US Second Lady Usha Vance Reveals Her Favourite Colour And Netizens Love Her Answer
Second Lady Usha Vance drew smiles during a school visit this week when a student asked her a simple but thoughtful question: 'What is your favourite colour?"
In a video clip shared by Fox News, Vance paused, smiled, and said, 'That is an excellent question." She then pointed to her outfit and explained why red is one of her favourites.
'You might notice I am wearing a red dress today," Vance told the students. 'That is because it is one of my favourite colours and also my three-year-old's favourite colour. She actually made me change this morning into this outfit so that we could match."
'EXCELLENT QUESTION!': Second lady Usha Vance tells a group of students why red is one of her favorite colors — and how she's not the only one in her family who loves red. pic.twitter.com/O9qqJ03YIb — Fox News (@FoxNews) August 21, 2025
Vance added that the choice seemed even more fitting when she noticed that the schoolchildren were also wearing red. 'It's a good choice," she said, 'because all of you are wearing red too, and now we are all in school colours."
The event, part of Vance's outreach as second lady, offered a glimpse of her personal side. Alongside her husband, US Vice President JD Vance, she has been making public appearances since the new administration took office.
She went on to earn a degree in history from Yale University before studying at Cambridge as a Gates Scholar, completing an MPhil in early modern history.
In 2010, while pursuing her law degree at Yale, she met J.D. Vance during a student discussion group on 'social decline in white America." That exchange would later shape parts of her husband's bestselling 2016 memoir Hillbilly Elegy, a book on his childhood in the white working-class communities of the Rust Belt, which was adapted into a 2020 film directed by Ron Howard.
view comments
First Published:
August 21, 2025, 23:42 IST
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Loading comments...
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
an hour ago
- News18
5 Dead, 36 Hurt In Colombia Bomb Attack Near Air Base, Probe Underway
Last Updated: Cali Mayor Eder has announced a ban on large trucks entering the city, citing the risk of additional attacks. A vehicle bomb explosion in the Colombian city of Cali killed at least five people and injured dozens more on Thursday, according to reports from AFP. The incident occurred near a military facility and has raised concerns about escalating violence in the lead-up to the 2026 presidential elections. Cali's Mayor Alejandro Eder confirmed the toll, stating that preliminary reports indicated at least five fatalities and 36 people injured. The explosion occurred on a busy street in the northern part of the city, close to the Marco Fidel Suárez Military Aviation School. Authorities believe the blast targeted the air base directly. Police officials stated that the vehicle bomb was likely meant to hit military personnel stationed at the base. While the motive remains unclear, some officials have suggested the attack may be an attempt to destabilize ongoing peace efforts in the region. Eyewitnesses described the moment of the explosion. Héctor Fabio Bolaños, 65, told AFP, 'There was a thunderous sound of something exploding near the air base. Many houses were damaged in front of the base." Following the blast, several buildings, including a school, were evacuated as a precaution. Another witness indicated that some of those killed may have been civilians passing by at the time of the explosion. In response to the attack, Mayor Eder has announced a ban on large trucks entering the city, citing the risk of additional threats. He also offered a reward of US$10,000 for information leading to those responsible. While the investigation is ongoing, no group has claimed responsibility. However, Valle del Cauca Governor Dilian Francisca Toro condemned the bombing, calling it a 'terrorist attack." She added, 'Terrorism will not defeat us." The Colombian Air Force released an official statement, saying, 'At this time, efforts are underway to verify the damage to facilities and personnel, as well as the investigation to determine the causes and perpetrators of this terrorist act, which threatens civilians and the lives of the men and women who serve Colombians from the Air Force." Colombia has seen a rise in violence in recent months. In June, leftist guerrillas claimed responsibility for attacks around Cali that left seven people dead. On Thursday, a separate incident in Antioquia department resulted in eight deaths during clashes between guerrilla fighters and police officers. Authorities have not yet confirmed who was behind that attack. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Loading comments...
News18
2 hours ago
- News18
Trump Pick Alina Habba Serving Illegally As US Attorney, Says Federal Judge
Last Updated: Judge Brann further noted that Habba's appointment had occurred 'through a novel series of legal and personnel moves.' Alina Habba, currently serving as the acting US Attorney for New Jersey, has been disqualified from continuing her role in any active criminal cases initiated by her office. A federal judge issued the ruling on Thursday, stating that the former personal attorney for President Donald Trump has not been lawfully serving in an official legal capacity. 'Faced with the question of whether Ms. Habba is lawfully performing the functions and duties of the office of the United States Attorney for the District of New Jersey, I conclude that she is not," wrote Judge Matthew Brann of the Middle District of Pennsylvania in his opinion. Judge Brann further noted that Habba's appointment had occurred 'through a novel series of legal and personnel moves." His ruling may still be appealed by the Trump administration before it officially takes effect. The decision came in response to a legal challenge brought by criminal defendants in New Jersey. The group questioned the validity of the charges filed against them, arguing that Habba no longer held the authority to prosecute after the expiration of her 120-day term in July. Last month, in anticipation of the term's expiration, New Jersey's federal district judges had selected a new nominee to succeed Habba as acting US Attorney. However, that appointment was blocked by US Attorney General Pam Bondi, who removed the judges' nominee from the office entirely. Habba was sworn in as acting US Attorney on March 28, shortly after serving as President Trump's personal legal counsel. In April, during a Fox News interview, she revealed her office had initiated an investigation into New Jersey's Democratic Governor Phil Murphy and Attorney General Matthew Platkin. The following month, in May, she again appeared on Fox News to announce that criminal charges were being brought against Newark Mayor Ras Baraka. Her 120-day appointment officially concluded last month. To continue serving in the role beyond that term, Habba would require confirmation by the US Senate, something that has not occurred yet. The Justice Department, however, has defended her continued service, asserting that the president holds wide authority to fill such vacancies. 'The President has made clear that he will not permit anyone other than Ms Habba to fill the current vacancy in the office of the United States Attorney on a temporary basis," prosecutors wrote in a recent court filing. view comments First Published: August 22, 2025, 03:35 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Loading comments...
News18
2 hours ago
- News18
Supreme Court lets Trump admin cut $783 mn of research funding in anti-DEI push
Last Updated: Washington, Aug 21 (AP) The Trump administration can slash hundreds of millions of dollars' worth of research funding in its push to cut federal diversity, equity and inclusion efforts, the Supreme Court decided Thursday. The high court majority lifted a judge's order blocking $783 million worth of cuts made by the National Institutes of Health to align with Republican President Donald Trump's priorities. The high court did keep Trump administration guidance on future funding blocked, however. The court split 5-4 on the decision. Chief Justice John Roberts was along those who would have kept the cuts blocked, along with the court's three liberals. The order marks the latest Supreme Court win for Trump and allows the administration to forge ahead with cancelling hundreds of grants while the lawsuit continues to unfold. The plaintiffs, including states and public-health advocacy groups, have argued that the cuts will inflict 'incalculable losses in public health and human life". The Justice Department, meanwhile, has said funding decisions should not be 'subject to judicial second-guessing" and efforts to promote policies referred to as DEI can 'conceal insidious racial discrimination." The lawsuit addresses only part of the estimated $12 billion of NIH research projects that have been cut, but in its emergency appeal, the Trump administration also took aim at nearly two dozen other times judges have stood in the way of its funding cuts. Solicitor General D John Sauer said judges shouldn't be considering those cases under an earlier Supreme Court decision that cleared the way for teacher-training programme cuts. He says they should go to federal claims court instead. But the plaintiffs, 16 Democratic state attorneys general and public-health advocacy groups, argued that research grants are fundamentally different from the teacher-training contracts and couldn't be sent to claims court. Halting studies midway can also ruin the data already collected and ultimately harm the country's potential for scientific breakthroughs by disrupting scientists' work in the middle of their careers, they argued. US District Judge William Young judge in Massachusetts agreed, finding the abrupt cancellations were arbitrary and discriminatory. 'I've never seen government racial discrimination like this," Young, an appointee of Republican President Ronald Reagan, said at a hearing in June. He later added: 'Have we no shame." An appeals court left Young's ruling in place. (AP) SCY SCY view comments First Published: August 22, 2025, 03:15 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Loading comments...
