; 'For the first time in a long while, I felt relieved,' writes Ardern, when he stepped down. ReadingRoom reached out to 10 parliamentarians inside the Labour camp during Cunliffe's leadership. All were asked the same question: 'Was Cunliffe as bad as Ardern and Robertson say he was? What did you make of him?' Each were offered anonymity. Five ran for the hills, including the MP who remarked, 'This feels like kicking him when he is down.' Muldoon once famously responded, 'What better time to kick someone?' And so it was that one former colleague of Cunliffe's said, 'He was a man of overweening and largely unjustified self-confidence, from the time he entered Parliament. 'A clue came at a campaign launch at Auckland Town Hall, at which DC asked his local electorate supporters to wear red wigs … in honour of his own ginger self.' The parliamentarian remembered an exchange with Grant Robertson after Cunliffe had been deposed as leader. 'How's David doing, Grant?' 'Increasingly unhinged.' Robertson's section on Cunliffe in Anything Can Happen also somewhat comes off its hinges. As well as the extract that appeared in ReadingRoom on Tuesday, he claims Cunliffe pushed the line that Labour could not have a gay leader, 'was not burdened with modesty', had no EQ, created an atmosphere that he describes as 'toxic', and writes of Helen Clark promoting him as Minister of Health, 'I vividly remember him becoming Minister of Health and announcing to the House like some kind of sheriff that there was a new kid in town running the show. I wanted to crawl under my desk.' But another contemporary in the Cunliffe years was more favourable. 'I liked David a lot. He was bright and capable. He wasn't perfect, who is? 'I personally was disappointed that Helen Clark anointed Phil Goff and Annette King as her successors after the 2008 election as it felt like it was going back to the past instead of allowing the party to go forward. We will never know what would have happened. David was blamed for the loss of the 2014 election – unfairly in my view.' A third colleague tried to take the long view. They emailed, 'With the benefit of hindsight I'm a little more charitable than I might have been if you asked me 10 years ago. I think David didn't really know himself and was broken rather than malicious. In his own mind I believe he meant well, but he was fundamentally lost and seemed to be forever seeking the approval of others. As we later found out, he was also going through some significant personal issues at the time which would have been a distraction. 'This all played out in ways that were harmful to those around him and which weren't conducive to effectively leading a political party. It was a horrible and traumatic time for all involved, but there's no benefit in dwelling on the past. It happened, we've all moved on, and I try not to hold on to bitterness or resentment. I only hope he's found some stability and happiness in his life outside politics.' (Cunliffe was also contacted. He replied by email, 'After careful consideration, I must respectfully decline your offer of an interview. As with previous requests regarding Jacinda's book, my decision is based on differing recollections of events, the fact that the issues discussed were not brought to me directly, and my desire to move beyond reactive political discourse. At this time, I do not intend to participate in further interviews of this nature. I hope you understand my position, and I thank you for your professionalism in your approach.') A fourth colleague gave an interview on the phone on Tuesday morning. 'Oh gidday Steve. I've actually just read the excerpt from Grant's book that you published at ReadingRoom.' And? 'And I absolutely recognised the bit about Grant saying he had a habit of disappearing from important events to go and spend time on his phone. I experienced a couple of examples of that myself. My abiding memory is hosting him in my electorate, having him scarper from an event exactly the way Grant describes in his book. You know, which isn't great when you're trying to win your local community over. 'I mean – he was very disappointing. You know, he had a lot of support across the party and he had backers in caucus who kind of put their neck on the line with caucus colleagues to support him. And I think a lot of those people felt very let down by his leadership. 'He was a very high IQ individual, but had very, very low EQ. He just had no idea how to go about managing people, working with people. Of course he was working with a group of people who were somewhat hostile to him and had no idea how to deal with that. 'Some of his decision making was very haphazard. He would make major decisions apparently on the fly. But when he actually sat down and worked through policy detail, he was great at thinking things through. 'But he just didn't have the attributes required either to manage his caucus or to be a spokesperson for the party and to win people over on an emotional level.' The final interview was a change in emphasis: rather than asking about Cunliffe, questions were asked about Robertson, and Ardern. The parliamentarian said, 'Their obsession with demonising him is odd. David did his very best to get Labour elected to government. But when he was the leader, he was consistently undermined by parts of our caucus. So that made life difficult. He was always watching his back because of the kind of vitriol that you are seeing now.' They meant the memoirs by the former Prime Minister and her deputy. They continued, 'I've always taken the view that whoever the leader is of my party, my job as a caucus member was to back them 100 percent so that we could get a Labour government elected and we could address the issues that New Zealanders needed addressing. But that wasn't a view held by all my caucus.' Including Robertson? 'Not that I'm aware of. But certainly, you know, people who he was closely associated with were. There was a lot of commentary from within the Labour Party caucus that was undermining David Cunliffe at the time. To me that is indefensible as it is with any of our leaders.' What does it say about Robertson and Ardern that they are singling out Cunliffe to trash him? 'It looks defensive to me. Like they have a need to demonise someone who was actually doing his best for the things that we all believed in and giving those policies over the line. 'It was publicly known at the time, you know, leading up to David Cunliffe's election as our leader, that there was a group within our caucus who chose to tell the media that they called themselves the ABCs and that stood for Anyone But Cunliffe. 'That's not collegial and it's not collective and it's not unified. That undermining continued through his leadership. I mean I'm not going to say that he was the perfect leader, but he was a very good leader. He always stuck to the principles and policies that we were promoting as a party. And he was, you know, really good at communicating those ideas and that information. 'David was a great communicator. I mean it was widely regarded that he got the better of John Key in the leaders debates. But the defeat that we suffered at that election was recognition from the voting electorate that we had a caucus that was working against itself. 'And I think that there's been an attempt over the years to create the narrative that David Cunliffe undermined David Shearer. David Shearer undermined David Shearer. I mean he couldn't say a sentence straight whenever he spoke in front of the media. That was the basic problem there. 'What happened is that parts of our caucus circulated a petition calling for him to step down as leader. David Cunliffe was not involved in that petition. It was people associated with the ABC group. History is kind of being rewritten of David Shearer being forced to stand down as something that David Cunliffe and his supporters brought about. But the record will show that it was actually people from within the Grant Robertson camp that actually executed that pressure and that petition.' Was Grant Robertson – later the deputy Prime Minister and finance minister, and now the author of Anything Can Happen, which tells his version of events during his political career – the leader of that camp? 'Grant wasn't the ringleader,' they replied, 'but he was quite careful not to be the person carrying the message'. ReadingRoom has devoted most of the week to coverage of the former finance minister's book. Tomorrow: the memoir is reviewed by Tim Murphy.
NZ Herald
2 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Tāmaki Makaurau by-election: Labour and Te Pāti Māori face off
National, Act, New Zealand First and the Greens have all opted out of running candidates. Labour's Peeni Henare will fight for his old seat against Te Pāti Māori's choice of former broadcaster Oriini Kaipara. Vision NZ leader Hannah Tamaki, NZ Loyal's Kelvyn Alp and independent Sherry Lee Matene have also put their names into the ring. Voting begins today for overseas voters, advance voting opens on August 25, and election day is set for September 6. Victoria University of Wellington associate professor Lara Greaves told The Front Page we shouldn't read too much into the results of this by-election. 'It's a fairly straightforward by-election ... turnout will probably be quite low. 'There are a few other minor candidates and independents running around the edges just trying to get a bit of a voice for their platform and show up to the debates and get some attention. 'But, we are really looking at a Labour versus Te Pāti Māori matchup,' she said. Greaves said the electorate is one of the youngest in the country, with a median age of 'somewhere in the 20s'. 'The thing that Labour now has to balance is, do you keep the old guard, the people who held ministerial positions in the Ardern Government, the baggage that might be associated with that has to be balanced with the experience they have. 'For Labour, it is interesting because it does seem like they haven't had that many retirements. It does seem like the party will contest the next election with a lot of that lineup of the ministers from the Ardern years that are still there,' she said. Listen to the full episode to hear more about: The background of the electorate. Maori vs general electorates. Why the right bloc isn't putting anyone in contention. Key issues for voters. Why a Pākeha can run for a Māori seat. Who is running for the Tāmaki Makaurau seat? Labour MP and Tamaki Makaurau candidate Peeni Henare in his office at Parliament in July. Photo / Mark Mitchell Labour's Peeni Henare held the Tāmaki Makaurau seat between 2014 and 2023 when he lost it to Kemp by a slender 42-vote margin. Labour Party leader Chris Hipkins said: 'Henare is exactly the leader Tāmaki Makaurau needs, with a deep understanding of the issues that matter.' Henare said communities had been saying 'loud and clear' they want 'jobs, access to quality and affordable health services, affordable housing, and relief from the rising cost of living must be a top priority'. Henare has noted Labour's Georgie Dansey, a wāhine Māori, would enter Parliament if he won the byelection. Te Pāti Māori has selected journalist and former TV3 broadcaster Oriini Kaipara to contest the Tāmaki Makaurau byelection. The party confirmed its selection on social media, calling Kaipara (Ngāi Tūhoe, Ngāti Awa, Tūwharetoa, Ngāti Rangitihi) a 'longtime West Auckland advocate'. Kaipara said she had grown tired of 'sitting on the sidelines' and 'having to bite my tongue when I see a huge hīkoi walking past me and I cannot actively voice my truth'. Brian and Hannah Tamaki address supporters at the Auckland Domain last year during the 'Make New Zealand Great Again' convoy. Photo / Sylvie Whinray Vision NZ leader Hannah Tamaki announced early on that she would again run for the seat. The wife of Destiny Church leader Brian Tamaki received 829 votes in the 2023 election. She believed her record helping in South Auckland communities was 'unquestionable', but acknowledged her 'faith' or her association with Destiny Church's Man Up programme could unsettle voters. Members of the programme were linked to the storming of a pride event at a West Auckland library earlier this year. Protesters wearing Man Up T-shirts were also associated with temporarily blocking this year's Wellington Pride Parade. Counterspin's Kelvyn Alp with guest, far right conspiracy theorist Damien de Ment. Photo / Supplied Counterspin Media founder Kelvyn Alp has also put his name into contention. He was prominent during the 2022 Parliament protests. Twenty years ago, he was the public face of the so-called New Zealand Armed Intervention Force, which came under security service attention after it talked about overthrowing the government. Finally, Sherry Lee Matene is running as an independent. There is no publicly available information about her. What are the key dates? Wednesday, August 20: Overseas voting begins. Monday, August 25: Advance voting begins. Thursday, August 28: Cutoff for NZ Post to receive election-related mail for delivery. Friday, September 5: Advance voting ends. All political advertising must end, and election signs must be taken down by midnight. Saturday, September 6: Election day for the Tāmaki Makaurau by-election. Voting places open from 9am to 7pm. Election night - preliminary results released progressively from 7pm. Wednesday, September 17: Official results declared The Front Page is a daily news podcast from the New Zealand Herald, available to listen to every weekday from 5am. The podcast is presented by Chelsea Daniels, an Auckland-based journalist with a background in world news and crime/justice reporting who joined NZME in 2016. You can follow the podcast at iHeartRadio, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts.
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
From taonga to target: the assault on te reo Māori
Foreign Minister Winston Peters refused to call New Zealand 'Aotearoa' last month in Parliament. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii Across Aotearoa - or New Zealand - depending on the speaker, resistance to te reo Māori and calls to roll it back from public life are growing louder. In Parliament, lawmakers are pushing a growing number of policies that critics say erode Māori culture and put New Zealand at risk of losing its cultural identity. Among the policies, cuts to te reo Māori teacher training , mandating English-first in public service naming and communication, the disestablishment of Te Aka Whai Ora (Māori Health Authority), reversal of co-governance reforms, and undermining local Māori representation. The coalition also supported the Treaty Principles Bill , pushed by ACT, which aimed to enshrine fixed principles of the Treaty and extend these to all New Zealanders, effectively diluting Māori-specific rights. The bill was ultimately rejected by Parliament. Just last week, it was revealed that Education Minister Erica Stanford stopped the printing of new editions of a series of books designed to teach Year 1s how to read, which included te reo words, while last month in Parliament, Foreign Minister Winston Peters refused to call New Zealand 'Aotearoa'. Together, these measures signal a retreat from decades of progress toward biculturalism, says associate professor Awanui Te Huia, who teaches Māori studies at Victoria University. "The issue that these policies have created is it emboldens those [racist] positions and it treats the irrational as rational," she tells The Detail . "When we're hearing these anti-Tiriti or Waitangi statements, when we hear these anti-Māori, anti-te reo Māori statements, and they are being put forward as rational and considered arguments, this is when we have some of the trouble ... it platforms particular perspectives that are harmful for our community, harmful for cohesion." She says the revival of te reo is one of our greatest national achievements - proof of a country willing to confront its past and weave its two founding cultures together. But she worries the government's policies will stall momentum. "It's not a zero-sum game. If te reo Māori is doing well, that does not take anything away from another person; it's additive." And she says the cost of the roll-back of Māori rights and culture is damaging. "There is considerable racism that happens in our communities, and that has multiple implications across the spectrum - on economics ... on our socio-political spectrums." Māori journalist Ella Stewart has been covering the policy changes for RNZ's in-depth department. She tells The Detail that the Māori community is hurting, but also pushing back. "I have spoken to a raft of people, in my personal life but also just in reporting ... I remember speaking to Tureiti Moxon a couple of weeks ago, and she said that this partnership that's been forged many years ago, over decades and decades, to get to a point where Māori are actually at the decision-making table - she said that's all been taken away. "You have also got Māori legal scholars, Te Tiriti/treaty experts, like Carwyn Jones, who said to me, 'we are seeing that this government has a clear strategy of removing Māori rights and removing the ability of Te Tiriti to have any impact in our law'." She says, from her conversations, people would prefer if the government focused on big picture issues, rather than stripping te reo Māori from agency names and books. "I think they are mainly upset because there are some issues that are being focused on that arguably the government could be spending time doing something more important ... on more pressing issues for our people rather than 'should the name of New Zealand be New Zealand or Aotearoa', maybe focus on how you can further our people." Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here . You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook
